Dialogical Connexive Logic

Synthese - Many of the discussions about conditionals can best be put as follows:can those conditionals that involve an entailment relation be formulatedwithin a formal system? The reasons for the...     

Variable Sharing in Connexive Logic

Journal of Philosophical Logic - However broad or vague the notion of connexivity may be, it seems to be similar to the notion of relevance even when relevance and connexive logics have been shown...     

Negation as Cancellation, and Connexive Logic

Of the various accounts of negation that have been offered by logicians in the history of Western logic, that of negation as cancellation is a very distinctive one, quite different from the explosive accounts of modern "classical" and intuitionist logics, and from the accounts offered in standard relevant and paraconsistent logics. Despite its ancient origin, however, a precise understanding of the notion is still wanting. The first half of this paper offers one. Both conceptually and historically, the account of negation as cancellation is intimately connected with connexivist principles such as ¬( ¬). Despite this, standard connexivist logics incorporate quite different accounts of negation. The second half of the paper shows how the cancellation account of negation of the first part gives rise to a semantics for a simple connexivist logic.     

The Logic of the History of Ideas

Book Information The Logic of the History of Ideas. By Mark Bevir. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 1999. Pp. xii + 337. Hardback, $120.80.     

Embedding Friendly First-Order Paradefinite and Connexive Logics

Journal of Philosophical Logic - First-order intuitionistic and classical Nelson–Wansing and Arieli–Avron–Zamansky logics, which are regarded as paradefinite and connexive logics,...     

世界逻辑元研究的进展--评《逻辑学思想史》

张家龙主编的<逻辑学思想史>(张家龙、刘培育、郑伟宏、邵强进合著)已由湖南教育出版社出版.我是该书审稿人和热心读者,多次阅读,反复体味,深感其多有堪向广大读者推介的特色和优点.     

中国逻辑史研究的三种立场

先秦时期有没有逻辑,如果有逻辑,它是一种什么样的逻辑,这是一个长期争论的问题.自从梁启超开始研究墨家论理学(逻辑学)以来,在中国学术界就开始了关于中国古代是否有西方逻辑学的争论.例如,梁启超、虞愚等学者认为中国先秦时期有西方那样的逻辑学,当时还有一些学者认为中国先秦时期没有西方亚里士多德那样的逻辑学.建国后,关于中国逻辑史的研究对象,中国逻辑史界一直存在着分歧.自1980年中国逻辑史研究会在广州成立以来,开始了有组织的学术讨论和集体研究,使中国古代逻辑思想史的研究以前所未有的成果面世,出现了大量的论文、著作和教材.从这些著作和论文看,20世纪80-90年代,尤其是90年代,中国逻辑史界关于中国逻辑史的研究对象问题,主要有三种观点,即中国逻辑史是名学和辩学史、是中国形式逻辑的思想发展史、是中国古代符号学史.     

"生产主义批判"的历史和逻辑

马克思给予物质生产以历史基础地位,却对生产主义予以严厉的批判。这一理论取向为历代马克思主义者所继承,也成为西方马克思主义、各种新马克思主义和后马克思主义的显性话语,因而成为我们判断一个学派与马克思主义有无学脉关系的根本论题之一。生产主义批判,包括“生产主义社会”批判和“生产主义”意识形态批判两个方面。生产主义社会批判又经过了狭义生产主义批判和广义生产主义批判两个阶段。一狭义生产主义批判“生产主义社会”批判首先是对“生产—消费社会”型的经济体制和社会体制的批判。在这种体制中,生产是社会的支配原则,在生产…     

中国逻辑史研究若干问题

中国逻辑史研究 ,是近百年来兴起的新事物。经几代学者努力 ,已获得丰硕成果 ,今天的中国逻辑史学科和研究方向 ,在中国学术和教育领域占有一定地位 ,引起海内外学者关注。持续百年的中国逻辑史研究 ,近年涌现以更新、转换方法为标记的回顾、反思和再认识潮流 ,并伴生诸多尖锐问题。正确反思过去 ,分析当前问题 ,有助于研究的开展和深入。一、中国古代逻辑是否存在。崔清田主编《名学与辩学》 (山西教育出版社 ,1 997年版 )“后记”说 :“《名学与辩学》是国家教委‘八五’人文社科规划项目的研究成果。”“《名学与辩学》被作为中国逻辑史…     

事件:爆发在历史逻辑的断裂处

事件的概念引导我们对历史与逻辑的统一这一命题进行重新的思考与审视。长久以来,目的论的连续性图景构成人们思考这一命题的惯性思维,而对于从必然性中逸出的偶然性,人们并未在理论上给予充分的解释。本文结合本雅明、巴丢和德勒兹的哲学,借助突变论的理论成果,试图对黑格尔意义上的历史与逻辑的统一进行解构,以期在新的基础上使二者重新结合起来。     

中国逻辑史研究的一种观念

在中国逻辑史界有一被称为南开学派的学术群体,这种称呼当否另当别论,但它却说明南开学派有了自己的研究特色.如果承认中国逻辑史研究南开学派命名的合理性,那么其意指由温公颐先生开创的、崔清田先生继承和超越的、按照崔清田先生观念进行研究的研究群体,它代表的是中国逻辑史研究的一种观念--多元逻辑观.它认为,就比较逻辑研究而言,不同文化需求下有不同的逻辑.这种观念肇始于1990年代,成熟于2000年代前期.     

