Gewalt und Vertrauen

Puzzles are often the result of wrong questions. Not the question is interesting, how it is possible that “quite normal men” are capable of extreme violence, rather the question why in face of world history this question persists and is still considered as being interesting. This article is an attempt to find an answer to this question by discussing the special relation developed by the cultural formation named “modern age” to violence in general and last but not least to its own violence. Violence underlies in modern age a pressure of legitimation which strongly differs from other cultures, and the trust in modern age is to a great extent based on the – all too often counterfactual – assumption that it is non-violent or at least on the way to that. In the course of these considerations it should be examined why there is no satisfying sociology of violence although just this lack is known and bemoaned –, as well as the question on which bases such a sociology could be established: systematically, considering a phenomenology of physical violence and the analysis of the relation of power and violence as well as the communicative function of violence; historically, considering the question how the special relation of modern age to violence was developing and to which changes it is subjected in face of the excesses of violence of the 20th century.     

Leben ohne Gewalt organisieren

Several runs of a cognitive-behavioral group-based training program for violent offenders in a youth detention center were evaluated. The training aims at reducing disposition towards violence, promoting responsibility and strengthening personal and social resources. The 49 participants were compared to 47 non-participating violent offenders. For the participants a reduction of several facets of aggression and an increase of responsibility for the offence was observed in a pre-post-comparison. However, treatment effects appear to decrease with longer observation time. Competencies such as empathy were not affected by the training. Furthermore, participants showed no difference to non-participants regarding officially recorded violent recidivism.     

Gewalt als Selbstschutz gegen Angst

The article reports on the treatment of a radically right wing young man. His ideology, acts of and inclination to violence and his ownership of weapons, including weapons of war, gave him the feeling of being different from the others and also gave him protection from anxiety, especially the fear of death, and some stability to his fragile ego. In his childhood, he functioned as the object of unfulfilled wishes of his mother, who was a war baby and was unable to empathise his feelings. During treatment, he relived traumatic childhood experiences. His powerful feelings and corresponding countertransference experience, opened ways for a comprehensive understanding of his inclination to violence and to new experiences.     

Gewalt und Missbrauch in der Psychotherapie

Starting from the fundamental ethical principles of medicine, the different forms of abuse in psychotherapy are described and discussed in the context of particular case studies. Besides sexual abuse, also the more subtle violations of basic ethical principles are taken into consideration. These include especially orally-exploitative forms of abuse, therapists’ improper acting-out of their own desires for close attachment or dominance conflicts, and narcissictic abuse. Finally, a particular type of narcissistic abuse is dealt with: the over-emphasis on the therapist’s own therapeutic method, with a tendency to dismiss alternative treatment strategies that might be more appropriate for the individual patient.     

Der schwierige Weg der Dritten Gewalt zwischen Freiheit und Sicherheit

The Federal Constitutional Court is searching for a legal instrument with which it can enforce the entitlement to freedom of those sentenced to lengthy prison terms when leniency is not shown due to the passivity of correctional facilities. Increasingly – and in contrast to the 1990s – judicial ministries urge correctional facilities to be conservative with respect to decisions on privileges due to the prioritization of aspects of public security (trial vs. expectation clauses). The courts responsible for the execution of civil judgment need successful experiences in the liberalization of the enforcement of sentences in order to give a positive legal prognosis. With its most recent decision, the Federal Constitutional Court affirmed its determination to aid the inmates’ entitlement to freedom if the penal system does not relax sentences. From a criminological perspective, it is already the case that the relevance of leniency tests for the creation of prognoses is questioned. A sentence enforcement chamber of the regional court in Aachen recently ordered the release of a prisoner after 35 years without any leniencies. Specialists’ appraisals were given priority over the judicial correctional facility’s judgment. Under consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of denied privileges the paper calls for stronger constitutional access for the courts responsible for the enforcement of sentences.