Therapieresistente Depression bei älteren Patienten

Antidepressive monotherapy using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors leads to satisfactory remission in the first 4 weeks of therapy in only 40?% of clearly depressive patients. After unsatisfactory therapy with serotonin reuptake inhibitors the change to dual antidepressants is most common. An unsatisfactory response also to this second attempt at therapy is referred to as therapy resistance. Therapy resistant depression can necessitate changing to other antidepressants, such as classical cyclic antidepressants. Therapy attempts with atypical antidepressants, such as buproprion or mirtazapin or monotherapy with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor can be carried out; however, success of therapy in severely depressive patients still remains unsatisfactory in at least 20?% of cases even after several pharmacological approaches and even after psychotherapy or augmentation strategies (e.g. lithium and antipsychotics). It is less probable that bipolar depression will respond to antidepressive therapy than recurrent unipolar depression.     

Pharmacotherapeutic options in the treatment of comorbid depression and anxiety

Although anxiety and mood disorders are listed as separate disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, they frequently coexist. They may be expressed phenotypically as comorbidities or as the provisional entity mixed anxiety-depressive disorder. Patients with both anxiety and depression are more symptomatic, use more health care resources, and have a worse prognosis than those with a single disorder. Recognizing and treating these patients are challenges for physicians because the symptoms of the two disorders often overlap. Administration of effective treatment, comprising both anxiolytic and antidepressant effects, can reduce patient distress and disability, as well as inappropriate utilization of medical services. Medications such as tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, nefazodone, venlafaxine XR (extended release) and mirtazapine, are highly effective in treating comorbid depression and anxiety. These newer agents now represent the pharmacotherapeutic treatments of choice for the comorbid conditions.     

Overview of diagnosis and drug treatments of anxiety disorders

Anxiety disorders are common and often disabling. They fall into five main categories: panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, each of which have characteristic symptoms and cognitions. All anxiety disorders respond to drugs and psychological treatments. This review will focus on drug treatments. Recent research has emphasized the value of antidepressants especially the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and related sedative-like compounds. The common co-existence of depression with all of the anxiety disorders means that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are now generally considered to be the first-line treatments but the benzodiazepines have some utility especially in promoting sleep and working acutely to reduce extreme distress.     

Medication treatment for depression in children and adolescents

Depression in children and adolescents is relatively common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality-thus, it is strongly deserving of treatment. To date, there have been a number of randomized, controlled trials of both tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the acute treatment of depression in youths. Surprisingly, the available data do not demonstrate TCA superiority over placebo for this disorder in this age group. There is, however, evidence of SSRI superiority to placebo, and longer-term treatment with SSRIs may help prevent recurrence. There is almost no data on other pharmacologic approaches. Effective use of the efficacious treatments also depends on effective case-finding and providing treatment, which families and youths will take in adequate quantity and duration. The right approaches to these aspects of effective treatment are greatly understudied.     

Treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: strategies for intervention

The mainstay of treatment for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a combination of psychotherapy and medication treatments. The first-line medications for PTSD are antidepressants, with two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (sertraline and paroxetine) currently Food and Drug Administration-indicated for PTSD. However, many patients do not have an adequate response to antidepressants, therefore, combinations with other antidepressants or with other classes of psychotropic medication are often utilized to enhance the therapeutic response. Other agents that have been used include mood stabilizers, anti-adrenergics, anxiolytics, and atypical antipsychotics. The heterogeneity of symptom clusters in PTSD as well as the complex psychiatric comorbidities (eg, with depression or substance abuse) further support the notion that combinations of medications may be needed. To date, there is a paucity of data to support specific strategies for augmenting antidepressants in PTSD. This review will address representative existing studies and discuss several potential pharmacologic strategies for patients suffering from treatment-refractory PTSD.     