政府改革之历史足迹与成长逻辑——基于历史坐标中的两种信任理论之考量

公共行政学自其诞生以来的百余年间,对于政府本身的定位经过了多次变化。我国行政伦理学家张康之教授从历史的宏观视野对政府的历史坐标进行了深入考察,提出了统治型政府、管理型政府和服务型政府的划分,与此相对应地提出了习俗型信任、契约型信任和合作型信任三种信任类型,为考察政府改革的历史足迹与成长逻辑提供了一种新的分析框架。公共行政学视域下的政府改革理论,从一开始就蕴含着市场运作逻辑和企业管理思想,20世纪六七十年代开始的新公共管理改革运动则将公共行政学的这一传统发挥到了极致。市场化政府改革将市场逻辑和经济人思维带进了政府,形成了一种基于契约化之上的管理型政府模式。基于理性而建立起来的契约型信任本身的脆弱性,决定了政府市场化改革的危机结果。非政府组织的出现以及新市民社会的成长,意味着一种网络式的社会治理和通过广泛的合作而进行的合作治理模式的到来。信任是合作的前提,合作治理模式的建构必须以合作型信任的建立为基础。未来的政府改革应该适应后工业社会的发展趋势,从基于契约型信任的市场化取向中解放出来,迈向多元治理主体本着公平参与、充满合作型信任以及基于善的完美生活追求的合作型治理模式。     

Discarding the Barthian Spectacles. Part III: Rewriting the History of Protestant Theology in the 1920s

Abstract : This essay, the third in a series introducing “the veritable renaissance” of scholarly attention to Protestant theology in Germany in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, examines the larger context of Protestant theology in the 1920s and the question of whether it was now continuous or discontinuous with what had gone before. Then, using the study by Matthias Wolfes, Protestantische Theologie und moderne Welt, we look at the work of three hitherto and long forgotten theologians—Horst Stephan, Georg Wehrung, and Georg Wobbermin—each of whom developed distinctive approaches to theology and ask about their significance for us in the present.     

略论因明学史学上的若干问题

因明学史研究目前仍是学术界的一个薄弱环节,很多问题一直没有得到解决,甚至有以讹传讹之处。本文对因明学何时传入汉地的问题、刘勰《文心雕龙》与因明学的关系、因明学在唐代佛道之争中的作用等问题进行了探讨。     

编者导言(英文)

This special issue of the journal‘Studies in Logic’ results from an international workshopon‘TheHistory of Logic in China’held in Amsterdam,The Netherlands,on November 24-26, 2010 (http://www.sciencehistory.asia/history-logic-china).This event brought together,     

中国逻辑史的五个问题(英文)

This journal issue does not stand on its own. A number of projects are under way that aim at bringing together scholars in the history of Chinese logic and working logicians interested in learning more about this fascinating alternative tradition.One such project is a forthcoming book called Five Questions on History of Chinese Logic,     

Carnap and Kuhn: On the Relation between the Logic of Science and the History of Science

This paper offers a refutation of J. C. Pinto de Oliveira’s recent critique of revisionist Carnap scholarship as giving undue weight to two brief letters to Kuhn expressing his interest in the latter’s work. First an argument is provided to show that Carnap and Kuhn are by no means divided by a radical mismatch of their conceptions of the rationality of science as supposedly evidenced by their stance towards the distinction of the contexts of discovery and justification. This is followed by an argument to the effect that the fact that Carnap’s own work concentrated on formal aspects of scientific theories does not licence the conclusion that he thought historical investigations and concerns irrelevant for what we nowadays would rightly call “philosophy of science”.     

从劳动逻辑到实践逻辑

马克思实践哲学面临了从劳动逻辑向实践逻辑提升和转换的需要,以拯救易被化约于劳动之中的伦理—政治型实践范畴的独立地位。但这项工作必须自觉区别于西方实践哲学传统的实践与劳动二分立场。马克思劳动概念中蕴含了属于它自身的伦理规范内涵,需要将这一伦理规范内涵释放出来,以完成向伦理—政治型实践范畴的过渡。     

Writing (and Rewriting) About the Psychology of Women

Sex Roles is celebrating its 35th anniversary by inviting articles from authors of relevant textbooks. I wrote The Psychology of Women because I have a long-standing concern for social justice and because I actually enjoy writing textbooks. The structure of the 7th edition of this textbook is not markedly different from other recent editions. However, our discipline has changed substantially in terms of the volume of research, the growing emphasis on intersectionality, the awareness that gender biases and gender comparisons are often relatively subtle, and the changing nature of the research findings. Current textbook authors face challenges such as the overwhelming amount of new information, the difficulty of presenting information about social justice, and problems with publishing companies. Achieving gender equality will continue to be a challenging goal.