The effects of elaboration on recognition memory

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of elaboration on recognition memory. Subjects were given either simple or complex sentences to learn and were tested for recognition of either an individual target word or the entire sentence. Complex sentences supported better recognition performance only when the test item allowed the subject to easily redintegrate the initial encoding context, either by re-presenting the encoded sentence as the test item or by constructing sentences such that the component words of the sentence could be easily redintegrated from an individual target item. It was suggested that complex, elaborate encoding established a richer trace, but that this richness can be utilized to enhance recognition only when the test conditions permit a reinstatement of the original encoding context.     

Context effects in recognition memory: The frequency attribute

The first experiment determined whether frequency context would affect recognition memory decisions and frequency judgments. In the high-frequency context condition, 5 words were presented at study six times each prior to the section of the list containing the target items. In the low- frequency context condition, 30 words were presented at study one time each prior to the targets. The items tested were the same in the two conditions and were presented one, two, or three times each. Recognition performance and the judged frequency of target items presented once at study was higher in the high-frequency context condition than in the low-frequency context condition, but the opposite was true for items presented three times at study. The results of three subsequent recognition memory experiments suggested that encoding processes were critically involved.     

Feature frequency effects in recognition memory

Rare words are usually better recognized than common words, a finding in recognition memory known as the word-frequency effect. Some theories predict the word-frequency effect because they assume that rare words consist of more distinctive features than do common words (e.g., Shiffrin & Steyvers's, 1997, REM theory). In this study, recognition memory was tested for words that vary in the commonness of their orthographic features, and we found that recognition was best for words made up of primarily rare letters. In addition, a mirror effect was observed: Words with rare letters had a higher hit rate and a lower false-alarm rate than did words with common letters. We also found that normative word frequency affects recognition independently of letter frequency. Therefore, the distinctiveness of a word's orthographic features is one, but not the only, factor necessary to explain the word-frequency effect.     

Study time effects in recognition memory

We empirically tested the assumption that study time increases recognition accuracy because the storage of information is better when study time is longer as Shiffrin and colleagues have reported, an assumption common to parallel models of recognition. In the present study with 123 subjects, we examined the effect of item strength on four measures: hit rate, false alarm rate, d', and beta, for a single-word recognition task with longer study times than those usually used in the literature. Analysis indicated significant increase for hit rate and d' and a decrease in false alarm rate, as one goes from weak to stronger study conditions, and a change in ln(beta) when study time is greater than 1 sec. These results suggest that familiarization is one, but not the only, factor underlying the strength-mirror effect.     

Articulation effects in melody recognition memory

Various surface features—timbre, tempo, and pitch—influence melody recognition memory, but articulation format effects, if any, remain unknown. For the first time, these effects were examined. In Experiment 1, melodies that remained in the same, or appeared in a different but similar, articulation format from study to test were recognized better than were melodies that were presented in a distinct format at test. A similar articulation format adequately induced matching processes to enhance recognition. Experiment 2 revealed that melodies rated as perceptually dissimilar on the basis of the location of the articulation mismatch did not impair recognition performance, suggesting an important boundary condition for articulation format effects on memory recognition—the matching of the memory trace and recognition probe may depend more on the overall proportion, rather than the temporal location, of the mismatch. The present findings are discussed in terms of a global matching advantage hypothesis.     

Response set effects in recognition memory

In three experiments, Ss responded to individual digits or letters according to whether or not each was in some prememorized list. There were either two possible responses (yes-no condition) or a single response (yes-only and no-only conditions). With memory sets of one, two, or four digits, RT was a linear function of memory set size. The slope of the function was least under the yes-only condition and greatest under the yes-no condition. Nonspecific practice had little effect on any of the slopes. With memory sets of 4, 8, or 12 letters, the slopes under the yes-only and yes-no conditions did not seem to differ, and practice with specific sets flattened the function considerably in both cases. Overall, the errors under the yes-no condition were mostly false alarms, those under the no-only condition mostly misses, and those under the yes-no condition were divided about equally. The results are interpreted partially in terms of a multiple-observations model of decision time.     

Stimulus suffix effects in recognition memory

Recall of auditory items can be disrupted by presentation of an irrelevant auditory stimulus (a stimulus suffix). Previous researchers have suggested that suffix effects are not found on recognition tests. Two experiments are presented here that demonstrate suffix effects on recognition tests. These results suggest that suffixes interfere with item information and that suffix effects cannot be attributed solely to retrieval processes.     