Treatment-resistant panic disorder

A substantial number of patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia may remain symptomatic after standard treatment (including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, or irreversible monamine oxidase inhibitors). In this review, recommendations for the treatment of patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia who do not respond to these drugs are provided. Nonresponse to drug treatment could be defined as a failure to achieve a 50% reduction on a standard rating scale after a minimum of 6 weeks of treatment in adequate dose. When initial treatments have failed, the medication should be changed to other standard treatments. In further attempts at treatment, drugs should be used that have shown promising results in preliminary studies, such as venlafaxine. Combination treatments may be used, such as the combination of an selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and a benzodiazepine. Psychological treatments such as cognitive-behavioral therapy have to be considered in all patients, regardless whether they are nonresponders or not. According to existing studies, a combination of pharmacologic treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy can be recommended.     

Childhood depression: pharmacological therapy/treatment (pharmacotherapy of childhood depression)

Critiqued the published double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of antidepressant pharmacotherapy in child and adolescent major depressive disorder to assess their overall efficacy. The pharmacological mechanism of antidepressant action also was discussed. At best, antidepressant treatment for depressed youths is only modestly effective. In particular, the tricyclic antidepressants are not superior to placebo; however, early evidence with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is more encouraging. The theoretical basis for this response pattern is discussed from a methodological perspective, from a neurodevelopmental status, and from a biological viewpoint. Study modifications are suggested which could improve some of the methodological limitations apparent in previous clinical drug trials.     

Social anxiety disorder: psychobiological and evolutionary underpinnings

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) also know as social phobia is increasingly recognized as a highly prevalent and disabling psychiatric disorder. SAD patients demonstrate cognitive-affective distortions in relation to social situations and abnormal activation patterns in limbic structures during functional imaging. Behavioral inhibition is an endophenotype that may be useful in understanding vulnerability to SAD, and that has specific imaging and genetic correlates. From an evolutionary perspective, it has been speculated that SAD represents a false appeasement alarm. It is notable that SAD responds to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, but not to most tricyclic antidepressants; this finding is consistent with the importance of serotonin and dopamine in mediating this disorder.     

The future of depression psychopharmacology

Along with the development of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors there has been a tremendous widening of the definition of depression and an impressive decrease in the placebo-drug difference in controlled studies. In the early 1960s, about one third of depressed patients improved with placebo and two thirds with active compounds. Current controlled studies suggest that the situation has certainly not improved. The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression Study found that response rates to new compounds after the failure of the first antidepressant are low. The monoamine hypothesis of depression was formulated in the mid 1960s based on the antidepressant efficacy of the monoamine reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and the depressogenic effects of reserpine as a monoamine depleter. However, no monoamine-related finding has been found that is diagnostic for depression. A second major hypothesis regarding depression has been the stress cortisol hypothesis. However, blood cortisol levels are not diagnostic of depression. Psychiatric clinicians are convinced that there are patients for whom antidepressants have made the difference between life and death. However, physicians may generalize unjustifiably based on single dramatic cases to a much larger diagnostic group. Perhaps there are many causes of different types of human sadness, and perhaps only some of these involve mechanisms related to monoamines. Thus, perhaps only some kinds of depression are responsive to monoamine affecting antidepressants..     

Serotonin syndrome in elderly patients treated for psychotic depression with atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants: two case reports

We report two cases of serotonin syndrome in elderly patients during treatment of psychotic depression with atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants. The first case is a 69-year-old man who was admitted for depression with psychosis and treated with trazodone, risperidone, and sertraline. Subsequently, he developed myoclonus, tremor, cogwheel rigidity, and diaphoresis. The second case is a 72-year-old female initially admitted to a medical inpatient unit for a change in mental status that presented as increased confusion, lethargy, slurred speech, and a fever of 101.5 degrees. She had been on phenelzine and quetiapine. In both cases, all symptoms resolved within 24 hours of the psychotropics being stopped. In both cases, we believe that serotonin syndrome was produced by a combination of an antidepressant and an atypical antipsychotic. There have been several case reports of serotonin syndrome from similar combinations of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotic treatment. Clinicians treating elderly patients with a combination of serotonergic antidepressants and atypical antipsychotics for psychotic depression should be aware of the potential for serotonin syndrome.     

