Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Explaining the Differences

A number of writers have tackled the task of characterizing the differences between analytic and Continental philosophy. I suggest that these attempts have indeed captured the most important divergences between the two styles but have left the explanation of the differences mysterious. I argue that analytic philosophy is usefully seen as philosophy conducted within a paradigm, in Kuhn's sense of the word, whereas Continental philosophy assumes much less in the way of shared presuppositions, problems, methods and approaches. This important opposition accounts for all those features that have rightly been held to constitute the difference between the two traditions. I finish with some reflections on the relative superiority of each tradition and by highlighting the characteristic deficiencies of each.     

分析哲学和向黑格尔的回归（续）

分析的黑格尔主义摩尔式的经验主义的可能性是以直接知识为基础的,由于经验主义受到各个方面的批判,这种可能性也已经被削弱了。这些批评始于后期维特根斯坦,然后又在纽拉斯、奎因、塞勒斯、戴维森、罗蒂和其他一些人那里得到了继续。伴随着这些批评而来的是两个很不相同的为关     

Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy

Book Information Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. By Robert Hanna. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 2001. Pp. xv + 312. Hardback, £45.00.     

On the Divide: Analytic and Continental Philosophy of Music

On offer here is a tradition‐neutral way of understanding the distinction between analytic and continental philosophy of music. The distinction is drawn in terms of methodology, rather than content, by identifying contrasting methodological tendencies of each tradition—initial maneuvers that frame an investigation, which are related to one another insofar as they involve, or do not involve, two kinds of methodological detachment. These maneuvers are extracted through a consideration of contrasting pairs of examples. The pairs consist of an analytic and a continental account of a core issue in the philosophy of music. The issues considered are musical experience, musical ontology, and the relationship between music and the emotions. The philosophers considered are Roger Scruton and Pierre Bourdieu, Jerrold Levinson and Lydia Goehr, Peter Kivy, and Andrew Bowie.     

分析的魅力:普兰丁格对分析哲学的利用和改造

阿尔文·普兰丁格(Alvin Plantinga,1932～)是当代美国著名的宗教哲学家.其研究领域广泛,学术影响深远,特别在知识论的研究上有很深的造诣,被称为当今英美宗教哲学界的"三巨头之一"[1].综观普兰丁格的学术生涯及其研究成果,不难发现其学术探究的方法别具一格.     

Linguistic Justice and Analytic Philosophy

Abstract

This paper investigates whether analytic philosophers who are non-native English speakers are subject to linguistic injustice and, if yes, what kind of injustice that is and whether it is different from the general disadvantage that non-native English speakers meet in a world where English is rapidly becoming the lingua franca. The paper begins with a critical review of the debate on linguistic justice, with a particular focus on the emergence of a lingua franca and the related questions of justice, both in terms of the disadvantages suffered by those groups who bear the cost of learning another language and in terms of forms of discrimination due to accents and language improprieties. We argue that being at a relative disadvantage compared to others does not necessarily translate in a proper injustice if fundamental civil, political and social provisions are in place. We suggest that a circumstance of injustice arises when such disadvantage affects those who are not yet members of such academic community such as prospective students, thus contributing in keeping the non-native group a minority. We qualify this case of disadvantage as a matter of structural injustice.     

Guest Editorial: French Analytic Philosophy Today

Philosophical Studies -     

The Grammar of Politics, Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy

Books reviewed:
Cressida J. Heyes (ed.), The Grammar of Politics, Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy , Cornell University Press, 2003, xii + 259, no price. Reviewed by Peter Johnson, University of Southampton Department of Philosophy University of Southampton Highfield Southampton UK     

政治哲学:政治的理性和良心--兼评施特劳斯的"政治哲学"概念

政治哲学研究首先遇到的棘手问题直接涉及该学科研究对象的"政治哲学"概念本身的界定,其核心是如何理解政治与哲学的关系.对此,本文拟从下述两个方面来加以考察. 一政治与哲学的双重变奏 施特劳斯对政治哲学的核心定义正是基于对政治与哲学的关系的分析和揭示.在他看来,政治与哲学具有两种关系,据此,可以相应地对政治哲学做出两种理解和界定.     

朱谦之"文化哲学"研究

在朱谦之的学术世界里,<文化哲学>的地位是他前期最后的学问顶点.(马列主义非受容时期1918～1949)①正如他所说的一样,哪怕只能活一天,也要为文化研究尽力,从这一点可见一斑.终其一生,他都带着谨慎在为文化研究执着地追求.     

技术的文化塑造与技术多样性的政治学

技术的文化塑造是技术的社会形成理论的具体化."文化塑造"一词具有多种意义,在技术的社会形成过程中,文化扮演着重要的角色和作用.具体而言,技术的文化塑造涉及到技术发展中的文化意义和技术政策的意义,它反对长期流行的技术决定论的观点,即技术统治论式的技术政策.本文最引人注目之处在于提出了"技术的不确定性循环"这一概念,即认为新技术从一开始就具有明显的不确定性特征,并构成了以后的系列问题.技术的这一循环特征包括了以多种方式相互交织的不确定性.而技术的不确定性循环,则必然要涉及到技术的多样性,以及技术创新体制和互动创新网络的构建,并最终关联到技术多样性的政治学的构建.