The influence of decision criteria upon remembering and knowing in recognition memory.

One may recognise an item as 'old' on basis of a recollective experience or by a feeling of familiarity without specific recollection. The former is called a 'remember' judgement; the latter a 'know' judgement. It has been claimed that remember and know responses reflect qualitatively distinct components of recognition memory, and not just derive from gradual differences in perceived trace strength or subjective certainty (i.e. remember judgments include memories of which one is more confident). Nonetheless, the present study examined the possibility that the distinction does relate to decision criteria placed upon a single familiarity axis (see Donaldson, 1996; Hirshman & Master, 1997). To this purpose, two groups of subjects were compared: one, which was instructed to be very conservative in their old-new judgements, while the other group was stimulated to be very lenient instead. Remember hit rates increased with more lenient criteria, whereas know hit rates did not, but false alarm rates did. While remember sensitivity was equal in the two groups, know sensitivity was lower with liberal criteria. Also it correlated with overall response bias. This lends support to the possibility that subjects not only apply an old-new decision criterion, but also set a remember-know criterion, which is affected in a similar way by liberal versus conservative instructions.     

Critical role of the cholinergic system for object-in-place associative recognition memory

Object-in-place memory, which relies on the formation of associations between an object and the place in which it was encountered, depends upon a neural circuit comprising the perirhinal (PRH) and medial prefrontal (mPFC) cortices. This study examined the contribution of muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission within this circuit to such object-in-place associative memory. Intracerebral administration of scopolamine in the PRH or mPFC impaired memory acquisition, but not retrieval and importantly we showed that unilateral blockade of muscarinic receptors simultaneously in both regions in opposite hemispheres, significantly impaired performance. Thus, object-in-place associative memory depends upon cholinergic modulation of neurones within the PRH-PFC circuit.Recognition memory enables individuals to judge whether stimuli have been encountered before. In its most basic form such judgments may be made on the basis of simply whether a stimulus is familiar or novel (familiarity discrimination). However, these judgments may also be made using associations formed between a stimulus and the location or environmental setting in which it was previously encountered. Such object-in-place associative memory in animals is of particular interest as it is acquired rapidly and it requires the integration of object and spatial information and thus has been described as an analog of human episodic memory (Wilson et al. 2008).The perirhinal cortex (PRH) in the medial temporal lobe is a critical neural structure for object recognition and object-in-place associative memory (Bussey et al. 2000; Barker et al. 2007), but unlike object recognition, this memory process is also dependent on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (Kesner and Ragozzino 2003; Browning et al. 2005; Barker et al. 2007) and crucially it has been shown to depend upon a functional interaction between the PRH and mPFC, with each region making a distinct cognitive contribution to the memory formation (Barker et al. 2007; Barker and Warburton 2008).Having identified two neural regions critical for object-in-place associative memory, we now extend our investigations to explore the underlying cellular mechanisms mediating acquisition or retrieval of this memory process. The present study focused on the neurotransmitter acetylcholine as cholinergic innervation of the PRH is crucial for familiarity discrimination (Tang et al. 1997; Easton and Gaffan 2001; Warburton et al. 2003; Abe et al. 2004; Winters and Bussey 2005). In contrast, the role of muscarinic receptor neurotransmission in the PRH or mPFC in object-in-place associative memory is unknown. Further, while it might appear that object recognition memory and object-in-place memory are likely to share common neural substrates, recent data from our laboratory suggest that this may not be the case (Griffiths et al. 2008).To explore the importance of muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission within the PRH-mPFC circuit for object-in-place memory, rats were implanted with bilateral cannulae aimed at the PRH or mPFC or both regions to allow direct intracerebral administration of scopolamine during distinct stages of an object-in-place task. Memory performance was tested following either a short (5 min) or long (1 h) retention delay. