Emotional memory formation is enhanced across sleep intervals with high amounts of rapid eye movement sleep

Recent studies indicated a selective activation during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep of the amygdala known to play a decisive role in the processing of emotional stimuli. This study compared memory retention of emotional versus neutral text material over intervals covering either early sleep known to be dominated by nonREM slow wave sleep (SWS) or late sleep, in which REM sleep is dominant. Two groups of men were tested across 3-h periods of early and late sleep (sleep group) or corresponding retention intervals filled with wakefulness (wake group). Sleep was recorded polysomnographically. Cortisol concentrations in saliva were monitored at acquisition and retrieval testing. As expected, the amount of REM sleep was about three times greater during late than during early retention sleep, whereas a reversed pattern was observed for SWS distribution (P<0.001). Sleep improved retention, compared with the effects of wake intervals (P<0.02). However, this effect was substantial only in the late night (P<0.005), during which retention was generally worse than during the early night (P<0.02). Late sleep particularly enhanced memory for emotional texts. This effect was highly significant in comparison with memory for neutral texts (P<0.01) and in comparison with memory after late and early wake intervals (P<0.001). Cortisol concentration differed between early and late retention intervals but not between sleep and wake conditions. Results are consonant with a supportive function of REM sleep predominating late sleep for the formation of emotional memory in humans.     

Sleep in children improves memory performance on declarative but not procedural tasks

Sleep supports the consolidation of memory in adults. Childhood is a period hallmarked by huge demands of brain plasticity as well as great amounts of efficient sleep. Whether sleep supports memory consolidation in children as in adults is unclear. We compared effects of nocturnal sleep (versus daytime wakefulness) on consolidation of declarative (word-pair associates, two-dimensional [2D] object location), and procedural memories (finger sequence tapping) in 15 children (6-8 yr) and 15 adults. Beneficial effects of sleep on retention of declarative memories were comparable in children and adults. However, opposite to adults, children showed smaller improvement in finger-tapping skill across retention sleep than wakefulness, indicating that sleep-dependent procedural memory consolidation depends on developmental stage.     

Memory consolidation during sleep: interactive effects of sleep stages and HPA regulation

Sleep is critically involved in the consolidation of previously acquired memory traces. However, nocturnal sleep is not uniform but is subject to distinct changes in electrophysiological and neuroendocrine activity. Specifically, the first half of the night is dominated by slow wave sleep (SWS), whereas rapid eye movement (REM) sleep prevails in the second half. Concomitantly, hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity as indicated by cortisol release is suppressed to a minimum during early sleep, while drastically increasing during late sleep. We have shown that the different sleep stages and the concomitant glucocorticoid release are interactively involved in the consolidation of different types of memories. SWS-rich early sleep has been demonstrated to benefit mainly the consolidation of hippocampus-dependent declarative memories (i.e. facts and episodes). In contrast, REM sleep-rich late sleep was shown to improve in particular emotional memories involving amygdalar function, as well as procedural memories (for skills) not depending on hippocampal or amygdalar function. Enhancing plasma glucocorticoid concentrations during SWS-rich early sleep counteracted hippocampus-dependent declarative memory consolidation, but did not affect hippocampus-independent procedural memory. Preventing the increase in cortisol during late REM sleep-rich sleep by administration of metyrapone impaired hippocampus-dependent declarative memory but enhanced amygdala-dependent emotional aspects of memory. The data underscore the importance of pituitary-adrenal inhibition during early SWS-rich sleep for efficient consolidation of declarative memory. The increase in cortisol release during late REM sleep-rich sleep may counteract an overshooting consolidation of emotional memories.     

Sleep's function in the spontaneous recovery and consolidation of memories

Building on 2 previous studies (B. R. Ekstrand, 1967; B. R. Ekstrand, M. J. Sullivan, D. F. Parker, & J. N. West, 1971), the authors present 2 experiments that were aimed at characterizing the role of retroactive interference in sleep-associated declarative memory consolidation. Using an A-B, A-C paradigm with lists of word pairs in Experiment 1, the authors showed that sleep provides recovery from retroactive interference induced at encoding, whereas no such recovery was seen in several wake control conditions. Noninterfering word-pair lists were used in Experiment 2 (A-B, C-D). Sleeping after learning, in comparison with waking after learning, enhanced retention of both lists to a similar extent when encoding was less intense because of less list repetition and briefer word-pair presentations. With intense encoding, sleep-associated improvements were not seen for either list. In combination, the results indicate that the benefit of sleep for declarative memory consolidation is greater for weaker associations, regardless of whether weak associations result from retroactive interference or poor encoding.     

