Oral administration of guanosine impairs inhibitory avoidance performance in rats and mice

Extracellular guanine-based purines, mainly the nucleoside guanosine, have recently been shown to exert neuroprotective effects, which seem to be related to antagonism of the glutamatergic system. In this study, we investigated the effects of acute oral administration of guanosine on inhibitory avoidance task in rats and mice. We also studied its effects on locomotor activity, anxiety-related behaviors and mechanisms of action involving the purinergic system. Guanosine (2.0 and 7.5mg/kg, per os), administered 75min pretraining, dose-dependently impaired retention of the inhibitory avoidance task in rats and mice, an effect not prevented by the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine. Guanosine presented no effects on locomotor activity and anxiety-related behaviors. This amnesic effect of guanosine may be compatible with inhibition of glutamatergic system and seems to be not mediated by adenosine.     

Amnesic effect of cycloheximide in the mouse mediated by adrenocortical hormones.

The involvement of adrenocortical hormones in the amnesic effect of cycloheximide was examined in mice. Subcutaneous injection of cycloheximide shortly before a training trial of a passive avoidance task resulted in an amnesia of the avoidance response. However, amnesia was absent in the adrenalectomized animals in which cerebral protein synthesis was suppressed by cycloheximide. Injection of corticosteroids antagonized the amnesic effect, most effecively if the steroids were given immediately after training. The influence of the hormonal treatments upon the amnesic effect was not ascribable to a change in general activity level. The amnesic effect of subcutaneously injected cycloheximide appears to be mediated by hormonal deficiency, and not related to suppression of the cerebral protein synthesis.     

Different involvement of type 1, 2, and 3 ryanodine receptors in memory processes

The administration of the ryanodine receptor (RyR) agonist 4-Cmc (0.003-9 nmol per mouse intracerebroventricularly [i.c.v.]) ameliorated memory functions, whereas the RyR antagonist ryanodine (0.0001-1 nmol per mouse i.c.v.) induced amnesia in the mouse passive avoidance test. The role of the type 1, 2, and 3 RyR isoforms in memory processes was then evaluated by inhibiting the expression of the three RyR proteins in the mouse brain. A selective knockdown of the RyR isoforms was obtained by the i.c.v. administration of antisense oligonucleotides (aODNs) complementary to the sequence of RyR1, RyR2 and RyR3 proteins, as demonstrated by immunoblotting experiments. RyR1 (5-9 nmol per mouse i.c.v.) knockdown mice did not show any memory dysfunction. Conversely, RyR2 (1-7 nmol per mouse i.c.v.) and RyR3 (1-7 nmol per mouse i.c.v.) knockdown animals showed an impairment of memory processes. This detrimental effect was temporary and reversible, disappearing 7 d after the end of the aODN treatment. At the highest effective doses, none of the compounds used impaired motor coordination, as revealed by the rota rod test, nor modified spontaneous mobility and inspection activity, as revealed by the hole-board test. In conclusion, the lack of any involvement of cerebral RyR1 was demonstrated. These findings also showed the involvement of type 2 and type 3 RyR in the modulation of memory functions identifying these cerebral RyR isoforms as critical targets underlying memory processes.     

Reversal of retrieval impairment caused by retroactive interference on a two-way active avoidance task in rats

Rats were exposed to an open field with flashing light (OFL; 60-W lamp, 30 Hz, for 7 min) 2 h after training and/or 2 h before testing in a two-way active avoidance task (30 trials, 0.5-mA footshock). Post-training OFL presentation caused retroactive interference, i.e., a retrieval impairment/amnesia for the avoidance task. Pretest OFL exposure reversed the post-training OFL-induced retrieval deficit. Diazepam (2.0 mg/kg), atropine (2.0 mg/kg), and methylatropine (0.1 mg/kg) administered before post-training OFL presentation blocked the OFL amnesic effect. However, these drugs did not counteract the pretest OFL-induced recovery of retrieval. Atropine and methylatropine administered 2 h before testing to rats receiving only post-training OFL presentation canceled the OFL-interfering effect. These results suggest: (1) that the amnesic effect of post-training OFL is due to failure of retrieval of the avoidance task, (2) that the reversal of this retrieval impairment by pretest OFL exposure may involve either priming or state-dependent mechanisms, and (3) that there are different modulatory mechanisms involved in post-training and pretest OFL effects.     

