在小学语文课上培养学生的创新能力

正对学生进行创新教育是现代教学理念的核心要求,它能够促进学生的思维发展和创新能力的培养及提高。小学语文课堂教学的创新教育,要充分结合语文学科的独特性质和语言特点,通过挖掘教材中的创新因素、利用多媒体教学手段等激发学生学习语文、勇于创新的主观欲望,挖掘每一个学生的学习与创新潜能,培养学生的创新精神和创新能力。一、创设适于学生创造的教学情境,激发学生强烈的好奇心和创造欲望良好的课堂教学氛围是培养学     

溶创造教学于音乐教学之中

培养具有创新精神和实践能力的新型社会主义建设人材,离不开教育。而音乐是一门培养学生创造能力的重要学科。在音乐教学中用创造教学的方法和手段,发挥学生想象力、发掘创造性思维潜能,促使他们成为新世纪的创新人材具有非常重要的意义     

中小学生创造性倾向、智力及学业成绩的相关研究

本研究采用威廉斯创造性倾向量表和瑞文标准推理测验,结合中小学生语文、数学成绩,对524名中小学生进行创造性倾向、智力和学业成绩的相关研究.研究发现:(1)中小学生创造性倾向从小学到初中都处于发展阶段,高中以后基本趋于稳定,中小学生的智力一直处于发展增长趋势;(2)小学生的语文、数学成绩与创造性倾向总分有显著相关,初中生的数学成绩与创造性倾向总分以及四项行为特质都有显著相关,小学、初中和高中学生的语文、数学成绩与智力有显著相关;(3)小学中、低分段语文成绩和低分段数学成绩与其创造性倾向有显著相关,初中学生的语文成绩只有高分段与创造性倾向有显著相关,小学和高中语、数成绩三个分段学生的学业成绩跟智力显著相关.     

浅谈数学课堂教学中创新精神的培养

历史是前进的，文明是发展的，人类正是以自己的创造书写着自己的文明史。人类的任何创造都是思维之花结出的实践之果，没有成功的思维就没有成功的创造。在当前课程改革的过程中，课堂教学改革是主渠道，是关键。在课堂教学改革中要不断促进学生主体发展，培养学生的创新精神。思想是行动的先导，没有正确的理论指导，就很难有有效的教与学的实际活动。本人在小学数学课堂教学的实践中就培养学生的创新精神作了自己的一些探索和实验。     

在语文教学中注重发展学生的求异思维

素质教育一个极其重要的方面就是创新精神。小学语文作为一门基础学科,包含着丰富的创新内涵,我们必须转变教学观念,深化教学方法,结合语文听、说、读、写的训练,为学生创新能力培养创造“肥沃土壤”。作为一名小学教师,在小学这个基础教育阶段必须要致力于培养学生的创新意识,设法点燃学生心中的创新火花,从而逐步培养学生的创新能力。     

音乐教学中应注重创造性思维和创新精神的培养

教育是治国之本,有了教育人类才能得到净化,人的素质才能不断的提高.知识经济时代对具有创新型人才培养提出前所未有的紧迫要求,处在大教育背景之中的音乐教育同样面临机遇和挑战.所谓创新型人才就是具有创造性思维和创新精神的人.创新能力不仅是一个民族、一个国家赖以生存和进步的条件,也是衡量一个民族和国家是否富有生机和活力与持续发展的标志.主体性创造发展是教育的最高和最终目的.只有人的主体意识得到唤醒和培养,人才能以积极的态度,最大限度地发挥自身的力量,去认识世界,改造世界,推动社会整体发展.教育者必须站在人的发展的高度,去实施一种开放的、多元的、富于创意的教育模式,有目的和有针对性地组织教育活动,把受教育者培养成为能够积极主动地进行认识与创造的社会主体.由此看来开发学生的创造性思维,培养学生创新精神是音乐教育改革与发展中的重要课题.因此,本文主要从音乐教学的角度着重阐述音乐教学中培养创造性思维和创新精神的问题.     

美术教学应加强学生创新能力的培养

创新是美术学科所具有的显著特征,美术教育对创新能力的培养有突出作用。要美术教学中要通过更新教师的观念,提高学生创造能力;采现创新的教学方法,挖掘学生的潜能;改革评价机制,促进学生开放性、个性和创新意识、创新精神的形成。     

论石涛山水画中的创新精神

随着人们生活水平的不断提升,人们对绘画作品有了全新的理解与认识。石涛绘画艺术作品在当今仍然有着极强的艺术感染力与创造生命力,体现了"四王"作品的核心与精髓。石涛的绘画主要以生活为创作元素,其师法自然,打破了墨守成规的传统绘画方法,创造出新颖独特的绘画艺术品,被世人参考模仿。从石涛的艺术创新精神入手,并对其艺术创作精神的产生进行简要分析,通过对其绘画艺术中的创新精神体现进行深入的了解与分析,阐述了石涛山水画中创新精神对未来艺术发展的现实意义,促进了绘画艺术中的创新精神得以进一步延续。     