Declarative memory consolidation: mechanisms acting during human sleep

Of late, an increasing number of studies have shown a strong relationship between sleep and memory. Here we summarize a series of our own studies in humans supporting a beneficial influence of slow-wave sleep (SWS) on declarative memory formation, and try to identify some mechanisms that might underlie this influence. Specifically, these experiments show that declarative memory benefits mainly from sleep periods dominated by SWS, whereas there is no consistent benefit of this memory from periods rich in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. A main mechanism of declarative memory formation is believed to be the reactivation of newly acquired memory representations in hippocampal networks that stimulates a transfer and integration of these representations into neocortical neuronal networks. Consistent with this model, spindle activity and slow oscillation-related EEG coherence increase during early sleep after intense declarative learning in humans, signs that together point toward a neocortical reprocessing of the learned material. In addition, sleep seems to provide an optimal milieu for declarative memory reprocessing and consolidation by reducing cholinergic activation and the cortisol feedback to the hippocampus during SWS.     

Remembering specific features of emotional events across time: The role of REM sleep and prefrontal theta oscillations

When an episode of emotional significance is encountered, it often results in the formation of a highly resistant memory representation that is easily retrieved for many succeeding years. Recent research shows that beyond generic consolidation processes, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep importantly contributes to this effect. However, the boundary conditions of consolidation processes during REM sleep, specifically whether these extend to source memory, have not been examined extensively. The current study tested the effects of putative consolidation processes emerging during REM sleep and slow wave sleep (SWS) on item and source memory of negative and neutral images, respectively. Results demonstrate superior emotional relative to neutral item memory retention after both late night REM sleep and early night SWS. Emotional source memory, on the other hand, exhibited an attenuated decline following late night REM sleep, whereas neutral source memory was selectively preserved across early night SWS. This pattern of results suggests a selective preservation of emotional source memory during REM sleep that is functionally dissociable from SWS-dependent reprocessing of neutral source memory. This was further substantiated by a neurophysiological dissociation: Postsleep emotional source memory was selectively correlated with frontal theta lateralization (REM sleep), whereas postsleep neutral item memory was correlated with SWS spindle power. As such, the present results contribute to a more comprehensive characterization of sleep-related consolidation mechanisms underlying emotional and neutral memory retention. Subsidiary analysis of emotional reactivity to previously encoded material revealed an enhancing rather than attenuating effect of late night REM sleep on emotional responses.     

Sleep in children enhances preferentially emotional declarative but not procedural memories

Although the consolidation of several memory systems is enhanced by sleep in adults, recent studies suggest that sleep supports declarative memory but not procedural memory in children. In the current study, the influence of sleep on emotional declarative memory (recognition task) and procedural memory (mirror tracing task) in 20 healthy children (10-13 years of age) was examined. After sleep, children showed an improvement in declarative memory. Separate analysis with respect to the emotional stimulus content revealed that sleep enhances the recognition of emotional stimuli (p > .001) rather than neutral stimuli (p = .084). In the procedural task, however, no sleep-enhanced memory improvement was observed. The results indicate that sleep in children, comparable to adults, enhances predominantly emotional declarative memory; however, in contrast to adults, it has no effect on the consolidation of procedural memory.     

System consolidation of memory during sleep

Over the past two decades, research has accumulated compelling evidence that sleep supports the formation of long-term memory. The standard two-stage memory model that has been originally elaborated for declarative memory assumes that new memories are transiently encoded into a temporary store (represented by the hippocampus in the declarative memory system) before they are gradually transferred into a long-term store (mainly represented by the neocortex), or are forgotten. Based on this model, we propose that sleep, as an offline mode of brain processing, serves the ‘active system consolidation’ of memory, i.e. the process in which newly encoded memory representations become redistributed to other neuron networks serving as long-term store. System consolidation takes place during slow-wave sleep (SWS) rather than rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. The concept of active system consolidation during sleep implicates that (a) memories are reactivated during sleep to be consolidated, (b) the consolidation process during sleep is selective inasmuch as it does not enhance every memory, and (c) memories, when transferred to the long-term store undergo qualitative changes. Experimental evidence for these three central implications is provided: It has been shown that reactivation of memories during SWS plays a causal role for consolidation, that sleep and specifically SWS consolidates preferentially memories with relevance for future plans, and that sleep produces qualitative changes in memory representations such that the extraction of explicit and conscious knowledge from implicitly learned materials is facilitated.     

