共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Editorial Board 《Philosophical Studies》2001,103(3):342-343
Authors Index
Author Index Volume 103 2001 相似文献2.
3.
Authors Index
Author Index Volume 113 2003 相似文献4.
Alexander R. Pruss 《Philosophical Studies》2001,104(3):337-338
Volume Contents
Contents Volume 104 2001 相似文献5.
Michael Williams 《Philosophical Studies》2001,103(3):341-342
Volume Contents
Contents Volume 103 2001 相似文献6.
7.
8.
9.
Barbara H. Partee 《Philosophical Studies》2004,119(3):343-344
Volume Contents
Contents Volume 119 2004 相似文献10.
Science and Engineering Ethics - 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
Bruce E. Pfeiffer Hélène Deval Frank R. Kardes Edward R. Hirt Samuel C. Karpen Bob M. Fennis 《Thinking & reasoning》2013,19(4):500-505
Negative acknowledgement is an impression management technique that uses the admission of an unfavourable quality to mitigate a negative response. Although the technique has been clearly demonstrated, the underlying process is not well understood. The current research identifies a key mediator and moderator while also demonstrating that the effect extends beyond the specific acknowledged domain to the overall evaluation of a target object. The results of study 1 indicate that negative acknowledgement works through mitigating negatively valenced cognitive responses. People who are presented with a negative acknowledgement are less likely to counterargue when forming an evaluation. The results of study 2 reveal that individual differences in need for structure impact the effectiveness of the technique. People who are high in need for structure are more susceptible to the effect presumably because of their desire for easy-to-use information that aids the formation and maintenance of simple knowledge structures. 相似文献
15.
Katherine Sonderegger 《International Journal of Systematic Theology》2023,25(4):555-566
This essay aims to reply to the three essays devoted to Systematic Theology, volume 2. Common to all three essays is the conviction that my Trinitarian theology exhibits a kind of unicity that gives rise to inconsistencies of method and worries in matters of doctrine. My reply lays out several forms of unity and details how I hope to present proper uniformity in form and matter of dogmatics. A precis of my underlying Doctrine of Scripture and my forthcoming Christology is appended as well, as these prove central to the essayists' queries about the volume. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.