On the requirement of nitric oxide signaling in the amygdala for consolidation of inhibitory avoidance memory

Evidence suggests that the NO/sGC/PKG pathway plays a key role in memory processing but the actual participation of this signaling cascade in the amygdala during memory consolidation remains unknown. Here, we show that when infused in the amygdala immediately after inhibitory avoidance training, but not later, the NO synthase inhibitor L-NNA hindered long-term memory retention without affecting locomotion, exploratory behavior, anxiety state or retrieval of the avoidance response. The amnesic effect of L-NNA was not state-dependent and was mimicked by the soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor LY83583 and the PKG inhibitor KT-5823. On the contrary, post-training intra-amygdala infusion of the NOS substrate L-Arg, the NO-releasing compound SNAP or the non-hydrolysable analog of cGMP 8Br-cGMP increased memory retention in a dose-dependent manner. Co-infusion of 8Br-cGMP reversed the amnesic effect of L-NNA and LY83583 but not that of KT-5823. Our data indicate that the NO-induced activation of PKG in the amygdala is a necessary step for consolidation of inhibitory avoidance memory.     

The Effects of L-glucose on memory in mice are modulated by peripherally acting cholinergic drugs.

D-Glucose improves memory in animals and humans and in subjects with memory pathologies. To date, the accepted conclusion drawn from animal research is that D-glucose improves memory via alterations in central cholinergic systems. However, recent evidence suggests that a sugar which does not cross the blood-brain barrier also facilitates memory (Talley, Arankowsky-Sandoval, McCarty, & Gold, 1999). The present study examined the effects of peripherally administered L-glucose, a stereoisomer of D-glucose, in male mice. Intraperitoneal administration of L-glucose (300 mg/kg) before testing enhanced place learning in the Morris water maze. Mice injected with L-glucose had significantly shorter escape latencies than mice injected with saline (1 ml/kg). Effects were observed on both reference memory and working memory tasks. L-Glucose did not facilitate performance on either task when it was simultaneously administered with cholinergic antagonists that are excluded from the central nervous system. Thus, simultaneous administration of either methyl-scopolamine (0.3 mg/kg), a peripherally acting muscarinic receptor blocker, or hexamethonium (1 mg/kg), a peripherally acting nicotinic receptor blocker, reversed the effect of L-glucose on memory. These findings suggest that the memory effects of l-glucose may be mediated by facilitated acetylcholine synthesis and/or release in the peripheral nervous system.     

Influence of intracerebroventricular administration of dopaminergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory in the step-down passive avoidance test

The effects of dopaminergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance task were examined in mice. Pre-training administration of morphine (5mg/kg) led to state-dependent learning with impaired memory retrieval on the test day which was reversed by pre-test administration of the same dose of the opiate. The pre-test intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist (SKF38393), dopamine D2 receptor agonist (quinpirole) and dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (sulpiride) not only reversed the effect of pre-training morphine treatment, but also increased this action of the drug. Furthermore, the pre-test i.c.v. administration of dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (SCH23390) prevented the restoration of memory by morphine. In conclusion, the morphine-induced recovery of memory, on the test day, seems to be induced, at least in part, through dopamine receptors.     

Involvement of Glutamate Receptors, Protein Kinases, and Protein Synthesis in Memory for Visual Discrimination in the Young Chick

Two-day-old chicks were trained to discriminate between edible chick crumbs and arrays of colored beads glued to the floor of their cage. Normal chicks learned this task within a few minutes and retained it for at least 24 h. The role of several biochemical systems known to be required for other forms of early learning in the chick was explored in this task. Antagonists and inhibitors of these systems were used in the doses known to produce amnesia in a related passive avoidance learning model. Drugs were injected intracerebrally just before training, and retention was tested at various times subsequently. The protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin (240 nmol/chick) was without effect on retention at 30 min posttraining, but chicks were amnestic at 3 and 24 h. The protein kinases inhibitors melittin (1.2 nmol/chick) and 1-(5-isoquinolinylsulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine hydrochloride (100 nmol/chick) were without effect on retention at 30 min posttraining but were amnestic by 3 h. While these effects are similar to those found for one-trial passive avoidance training, neither theN-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a, d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (up to 15 nmol/chick) orDL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (1.3 nmol/chick), both of which are amnestic for passive avoidance, nor the non-NMDA-glutamate receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3,-dione (4 nmol/chick) were amnestic for the visual discrimination task. By contrast, the metabotropic glutamate receptor blocker (RS)-α-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (300 nmol/chick) injected 5 min pretraining resulted in amnesia at 3 h posttraining. The implications of these findings for the putative “memory consolidation cascade” are discussed.     

