共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
LUDGER VIEFHUES‐BAILEY 《Modern Theology》2011,27(3):452-461
How can we imagine anew the discipline of philosophy of religion, given the feminist critiques that it privileges thinking driven by the needs of male subject formation? I address this question first by arguing with Cavell that a specific masculine aversion of erotic reciprocity produces a particular skeptical epistemology. Overcoming this phallocentric thinking requires therefore a new eros. Secondly, I will argue that the fluidly gendered subjectivities I detect in Cavell's work on film enable such a new erotic and epistemic orientation. I conclude by outlining the consequences of this orientation for the pursuits of philosophy of religion. 相似文献
17.
18.
THE SOCRATIC METHOD AND PHILOSOPHY FOR CHILDREN 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
JOHN P. PORTELLI 《Metaphilosophy》1990,21(1-2):141-161
19.
20.
WILLIAM B. GRIFFITH 《Metaphilosophy》1982,13(3-4):181-200