Moritz Schlick

Ohne ZusammenfassungDiefer Nachruf auf Moritz Schlick, der anläßlich der erften Wiederkehr feines Todestages erfcheinen follte, kommt infolge unvorhergefehener Umftände erft jetzt zum Abdruck.     

Nachruf auf Moritz Schlick

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

De beteekenis van Moritz Schlick voor de wijsbegeerte

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Li Zehou and Moritz Schlick on the Roots of Beauty

Beginning from the Enlightenment view that beauty or art is ＂useless,＂ the attempts to explain how aesthetic experience and judgment are possible presented by Moritz Schlick and Li Zehou are examined, compared and contrasted. The paper treats three main subjects, the anthropological origins of beauty, the origins of aesthetic judgments and the problem of the purpose or function of beauty or aesthetic experience. In the first--the historical-causal roots of beauty--the problem discussed is how to account for aesthetics in light of the practical needs and pursuits of human beings. For Schlick, the problem is couched in terms of how aesthetic experience can be made consistent with natural selection. The second main subject-the philosophical roots of beauty-is a discussion of the origin in the sense of justification of aesthetic judgments. And the third examines the problem of assigning some purpose to aesthetic feelings and attitudes. An apparent contrast is made, and perhaps resolved, between the respective views of Schlick and Li.     

石里克伦理思想述评

本文探讨了逻辑实证主义维也纳学派石里克的伦理思想 ,认为他引入心理学方法而提出的动机形成律在解释人的道德问题上极具特色 ,分析了他的快乐情感的价值以及人合乎道德行动的动因等伦理观点 ,并通过将其与边沁的功利主义、康德的义务论以及中国的程朱理学、泰州学派等伦理思想的比较 ,进一步挖掘了石里克伦理思想的理论价值。     

The Twofold Assumption: A Response to Cole-Turner,Moritz, Peters and Peterson

Abstract

The article discusses points and perspectives offered by the four respondents to the R.J. Russell Fellow Lectures for 2013/14. Joshua M. Moritz and Ron Cole-Turner bring in new material from biblical and patristic traditions relevant for the proposal of deep incarnation. How does the concept of deep incarnation fare in relation to tradition and science? Ted Peters and Daniel J. Peterson raise questions about the compatibility between a compatibilist view of divine action and creaturely freedom on the one hand, and ideas of kenosis on the other. Which models of kenosis models are workable, and which forms of compatibilism?