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom Animals Scientific Procedures Act (1986) and associated guidelines. Details of the surgery, infusion procedures, behavioral testing, and histology have been published previously (Barker and Warburton 2008). Briefly, male DA rats (230–250 g, Bantin and Kingman, UK) housed under a 12-h/12-h light/dark cycle (light phase 18:00–6:00 h), were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction 4%, maintenance 2%–3%) and surgically implanted with bilateral cannulae aimed at either the PRH or mPFC or both regions. After a two-week recovery period all rats were handled, habituated, and then tested in the object-in-place memory task.Sample phase: Each rat was placed in a black open-topped wooden arena (50 × 90 × 100 cm) containing four different objects (A, B, C, D) constructed from “Duplo” (Lego UK Ltd.). The walls of the arena were surrounded with a black cloth to a height of 1.5 m, and the floor covered with sawdust. The objects were placed 15 cm from the walls (see Fig. 1A) and each rat was allowed to explore the objects for 5 min, after which it was removed for the delay (5 min or 1 h). Exploratory behavior was defined as the animal directing its nose toward the object at a distance of <2 cm. Any other behavior, such as looking around while sitting on or resting against the object, was not recorded. Subjects that failed to complete a minimum of 15-s exploration in the sample phase or 10 s of exploration in the test phase were excluded from the analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Diagrammatic representations of the individual infusion sites in each animal. (A) Bilateral medial prefrontal (mPFC) group. (B) Bilateral perirhinal (PRH) group. (C) The mPFC infusion sites of the PRH+mPFC group. (D) The PRH infusion sites of the PRH+mPFC group. All of the infusion sites were within the PRH or mPFC.Test phase: Two of the objects, e.g., B and D, exchanged positions and the subjects were replaced in the arena for 3 min. The time spent exploring the two objects that had changed position was compared to the time spent exploring the two objects that had remained in the same position. If object-in-place memory is intact, subjects spend more time exploring the “moved” objects, compared to the “unmoved” objects. Scopolamine hydrobromide (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline solution was administered at a dose of 10 μg/μL per hemisphere (Schroeder and Packard 2002; Warburton et al. 2003; Winters et al. 2006); control infusions consisted of saline. The infusions were given either 15 min before the sample phase or 15 min before the test phase. At the end of the experiment, each rat was anesthetized and perfused transcardially. Coronal brain sections (40 μm) were stained with cresyl-violet to verify the cannulae locations. All the rats in the PRH group had the tip of the bilateral cannulae in the PRH and all the rats in the mPFC group had tips in the ventral portion of the prelimbic or dorsal portion of the infralimbic region of the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1B). From unpublished observations, using Indian ink and radiolabeled scopolamine, the region infused is estimated to be 1–1.5 mm³, and largely confined to perirhinal cortex or the prelimbic/infralimbic regions of the prefrontal cortex. This spread is consistent with previously quoted results in other brain regions (Martin 1991; Izquierdo et al. 2000; Attwell et al. 2001). Figure 2, A and B show the performance of the rats receiving bilateral infusions of scopolamine or vehicle into either the PRH (n = 12) or mPFC (n = 12) 15 min prior to the sample phase. After a minimum of 48 h, vehicle or scopolamine was infused in a cross-over design and the animal retested using different objects. A three-way ANOVA (drug × region × delay) showed that scopolamine infusion into either region significantly impaired the acquisition of object-in-place memory (main effect of drug F _(1,35) = 63.87, P < 0.001). The magnitude of the deficit was similar irrespective of the region into which scopolamine was infused (region F _(1,35) < 1.0) or the delay employed (delay F _(1,35) < 1.0). Further analyses to examine whether individual groups discriminated between the objects, using a within subjects t-test (two-tailed), confirmed that vehicle-treated animals in the PRH and mPFC groups showed a significant preference for the moved objects over the objects that had remained in the same position, irrespective of the retention delay (PRH 5 min t ₍₉₎ = 2.96, P < 0.02; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 5.71, P < 0.001: mPFC 5 min t ₍₅₎ = 5.47, P < 0.005; 1 h t ₍₁₁₎ = 9.89, P < 0.001), while scopolamine infusion into the PRH or mPFC significantly disrupted the animal''s ability to discriminate (PRH 5min t ₍₉₎ = 0.13, P = 0.9; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 0.92, P = 0.38: mPFC 5 min t ₍₅₎ = 0.051, P = 0.961; 1 h t ₍₁₁₎ = 0.68, P = 0.51). Scopolamine was without effect on the total amount of exploration completed in the sample or test phases (all Fs < 1.0).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Discrimination between the objects was calculated using a discrimination ratio, which takes into account individual differences in the total amount of exploration. The discrimination ratio is calculated as follows: the difference in time spent by each animal exploring objects that changed position compared to the objects that remained in the same position divided by the total time spent exploring all objects. (A) Infusion of scopolamine (Scop) into the perirhinal cortex (PRH) significantly impaired performance in the object-in-place task following a 5 min and a 1 h delay. (B) Infusion of scopolamine (Scop) into the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) significantly impaired performance in the object-in-place task following a 5 min and a 1 h delay. Illustrated for each group is the mean (+ SEM) discrimination ratio. