Introduction to the Special Theme on Analytic Philosophy

Since the last decades of the 20th century,analytic philosophy has been undermined by many philosophers in many ways.Some have claimed that analytic philosophy effectively ended with Quine's attack on empiricist dogmas,moving in an alternative direction.Others have insisted that it endures,taking a specific approach to philosophical problems inspired by prior speculation.Still others have criticized it based on recent developments in such fields as neuroscience and computer science.Clearly,the present status and the nature of analytic philosophy has been disputed.Several international conferences have recently been held in China to reflect upon,and respond to,these controversies.     

Introduction to the Special Theme "Daoist Philosophy and Philosophical Daoism: Conceptual Distinctions"

The concept of "Daoist philosophy" is well established in the academic institutional order today.Universities offer courses on Daoist philosophy,publications appear under this title,and congresses are held to present new research in the field.We are well familiar with this term-but what shall we say when somebody asks us what Daoist philosophy is.     

当代发展哲学的主题嬗变

国内发展哲学研究起始于20世纪90年代初,它的兴起与发展是以中国社会发展为参考系,从而确定自己的研究对象,是专门对中国从传统社会向现代社会总体性转变的发展问题即中国现代化问题的哲学研究.     

中国现代学术体制中的"哲学"

我以极大的兴趣读了张祥龙教授对发表于<中国学术>上的拙文<儒家经验与哲学话语>所做出的回应.我觉得我们对"现代儒家哲学"概念所存在的一些根本困境颇有同感.我以为我们在诊断症结方面,比在澄清困境时使用的策略方面所持有的分歧要小.我们的主要分歧源于我强调使用狭义哲学概念的必要,而张教授则倾向于使用广义的哲学观念.     

Introduction to the Special Issue: Sociological Contributions to the Understanding of Emotion

Motivation and Emotion -     

中国近代学人对哲学的理解

“哲学”一词对中国学人来说,是舶来之语。哲学这一学科也是在近代中、西学术的冲突与交融中逐渐构建并发展起来的。中国学人对哲学的理解与认识经历了一个从引进外来术语,到理解诠释,再到确立自身的哲学体系的过程。追溯中国学人对哲学的认识过程,可以帮助我们把握中国近代哲学学科的建设思路及其某些特点,对新世纪中国哲学的学科建设不无裨益。     

关于当代中国哲学史学史的若干思考

所谓当代中国(以下的论述内容不包括台港澳地区)哲学史学史,是把1949年至1999年50年间的中国哲学史研究作为对象,从历史批评意识出发进行整体反思,分析其得失,厘定其价值,评判其贡献,超越其局限,推进其发展的一门学科.[1]