Involvement of central cholinergic mechanisms in the effects of oxytocin and an oxytocin receptor antagonist on retention performance in mice

Oxytocin (OT, 0.10 microg/kg, sc) impaired retention of a one-trial step-through inhibitory avoidance task when injected into male Swiss mice 10 min after training, as indicated by retention performance 48 h later. In contrast, the immediate post-training administration of the putative oxytocin receptor antagonist d(CH(2))(5)[Tyr(Me)(2), Thr(4), Thy-NH(9)(2)] OVT (AOT, 0.30 microg/kg, sc) significantly enhanced retention performance. Neither OT nor AOT affected response latencies in mice not given footshock on the training trial, and neither the impairing effects of OT nor the enhancing effects of AOT were seen when the training-treatment interval was 180 min, suggesting that both treatments influenced memory storage. The effects of OT (0.10 microg/kg, sc) on retention were prevented by AOT (0.03 microg/kg, sc) given immediately after training, but 10 min prior to OT treatment. The central acting anticholinesterase physostigmine (35, 70, or 150 microg/kg, i.p.), but not its quaternary analogue neostigmine (150 microg/kg, i.p.), reversed the impairment of retention performance induced by OT, whereas low subeffective doses of the centrally active muscarinic cholinergic antagonist atropine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or the central acting nicotinic cholinergic antagonist mecamylamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), but not methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or hexamethonium (5 mg/kg, i.p.) prevented the enhancement of retention performance caused by AOT. We suggest that oxytocin negatively modulates the activity of central cholinergic mechanisms during the posttraining period that follows an aversively motivated learning experience, leading to an impairment of retention performance of the inhibitory avoidance response.     

Epinephrine Effects on Memory Are Not Dependent on Hepatic Glucose Release

Epinephrine released or administered soon after a given training task modulates memory processes. Since epinephrine does not readily cross the blood–brain barrier, studies have suggested that some of the central effects of epinephrine might be mediated by peripheral release of glucose. These experiments examined the involvement of blood glucose levels in the posttraining effects of peripherally administered epinephrine. The effects of the administration of epinephrine (25 and 625 mg/kg) on memory of an inhibitory avoidance task were evaluated in fed and fasted rats (depleted glycogen stores in liver). Blood glucose levels after the task in each group were also measured. Female Wistar rats were divided in two groups. Fed and 48-h-fasted animals were submitted to the inhibitory avoidance task and received ip epinephrine or saline immediately after training. The test session was carried out 48 h after training. Epinephrine (25 or 625 mg/kg) caused an increased glycemia in fed rats, but no effect was observed in fasted animals. Administration of epinephrine 25 mg/kg induced a facilitation of memory, while epinephrine 625 mg/kg impaired retention (either in fasted or in fed animals). There was no relation between increased glycemia induced by epinephrine and its effects on memory, since this drug presented its classical effects independently of the previous state of the animal (fed or fasted). The results of the present study suggest that the effects of systemic released or administered epinephrine on memory processes are not dependent on hepatic glucose release.     

Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study

Studies of attentional capture by personally significant stimuli have reached inconsistent results, possibly because of improper control of the participants' attention. In the present study, the authors controlled visual attention by using a Stroop-like task. Participants responded to a central color and ignored a word presented either centrally (i.e., at the focus of attention) or peripherally (i.e., outside the focus of attention). Central words led to slower reaction times and larger orienting responses for significant items than for neutral items. These effects largely disappeared when the words appeared in a peripheral location. The peripheral words interfered with performance when they were relevant to task demands. These results indicate that there is a fundamental difference between task-relevant words and personally significant words: The former capture attention even when presented peripherally, whereas the latter do not.     

Benzodiazepine receptor ligand influences on acquisition: suggestion of an endogenous modulatory mechanism mediated by benzodiazepine receptors

In rats, pretraining ip administration of the central benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, flumazenil (5.0 mg/kg), or of the inverse agonist, n-butyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (BCCB) (0.2 or 0.5 mg/kg), facilitated retention of a step-down inhibitory avoidance task; the central agonists, clonazepam and diazepam (0.4 or 1.0 mg/kg), had an opposite effect, and the peripheral agonist, 4'-chlordiazepam (1.25 or 6.25 mg/kg), was without effect. Pre- but not post-training flumazenil (2.0 mg/kg) blocked the effect of BCCB (0.5 mg/kg), clonazepam (1.0 mg/kg), or diazepam (1.0 mg/kg) given also pretraining. The post-training administration of all of these drugs had no effect on retention of the avoidance task. Flumazenil (5.0 mg/kg) and BCCB (0.5 mg/kg), given before training, enhanced retention test performance of habituation to a buzzer but not of habituation to an open field. In the three tasks studied, none of the drugs used had any appreciable effect on training session parameters. These results suggest that there is an endogenous mechanism mediated by benzodiazepine agonists, sensitive to inverse agonists, that normally down-regulates acquisition of certain behaviors; this mechanism becomes activated only when the tasks involve or occur with a certain degree of stress or anxiety (i.e., inhibitory avoidance or habituation to the buzzer) and not in less stressful or anxiogenic tasks (i.e., habituation to an open field).     