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001 difference between groups.It could be argued that the impairment produced by intracortical infusions of scopolamine following a short delay, reflects an effect on retrieval as well as acquisition. Therefore, we examined the effect of pretest administration of scopolamine (infusion 15 min before the start of the test phase) in the mPFC or PRH following a 1 h delay. No significant impairments were found (mean discrimination ratio ± SEM: PRH vehicle 0.38 ± 0.07, scopolamine 0.46 ± 0.11; mPFC vehicle 0.37 ± 0.08, scopolamine 0.44 ± 0.05), confirmed by a nonsignificant drug effect (F _(1,14) < 1.0, P > 0.1) and nonsignificant drug × area interaction (F _(1,14) = <  1.0, P > 0.1). In addition all groups significantly discriminated between the moved objects compared to objects in the same location (PRH vehicle t ₍₇₎ = 4.95, P < 0.01; PRH scopolamine t ₍₇₎ = 3.45, P < 0.05; mPFC vehicle t ₍₇₎ = 4.26, P < 0.01; mPFC scopolamine t ₍₇₎ = 8.37, P < 0.01). Scopolamine was without effect on the total amount of exploration completed in the test phase (drug × region F _(1,14) < 1.0, P > 0.05).To evaluate the importance of intrahemispheric interactions between these cortical regions and the cholinergic system, a third group of animals had cannulae implanted into both the PRH and mPFC (n = 12). In this experiment the behavioral effects of unilateral scopolamine infusions into the PRH and mPFC in the same hemisphere (Scop Ipsi) were compared with the effects of unilateral scopolamine infusions into opposite hemispheres (Scop Contra). The animals assigned to the Scop Ipsi group on day one, received infusions into opposite hemispheres (Scop Contra) on day two (minimum of 48 h later). Likewise, the animals in the Scop Contra group on day one, received ipsilateral infusions on day two. Figure 3 shows discrimination performance following a 5 min or 1 h delay. A two-way within-subject ANOVA revealed that the Scop Contra group was significantly impaired (infusion F _(1,20) = 44.35, P < 0.001) irrespective of the delay (infusion × delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P < 0.05). Further analysis confirmed that the Scop Contra group failed to discriminate between the moved and unmoved objects (5 min t ₍₁₀₎ = 0.70, P > 0.1; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 1.03, P > 0.1), while the Scop Ipsi group preferentially explored the moved objects (5 min t ₍₁₀₎ = 9.99, P < 0.0001; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 4.34, P = 0.001).Open in a separate windowFigure 3.Unilateral scopolamine infusions into the PRH and mPFC in opposite hemispheres (Scop Contra) impaired object-in-place performance following both a 5 min and a 1 h delay. Scopolamine infusions into both the PRH and mPFC in the same hemisphere (Scop Ipsi) had no effect on performance following either delay. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 difference between groups.Scopolamine was without effect on overall exploration levels during the sample (infusion × delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P > 0.05; infusion F _(1,20) < 1.0, P > 0.05; delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P > 0.05) or test phases (infusion × delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P  >  0.05; infusion F _(1,20)  <  1.0, P > 0.05). There was a significant main effect of delay (F _(1,20) = 10.67, P < 0.01), as the Scop Ipsi and Scop Contra groups completed a greater amount of exploration in the test phase following a 1 h delay compared to a 5 min delay.These results demonstrate that acquisition, but not retrieval of object-in-place memory, is dependent upon muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission in both the mPFC and PRH. Thus, acute bilateral administration of scopolamine directly into the mPFC or PRH before the sample phase impaired both short- and long-term memory performances. In contrast administration of scopolamine into either the mPFC or PRH prior to the test phase had no effect. Significantly, co-administration of scopolamine into the PRH and mPFC in opposite hemispheres produced a significant impairment in both short-term and long-term object-in-place memory compared to performance following co-administration of scopolamine into the PRH and mPFC in the same hemisphere. Thus, concomitant activation of cholinergic muscarinic receptors is necessary in both regions for the formation of object-in-place associative recognition memory.Our previous studies investigating the role of the mPFC and PRH in object-in-place associative memory suggest that these regions make different cognitive contributions to this mnemonic process. Thus, the PRH appears to be primarily involved in the acquisition of “object” information, while we have hypothesized that the role of the mPFC is to integrate object and place information (Barker et al. 2007). As administration of scopolamine into either region disrupted performance following a long- or