共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Zhengyu Sun 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2006,1(1):124-132
To explore the development of contemporary Chinese philosophy, fundamentally, is to explore the development of Marxist philosophy
in contemporary China. The disputes over philosophical views in Chinese academic circles during the first half of the twentieth
century have been focused on understanding Marxist philosophy from such aspects as “what kind of philosophy Chinese society
needs,” “the relation of philosophy to science,” and “philosophy as an idea to reflect on one’s life.” These explorations
have provided us a significant ideological insight into the development of Marxist philosophy and contemporary Chinese philosophy;
that is, in contemporary China, Marxist philosophy, as a doctrine of the liberation and all-round development of human beings,
exists not only as a kind of “doctrine” or “academy” but also as a kind of widely accepted “xueyuan (academic cultivations)” among people.
Translated by Zhao Zhiyi from Jourmal of Jilin University (Social Sciences), 2005:1 相似文献
2.
西方“具身认知”心理学与赋存在中国文化里的以“天人合一”为核心的“体知”心理学思想息息相通, 而中国文化又有其独异于西方文化的“身体”智慧。文化的源头实为神话。追根溯源, 本文主要从具身认知的视阈中将中西方神话中“身体”的角色两相比照, 首先从本体论维度以现象学诠释的方法来描述神话的身体母体是如何生成的, 并以天地开辟神话、万物肇始神话和人类起源神话为例揭示中国“身体”的本体论特色—— 一元论; 其次再从空间维度以概念隐喻的理论来剖析神话的身体现象学场域是如何延展的, 并从物我同一角度、天人交感角度和人神相通角度来彰显中国“身体”的空间维度特色——气论; 最后再从时间维度以社会建构理论来解构神话的身体是如何在时间场域中流变的; 并从社会、文化和历史三个层面来表达中国“身体”的时间维度特色——易论。通过从中国神话故事中挖掘中国传统文化中独有的“具身智慧”, 以期为建立中国人自己的科学心理学起抛砖引玉之用。 相似文献
3.
张再林 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2009,4(3):343-359
Unlike traditional Western philosophy, which places no special emphasis on the importance of family structure, traditional
Chinese philosophy represented by Confucianism is a set of theories that give family a primary position. With family as the
foundation, a complete framework of “human body → two genders → family and clan” is formed. Therefore, family in Chinese philosophy
is existent, gender-interactive and diachronic. It should also be noted that family also plays a fundamental role in Chinese
theories on cosmology, religion, and many other subjects. In other words, Chinese culture as a whole is imprinted with reflections
on family. Nowadays, as the value of family becomes less prominent, re-examining ancient Chinese philosophy will undoubtedly
bear theoretical significance. Meanwhile, traditional Chinese philosophy can also offer an ideological framework for the re-construction
of family values in the contemporary world.
__________
Translated by Zhang Shaoqian from Zhexue yanjiu 哲学研究 (Philosophical Researches), 2008, (1): 56–63 相似文献
4.
Gang Liu 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2007,2(1):95-114
The research programme of the philosophy of information (PI) proposed in 2002 made it an independent area or discipline in
philosophical research. The scientific concept of ‘information’ is formally accepted in philosophical inquiry. Hence a new
and tool-driven philosophical discipline of PI with its interdisciplinary nature has been established. Philosophy of information
is an ‘orientative’ rather than ‘cognitive’ philosophy. When PI is under consideration in the history of Western philosophy,
it can be regarded as a shift of large tradition. There are three large traditions at large, known as Platonic, Kantian and
Leibniz-Russellian. In the discussion of the position of the possible worlds, we have modal Platonism and modal realism, but
both of the theories are made in the framework of Western philosophy. In this essay, it is argued that possible worlds could
be seen as worlds in information, which is then an interpretation of modal information theory (MIT). Our interpretation is
made on the basis of Leibniz’s lifelong connection with China, a fact often overlooked by the Western philosophers. Possible
world theory was influenced by the Neo-Confucianism flourishing since the Song Dynasty of China, the foundation of which is
Yijing. It could be argued that Leibniz’s possible world theory was formulated in respect to the impact of the thoughts reflected
in Yijing, in that one of the prominent features is the model-theoretic construction of theories. There are two approaches to theory
construction, i.e., axiom-theoretic and model-theoretic. The origin of the former is from ancient Greece and the latter from
ancient China. And they determined the different features of theoretic structures between the oriental and occidental traditions
of science and technology. The tendency of the future development of science and technology is changing from the axiom-theoretic
to the model-theoretic orientation, at least the two approaches being complementary each other. To some extent, this means
the retrospective of tradition in the turning point of history, and some of the China’s cultural traditions might become the
starting points in formulating the future Chinese philosophy of science and technology. 相似文献
5.