The contribution of sleep to hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation

There is now compelling evidence that sleep promotes the long-term consolidation of declarative and procedural memories. Behavioral studies suggest that sleep preferentially consolidates explicit aspects of these memories, which during encoding are possibly associated with activation in prefrontal-hippocampal circuitry. Hippocampus-dependent declarative memory benefits particularly from slow-wave sleep (SWS), whereas rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep seems to benefit procedural aspects of memory. Consolidation of hippocampus-dependent memories relies on a dialog between the neocortex and hippocampus. Crucial features of this dialog are the neuronal reactivation of new memories in the hippocampus during SWS, which stimulates the redistribution of memory representations to neocortical networks; and the neocortical slow (<1Hz) oscillation that synchronizes hippocampal-to-neocortical information transfer to activity in other brain structures.     

Reactivation and Consolidation of Memory During Sleep

ABSTRACT— Recent research has shown compellingly that sleep supports the consolidation of declarative memories for events and facts. During consolidation, memories are stabilized against future interference and undergo qualitative changes with regard to their "explicitness" and underlying neural representation. In this article, we argue that declarative memory consolidation during sleep is based on covert reactivations of newly encoded memory traces in the hippocampus. During slow-wave sleep (SWS), the prominent slow oscillations act to synchronize the repeated reactivation of the newly encoded representations in hippocampal networks with the generation of spindle activity in the thalamus, supporting changes in neocortical networks that contribute to long-term memory storage. In this view, sleep plays an active role in the consolidation of memories, in which the neuronal reactivation of newly acquired memories is critical for the redistribution and integration of these memories into the network of pre-existing long-term memories.     

What drives sleep-dependent memory consolidation: Greater gain or less loss?

When memory is tested after a delay, performance is typically better if the retention interval includes sleep. However, it is unclear what accounts for this well-established effect. It is possible that sleep enhances the retrieval of information, but it is also possible that sleep protects against memory loss that normally occurs during waking activity. We developed a new research approach to investigate these possibilities. Participants learned a list of paired-associate items and were tested on the items after a 12-h interval that included waking or sleep. We analyzed the number of items gained versus the number of items lost across time. The sleep condition showed more items gained and fewer items lost than did the wake condition. Furthermore, the difference between the conditions (favoring sleep) in lost items was greater than the difference in gain, suggesting that loss prevention may primarily account for the effect of sleep on declarative memory consolidation. This finding may serve as an empirical constraint on theories of memory consolidation.     

Slow wave sleep during a daytime nap is necessary for protection from subsequent interference and long-term retention

While it is now generally accepted that sleep facilitates the processing of newly acquired declarative information, questions still remain as to the type and length of sleep necessary to best benefit declarative memories. A better understanding could lend support in one direction or another as to the much-debated role of sleep, be it passive, permissive, or active, in memory processing. The present study employed a napping paradigm and compared performance on a bimodal paired-associates task of those who obtained a 10-min nap, containing only Stages 1 and 2 sleep, to those whose nap contained slow-wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (60-min nap), as well as to subjects who remained awake. Measurements were obtained for baseline performance at training, after a sleep/no sleep interval for short-term retention, after a subsequent stimulus-related interference task, and again after a weeklong retention period. While all groups learned the information similarly, both nap groups performed better than the Wake group when examining short-term retention, approximately 1.5h after training (10-min p=.052, 60-min p=.002). However, performance benefits seen in the 10-min nap group proved to be temporary. Performance after a stimulus-related interference task revealed significantly better memory retention in the 60-min nap group, with interference disrupting the memory trace far less than both the Wake and 10-min nap groups (p<.001, p=.006, respectively). After a weeklong retention period, sleep's benefit to memory persisted in the 60-min nap group, with performance significantly greater than both the Wake and 10-min nap groups (p<.001, p=.004, respectively). It is our conclusion that SWS, obtained only by those in the 60-min nap group, served to actively facilitate the consolidation of learned bimodal paired-associates, supported by theories such as the Standard Theory of Consolidation as well as the Synaptic Homeostasis Hypothesis.     

