Classical conditioning of beginning reading responses

The present study describes the first demonstration that laboratory-controlled experimental procedures can lead to the successful acquisition and subsequent retention of classically conditioned beginning reading responses (CCBRRs) in children of both sexes and mean age of 4 yr. Anticipatory instructions combined with higher-order classical conditioning temporally arranged into a trace conditioning paradigm presented for 10 trials for each response to be learned led to beginning reading responses being successfully acquired by 20 children during 95% of the 2,220 total acquisition learning trials and subsequently correctly recalled on 114 of the 222 retention test trials. Findings support the view that perhaps the relatively sudden and sustained acquisition learning curves for reading responses on the second-signalling-system level of behavior in the present study may be quite different from the relatively slow and incremental learning curves usually obtained in classical conditioning of the autonomic type which occur on the first-signalling-system level.     

Classical conditioning of goldfish in the shuttlebox

Goldfish trained in a shuttlebox with light as CS and brief shock as US acquire the shuttling response to light whether or not an avoidance contingency is in effect. That the change in behavior produced by the classical procedure is not due merely to sensitization is demonstrated by a discriminative control. The results suggest the usefulness of the shuttlebox for the study of classical conditioning in goldfish and call into question the instrumental interpretation of the change in behavior produced by the avoidance procedure.     

Classical aversive conditioning of catecholamine and corticosterone responses

Some earlier work, not rigorously controlled, suggested that conditional increases in sympathoadrenal stress hormones could occur. The purpose of this experiment was to test this idea further using an appropriately controlled design. To do this, we subjected rats living in a tether-type apparatus to differential fear conditioning. Chronic catheterization allowed us to sample blood before and after conditional stimulus probes without having to touch the rats. No evidence for conditional changes in norepinephrine and corticosterone was found. In contrast, differential conditioning of epinephrine responses was found. The conditional response, however, was not a simple one in that conditional increases in epinephrine following CS+ probes were not always seen. These data support the idea that learned changes in hormonal stress respondents can occur. But they leave open the question of why clear cut conditional changes in these visceral systems are so difficult to obtain.