贺来 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2008,3(2):267-281
In order to deepen the studies on the philosophy of practice, it is essential to explore the political significance of Marx's
philosophy of practice. Marx's philosophy of practice is rooted in the problem of modernity and the separation between “individual
subjectivity” and “societal community” in the modern context is the basic background of Marx's practical philosophy. It is
the basic interest of Marx's philosophy of practice to find a way to end this separation via critique of civil society. Therefore,
Marx's philosophy of practice has a clear significance, which manifests in the following aspects: one is “liberation politics,”
and the other, “the regulatory mode of the socio-political institution.”
Translated by Zhang Lin from Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究 (Philosophical Research), 2007, (1): 3–10 相似文献
6.
Yunyi Zhang 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2007,2(2):230-246
When Western science was introduced to modern China, more translated words were used to express fundamental concepts and terms
than borrowed words. The process of academic translation, commensuration, and communication between Western and Chinese philosophy
is a process of comparative philosophical research. Nowadays, however, it seems that Chinese philosophy is evaluated by a
Western Hegelian criterion. This leads to the debate over whether or not China has philosophy. But it is meaningless to argue
about whether or not China has the name of philosophy. The key issue is whether or not China has the actuality of philosophy. Looking at the history of Western philosophy, it seems that the Hegelian definition of philosophy was the
only one that existed in Europe. However, during the last 200 years after Hegel that the two main philosophical trends of
positivism (scientism) and irrationalism developed from anti-Hegelianism or “Spurning Metaphysics.” As metaphysics is being
reconstructed, the ghost of Hegel has reappeared. It is clear that in the future, philosophy will evolve from the development
of human metaphysics or cultural philosophy. It is a process of the “negation of negation”: from traditional metaphysics to
the spurning of metaphysics, and then to human metaphysics.
Translated by Wu Bo from Wenshizhe 文史哲 (Journal of Literature, History and Philosophy), 2005, (3): 18–25 相似文献
7.
Quanxing Xu 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2008,3(1):39-54
The epistemology in Chinese philosophy remarkably emphasizes the cultivation of cognitive subjects. According to such epistemology,
intelligence arises from benevolence, and thus morality should be valued to gain knowledge. In this way, epistemology is integrated
with theories of values and cultivation. The cultivation of cognitive subjects in Chinese philosophy mainly involves a stance,
attitudes, ways of thinking and feelings of a cognitive subject. To expatiate and develop the theory of the cultivation of
cognitive subjects in Chinese philosophy has much meaning for the construction of a modern Chinese-style Marxist philosophy
system.
Translated by Huang Deyuan from Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究 (Philosophical Research), 2006, (8): 49–54 相似文献
8.
LEI Huanjie 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2022,17(1):134
A review of the decades of research shows that Chinese philosophy of science and technology, on the strength of carrying forward traditions and blazing new trails, has made progress in the construction of discipline system and development of institutions, teaching materials and periodicals, with deepening the discussion on discipline orientation. In academic system construction, driven by efforts to update the academic framework and deepen research on the philosophy of nature, philosophy of science, philosophy of technology, science, technology and society, as well as other traditional fields, achievements have been made in ethical reflections on high technology, engineering ethics, big data and artificial intelligence philosophy, responsible innovation and other emerging, frontier and crosscutting fields. In the construction of discourse system, work has been done to make China’s voice heard on the international stage, excavate and elucidate the excellent traditional Chinese culture, and build disciplines with Chinese characteristics. In short, the achievements of the Chinese philosophy of science and technology have not come easily. Though a diverse and dynamic academic pattern has been formed, and wonderful and unique Chinese discourse has been created, we still face some problems. To accelerate the construction of “Three Systems” of the philosophy of science and technology with Chinese characteristics by building on existing achievements, we should carry forward the tradition of dialectics of nature and strengthen the guidance of Marxism, consolidate the foundation of philosophy and support interdisciplinary interaction and cooperation, track the frontiers of science and technology, and pay attention to the social operation of science and technology. 相似文献
9.