short-retention delay, the present data suggest that the neural mechanisms underlying both these different cognitive processes must be dependent upon cholinergic neurotransmission.The results demonstrate that muscarinic receptor neurotransmission is clearly critical for acquisition of the object-in-place task as no impairment was produced when scopolamine was administered only prior to the test phase. While the current study is the first to investigate the importance of cholinergic neurotransmission in object-in-place associative memory, a number of previous studies have shown that intra-PRH infusions of scopolamine block discrimination of novel and familiar objects when administered prior to the sample phase, but not when administered immediately after the sample phase or prior to the test phase (Aigner and Mishkin 1986; Aigner et al. 1991; Warburton et al. 2003; Winters et al. 2006). Thus, together these results support the hypothesis that muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission within the PRH is necessary for encoding representations of new visual stimuli for subsequent recognition (Turchi et al. 2005), but not for the retrieval of such information. The present results also show for the first time that muscarinic receptor neurotransmission within the mPFC is crucial for the encoding, but not the retrieval of object-in-place memory.It may be argued that the disruptions in performance following administration of scopolamine reflect disruptions in attentional processing. Indeed muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex has been implicated in both mnemonic and attentional processes (Voytko et al. 1994; Everitt and Robbins 1997; Chudasama et al. 2004; Dalley et al. 2004). However, deficits in attentional processing are typically observed when the attentional demands of the tasks are high, for example, when very short (millisecond) stimulus exposure times are used (Chudasama et al. 2004; Dalley et al. 2004). In the present study, the exposure time to the stimuli is relatively long (minutes); further there was no evidence of a drug-associated change in explorative behavior following either an infusion into the mPFC or PRH or simultaneously into both regions. Thus, it seems unlikely that the impairments in memory observed can be attributed purely to an attentional deficit, although it is possible that during the encoding of the object-in-place task attentional processes are also recruited involving the cholinergic afferents to the mPFC or PRH.The results showing that simultaneous muscarinic cholinergic blockade in the PRH and mPFC produces a significant impairment in performance support our previous findings of a neural system for object-in-place memory and extend these findings to show that cholinergic neurotransmission is a key component within the system. Our results also support those studies in primates demonstrating a circuit involving the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, and inferior temporal cortex is necessary for object memory encoding (Easton et al. 2002; Easton and Parker 2003).Results from our laboratory have shown that the maintenance of long-term, but not short-term, object-in-place memory is critically dependent upon concurrent NMDA receptor activation in the PRH and mPFC (Barker and Warburton 2008), while short-term object-in-place performance is dependent upon kainate receptor activation in the PRH. Hence, we have argued that there may be multiple cellular mechanisms underlying encoding of information for the short or long term. The present study contrasts with these findings as it demonstrates the necessity for muscarinic receptor activation for both short- and long-term object-in-place memory. Primate studies have indicated that a synergistic interaction between the cholinergic and glutamatergic systems plays an important role in the regulation of visual recognition memory (Matsuoka and Aigner 1996). Hence, further investigations are warranted to explore such interactions in the rat; for example, an interaction between NMDA and muscarinic receptor neurotransmission may mediate long-term recognition memory, while a kainate–muscarinic receptor interaction may mediate short-term recognition memory. Further, the extent to which the contribution of the cholinergic system to encoding of object-in-place memory within the PRH-mPFC system is the same for both short- or long-term memory is unknown.Our results have demonstrated that when a subject is required to use information concerning an association between an object and a place to produce a behavioral response, muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the mPFC are involved. Further, the object-in-place task requires the subject to acquire and remember the topographical relationship between the objects, a process that is known to depend upon the parietal cortex (Goodrich-Hunsaker et al. 2005). The precise contribution of object and spatial information processing in the parietal cortex to the operation of the PRH-mPFC circuit has yet to be determined.In conclusion, the cholinergic projections to the PRH and mPFC originating in the basal forebrain (Wenk et al. 1980) are an important component of the neural mechanisms underlying short- and long-term object-in-place associative memory.     

