共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 8 毫秒
1.
MOU Bo 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2014,9(4):495-497
This special theme section concerns "Philosophy of language, Chinese language, and Chinese philosophy," presenting (with its own distinct focus) the general theme of an ongoing international collective research project, "Philosophical Issues concerning Chinese Language and Development of Contemporary Philosophy of Language," the initial results of which are presented in the four articles here. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
ZHANG Wei 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2020,15(3):380
How should Scheler’s critique of Kant’s ethics be interpreted? This paper focuses on two aspects of Scheler’s critique of Kant’s ethics: 1) the problem of “formalism” in Kant’s ethics, and 2) the problem of the “ethics of autonomy” and “ethics of heteronomy.” Generally speaking, Scheler’s project has a “modern” starting point; that is to say, his work starts with the rejection or critique of Kant and Aristotle. Most essentially, Scheler’s “material ethics of values” (ethics of person) must stay autonomous. Following Kant, Scheler takes Aristotle’s theory as an “ethics of heteronomy,” and then competes with Kant within the “ethics of autonomy” and further develops his own “ethics of personal autonomy.” 相似文献
12.
13.
The current special issue focuses on logical and probabilistic approaches to reasoning in uncertain environments, both from a formal, conceptual and argumentative perspective as well as an empirical point of view. In the present introduction we give an overview of the types of problems addressed by the individual contributions of the special issue, based on fundamental distinctions employed in this area. We furthermore describe some of the general features of the special issue. 相似文献
14.
《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2017,(3):335-339
The present issue of Frontiers of Philosophy in China (FPC),"Special Issue on Daoist Philosophy Ⅱ:Contemporary Explorations in the Thought of the Laozi,"is a companion to a previous issue of FPC,"Daoist Philosophy and Philosophical Daoism:Conceptual Distinctions" (volume 12,no.1).Where that issue offered four original English-language articles on topics in Daoist philosophy mainly from Western perspectives,this issue presents four original Chinese-language articles in translation focused on topics in Daoist philosophy from the Chinese perspective. 相似文献
15.
16.
LU Kejian 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2014,(3):339-341
Theorists in the period of the Second International mostly regarded Marx's theories as an empirical science but refused to admit the existence of "Marx's philosophy." Marx himself also held the idea of "abolishing philosophy" and in The German Ideology, he even drew an analogy comparing the relationship between philosophy and empirical science and that between masturbation and actual sexual love. Since Plekhanov, and particularly since Lenin, Dialectical Materialism has been considered to be synonymous with Marx's philosophy. Early Marxists from Luk~ics and Gramsci to Korsch were all against the trend that theorists of the Second International consigning Marx's theories to empirical science, but, at the same time, they also objected to systemizing Marx's philosophy in terms of Dialectical Materialism (they even traced the origin of this approach back to Engels), and, as the result, they created a new interpretive approach to Marx's "praxis philosophy." 相似文献
17.
Treatment Interventions for Perfectionism—A Cognitive Perspective: Introduction to the Special Issue
Gordon L. Flett Paul L. Hewitt 《Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy》2008,26(3):127-133
The current article provides an overview of the papers included in this special issue and includes a discussion of key issues
pertaining to psychological treatments for perfectionism. We describe and review two new treatment intervention studies in
this special issue that focus on perfectionism in university students as well as other contemporary research on the use of
cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat perfectionists. While the significant reductions in levels of perfectionism as a result
of treatment are noteworthy, we caution that perfectionism is a relatively enduring trait; thus, some perfectionists will
remain treatment resistant and overall levels of perfectionism may remain relatively high even when significant improvements
are realized. Moreover, we discuss the established tendency for perfectionism to be associated with residual symptoms of distress
following treatment. As part of our discussion of the other articles in this special issue, we highlight cognitive factors
of likely significance in the treatment of perfectionism, including the ruminative response style, the tendency to experience
perfectionistic automatic thoughts, and the role of core irrational beliefs in the development of perfectionism. These articles
underscore the need to consider key cognitive factors that are central to dysfunctional forms of perfectionism.
This special issue on perfectionism is the third special issue on this topic to appear in the Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy under the editorialship of Windy Dryden. We are very grateful for the continuing opportunity in this journal to explore issues
related to the cognitive and treatment aspects of perfectionism. 相似文献
18.
19.
20.
Paul Giladi 《International Journal of Philosophical Studies》2019,27(3):359-362
ABSTRACTIn our Introduction to the special issue on Hegel and Sellars, we explain why there needs to be a more detailed analysis of the similarities and differences between Hegel and Sellars. Sellars is usually regarded as closer to Kant than to Hegel, but this obscures the more Hegelian features of his theoretical and practical philosophy. We briefly describe each article in the special issue. 相似文献