Ping He 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2007,2(2):219-229
From the point of view of the development of Chinese Marxist philosophy, this paper comprehensively analyzes the current phenomenon
of “Return to Marx” by pointing out: (1) the phenomenon of “Return to Marx” meets the need to reconstruct ideology during
the time of social change in China and it is a theoretical manifestation of the shift from planned economy to market economy
in China; (2) the phenomenon of “Return to Marx” embodies the academic path of the past ten years of Chinese Marxist philosophy;
(3) the phenomenon of “Return to Marx” places too much emphasis on logic while too little emphasis on history. This understanding,
the epistemological root of “Return to Marx”, has caused the negative effect and is also worth our attention and further study.
Translated by Zhao Bi from Xuexi Yu Tansuo 学习与探索 (Study & Exploration), 2004, (5): 1–5 相似文献
10.
该文认为政治就是以公共权力分配为核心内容的游戏;政治学与政治哲学的根本区别在于政治学研究权力游戏规则的运行规律,而政治哲学则研究权力游戏规则的合法性;古典西方政治哲学所形成的是一种正义传统,而它正与中国古典政治哲学的天道传统相呼应。中国近代所形成的革命文化破坏了我们自己的政治哲学传统,重建我们自己的政治哲学和政治文化传统,是当代中国文化建设的核心任务之一。 相似文献
11.
LI Cunshan 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2018,13(4):634
Since China’s reform and opening up in 1978, the study of Chinese philosophy has proceeded together with the times, not only making tremendous academic progress, but also serving as an important part of research on Chinese culture that undertakes the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and Chinese culture. This essay gives a brief review of the study of Chinese philosophy over the last forty years with particular attention to five aspects, namely the new horizons in the study of Chinese philosophy, the characteristics of Chinese philosophy, the comparison between Chinese and Western philosophy that also involves the “legitimacy” of the former, the relevance of Chinese philosophy for contemporary times, and the basic methodologies of Chinese philosophy. 相似文献
12.
ZHANG Xuezhi 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2022,17(1):35
Philosophy can be divided into two systems, i.e. the vertical and the horizontal. Characterized with the creation of spirit and the logical evolution of concepts, the vertical system expresses historical reflections on the achievements of human culture. Meanwhile, the horizontal system focuses on the analysis of cognitive activities to explore the nature of subject and object, the elements of knowledge, and the basis of its certainty. Chinese philosophers, such as Hu Shih, Fung Yulan, Zhang Dainian, Mou Zongsan and Zhang Shiying, have previously explored the various definitions of philosophy. Their explorations manifest the internationalization of Chinese philosophy during different eras. This paper defines philosophy as human beings’ awareness of their environment and systematical reflections on their activities and ensuing consequences. As part of world philosophy, Chinese philosophy encapsulates the essence of Chinese culture, as the thinking method of Chinese people, and as a set of thought systems possessing a unique style. 相似文献
13.
基本归因错误曾被社会心理学家认为是人类普遍具有的一种归因倾向,然而,文化心理学的研究却发现:不同文化脉络中的人表现出不同的归因倾向,确切地说,归因实际上会受到文化的影响,即便是所谓的基本归因错误亦具有文化局限性。进而言之,文化心理学的研究打破了以往心理学中关于人们的基本认知过程和方式具有文化普遍性的思维定式。由此看来,心理学研究只有立足于一定的社会文化脉络,才能更好地理解和把握人类的心理和行为 相似文献
14.
WANG Chengbing 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2022,17(1):61
William James is one of the first philosophers with significant international influence in the history of American philosophy. James played an extremely important role in the emergence and development of American pragmatism, striving to show cultural self-confidence and pursuing the localization as well as independence of philosophy in the development of America. It is of great importance to further study James’s philosophy in the context of contemporary academics. Academia should value the collection, editing, translation and research of the philosophical classics of James and important literatures, pay attention to the clues of development and academic trends of the important concepts and ideas of James’s pragmatism philosophy, and rethink the status and influence of James’s philosophy in modern Western philosophy, trying to carry out comparative studies between James’s philosophy and traditional Chinese philosophy. 相似文献
15.
JIANG Yi 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2018,13(2):182
“Learning to be Human” is the theme of the 24th World Congress of Philosophy, to be held in Beijing in 2018, and also an important topic in traditional Chinese Confucian philosophy. Different interpretations of this theme, however, directly determine how to understand the study of Chinese philosophy in the context of world philosophy today. Changes in contemporary philosophy urge us to reconsider philosophical research in today’s China. Reflecting on the status quo of research on Chinese philosophy and finding a method for solving certain existing difficulties will ultimately enhance the study of Chinese philosophy. 相似文献
16.