The effects of list-method directed forgetting on recognition memory

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois It is an almost universally accepted claim that the list-method procedure of inducing directed forgetting does not affect recognition. However, previous studies have omitted a critical comparison in reaching this conclusion. This article reports evidence that recognition of material learnedafter cue presentation is superior for conditions in which the material that preceded cue presentation was designated as to-be-forgotten. Because the absence of an effect of directed-forgetting instructions on recognition is the linchpin of the theoretical claim that retrieval inhibition and not selective rehearsal underlies that effect, the present results call into question the need to postulate a role for inhibition in directed forgetting.     

Context and repetition effects in recognition memory

The demonstration of a repetition effect in recognition memory when context at the time of test is different from that occurring during presentation places limits on the role played by context in interpretations of recognition memory. Four experiments are reported that explore those limits, including a situation in which the repetition effect does not obtain due to the nature of the context. The data are interpreted in terms of the important interaction between item information and contextual information in theoretical accounts of recognition memory.     

Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory

This study argues for the importance of physical word features in recognition memory by investigating the influence of orthographic distinctiveness. Experiment 1 demonstrated a mirror effect in ayes/no recognition test by manipulating orthographic neighborhood size. Words with small neighborhoods showed more hits and fewer false alarms than did words with larger neighborhoods. Experiment 2 replicated the neighborhood size mirror effect using null pairs in a forced choice recognition test. Experiment 3 required remember/know judgments in a yes/no recognition task. Experiment 4 used the same yes/no test as did Experiment 1, adding a study task that drew attention away from orthographic information in the study list. The mirror pattern disappeared with the addition of the study task.     

The Effects of L-glucose on memory in mice are modulated by peripherally acting cholinergic drugs.

D-Glucose improves memory in animals and humans and in subjects with memory pathologies. To date, the accepted conclusion drawn from animal research is that D-glucose improves memory via alterations in central cholinergic systems. However, recent evidence suggests that a sugar which does not cross the blood-brain barrier also facilitates memory (Talley, Arankowsky-Sandoval, McCarty, & Gold, 1999). The present study examined the effects of peripherally administered L-glucose, a stereoisomer of D-glucose, in male mice. Intraperitoneal administration of L-glucose (300 mg/kg) before testing enhanced place learning in the Morris water maze. Mice injected with L-glucose had significantly shorter escape latencies than mice injected with saline (1 ml/kg). Effects were observed on both reference memory and working memory tasks. L-Glucose did not facilitate performance on either task when it was simultaneously administered with cholinergic antagonists that are excluded from the central nervous system. Thus, simultaneous administration of either methyl-scopolamine (0.3 mg/kg), a peripherally acting muscarinic receptor blocker, or hexamethonium (1 mg/kg), a peripherally acting nicotinic receptor blocker, reversed the effect of L-glucose on memory. These findings suggest that the memory effects of l-glucose may be mediated by facilitated acetylcholine synthesis and/or release in the peripheral nervous system.     

The effects of intravenous diazepam and hyoscine upon human memory

Diazepam and hyoscine are known to have amnesic effects when administered intravenously. The two drugs are pharmacologically quite different from each other and might be expected to produce qualitatively distinct patterns of impairment in formal memory tasks. Groups of normal volunteers received intravenous administrations of diazepam, hyoscine and saline following a double-blind procedure and were then tested on immediate serial recall. Diazepam and hyoscine produced similar deficits on concrete and abstract words whether scored for ordered recall or item recall. In terms of ordered recall, phonemic similarity produced impaired performance under all three administrations, but semantic similarity did not. In terms of item recall, diazepam and hyoscine produced impaired performance on unrelated words, but the impairment was reduced under conditions of either phonemic or semantic similarity. There were also some interesting differences between diazepam and hyoscine in terms of their effects upon the shape of the serial-position curve and upon the types of intrusion error. The results confirm that both diazepam and hyoscine impair acquisition processes but fail to distinguish the effects of the two drugs upon different categories of encoding operations.     

