马克思思想的当代意义（笔谈）——马克思的理论与社会主义的前途

“现实的社会主义”的失败向人们提出了一个极其尖锐的问题：这一实践活动赖以进行的马克思主义理论是否正确?对这一理论和这一实践的关系所进行的批判性的(客观科学的)分析表明，就主要标准(生产力的发展，生产的社会化程度；所有制关系；社会阶级结构；分配原则；     

霍耐特与批判理论的"政治伦理转向"

在几十年历史演变过程中,法兰克福学派批判理论经历了三期发展:第一期发展侧重于批判理论建构与工业文明批判;第二期发展侧重于批判理论重建与现代性批判;第三期发展完成了批判理论的“政治伦理转向”。如果说,哈贝马斯话语伦理学、商谈政治理论,意味着批判理论的“政治伦理转向”一定程度实现;那么,霍耐特承认理论及其多元正义构想,则标志着批判理论的“政治伦理转向”最终完成。尽管霍氏徘徊于批判理论与后批判理论、理想主义与现实主义、一元主义与多元主义之间,但是最终从批判理论走向了后批判理论。     

霍耐特与批判理论的“政治伦理转向”

在几十年历史演变过程中,法兰克福学派批判理论经历了三期发展:第一期发展侧重于批判理论建构与工业文明批判;第二期发展侧重于批判理论重建与现代性批判;第三期发展完成了批判理论的“政治伦理转向”。如果说,哈贝马斯话语伦理学、商谈政治理论,意味着批判理论的“政治伦理转向”一定程度实现;那么,霍耐特承认理论及其多元正义构想,则标志着批判理论的“政治伦理转向”最终完成。尽管霍氏徘徊于批判理论与后批判理论、理想主义与现实主义、一元主义与多元主义之间,但是最终从批判理论走向了后批判理论。     

H管理理论探索

H管理理论是我国学者提出的具有中国特色的管理理论。本文针对H管理理论的主要思想、构成内容进行了探索 ,着重考察了H管理理论中的人格学说 ,并对该理论的理论基础和实践基础进行了分析和论证 ,最后指出H管理理论的理论意义和实践意义 ,以及以后需要完善之处。     

命门学说的哲学基础与理论渊源

命门学说是对藏象学说、阴阳理论、太极理念的进一步发展,它拓展和完善了中医理论体系;命门学说既是中医临床实践经验的总结,又以其独特的理论价值推动了中医临床的发展.命门学说在中医学术的发展史上有着十分重要的地位.着重从其学术背景、哲学基础与理论渊源进行阐述.     

马克思意识形态理论研究述评

本文通过对学术界关于马克思意识形态理论的历史发展阶段、意识形态概念的内涵、意识形态理论的基本特征和本质等四个问题研究状况的探讨与分析,获得以下观点:马克思意识形态理论的历史发展可划分为四个阶段;马克思的意识形态概念是一个否定性概念;马克思意识形态理论的基本特征有虚假性、无意识性和阶级性;马克思意识形态理论的本质是意识形态批判.     

从思想理论的深处谈佛教与社会主义社会相适应

佛教是以佛陀的教义为理论基础的社会团体，社会主义社会是以社会主义思想理论为指导，以最终实现共产主义社会为目的。在共产主义社会里，社会的发展、稳定、和平的基础是源自高度的个人自觉，但在发展中的社会主义初级阶段的社会里，社会的良好秩序、稳定发展则需要以法律的力量来维护，更需要来自佛教的感化和人们的信仰相辅佐。因为法律能够规范人们的社会生活行为，而佛教是从人们的内心教育开始，并导其言行，令其入于合情合理的行为准则，法律是对人们行为结果的衡量与判断，佛教是对人们断恶修善行为的内在要求，防患于未然。法律…     

霍克海默社会批判理论诠解

近年来,随着对法兰克福学派批判理论研究的深入,霍克海默的社会批判理论也逐渐为学界关注。全面而客观地认识霍克海默的社会批判理论,对于理解批判理论的源头所在,具有重要意义。本文试图基于马克思的思想对其作一次重新思考和评价,即立足于当时特定的社会现实,从霍克海默自身的哲学语境出发,辩证地分析和评价霍克海默的社会批判理论,彰显其批判性,充分肯定其积极的理论意义。同时,文章对霍克海默社会批判理论的缺陷和不足也给予了深入的分析。     