Slow wave sleep and recollection in recognition memory

Recognition memory performance reflects two distinct memory processes: a conscious process of recollection, which allows remembering specific details of a previous event, and familiarity, which emerges in the absence of any conscious information about the context in which the event occurred. Slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep are differentially involved in the consolidation of different types of memory. The study assessed the effects of SWS and REM sleep on recollection, by means of the "remember"/"know" paradigm. Subjects studied three blocks of 12 words before a 3-h retention interval filled with SWS, REM sleep or wakefulness, placed between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m. Afterwards, recognition and recollection were tested. Recollection was higher after a retention interval rich in SWS than after a retention interval rich in REM sleep or filled with wakefulness. The results suggest that SWS facilitates the process of recollection in recognition memory.     

原发性失眠对睡眠依赖性记忆巩固的影响及机制

现代社会的失眠问题异常突出,其对睡眠依赖性记忆巩固（SDC）的影响日益引起重视。目前,原发性失眠（PI）对陈述性及程序性记忆SDC的影响存在分歧。梳理以往研究发现,系统巩固假说和突触稳态假说支持睡眠结构紊乱及脑结构异常可能是PI患者SDC损伤的潜在脑机制。未来研究可考虑同步采集行为、脑电和脑成像数据,深入探究PI影响SDC的脑机制,并验证上述假说;还可尝试通过经颅电/磁刺激和目标记忆重激活等无创性干预措施改善PI患者的SDC效应。     

Immediate as well as delayed post learning sleep but not wakefulness enhances declarative memory consolidation in children

While there is mounting evidence for the importance of sleep for declarative memory consolidation in adults, so far this issue has not been investigated in children despite considerable differences in sleep duration and sleep architecture between children and adults. Here, 27 children (aged between 9 and 12yr) were examined on two conditions: on the Sleep-Wake condition, subjects learned word pairs in the evening and delayed recall was tested first in the next morning after sleep and then again in the following evening after daytime wakefulness. On the Wake-Sleep condition, learning took place in the morning and delayed recall was tested in the evening of the same day and again in the next morning after sleep. In both conditions retention of declarative memory was significantly increased only after an interval of sleep that either followed immediately after learning (as in the Sleep-Wake condition) or that followed after daytime wakefulness (as in the Wake-Sleep condition), respectively. The results support the hypothesis that sleep plays an active role in declarative memory consolidation even if delayed and further show for the first time the importance of sleep for declarative memory consolidation during childhood.     

Sleep enhances explicit recollection in recognition memory

Recognition memory is considered to be supported by two different memory processes, i.e., the explicit recollection of information about a previous event and an implicit process of recognition based on an acontextual sense of familiarity. Both types of memory supposedly rely on distinct memory systems. Sleep is known to enhance the consolidation of memories, with the different sleep stages affecting different types of memory. In the present study, we used the process-dissociation procedure to compare the effects of sleep on estimates of explicit (recollection) and implicit (familiarity) memory formation on a word-list discrimination task. Subjects studied two lists of words before a 3-h retention interval of sleep or wakefulness, and recognition was tested afterward. The retention intervals were positioned either in the early night when sleep is dominated by slow-wave sleep (SWS), or in the late night, when sleep is dominated by REM sleep. Sleep enhanced explicit recognition memory, as compared with wakefulness (P < 0.05), whereas familiarity was not affected by sleep. Moreover, explicit recognition was particularly enhanced after sleep in the early-night retention interval, and especially when the words were presented with the same contextual features as during learning, i.e., in the same font (P < 0.05). The data indicate that in a task that allows separating the contribution of explicit and implicit memory, sleep particularly supports explicit memory formation. The mechanism of this effect appears to be linked to SWS.     

Offline consolidation of memory varies with time in slow wave sleep and can be accelerated by cuing memory reactivations

Memory representations are reactivated during slow-wave sleep (SWS) after learning, and these reactivations cause a beneficial effect of sleep for memory consolidation. Memory reactivations can also be externally triggered during sleep by associated cues which enhance the sleep-dependent memory consolidation process. Here, we compared in humans the influence of sleep periods (i) of 40min and (ii) of 90min without externally triggered reactivations and (iii) of externally triggered reactivations by an associated odor cue during a 40-min sleep period on the consolidation of previously learned hippocampus-dependent visuo-spatial memories. We show that external reactivation by an odor cue during the 40-min sleep period enhanced memory stability to the same extent as 90min of sleep without odor reactivation. In contrast, 40min of sleep without external reactivations were not sufficient to benefit memory. In the 90-min sleep condition, memory enhancements were associated with time spent in SWS and were independent of the presence or absence of REM sleep. These results suggest that the efficacy of hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation depends on the duration of sleep and particularly SWS. External reactivation cues can accelerate the consolidation process even during shorter sleep episodes.     

