共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Travis Dumsday 《Sophia》2014,53(1):51-65
If God exists, and if our ultimate well-being depends on having a positive relationship with Him (which requires as a first step that we believe He exists), why doesn't He make sure that we all believe in Him? Why doesn't He make His existence obvious? This traditional theological question is today much-used as an argument for atheism. In this paper I argue that the answer may have something to do with God's character, specifically God's humility. 相似文献
4.
Hugh J. McCann 《Sophia》2013,52(1):77-94
This paper examines the relationship between God and those universals that characterize his nature. It is argued that God has sovereignty over his nature, even though he is not self-creating, and does not give rise to the universals that characterize his nature by any act of intellection. Rather, God is himself an act of rational willing in which all that is has its existence. Because the act that is God is one of free will, he has sovereignty over the features it displays, which include all that characterizes his nature. 相似文献
5.
6.
《International Journal of Systematic Theology》2017,19(2):144-162
In his thought‐provoking critique of classical Christian theism, Isaak Dorner argues that a traditional understanding of God's immutability precludes any diversity in God's action and presence in the world. Dorner reasons that the view of God developed in scholastic thought entails a ‘uniform’ divine causality in which God cannot act in new and distinct ways according to the various circumstances of his creatures. This sort of critique elicits the question of whether God's immutability, if taken to include his pure actuality, flattens out his action such that he is no longer truly engaged in the lives of his creatures. In this article, I propose that a development of the virtual distinction found in scholastic theology proper will enable us to integrate (1) the pure actuality of God and (2) what we may call the formal and temporal diversity of God's action pro nobis that confirms his authentic involvement in the world. Unfolding the explanatory power of the virtual distinction will require considering its relationship to the concept of God's pure actuality and analyzing different aspects of divine action in which the diversity of that action might be located. 相似文献
7.
Dan O’Brien 《Heythrop Journal》2020,61(3):412-423
Religious art can reconfigure our conception of God’s omniscience. This should be seen in terms of divine understanding, with empathy and love required for God’s understanding of human beings. §I surveys reasons to think that God can empathize with us. §II and §III consider different ways that religious art has attempted to represent such empathetic relations. There are images of Christ’s suffering that elicit empathy in the viewer, and there are depictions of God’s empathetic understanding of humanity. §IV and §V consider the epistemic roles of art and how religious art can reconfigure how we think of God’s omniscience. 相似文献
8.
9.
Traditional theism teaches that God engages in a relentless form of observation for every human being. If, as is widely supposed, humans have a right to privacy, then it seems that God constantly violates this right. In this paper we argue that there is both a defensible philosophical excuse and justification for this infringement. We also argue that this defense is extensible to human social and political contexts; it provides the vital elements of a theory of just privacy infringement. This theory is broadly compatible both with major forms of political theory (except anarchistic ones) and with the main conceptions of privacy defended in recent philosophical and jurisprudential literature. 相似文献
10.
11.
Kim‐Pong Tam Tse‐Mei Shu Henry Kin‐Shing Ng Yuk‐Yue Tong 《Journal of applied social psychology》2013,43(3):603-611
The present research examined the association between belief about immutability of moral character and punitiveness toward criminal offenders. Overall, participants who believed that moral character is immutable (entity theorists) were more punitive than those who believed that it is changeable (incremental theorists). More important, the present research identified two mediational paths: Entity theorists made more internal attribution of criminal behavior and held stronger expectation of offenders' recidivism, both of which in turn led to stronger punitiveness. Also, contrary to some researchers' speculation, entity theorists did not perceive less controllability in criminal behavior. Implications for implicit theory research and criminal justice research are discussed. 相似文献
12.
Leigh C. Vicens 《International Journal for Philosophy of Religion》2012,71(2):145-155
In this paper I consider the view, held by some Thomistic thinkers, that divine determinism is compatible with human freedom,
even though natural determinism is not. After examining the purported differences between divine and natural determinism,
I discuss the Consequence Argument, which has been put forward to establish the incompatibility of natural determinism and
human freedom. The Consequence Argument, I note, hinges on the premise that an action ultimately determined by factors outside
of the actor’s control is not free. Since, I argue, divine determinism also entails that human actions are ultimately determined
by factors outside of the actors’ control, I suggest that a parallel argument to the Consequence Argument can be constructed
for the incompatibility of divine determinism and human freedom. I conclude that those who reject natural compatibilism on
the basis of the Consequence Argument should also reject divine compatibilism. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
Emily Ann DeMoor 《Journal of religion and health》2009,48(1):113-115
“Divine Encounter” is a poem depicting a place-based religious experience. 相似文献
16.
17.
Ferhat Yöney 《Islam & Christian-Muslim Relations》2019,30(4):413-433
ABSTRACTIn 1980, George F. Hourani and, more recently in 2010, Mariam al-Attar argued that Islam is not compatible with divine command theory. They rehearsed some standard objections (namely the objectivity of morality, divine goodness, moral knowledge) targeted against meta-ethical divine command theory taking the Qur’an into consideration, and argued that it should be discarded from an Islamic point of view. In addition, they criticized divine command theory since it involves obedience to God and, therefore, does not allow moral reasoning but rather is the source of religious fundamentalism and violence. Although these objections are powerful when applied to the early Ash?arite version of divine command theory, they are not powerful against recent formulations of it presented by Christian philosophers. For example, a divine command theory like that of Robert Merrihew Adams is well suited to respond to these objections. Thus, divine command theory, in its recent formulations, is a genuine option for Muslims and should be given due consideration. 相似文献
18.
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion - 相似文献
19.
20.