American pragmatism and American psychoanalysis

The author compares American pragmatism with American psychoanalysis in an effort to place the existence of the many diverse schools and theories of psychoanalysis in a historical context. Pragmatism is seen as a theory of instrumentation or a collection of tools for accomplishing goals; it claims that many of our efforts to know and seek truth are based upon myths. Psychoanalysis, too, can be seen to pursue certain theoretical claims based on myths. The present climate of pluralism in psychoanalysis is not a phase, but an indication of our diverse ways of achieving in-depth understanding of another person.     

Editorial board page for “international forum of psychoanalysis”, volume 4, number 1

Abstract

This is a scanned image of the original Editorial Board page(s) for this issue     

Editorial board page for “International forum of psychoanalysis”, volume 6, number 4

Abstract

This is a scanned image of the original Editorial Board page(s) for this issue.     

Editorial board page for “international forum of psychoanalysis”, volume 4, number 2

Abstract

This is a scanned image of the original Editorial Board page(s) for this issue     

Editorial board page for “international forum of psychoanalysis”, volume 4, number 3

Abstract

This is a scanned image of the original Editorial Board page(s) for this issue     

The emergence of an American middle school of psychoanalysis commentary on Karen Rosica's paper

In this paper we explore a few points emphasized by both Fairbairn and American Relational Theory related to conceptualizations of the new and old object and the implications for working in the analytic situation. Underlying much of our discussion is the belief that there are useful tensions between, on the one hand, Fairbairn's emphasis on our attachment to bad and old objects and refractory clinging to these bad objects in the face of receiving something new, and, on the other, a construal of a push or willingness toward integrating externality and newness of objects (e.g., Winnicott, 1969; Benjamin, 1988). American Relational models which explore complexities of interaction augment an understanding of Fairbairn's formulations of why we hold on to old objects. Fairbairn's theory also offers ways of understanding aspects of repetition, even, and sometimes especially, in trying to provide new experience.     

Editorial board page for “international forum of psychoanalysis”, volume 4, number 4

Abstract

This is a scanned image of the original Editorial Board page(s) for this issue     

Psychoanalysis, psychoanalysis appropriated, psychoanalysis applied

The assumptions which predominate in the reading of psychoanalytic theory differ from those involved in listening to the patient in the psychoanalytic process. A weakness of much applied psychoanalysis is that these two sets of assumptions are confused and theoretical certainty is substituted for clinical exploration. This difference in assumptions is illustrated by the different assumptions about the signifier in two poems. In Freud's work on Leonardo, both attitudes toward the signifier are present, but the clinical aspect is located in Freud's method, not in his historical construction. The problems of maintaining a similar clinical stance in applied psychoanalysis are explored, and Freud's tendency toward historical certainty is speculatively considered as an instance of the parallelism phenomenon.     

Pandemic psychoanalysis

The American Journal of Psychoanalysis - Our clinical practice is contextualized by a co-participant trauma constituted by a confluence of upheavals–pandemic, politics, an epistemological...