共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Herbert Feigl 《Erkenntnis》1937,7(1):393-419
Ohne ZusammenfassungDiefer Nachruf auf Moritz Schlick, der anläßlich der erften Wiederkehr feines Todestages erfcheinen follte, kommt infolge unvorhergefehener Umftände erft jetzt zum Abdruck. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Jim Shelton 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2014,9(4):602-614
Beginning from the Enlightenment view that beauty or art is "useless," the attempts to explain how aesthetic experience and judgment are possible presented by Moritz Schlick and Li Zehou are examined, compared and contrasted. The paper treats three main subjects, the anthropological origins of beauty, the origins of aesthetic judgments and the problem of the purpose or function of beauty or aesthetic experience. In the first--the historical-causal roots of beauty--the problem discussed is how to account for aesthetics in light of the practical needs and pursuits of human beings. For Schlick, the problem is couched in terms of how aesthetic experience can be made consistent with natural selection. The second main subject-the philosophical roots of beauty-is a discussion of the origin in the sense of justification of aesthetic judgments. And the third examines the problem of assigning some purpose to aesthetic feelings and attitudes. An apparent contrast is made, and perhaps resolved, between the respective views of Schlick and Li. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Paul Livingston 《Synthese》2002,132(3):239-272
16.
17.
Thomas Mormann 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》2009,40(1):155-160
18.
19.
Niels Henrik Gregersen 《Theology & Science》2013,11(4):455-468
AbstractThe article discusses points and perspectives offered by the four respondents to the R.J. Russell Fellow Lectures for 2013/14. Joshua M. Moritz and Ron Cole-Turner bring in new material from biblical and patristic traditions relevant for the proposal of deep incarnation. How does the concept of deep incarnation fare in relation to tradition and science? Ted Peters and Daniel J. Peterson raise questions about the compatibility between a compatibilist view of divine action and creaturely freedom on the one hand, and ideas of kenosis on the other. Which models of kenosis models are workable, and which forms of compatibilism? 相似文献