The effects of physostigmine and scopolamine on recognition memory in monkeys

The visual recognition of rhesus monkeys was evaluated by means of a delayed nonmatching-to-sample task with trial-unique objects. Each daily session consisted of two lists of 20 objects each, which untreated animals were able to recognize at approximately 75% accuracy. When they were performing at this level reliably, doses of physostigmine (0.32, 1.0, 3.2, 10.0, 32.0, 56.0 micrograms/kg), scopolamine (1.0, 3.2, 5.6, 10.0, 17.8, 32.0 micrograms/kg), or saline were administered 20 min prior to the session. Physostigmine and scopolamine produced dose-related increases and decreases, respectively, in the number of objects correctly remembered. The systematic changes in performance support the view that cholinergic mechanisms contribute to recognition memory and suggest that tasks with trial-unique objects may be particularly useful for studying the mnemonic effects of cholinergic drugs.     

The effects of symmetry and contour on recognition memory in children

Children in prekindergarten, kindergarten, and second grade were tested on a delayed match-to-sample task using abstract visual patterns. The patterns varied both in type of visual organization (unstructured, diagonally symmetrical, vertically symmetrical, and horizontally symmetrical) and in amount of contour. Following the initial memory task, we attempted to train half of the children at each grade by directing their attention to axes of symmetry; the other half of the children received a control task. Subsequently, the subjects were given a second delayed match-to-sample test. On both pre- and post-training trials, structure influenced performance, especially in the two younger groups. Vertical and horizontal symmetry generally facilitated performance in the prekindergarteners, while all three types of symmetry facilitated performance in the kindergarteners. In addition, children generally responded more accurately to patterns with lower levels of contour. They also made more like-contour than unlike-contour confusions, indicating that quantitative aspects of patterns were encoded. Group differences suggested that both processing capacity and memory increase during the age range studied. Finally, there was no indication that training improved performance at any age.     

Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory

One widely acknowledged way to improve our memory performance is to repeatedly study the to be learned material. One aspect that has received little attention in past research regards the context sensitivity of this repetition effect, that is whether the item is repeated within the same or within different contexts. The predictions of a neuro-computational model (O’Reilly & Norman, 2002) were tested in an experiment requiring participants to study visual objects either once or three times. Crucially, for half of the repeated objects the study context (encoding task, background color and screen position) remained the same (within context repetition) while for the other half the contextual features changed across repetitions (across context repetition). In addition to behavioral measures, event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded that provide complementary information on the underlying neural mechanisms during recognition. Consistent with dual-process models behavioral estimates (remember/know-procedure) demonstrate differential effects of context on memory performance, namely that recognition judgements were more dependent on familiarity when repetition occurs across contexts. In accordance with these behavioral results ERPs showed a larger early frontal old/new effect for across context repetitions as compared to within context repetitions and single presentations, i.e. an increase in familiarity following repetition across study contexts. In contrast, the late parietal old/new effect, indexing recollection did not differ between both repetition conditions. These results suggest that repetition differentially affects familiarity depending on whether it occurs within the same context or across different contexts.     

The effects of memory load and delay on facial recognition

This experiment examined the effects of memory load over three periods of delay. Following presentation of 20, 35, or 50 targets, subjects were required to select these from an equal number of distractors 10 min, 1 week, or 2 weeks later. Increased target load (independent of increases in recognition load) decreased accuracy mainly by decreasing hit rate. Increasing delay decreased accuracy largely as a result of an increased false alarm rate. Most individual ROC curves, plotted on z-coordinates, had slopes < 1. Implications of this finding for the use of d' are discussed.     

Imagery and recognition memory: The effects of relational organization

Begg (1978), among others, has recently argued that recognition performance is independent of the size and number of units stored in memory, that is, the degree of interitem organization. In four experiments, interactive imagery was contrasted with separation imagery on recognition memory. In the first two studies, the recognition of single words was better under separation instructions; in the final studies, in which recognition of pairs of words was required, performance was better following interactive imagery. Rather than being independent of the size of memory units, recognition depends upon the relationship between the size of the units encoded at learning and the nature of the test items themselves.