在城乡规划教育中培养创新精神的探讨

当前,我国经济进入重要的转型时期,各行各业的创新决定了转型的成功与否。对于大学教育来说,培养创新精神应当作为素质教育的核心。城乡规划专业的学生有可能是未来城乡发展政策的制定者,更需要有创新精神。而挖掘学生的潜力,就要注重学生创新与思考能力的培养,提高审美鉴赏力和认识问题的深度,把创新精神的培养列为学科教育的核心目标。相应的,作为教师也应该不断学习,积极进取,跟上社会经济发展的步伐,跟上知识更新的速度,把创新精神列入规划专业的素质教育核心体系中。     

促进企业组织创新的途径

本文认为企业成功的关键条件之一是企业组织的创新,企业管理的一项重要任务就是通过长期的努力,使企业成为具有创造与革新精神的组织。促进企业组织创新的途径主要包括三个方面:(1)选拨与录用具有创新精神的人员;(2)采取有利于创新的领导方式;(3)建立与强化积极的企业组织文化。文章就此进行了探讨,提出了一些具体措施。     

Proactive Personality and Employee Creativity: The Effects of Job Creativity Requirement and Supervisor Support for Creativity

This study examined the relationships between proactive personality and employee creativity and the moderating roles of job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity in activating proactive personality associated with employee creativity. To provide a rigorous test of the hypotheses, we conducted a field study from a sample of 157 employee–supervisor pairs in South Korea. The results revealed that a proactive personality was positively associated with employee creativity. In addition, job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity jointly influenced the relationship between proactive personality and employee creativity. Specifically, proactive employees exhibited the highest employee creativity when job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity were both high.     

艺术创造力的脑神经生理基础

艺术创造力(Artistic Creativity)是创造力领域特异性研究的重要成果。它是个体产生新颖、独特而具有审美或艺术价值产品的能力, 和科学创造力一样也属于个体创造力的范畴。研究通过对已有脑损伤研究和神经影像研究梳理, 归纳和总结了艺术创造力的脑神经基础, 指出艺术创造力与科学创造力的神经基础存在一定差异, 认为艺术创造力主要和大脑的额叶、颞叶以及颞顶联合皮层密切相关。未来研究则需进一步借助巧妙的实验设计, 在严格控制个体差异和文化效应的基础上来对艺术创造力的脑结构和功能基础进行更细致的探讨。     

状态与特质之分：来自社会创造性的证据

以整群取样的方式选取650名小学儿童,采用社会创造性故事情境问卷、小学儿童社会创造性倾向问卷,分别测量了儿童在问题情境中的社会创造性和日常生活中的社会创造性,同时采用小五人格学生问卷中的开放性分量表、Rosenberg(1965)编制的自尊量表以及互联网使用偏好问卷中的(网络交往)信息交流偏好分量表,考察了儿童问题情境中的社会创造性与日常生活中的社会创造性的特点和性质。结果表明:(1)二者的发展趋势有所不同,儿童在问题情境中的创造性得分总体上呈现“倒Z形”的发展趋势,而日常生活中的创造性倾向总体上呈现“U形”发展趋势;(2)两种社会创造性与经验开放性、自尊及网络交往(信息交流)偏好呈现不同的相关,日常生活中的社会创造性与经验开放性、自尊及网络交往偏好均具有极其显著的正相关,问题情境中的社会创造性与经验开放性、自尊之间也具有显著正相关,但相关系数较低,而且与网络交往偏好无显著相关;(3)经验开放性、自尊和网络交往偏好均可以显著地预测日常生活中的社会创造性,而难以预测问题情境中的社会创造性。这表明,社会创造性可能存在状态与特质之分。     

Artistic and Everyday Creativity: An Act‐Frequency Approach

Scholars often distinguish everyday creativity and creativity in more formal domains, such as the arts. However, everyday creativity has been rather neglected in research. This paper compares artistic and everyday creativity. Three studies examine the content of behavior in artistic and everyday creativity, as well as similarities and differences in their relationships with personality traits, psychological well‐being, and psychopathology. Typical artistic creativity acts referred to time investment in the arts, generation of art works, and achievement in the arts, whereas typical everyday creativity acts concerned humor and self‐expression in daily activities. Both kinds of creativity were related to openness to experience, a personality trait described as the disposition towards creativity. However, artistic creativity was related to higher rates of psychopathology, while everyday creativity was related to extraversion, conscientiousness, and personal growth.     

A Review on the Study of Creativity in Singapore

This paper reviews the study of creativity in Singapore. Three questions are asked. What is the current status of the study of creativity in Singapore? What kinds of creativity studies have been conducted? What are the future directions of Singaporean creativity research? PsycLIT and Eric databases, as well as resources in Singapore libraries such as journals, proceedings, and books are searched. The study of creativity is grouped into five categories, namely conceptual framework, conceptions of creativity (empirical), creative competence (empirical), creativity programs, and creative pedagogy. This review intends to contribute to the literature of creativity and the understanding of human creativity. Future directions of Singapore's creativity research should address several issues including theories or models, methods and instruments, the sample, research agenda, and research network.     

