Mediated generalization in discrimination learning by Rhesus monkeys

Monkeys received discrimination training in which the choice of either a simultaneous or a serial compound of two visual images was rewarded before we assessed the monkeys' conditioned preference for one of the images from the compound. This preference was reduced or blocked if the other image had been associated with reward rather than nonreward prior to compound training. By contrast, the preference was enhanced if the other image was associated with reward rather than nonreward after compound training. The magnitudes of the blocking and enhancement were unaffected by the temporal structure, simultaneous or serial, of the stimulus compound. These results are discussed in terms of the representation of stimulus compounds, the role of within-compound associations, and the similarities between serial and simultaneous visual compounds as processed by monkeys.     

Determinants of serial discrimination learning by squirrel monkeys

Squirrel monkeys were presented multiple serial discriminations 1, 2, 4, and 8 problems long. They were then presented problems designed to separate the effects of within-list associative interference from the effects of within-problem intertrial interval as list length was increased. The Ss committed consistently fewer errors after Trial 1 reward than after Trial 1 nonreward and showed strong stimulus perseveration. An increase in within-problem intertrial interval from 30 sec to 4 min had no effect whereas the associative interference resulting from increased problem length caused a small but significant performance decrement. Old and new problems had about equal effects on serial discrimination. The findings indicated that squirrel monkeys are relatively insensitive to within-problem associative interference.     

A role for stimulus generalization in conditional discrimination learning

In each of three experiments on discrimination learning by rats, whether or not a 10-sec target stimulus was followed by food was determined by the nature of a 2-min background stimulus that accompanied it. A conditional discrimination was employed in Experiment 1 such that background A indicated food would follow one target but not the other, whereas this relationship between the targets and food was reversed in the presence of background B. Experiment 2 employed two feature-positive discriminations. Subsequent test trials revealed that the background for one discrimination was able to enhance responding during the target for the other discrimination. Experiment 3 employed a feature-positive and a feature-negative discrimination prior to test trials in which each target was presented separately during a compound of both background stimuli. The compound enhanced responding to the target from the feature-positive discrimination and reduced it to the target from the feature-negative discrimination. We suggest that to accommodate all these findings, the best explanation is provided by a configural model of Pavlovian conditioning.     

Single and concurrent discrimination learning by monkeys after lesions of inferotemporal cortex

Three monkeys with bilateral lesions of inferotemporal cortex and three unoperated controls (all previously sophisticated at visual discriminations) learned 60 discriminations between pairs of multi-featured computer-generated patterns. They then learned 5 problem sets, each composed of 5 pairs of the same kind learned concurrently, and finally 20 more single discriminations.

Previous reports that inferotemporal lesions selectively impair concurrent learning were disconfirmed; given practice at learning pairs concurrently, the inferotemporals learned these at a similar rate to single pairs. Analysis of intra-problem learning supported the suggestion that the lesion affects visual identification (the ability to distinguish objects within a large population) rather than visual association or memory.     

Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses.

Using horses, we investigated three aspects of the stimulus control of lever-pressing behavior: stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift. Nine solid black circles, ranging in size from 0.5 in. to 4.5 in. (1.3 cm to 11.4 cm) served as stimuli. Each horse was shaped, using successive approximations, to press a rat lever with its lip in the presence of a positive stimulus, the 2.5-in. (6.4-cm) circle. Shaping proceeded quickly and was comparable to that of other laboratory organisms. After responding was maintained on a variable-interval 30-s schedule, stimulus generalization gradients were collected from 2 horses prior to discrimination training. During discrimination training, grain followed lever presses in the presence of a positive stimulus (a 2.5-in circle) and never followed lever presses in the presence of a negative stimulus (a 1.5-in. [3.8-cm] circle). Three horses met a criterion of zero responses to the negative stimulus in fewer than 15 sessions. Horses given stimulus generalization testing prior to discrimination training produced symmetrical gradients; horses given discrimination training prior to generalization testing produced asymmetrical gradients. The peak of these gradients shifted away from the negative stimulus. These results are consistent with discrimination, stimulus generalization, and peak-shift phenomena observed in other organisms.     

Perseverative errors in object discrimination learning by aged Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata).

To examine the nature of age-dependent cognitive decline, performance in terms of concurrent object discriminations was assessed in aged and nonaged Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). Aged monkeys required more sessions and committed more errors than nonaged ones in the discriminations, even in simple object discriminations. Analyses of errors suggest that aged monkeys repeated the same errors and committed more errors when they chose a negative object at the 1st trial. A hypothesis analysis of behavior suggests that their incorrect choices were mainly due to object preference. Therefore, the impairment was probably caused by a failure to inhibit inappropriate responses. Together with previous neuropsychological findings, deficits of aged monkeys in the performance of object discriminations can be explained by dysfunction of the frontal cortex.