Involvement of spindles in memory consolidation is slow wave sleep-specific

Both sleep spindles and slow oscillations have been implicated in sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Whereas spindles occur during both light and deep sleep, slow oscillations are restricted to deep sleep, raising the possibility of greater consolidation-related spindle involvement during deep sleep. We assessed declarative memory retention over an interval containing a nap and determined spindle density for light and deep sleep separately. In deep sleep, spindle density was considerably higher and showed a strong and robust positive correlation with retention. This relation was absent for light sleep, suggesting that the potentiating effects of spindles are tied to their co-occurrence with slow oscillations.     

‘Sleep-dependent’ memory consolidation? Brief periods of post-training rest and sleep provide an equivalent benefit for both declarative and procedural memory

Sleep following learning facilitates the consolidation of memories. This effect has often been attributed to sleep-specific factors, such as the presence of sleep spindles or slow waves in the electroencephalogram (EEG). However, recent studies suggest that simply resting quietly while awake could confer a similar memory benefit. In the current study, we examined the effects of sleep, quiet rest, and active wakefulness on the consolidation of declarative and procedural memory. We hypothesized that sleep and eyes-closed quiet rest would both benefit memory compared with a period of active wakefulness. After completing a declarative and a procedural memory task, participants began a 30-min retention period with PSG (polysomnographic) monitoring, in which they either slept (n = 24), quietly rested with their eyes closed (n = 22), or completed a distractor task (n = 29). Following the retention period, participants were again tested on their memory for the two learning tasks. As hypothesized, sleep and quiet rest both led to better performance on the declarative and procedural memory tasks than did the distractor task. Moreover, the performance advantages conferred by rest were indistinguishable from those of sleep. These data suggest that neurobiology specific to sleep might not be necessary to induce the consolidation of memory, at least across very short retention intervals. Instead, offline memory consolidation may function opportunistically, occurring during either sleep or stimulus-free rest, provided a favorable neurobiological milieu and sufficient reduction of new encoding.