心衰三种学说历史演进中的科学思维

近５０年来，曾有三种不同解释心衰的学说，这些学说为心衰的治疗提供了适度的理论基础。在每一种有关心衰学说的产生的发展过程中，学说的提出和演变都体现了科学的思维方法，并使心衰的治疗产生质的飞跃，使其向理想的方向前进了一步。本文简述这一历史演进过程中的理论思维，旨在阐明疾病学说在医疗实践中的意义。     

论实践哲学的理论方式及其合理性

寻求马克思主义实践哲学合理的理论方式必须立足于实践哲学的基本立场 :实践是一个具有存在论意义的范畴 ;理论思维只是实践的一种方式 ,并不能获得一个外在于实践的“阿基米德点”。因而 ,实践哲学的理论活动便只能是对生活世界内某些成为“问题”的有限方面进行批判。实践哲学的理论方式蕴涵着一种新的真理观 ,即批判的真理。这种真理源于生活世界存在的事实性 ,并作为理论哲学真理符合论的超越     

Globalization and the contemporary development of Marxist philosophy: precondition, problem domain and research outline

Globalization was just emerging but did not really take shape during Karl Marx’s time. In fact, both Karl Marx and Engels predicted the trend of globalization but did not really live in such a time. Therefore, globalization is still a new issue and a new research area for Marxist philosophy today. Based on the distinctions between some important concepts such as globalization and modernization, this paper probes the problems concerning the development of modernity theory, social morphology and civilization theory, and the Marxist theory of values raised in the process of globalization. The paper also explores some theoretical issues concerning the socialist modernization with Chinese characteristics in the Marxist philosophy, and contemplates possible research areas, angles and methods of Marxist philosophical research in the global era. __________ Translated from Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究 (Philosophical Studies), 2005 (9) by Ouyang Kang, Liu Yumei, Zhu Lingling     

"中国马克思主义哲学"理论体系的实存应予肯定--兼答徐素华先生

徐素华先生文章把我提出的“中国马克思主义哲学”等同于他所说的“党的指导思想形态”,“在中国的马克思主义哲学”等同于他所说的“学术研究形态”,这不符合我的本意。“马克思主义哲学合法性问题”的讨论确实存在。“中国马克思主义哲学”是在中国实践中学习、运用,在总结实践经验、发扬中国优秀哲学文化、升华人民群众智慧的基础上发展了的马克思主义哲学。它是中国哲学的一个现代形态。它既是一个创新的哲学理论体系,又是党的指导思想的哲学基础。     

"实践"的内在张力与话语转换契机的开启--当代马克思主义法律理论研究新探

当代马克思主义法律理论的研究面临着从批判性导向向建设性导向的话语转换的需要。而传统马克思主义法律理论对法律规范意义的一贯抛弃态度,是实现话语转换的困难所在。本文通过回溯马克思的实践思想,发现否弃法律的规范意义并非马克思思想的固有逻辑。而籍由马克思实践思想中所蕴涵着的实践的内在张力性框架,可以把法律的规范意义容纳进来,并在此基础上开启出马克思主义法律理论研究谋求自身内部话语转换的可能和契机。     

马克思主义宗教观中国化的几个问题

马克思主义宗教观的中国化是当前我国宗教学研究的重要课题。它既表现为中国共产党把马克思主义宗教观的基本原理应用于中国革命和建设中的宗教问题的实际,走出了一条具有中国特色的解决宗教问题的道路的过程,也表现为形成了中国化的马克思主义宗教观。特别是中国特色社会主义宗教理论体系是马克思主义宗教观中国化的最新成果,是中国化马克思主义宗教观的标志,它是科学认识我国现阶段宗教问题的指南。这其中,我国宗教学界也作出了应有的贡献。     