Intracerebroventricular effects of angiotensin II on a step-through passive avoidance task in rats

A wealth of evidence indicates that angiotensin II (Ang II) is involved in learning and memory. However, the precise role of this peptide in these cognitive processes is still controversial, with data indicating either an inhibitory or an enhancing action. The present study was designed to further investigate the effects of intracerebroventricular injections of Ang II (0.5, 1 or 3nmol/5microl) on a step-through passive avoidance task in male adult Wistar rats. When administered pretraining, Ang II did not affect the acquisition of passive avoidance, but markedly improved avoidance performance when given before the retrieval test. The latter effect was observed in retest sessions performed up to 72h after training. Administration of the peptide five minutes after training impaired retention of inhibitory avoidance. Therefore, Ang II may exert opposite effects on passive avoidance memory according to its interference with brain mechanisms leading to the storage or retrieval of this aversively motivated task.     

Opioid mechanisms are involved in the disruption of arcaine-induced amnesia by context pre-exposure

Previous exposure to the training context disrupts glutamatergic N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) antagonist-induced amnesia, indicating that novelty is necessary for such an amnestic effect. While there are reports that novelty-related release of opioids cause amnesia, no study has addressed whether the amnestic effect of NMDAr antagonists involve opioid mechanisms. In this study we investigated whether pharmacological manipulation of the opioid system immediately after context pre-exposure alters the amnestic effect of arcaine, a NMDAr antagonist. Adult male Wistar rats were habituated (pre-exposed) to a fear conditioning training apparatus or to a different context (open field). Immediately after pre-exposure, animals were injected with saline or naloxone (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or anti-beta-endorphin antibody (1:500, i.c.v.). Forty eight hours after pre-exposure session, all animals were subjected to fear conditioning acquisition protocol and saline or arcaine (30 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered immediately after training. Testing was carried out 24 h later, and freezing responses due to re-exposure to the training apparatus were recorded. Pre-exposure to the training apparatus prevented the impairment of memory induced by post-training arcaine. Administration of naloxone or anti-beta-endorphin antibody, immediately after pre-exposure to the training apparatus, reinstated the amnesic effect of post-training arcaine. The results suggest that endogenous opioid mechanisms are involved in the pre-exposure-induced loss of the amnestic effect of arcaine.     

The effect of feedback on luminance thresholds for peripherally presented stimuli

The effect of a central task on peripheral vision was determined by obtaining absolute luminance thresholds for peripherally presented stimuli. A competing central task was provided by interrupting the fixation light and requiring the S to reilluminate it. Data were obtained over five sessions, with feedback information provided on each trial. Thresholds were highest for the initial session and declined as a function of practice. The magnitude of the change depended upon the interruption rate. When central and peripheral stimuli compete for attention, priority is given initially to the central task, but, with practice, the differences are reduced.     

IMPLICIT MEMORY IN AMNESIC PATIENTS:

Abstract— Previous observations of spared priming in amnesic patients have been based almost entirely on data from visual implicit memory tests Our research examined perceptual priming.in amnesic patients and control subjects on an auditory identification task in which previously spoken words and new words were presented in white noise We manipulated type of encoding task (semantic vs nonsemantic) and speaker's voice at study and test (same vs different) Priming was little affected.by either manipulation, and amnesic patients exhibited normal priming in all experimental conditions On an explicit test of recognition memory, by contrast, amnesic patients exhibited.severely impaired performance following the semantic study task, all subjects showed poor explicit memory following the nonsemantic study task Results are consistent with the idea that auditory priming depends largely on a presemantic auditory perceptual representation system     

Passive avoidance learning produces focal elevation of bursting activity in the chick brain: amnesia abolishes the increase