Of the myriad new experiences we encode each day, only a fraction are remembered over the long-term. The formation of long-term memory is crucial for optimal functioning in our everyday lives and for building knowledge across days, weeks, and years. Such enduring memories require not only the effective encoding of new information, but also a set of postencoding processes, termed “consolidation,” that function to stabilize and transform new memory traces over time (McGaugh 2000; Frankland and Bontempi 2005; Genzel and Wixted 2017).Consolidation of memory is better supported by some states of consciousness than others. For example, sleep has long been known to optimize memory consolidation, purportedly due to specific neurobiology that actively promotes the consolidation process (Diekelmann and Born 2010). Numerous studies have demonstrated that sleep facilitates the consolidation of both declarative and procedural memories. Slow oscillations (Huber et al. 2004; Marshall et al. 2006) and slow wave sleep (SWS) (Alger et al. 2012; Diekelmann et al. 2012) are thought to especially benefit hippocampus-dependent, declarative memory. Meanwhile, various forms of implicit and procedural memory have been linked to rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (Plihal and Born 1997; Mednick et al. 2009) or non-REM stage 2 (N2) sleep (Walker et al. 2002; Tucker and Fishbein 2009).A potential mechanism of offline memory consolidation during sleep is memory “reactivation,” in which patterns of neural activity in the hippocampus and cortex associated with awake experience are reiterated after learning. For example, when rats sleep after being trained on a spatial learning task, hippocampal “place cells” fire again in the same order as when the animals were being trained on the task during wake (Lee and Wilson 2002; Ji and Wilson 2007). Such neural reactivation not only occurs in the hippocampus, but also concurrently in a variety of cortical areas (Ji and Wilson 2007; Peyrache et al. 2009; Kaefer et al. 2020). The recent advent of optogenetics has allowed experimental investigation of memory reactivation in animal models. Experimentally disrupting the hippocampal ripple oscillations during which reactivation occurs impairs memory (Girardeau et al. 2009; Ego-Stengel and Wilson 2010). Conversely, selectively reactivating neural ensembles related to a particular memory appears to induce consolidation, particularly when this manipulation is applied during sleep or light amnesia (de Sousa et al. 2019).But is sleep the only brain state that facilitates memory consolidation in this way? It has been argued that sleep-specific neurobiology, including sleep slow waves (Alger et al. 2012), sleep spindles (Wamsley et al. 2012; Mednick et al. 2013; Laventure et al. 2016), and/or REM sleep (Karni et al. 1994; Stickgold et al. 2000; McDevitt et al. 2015; Boyce et al. 2016), is required for offline memory reactivation and consolidation to occur, or at least to occur optimally. However, a growing body of literature indicates that stimulus-free waking rest can similarly facilitate consolidation (Wamsley 2019). In two influential experiments, Dewar et al. (2012) demonstrated that compared with participants who completed a nonverbal distractor task, those who rested quietly with their eyes closed in a darkened room for 10 min after learning showed better memory for short stories encoded prior to the retention period. The rest group significantly outperformed the wake group after 15 min, 30 min, and 7 d (experiment 1), even in the absence of retrieval practice during the 7-d period (experiment 2).This effect of post-training rest on memory retention has been reported in an increasing number of papers across the last decade (Gottselig et al. 2004; Mercer 2015; Martini et al. 2018; Wamsley 2019; Martini and Sachse 2020). Brokaw et al. (2016) replicated the behavioral observations of Dewar et al. (2012) and showed that this memory benefit was associated with EEG slow oscillation activity, which is thought to facilitate hippocampal–cortical communication and concomitant memory consolidation during sleep (Marshall et al. 2006; Mölle and Born 2011). A recent study by Sattari et al. (2019) also linked improved memory performance to waking EEG slow oscillations, suggesting that the memory-enhancing effects of rest and sleep may share a common mechanism.Of course, it has been known for decades that at least some consolidation must occur during wakefulness. Local, cellular level consolidation begins to stabilize memory immediately following encoding (Bailey and Kandel 2008; Redondo and Morris 2011), enabling us to recall the events of the previous hours in the absence of intervening sleep. The novel suggestion of these more recent studies is that consolidation does not occur equivalently during all types of wakefulness (Dewar et al. 2012; Brokaw et al. 2016). Instead, stimulus-free rest periods appear to have features that are especially suited to facilitate memory.Reduced sensory processing during eyes-closed rest may be one factor accounting for the memory facilitation effect. However, even internally generated stimuli can also function to block consolidation, as demonstrated by the fact that mental tasks such as retrieval of autobiographical memory and focused meditation are also associated with a reduction in rest''s memory benefit (Craig et al. 2014; Collins and Wamsley 2020). Similarly, we reported in two previous studies that individuals with a high propensity for daydreaming show less memory benefit following a period of rest, presumably because intense internally generated mental activity inhibits consolidation (Humiston et al. 2019; Wamsley and Summer 2020).Together, these observations suggest that consolidation occurs during wakefulness when sensory processing is reduced, when low-frequency EEG oscillations are increased, and when internally generated cognition is at a minimum. Therefore, consolidation may not depend on neural mechanisms specific to sleep, instead opportunistically occurring across multiple states of consciousness whenever the correct conditions are met (Mednick et al. 2011). According to the opportunistic theory of memory consolidation, the processes of encoding and consolidation are mutually exclusive: During any brain state in which we are not currently encoding new information, existing memories consolidate as the neural milieu becomes favorable (Mednick et al. 2011; Wamsley 2019). Unoccupied quiet rest, like sleep, is a state in which the encoding of new stimuli is reduced. In addition, quiet rest and sleep also share a number of neurobiological features that are thought to actively promote memory consolidation, including overall slower EEG in comparison with active wakefulness, increased activation of default-mode network brain structures (Buckner and Vincent 2007), and decreased levels of acetylcholine in the brain (Hasselmo and McGaughy 2004). Additionally, the cellular-level offline reactivation of memory occurs not only during sleep, but also during quiet rest (Foster and Wilson 2006; Karlsson and Frank 2009; Carr et al. 2011; Staresina et al. 2013). At the same time, it must be noted that eyes-closed rest does not replicate all aspects of sleep neurobiology proposed to facilitate memory. For example, sleep spindle oscillations and sleep-specific neurohormonal changes are not present during eyes-closed rest.While sleep and rest both benefit memory in comparison with active wakefulness, it is not known whether they do so equivalently. With few studies directly comparing the size of rest''s memory benefit with that of sleep, it remains possible that sleep provides some benefit above and beyond that conferred by waking rest. The limited number of prior studies in this area have shown mixed results. As opposed to the type of truly task-free condition used in the waking rest studies reviewed above, most experiments comparing active wakefulness, rest, and sleep have used a “rest” condition in which participants are asked to complete an undemanding activity such as listening to music or books on tape. This approach sacrifices complete sensory restriction in return for allowing rest condition participants to maintain wakefulness for longer periods of time. For example, Mednick and colleagues have used quiet rest conditions in which participants listen to music or audiobooks, finding that this form of quiet rest facilitates memory equivalently to sleep for some forms of learning (Mednick et al. 2009; Sattari et al. 2019), but not for others (Mednick et al. 2002; McDevitt et al. 2014). Keeping rest participants awake via verbal instructions to alternately open and close their eyes, Simor et al. (2018) found no effect of post-training rest or sleep on performance of a serial reaction time task, relative to an active wake control. While these observations might indicate that only selected forms of memory can be consolidated during resting wakefulness, it is possible that the encoding of meaningful auditory stimuli during these rest conditions prevents optimal consolidation.Only a few prior studies have compared the memory effects of sleep with those of an equivalent duration of eyes-closed, entirely task-free rest. For example, Gottselig et al. (2004) successfully compared the effects of sleep, quiet rest, and active wakefulness on memory consolidation using a carefully controlled rest condition without any stimuli presented to the participants. Using a statistical auditory sequence learning task, they reported that both sleep and rest equivalently facilitated retention. In contrast, using a declarative memory task, Piosczyk et al. (2013) found that neither quiet rest nor sleep improved memory more than active wakefulness. A recent study from our own laboratory directly compared sleep, rest, and active wakefulness using declarative and procedural tasks commonly used in studies of sleep and memory (Tucker et al. 2020). However, high rates of attrition (due to rest participants inadvertently falling asleep and sleep participants failing to obtain sleep) prevented a robust test of our hypothesis that sleep and quiet rest would equivalently benefit memory, relative to active wakefulness.The goal of the current study was to directly compare the memory benefit of a brief nap (<30 min) with that of an equivalent duration of task-free quiet rest. We hypothesized that a brief period of sleep and quiet rest would have an equivalent effect on the consolidation of both declarative and procedural memories, significantly boosting memory retention compared with an equivalent duration of active wakefulness. Following our previous work, we expected that memory retention across sleep and quiet rest would be associated with slow oscillation EEG power in the <1-Hz range, but that participants with high trait daydreaming propensity would show less improvement across quiet rest.     