Depression and Huntington's disease: prevalence, clinical manifestations, etiology, and treatment

In order to determine the extent to which depression complicates Huntington's disease (HD), we have analyzed the existing literature on depression in HD in order to report the prevalence, clinical manifestations, and treatment of HD depression. By means of MEDLINE literature searches and reviews of HD articles' bibliographies, we identified for our analysis 16 HD depression studies. Our results indicate that the prevalence of depression is 30% for all HD patients. Clinical manifestations of HD depression include a marked increased risk for suicide. The etiology of HD depression is unclear, but may be due to a number of factors, such as dysfunction in the caudate nucleus, dysfunction in the ventral striatum, and various genetic factors that are discussed in this review. Case reports and case series support the efficacy of standard antidepressant interventions in resolving symptoms of depression. Efficacious treatments reported in the literature include tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and electroconvulsive therapy. In this study, the successful anecdotal treatment of seven consecutive HD depressed patients with sertraline suggests that sertraline may be a safe and efficacious treatment of HD depression.     

Selective phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor treatment of serotonergic reuptake inhibitor antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction: a review of diagnosis,treatment, and relevance

Sexual dysfunction related to antidepressants, particularly serotonin reuptake inhibitors is a major cause of premature treatment discontinuation. This places patients at increased risk for recurrence, relapse, chronicity, and mortality (eg, suicide). The clinical assessment requires a comprehensive evaluation of sexual function, including libido, arousal, orgasm, and resolution prior to affective disorder, disturbances associated with the emergence of depression, and changes or dysfunctions associated with antidepressant treatment. Other factors to be included for evaluating sexual dysfunction include inquiry for concurrent medical conditions, somatic treatments, lifestyle risk factors, and response to antidepressants. Current treatment approaches to antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction have relied on open-label reports, literature reviews, and clinical wisdom. Without double-blind, placebo-controlled studies to support them, too much non-evidence-based treatment may be offered to patients. Advances into nonadrenergic-noncholinergic novel signal transduction, specifically phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, offer new opportunities for developing evidence-based treatments for this side effect and improving depression disease management outcomes.     

Global Benefit-risk Evaluation of Antidepressant Action: Comparison of Pooled Data for Venlafaxine,SSRIs, and Placebo

Do antidepressants have an equivalent risk-benefit ratio? Venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is an effective antidepressant for treating major depression. The results of some clinical studies have suggested that venlafaxine may have more potent efficacy in sustaining remission in patients with major depression. Comparative clinical studies, however, lack suitable power to discern treatment differences in safety and also lack a quantitative basis for comparing risk and benefit. A global benefit-risk analysis of pooled data from eight randomized, double-blind, clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was performed. By using the ratio measure of risk-benefit, patients treated with venlafaxine (n=851) for 6-8 weeks experienced a relative gain of 1.57 compared with SSRI-treated patients (n=743) and a relative gain of 2.27 compared with placebo-treated patients (n=439). Subgroup analyses showed a relative gain of 1.35 for venlafaxine-treated patients (n=538) compared with fluoxetine-treated patients (n=549) and a relative gain of 2.53 compared with placebo-treated patients (n=357). A dose-response relationship was apparent between low (<75 mg/day), medium (75-150 mg/day), and high (>150 mg/day) dosages of venlafaxine; r values were 0.758, 0.822, and 1.181, respectively (P=.023, high dosage versus placebo; P=.030, medium dosage versus placebo). Important differences in risk and benefit exist between venlafaxine and SSRIs as a group compared with fluoxetine alone. A significant gain in benefit-risk in the treatment of major depression was observed with an increase in venlafaxine dosage from 75->150 mg/day.     

Cardiac Disorders and Antidepressant Medications

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been associated with an increase in cardiovascular disorders, especially in depressed patients who have pre-existing cardiac disease. These disorders are less likely to occur when a therapeutic dosage is administered. Injuries because of falls are more likely in elderly depressed patients, and orthostatic hypotension occurs with the use of TCAs. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants differ structurally and in side effects from TCAs and MAOIs. They appear to be effective for treatment of depression, and their side-effect profiles appear safer than those of earlier approved antidepressants used by depressed patients with cardiovascular disorders.     