Presentation of a bright bead to day-old chicks (Gallus domesticus: Ross 1 Chunky Chicks) elicits spontaneous pecking. If the bead is coated with an aversive substance (e.g., methylanthranilate), they will avoid similar beads subsequently; if it is coated with water, they peck avidly on re-presentation. Formation of a memory for this one-trial passive avoidance task is unaffected by subconvulsive transcranial electroshock when applied 10 min after training in 60% of birds, whereas "immediate" post-training electroshock renders 63% of chicks amnesic. Memory formation and retention is associated with a large bilateral enhancement in trained over control chicks (320 and 350% in left and right hemispheres, respectively; p less than 0.001) of a particular spontaneous multi-unit activity firing pattern, that is, short-duration (15-40 ms) bursts of large-amplitude (greater than or equal to 200 microV, 450 microV max p-p), high-frequency (400-450 Hz) spiking in anesthetized chicks. This effect is observed in data lumped from 1-13 h after training and is restricted to the intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale. When chicks are rendered amnesic by electroshock immediately following training, there is a complete abolition of this increase in burst firing; in those chicks where this treatment fails to elicit amnesia, the increase in bursting is still observed. In birds in which the shock is delayed and memory formation occurs, the increase in bursting activity is maintained; however, if the delayed shock produces apparent amnesia, then the increase is once again abolished. The electroshock had no effect on bursting per se in untrained chicks. There was no significant difference in tonic spiking between the chicks. A marked increase in the occurrence of bursting epochs in the IMHV of anesthetized chicks following passive avoidance training is therefore closely associated with memory formation, but not with the nonspecific concomitants of the training procedure.     

Glucocorticoid-mediated effects of systemic oxytocin upon memory retrieval

During the last decade, a considerable amount of evidence has accumulated to show that oxytocin (OT) is involved with functions other than its classical roles in reproduction-associated processes, such as social recognition, maternal behavior and neuroendocrine regulation of the stress response. It has been shown, for instance, that post-training systemic administration of oxytocin in mice produces an amnestic effect on the step-through inhibitory avoidance. Since it is still unclear how systemic levels of OT may affect CNS memory processes, our aim here was to investigate the hypothesis that systemic OT effects on memory retrieval might be mediated through an oxytocin-induced decrease in glucocorticoid release. In our first experiment, we have found an amnestic effect of i.p. pre-test 0.4 microg/kg of OT upon memory retrieval in the inhibitory avoidance task (IA); this OT dose was shown to (a) significantly decrease plasma corticosterone levels when compared to the saline group, and (b) not to cause any anxiety effects by itself in a plus-maze task. At last, an ineffective-by-itself dose of dexamethasone was able to reverse the amnestic effect of this OT dose. Our results suggest that the amnestic effect of systemically administered oxytocin upon memory retrieval in the inhibitory avoidance task was probably caused by an oxytocin-induced decrease in glucocorticoid release from the adrenal gland.     

Priming arithmetic reasoning in an amnesic patient

The present study elucidates the role of implicit memory in problem solving by evaluating priming effects in a severely amnesic patient. An arithmetic series completion task was adopted to investigate the effects of lags, of items difficulty, as well as the influence of different distractor tasks on priming numerical reasoning. The results indicated that the priming effect was maximized in difficult trials and disappeared after long lags. On the other hand, the facilitation effect was not modulated by the nature of the distractor tasks. Critically, the experimental design controlled for peripheral facilitation of visual input and verbal output processes and a recognition task indicated that the effect may not be attributed to explicit memory. Thus, the facilitation must be located to a more central stage, possibly at the stage in which the abstract formula of the underlying algorithm are generated (Langdon & Warrington, 1997).     

Exploring the motivation jungle: predicting performance on a novel task by investigating constructs from different motivation perspectives in tandem

Different theoretical viewpoints on motivation make it hard to decide which model has the best potential to provide valid predictions on classroom performance. This study was designed to explore motivation constructs derived from different motivation perspectives that predict performance on a novel task best. Motivation constructs from self-determination theory, self-regulation theory, and achievement goal theory were investigated in tandem. Performance was measured by systematicity (i.e. how systematically students worked on a problem-solving task) and test score (i.e. score on a multiple-choice test). Hierarchical regression analyses on data from 259 secondary school students showed a quadratic relation between a performance avoidance orientation and both performance outcomes, indicating that extreme high and low performance avoidance resulted in the lowest performance. Furthermore, two three-way interaction effects were found. Intrinsic motivation seemed to play a key role in test score and systematicity performance, provided that effort regulation and metacognitive skills were both high. Results indicate that intrinsic motivation in itself is not enough to attain a good performance. Instead, a moderate score on performance avoidance, together with the ability to remain motivated and effectively regulate and control task behavior, is needed to attain a good performance. High time management skills also contributed to higher test score and systematicity performance and a low performance approach orientation contributed to higher systematicity performance. We concluded that self-regulatory skills should be trained in order to have intrinsically motivated students perform well on novel tasks in the classroom.