绩效薪酬对员工突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的影响

研究分别从认知评价理论和习得性努力理论视角考察了绩效薪酬对员工突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的影响及其作用机制, 并检验了变革型领导和交易型领导对上述两条路径的调节效应。基于24家企业的364对上下级匹配数据的研究结果表明：绩效薪酬对内在动机和突破性创造力没有显著的影响, 对外在动机和渐进性创造力有显著的正向影响。变革型领导调节绩效薪酬与突破性创造力的关系：高变革领导情境下, 绩效薪酬通过正向影响内在动机间接对突破性创造力产生正向影响; 低变革领导情境下, 绩效薪酬通过负向影响内在动机间接对突破性创造力产生负向影响。交易型领导调节绩效薪酬与渐进性创造力的关系：交易型领导通过强化绩效薪酬对外在动机的影响进而放大了绩效薪酬对渐进性创造力的正向效应。针对上述结果, 讨论了本文的理论与实践意义。     

Supporting Creativity Or Conformity? Influence of Home Environment and Parental Factors on the Value of Children's Creativity Characteristics

Although creativity is a desirable skill, parenting for creativity may be quite a challenge and may be less favored than parenting for conformity. The present study aims to investigate parent-related factors that may support creativity versus conformity at home. To this end, this study examined how parents’ attitudes and values toward creativity, creative home environment, and mindful parenting style are related to parents’ perceptions of creative versus socially acceptable characteristics. Analyses of the data collected from 1324 parents (predominantly mothers) indicated that parents were more supportive of creativity traits than socially acceptable characteristics. Most importantly, parents’ attitudes and values toward creativity and creative home environment were significantly and positively related to support for creativity characteristics, whereas mindful parenting was significantly and negatively related to support for socially acceptable characteristics in children. Those findings show that parents who value creativity and set up a creative environment are more likely to support children's creativity. Mindful parenting style seems to indirectly support creativity because it is associated with lower respect for socially acceptable characteristics, some of which are at odds with creativity. Findings are discussed in terms of the implications for training programs that enhance awareness of creativity.     

Formulation of Policy and Strategy in Developing Creativity Education in Four Asian Chinese Societies: A Policy Analysis

The present study sought to compare and contrast educational policies on creativity education in four Asian Chinese societies, namely mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan. It establishes five criteria on creativity education policy, including policies regarding legislation on creativity education, definitions of creativity, standard implementation, explicit identification of special populations of creative students, and creativity education in the community. Among the four societies, Taiwan has an official document — the White Paper on Creative Education published in 2003 — whereas in Hong Kong and Singapore, creativity has been identified as an ability to be nurtured in students of all levels in their national curriculum reform. In mainland China, innovation is regarded as a synonym for creativity. Definitions of creativity have at times not been clearly defined, although multiple levels of creativity development (individual, school, societal, industrial, and cultural) have been discussed in Taiwan. In Hong Kong, creativity has been defined as a generic skill in various key learning areas (e.g., language education, mathematics education, science education, etc.) in the school curriculum. In Singapore, creativity is a learning outcome to be developed in students. None of these societies use standard creativity assessment tests as evidence of creative competence in students. When creativity has entered the central stage in the curriculum reform and creativity education is made available to every student, efforts have been made to identify highly creative students and provide them enrichment opportunities, mainly using performance assessments and performance in creativity competitions in these societies. But mainland China, Hong Kong, and Singapore do not sufficiently emphasize creativity education in the larger community.     

试论团体创造力研究与创造心理学的理论转向

团体创造力研究是当前创造心理学的新方向。本文讨论了自J．P．Guilford以来,从个体层次创造力研究发展到重视团体创造力研究的演变过程。认为团体创造力研究不仅在创造心理学传统理论框架内开辟了一个新时期,其方法论视角的转换为以更广阔视野揭示创造力本质打开了思路。     

The Structure of Creativity in Primary Education: An Empirical Confirmation of the Amusement Park Theory

In this study, we explored the structure of pupils’ creativity in primary education following the Amusement Park Theory, by investigating undiscovered linkages between the domains of writing, mathematics, and drawing. More specifically, we examined: (a) whether some domains and general thematic areas are more closely related to each other than to others, (b) whether literacy and mathematical ability are specific underlying traits of creativity in writing and mathematics, respectively, and (c) whether intelligence and divergent thinking are related to creativity in all domains. The sample consisted of 331 Dutch 4th grade pupils. For each research question, a model was analyzed using structural equation modeling. We found creativity in mathematics and creativity in writing to be most similar, followed by creativity in mathematics and creativity in drawing, with creativity in writing and creativity in drawing being least similar. Additionally, we found evidence for several underlying traits (i.e., literacy ability and mathematical ability) and initial requirements of creativity (i.e., intelligence and divergent thinking), none of which were important for creativity in only one domain, and of which only intelligence was important for creativity in all domains. Herewith, our study provides insights regarding the complexity of the structure of creativity in primary education.