Cardiac disorders and antidepressant medications

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been associated with an increase in cardiovascular disorders, especially in depressed patients who have pre-existing cardiac disease. These disorders are less likely to occur when a therapeutic dosage is administered. Injuries because of falls are more likely in elderly depressed patients, and orthostatic hypotension occurs with the use of TCAs. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants differ structurally and in side effects from TCAs and MAOIs. They appear to be effective for treatment of depression, and their side-effect profiles appear safer than those of earlier approved antidepressants used by depressed patients with cardiovascular disorders.     

Serotonin syndrome associated with the use of escitalopram

Escitalopram is the newest selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) available for use in the United States. It has been approved for the treatment of major depression and generalized anxiety disorder. It is the S-enantiomer of the SSRI citalopram and is highly serotonin specific as it has minimal effect on the reuptake of dopamine or norepinephrine. It is also a well-tolerated medication, with a side-effect profile comparable to the other SSRIs. While a number of side effects have been seen during escitalopram therapy, such as insomnia, nausea, and increased sweating, there are no reported cases of serotonin syndrome associated with escitalopram therapy to date. We present the case of a 24-year-old woman who developed serotonin syndrome after an increase in her escitalopram to 30 mg/day. We will review the diagnostic criteria of serotonin syndrome and the clinical scenarios in which serotonin syndrome can develop. We will also discuss the proposed treatments and role that polypharmacology may play in the development of this clinical entity.     

Psychopharmacology of depression in the next millennium

Over the last half of the 20th century, there have been a series of psychopharmacologic strategies for treatment of depression. As we approach the next century, new therapies in varying stages of American release are being developed. This review will focus on information available for the following proposed antidepressants: 1) reboxetine, a norepinephrine selective reuptake inhibitor; 2) milnacipran, a combined serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; 3) a new enantiomer of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; 4) duloxetine, another combined serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; 5) sunepitron, a combined 5-HT1A agonist and a2 antagonist; and 6) MK-869, a substance P inhibitor. Finally, other possible developing directions will be reviewed, including corticotropin-releasing factor.     

Psychotherapy and (or) Medications for Depression in Youth? An Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations for Treatment

This article reviews existing research pertaining to antidepressant medications, psychotherapy, and their combined efficacy in the treatment of clinical depression in youth. Based on this review, we recommend that youth depression and its treatment can be readily understood from a social-psycho-bio model. We maintain that this model presents an alternative conceptualization to the dominant biopsychosocial model, which implies the primacy of biological contributors. Further, our review indicates that psychotherapy should be the frontline treatment for youth with depression and that little scientific evidence suggests that combined psychotherapy and medication treatment is more effective than psychotherapy alone. Due primarily to safety issues, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors should be initiated only in conjunction with psychotherapy and/or supportive monitoring.     

Treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia: randomized placebo-controlled trial of four psychosocial treatments combined with imipramine or placebo

Few randomized controlled trials have included panic disorder patients with moderate to severe agoraphobia. Therefore, this population was studied using pharmacotherapy as well as psychotherapy. At the time of the study, imipramine was widely used as a pharmacological treatment. Also, current practice guidelines for patients with panic disorder find selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants roughly comparable in terms of efficacy. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to compare four psychosocial treatments-cognitive and graded in vivo exposure treatments, graded in vivo exposure, cognitive treatment, and supportive therapy-to evaluate the benefits of combining cognitive therapy with exposure in vivo. These treatments were combined with imipramine or placebo for a total of eight experimental conditions. Participants presented moderate to severe agoraphobia. The method involved a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 137 participants who completed a 14-session protocol involving the treatments just mentioned. Measures were taken at baseline and posttreatment and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. All treatment conditions were statistically and clinically effective in reducing self-reported panic-agoraphobia symptoms over the 1-year follow-up. No statistical differences were observed between imipramine and placebo conditions. This study found that all treatment modalities helped reduce panic and agoraphobic symptomatology over a 1-year follow-up period. These surprising results support the need to document the relations among the various components of an intervention. This would make it possible to assess the relative efficacy of the treatment components rather than of the intervention as a whole.