Chinese Marxist Philosophy Since Reform and Opening-Up

Since reform and opening-up began in 1978, Chinese Marxist philosophy has undertaken the double mission of enhancing the emancipation of the mind in society and of realizing its own ideological emancipation. It has gone through an evolutionary process from “extensive discussion about the criterion of truth” to “reform of philosophical textbooks”; from the proposal of the philosophical conception of “practical materialism” to reflection on “modernity”; and from the carrying-out of dialogues among Chinese, Western, and Marxist philosophies to the exploration of “new forms of civilization.” Chinese Marxist philosophy has shifted its way of doing research with practical materialism as a core conception, and it changed such modes of thinking as the intuitive theory of reflection based on na?ve realism, the theory of linear causality based on mechanical determinism, and the reductionism of essence based on abstract substantialism. As a result, it has boosted changes that were already underway in Chinese philosophy, worldviews, theories of truth, conceptions of history, and views of development, and it has further endowed the discourse system of Marxist philosophy with laudable subjectivity and originality.     

Marxist guidance: a dialectic lesson

Based on primary sources published in the Soviet Bloc, this article reviews orthodox Marxist theory, methodology, and practice. It compares the stated goals of Marxist guidance with actual outcomes, and identifies the foundations of guidance in the Soviet Bloc in terms of Marxist philosophy and social doctrine. The application of dialectic methodology to guidance is also explained. Current symptoms of ideological unrest in socialist society as exemplified by the now-suppressed reform movement in Czechoslovakia are analyzed and its dynamics identified. Finally, the article draws conclusions applicable to guidance in this country.     

Development and validation of the consumer disillusionment toward marketing activity scale

This study examines disillusioned consumers. The theory proposes that this is a group learning to lower their expectations of firm integrity and who, to avoid being let down, ignore marketing activity directly from the firm. This kind of exchange orientation develops as a response to consistent failure in perceptions of firm integrity. The research includes six studies, including over 600 adult consumers, to outline the development and validation of a measure of consumer disillusionment toward marketing activity. Completing the process provides a valid and reliable four‐item measure. In addition, the study includes the assessment of the nomological validity of the construct. The nomological validation includes using cue utilization theory to predict that disillusioned consumers favor advertising that provides evidence of verifiable integrity. The validation experiment uses print advertising containing high and low verifiable integrity stimuli. Results confirm the theory with disillusioned consumers focusing less on the firm as source of information. Further, these consumers respond more favorably than non‐disillusioned consumers to third party endorsers who serve to verify the firm's attempts to show integrity. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

李达哲学探索的独特理论个性

李达是中国现代史上少有的一位杰出的马克思主义哲学家,是马克思主义哲学中国化的重要代表人物之一,为马克思主义哲学中国化、为毛泽东哲学思想的形成和发展作出了突出重要的贡献。与马克思主义哲学中国化的其他重要代表人物相比较,李达对马克思主义哲学的探索具有鲜明的独特理论个性。考察、揭示、把握和品味李达哲学探索的独特理论个性,对于深刻理解马克思主义哲学中国化的历程及其内在规律,推进当代中国马克思主义哲学的发展,具有极其重要的意义。     

Fettering, Development and Revolution

In this article, I contrast two theories of history: a Marxist theory (that of G. A. Cohen) and an anarchist theory. Both theories, in their respective attempts at explaining epochal transitions, seem to require some plausible construal of Marx's claim that revolutions occur when a society's economic relations 'fetter' the development of its productive forces. From an examination of a number of different construals of 'fettering'—'development fettering', 'use fettering', 'ACRU fettering', 'net fettering', and even 'forfeitur'—I conclude that none of them supports the Marxist theory of revolution, while each is consistent with the anarchist theory of epochal transformation.     

马克思主义方法论的四大基本命题辨析

Marxist methodology is the direct reflection of Marxist world outlook.Marxist methodology and its basic principles are inseparable.Everything starts from reality,analyze specific circumstances,history and logic are consistent,and combine theory and practice are four basic propositions of Marxist methodology.They are all the expressions of Marxist world outlook and methodology,but with different characteristics.However,there are several specious even habitual fallacies which need to be discriminated,analyzed...