共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
CATHERINE WILSON 《美学与艺术评论杂志》2016,74(3):237-252
I offer a Darwinian perspective on the existence of aesthetic interests, tastes, preferences, and productions. It is distinguished from the approaches of Denis Dutton and Geoffrey Miller, drawing instead on Richard O. Prum's notion of biotic artworlds. The relevance of neuroaesthetics to the philosophy of art is defended. 相似文献
4.
5.
G B Vicario 《Perception》1978,7(2):225-228
A new optical-geometrical illusion is described. The parallelism of short rows of dots is affected by some unknown factor, so that the rows appear as pivoting on their middle point. Some explanations of the illusion are considered, but with no success. 相似文献
6.
Leo Goldman 《Journal of counseling and development : JCD》1973,51(10):745-748
7.
8.
9.
10.
SALLYA FELKER 《Journal of counseling and development : JCD》1974,52(8):520-520
11.
CARMICHAEL L 《The American journal of psychology》1951,64(1):137-138
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Ravenna Helson 《Journal of personality assessment》2013,95(3):205-214
The author of this article describes her childhood, career, and some of her main findings as a personality psychologist who studied women's creativity and adult development as she herself constructed her personal and professional identity in a changing environment and developed in a number of ways. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
F. J. Adelmann 《Studies in East European Thought》1972,12(3):270-281
In discussing questions of free will, Soviet philosophers fail to distinguish conditions from causes. This makes them unable to understand the very opponents they like to criticize. 相似文献
20.
PETER HOBSON 《Journal of applied philosophy》1984,1(2):293-304
ABSTRACT This paper attempts to provide some new insights into the problem of justifying paternalism. To begin with, there is a general analysis of the concept of paternalism which examines the conditions that must be present for it to occur. A distinction is then drawn between two contexts in which paternalism exists—first, where it applies to individuals or clearly specifiable groups and second, where it applies to society in general. Different approaches to justification are required in each case. It is argued that paternalism of the former type has to meet two necessary and sufficient conditions for it to be acceptable and a good deal of the paper is devoted to a discussion of these two conditions and the ways of determining when they are satisfied. Paternalism of the latter type which applies to the whole society is more difficult to justify, mainly because it applies indiscriminately to everyone regardless of their particular capacities, interests etc., but some suggestions are made as to when such paternalism may nevertheless be justified. 相似文献