共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Philip Egan 《新多明我会修道士》2004,85(996):251-252
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
《新多明我会修道士》2009,90(1025):138-140
16.
17.
Angelo Fernandes 《The Ecumenical review》1970,22(3):222-250
18.
Rawls' requirement that citizens of liberal democracies support only policies which they believe can be justified in 'public reason' depends on a certain ideal for the relationships between citizens. This is a valuable ideal, and thus citizens have reasons to try to achieve it. But it is not always possible to find the common ground that we would need in order to do so, and thus we should reject Rawls' strong claim that we have an obligation to defend our views in public reason. Because I recognize that we have strong reasons to conduct our political enquiry within the guidelines of political liberalism, but deny that we always have an obligation to do so, one might call my view 'permissive political liberalism'. 相似文献
19.
20.
John Deschner 《The Ecumenical review》1972,24(4):447-458