Christ as Chrism,Christ Given Away

This article develops the concept of Christ not as static body but as chrism for bodies. Christ as chrism travels in the matrix of relationality, on a vector toward the benefit of others. Conceptualizing christ as chrism potentially avoids both exclusionary and colonizing tendencies in Christian polity, and frames a Christian ethics that, while vulnerable and risky, marks the sanctity of the one giving Christ away.     

Christ as Culture 3: Christ as Drama

Abstract: Personal identity cannot exist without narrative coherence – without, that is to say, drama. Two sets of narratives make up the identity of Christ: a narrative of a human being among other human beings; and a narrative of the Son with the Father and the Spirit. The doctrine of the Trinity insists that these narratives are the same. A culture is necessarily dramatic: a story of persons and their relationships. Thus Christ may be understood as drama and as culture. This identification has implications for the liturgy of the church.     

Christ as Culture 2: Christ as Art

Abstract: Art can be understood as experimenting with possible worlds. There is, however, a real world underlying the possible worlds – the world created by God. We do not have unmediated access to this world, and so must, and can, continue to be artists, and a loss of faith in the existence of the real world leads to a loss of the possibility of art. If Christ is to be understood as art, then the Father is the artist who experiments with a possible world, which is thus defined as the real world, through his Son, the Logos.     

Being Christ for the Other

In recent years, Christian humanism has received renewed attention. This article engages with the works of William Schweiker and John W. de Gruchy, two of the most prominent representatives of Christian humanism in contemporary Protestant theology. In a manner which is complementary to their views, this article attempts to outline a Lutheran Christian humanism based on the ethics of Martin Luther and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Inspired by a Chalcedonian Christology, the article attempts to argue for a polemical affirmation of Christian humanism as a characteristic of the Lutheran tradition. With this paradoxical notion, the article attempts to move beyond the antagonism between universality and specificity in Christian social ethics.     

On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ

In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.     

Gandhian Conception of Christ

Gandhi conceived Christ in a very peculiar way. His hermeneutics of New Testament in relation to the person and work of Christ was quite different from the official versions of different denominations within Christianity. He did not accept Christ as “world saviour” in the sense in which the dogmas proclaim. Gandhi’s conception of Christ is thus very “selective” and interesting as he understood Christ as a Satyāgrahi and a great teacher through the Sermon on the Mount. He too viewed the cross of Christ as an example of non-violence. This peculiar Gandhian conception of Christ within the Indian premises was an antidote in a colonial context and to the imported Western Christ into the Indian pluralistic tradition.

     

Witnessing to Christ Today

The global health situation at the beginning of the third millennium is alarming. 1 While countries in the global North spend huge amounts of money providing high‐tech medicine for their citizens, many people in resource‐limited settings still do not have access to basic health care. These people bear an unjust burden of disease, and tens of thousands die every day of diseases that can be treated and often cured. In this regard, the contribution of Christian churches to health care is sorely needed. Already, churches and faith‐based organizations are important health providers in many countries. This is especially the case with regard to people in remote areas and in resource‐limited settings, and with marginalized groups in these and other places. In addition to the engagement by Christian bodies in health care, in many churches, especially the fast‐growing churches of the global South, spiritual healing is becoming increasingly important. These churches seek to provide healing through prayer, blessing, the laying on of hands, and anointing with oil. However, many inside and outside the churches are not so confident that the churches' engagement in the field of health and healing is essential to their mission. Some argue that the churches should only be involved in health care provision if there are no secular health providers available. Also, whilst others insist on the use of exclusively “spiritual” means to overcome illness, many question whether Christians today should still seek to overcome illness through this approach. Against this background, the World Council of Churches (WCC) and the German Institute for Medical Mission (DIFAEM) wish to contribute to an understanding of the healing mission of the church today. Both organizations are engaged in the field of mission and healing, and have a long history in dealing with questions about the Christian healing ministry. 2 Since its inception, the WCC has regarded issues related to health as part of its core work. Health care and theological questions on health and healing have been on the agenda of WCC programmes on mission, as well as those dealing with justice and diakonia. For many years, the WCC's Christian Medical Commission guided the organization's work on health and healing. DIFAEM has been a partner with the WCC in worldwide discussions on the healing mission of the churches since the mid‐1960s, and a leader in the promotion and implementation of the concept of primary health care. In 2005, the world mission conference in Athens, Greece, considered the theme, “Come Holy Spirit, Heal and Reconcile: Called in Christ to Be Reconciling and Healing Communities,” and strongly reaffirmed the healing mission of the church. In 2007, the WCC and DIFAEM jointly called for a “study group on mission and healing” to follow up the Athens mission conference. This study group was subsequently mandated to work on the Christian understanding of the healing mission of the church, and to promote Christian engagement in the field of health. The members of the group are theologians and medical professionals from four continents and various denominations. 3 The objectives of the group include:

• to clarify the holistic and integrated nature of Christian mission and healing, based on biblical theology;
• to demonstrate ways in which Christian communities can contribute towards health and healing in contemporary contexts.

In this article, the study group offers a summary of the ecumenical discussions on health, healing and wholeness that were documented in WCC publications issued between 1965 and 2005. The main insight of these discussions was that health is not only physical and/or mental well‐being but includes the social and spiritual and other dimensions as well. This is reflected in the definition of health approved by the WCC in 1989: “Health is a dynamic state of well‐being of the individual and society, of physical, mental, spiritual, economic, political, and social well‐being – of being in harmony with each other, with the material environment and with God.” 4 This expanded definition of health leads us to the Christian understanding that healing is not only and not primarily medical. Healing then includes, for instance, addressing the spiritual needs of sick persons as well as working for justice, peace and the integrity of creation. Moreover, the role of congregational and non‐congregational communities and faith‐ based and governmental organizations as well as individual Christians in the field of health and healing becomes obvious. Faith communities/congregations in particular are called to practise healing in various ways. They contribute to healing as social networks, as places of teaching and learning together, and as advocates for justice, peace and the integrity of creation. Healing is practised in liturgical acts and through nurturing and practicing charismatic gifts, through counselling and caring, and through creating safe and open spaces. Faith communities have a role in promoting primary health care, and can become vital partners of the formal health sector. This contribution aims to reaffirm the healing mission of the church, and to encourage churches, plus Christian communities and organizations, to engage in this ministry, and thus take part in God's mission of transforming the world. 5 Beate JAKOB