Changes in processing of masked stimuli across early- and late-night sleep: a study on behavior and brain potentials

Sleep has proven to support the memory consolidation in many tasks including learning of perceptual skills. Explicit, conscious types of memory have been demonstrated to benefit particularly from slow-wave sleep (SWS), implicit, non-conscious types particularly from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. By comparing the effects of early-night sleep, rich in SWS, and late-night sleep, rich in REM sleep, we aimed to separate the contribution of these two sleep stages in a metacontrast masking paradigm in which explicit and implicit aspects in perceptual learning could be assessed separately by stimulus identification and priming, respectively. We assumed that early sleep intervening between two sessions of task performance would specifically support stimulus identification, while late sleep would specifically support priming. Apart from overt behavior, event-related EEG potentials (ERPs) were measured to record the cortical mechanisms associated with behavioral changes across sleep. In contrast to our hypothesis, late-night sleep appeared to be more important for changes of behavior, both for stimulus identification, which tended to improve across late-night sleep, and for priming, with the increase of errors induced by masked stimuli correlating with the duration of REM sleep. ERP components proved sensitive to presence of target shapes in the masked stimuli and to their priming effects. Of these components, the N2 component, indicating processing of conflict, became larger across early-night sleep and was related to the duration of S4 sleep, the deepest substage of SWS containing particularly high portions of EEG slow waves. These findings suggest that sleep promotes perceptual learning primarily by its REM sleep portion, but indirectly also by way of improved action monitoring supported by deep slow-wave sleep.