Junping Liu 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2006,1(4):517-538
The terminology tianxia has both historical evolution and cultural and philosophical connotations. This concept not only denotes a geographical and
spatial meaning, but also implies the moral construct of metaphysics. A systematic study of its historical and cultural repercussions
can show that the evolution of the meaning “tianxia” not only embodies the cosmological construction, moral belief and self-identity of the Chinese nation, but also manifests
the historical processes of modern China evolving from “tianxia” to a modern nation-state. Meanwhile, the deconstruction of the tianxia cosmology has shattered the old Chinese concept of a single united tianxia, or the whole world under one Heaven. Also, “Confucian China” has been increasingly losing its vitality and strong hold on
the people, while the concept of nation-state has gained its way into people’s consciousness, which has added more diversity
and open-mindedness to the concept of tianxia.
__________
Translated from Wenshizhe 文史哲 (Literature, History and Philosophy), 2004 (6) by Huang Deyuan 相似文献
17.
Charles P. Chen 《Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy》1995,13(2):117-129
To explore the potential of Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) with clients of Chinese background, a brief review is conducted
with respect to parallels between RET philosophy and some key components of Chinese culture and ways in which Chinese think.
Arguments are advanced as to why RET is particularly suitable for use within a Chinese cultural context. Issues involved in
using RET with Chinese clients are addressed including the appreciation many Chinese have for the logical and rational aspects
of RET, the most appropriate type of client-counselor relationship to facilitate RET therapeutic progress, appropriate ways
to dispute, and some cautionary words on the use of “emotive methods”. Areas where the RET counselor needs to be particularly
sensitive to the cultural background of the client are highlighted.
Charles P. Chen holds a master's degree in educational counseling and is currently a Ph.D. student and instructor in the Department
of Counselling Psychology at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. His interests include cross-cultural
and multi-cultural counseling, career counseling, and group counseling. 相似文献
18.
John Zijiang Ding 《亚洲哲学》2018,28(2):117-134
Cartesian philosophy has had a profound influence on modern Chinese intellectuals since the mid 19th century. After the May Fourth Movement, there have been many Chinese scholars who worked immensely on Cartesian philosophy and conducted fruitful research including translations, biographies, monographs, and a large number of papers. The examination of mind/body has been one of the most important philosophic issues and also a fundamental truth-searching of the various great thinkers, from Confucius and Socrates to many later Eastern and Western philosophers. There are certain similarities and distinctions between Confucian ‘mind/body’ and Cartesian ‘mind/body’. As a super country with the highest population in the world, the studies of Cartesian philosophy in China have been very inadequate; it should be more prosperous and successful. 相似文献
19.
Wenhua Chai 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2006,1(3):366-381
Modern neo-Confucianism is studied at two levels, one is at the historical level and the other at the academic level. Modern
neo-Confucianism at the historical level was developed in the modern context, but its basic content belongs to the traditional
Confucianism or the study of Confucian classics. Modern neo-Confucianism at the academic level recognizes both the deficiencies
of the traditional Confucianism and rationality of western learning, and dedicates itself to the modernization of Confucianism.
Though Ma Yifu’s moral philosophy is developed in the context of modern Chinese culture, it fails to deal with the problem
of modern transformation of Confucian ethical values and its content still belongs to the traditional Confucianism. So it
should be labeled as the modern neo-Confucianism in the historical sense. In this paper, the author makes a systematic exploration
and an evaluation of Ma Yifu’s ethical thought.
__________
Translated from Lunlixue Yanjiu 伦理学研究 (Studies in Ethics), Vol. 18, 2005 (4) by Yang Xu 相似文献
20.
董仲舒的易学哲学思想是他的整个哲学体系的核心内容.其内涵丰富而深刻,主要表现在董仲舒赋予<易传>中的"元"以逻辑在先和价值根源之意义,表明"元"是一个价值本体范畴;他把<易传>的"继善成性"论改造为"天止人继"说,反映了人类在宇宙万物中之地位与意义的一种自觉精神;又把<易传>"人文化成"的思想观念发展为一种"人文宇宙观",从宇宙观高度审视人类文化,又从人类文化角度看待宇宙,观与文化观合二为一,表明了宇宙是人类文化创造的本源和基础,而人类文化是宇宙的发展和完善.这就从宇宙观的高度肯定、突出了人文价值的崇高意义. 相似文献