The amygdala is not necessary for unconditioned stimulus inflation after Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats

The basolateral complex (BLA) and central nucleus (CEA) of the amygdala play critical roles in associative learning, including Pavlovian conditioning. However, the precise role for these structures in Pavlovian conditioning is not clear. Recent work in appetitive conditioning paradigms suggests that the amygdala, particularly the BLA, has an important role in representing the value of the unconditioned stimulus (US). It is not known whether the amygdala performs such a function in aversive paradigms, such as Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats. To address this issue, Experiments 1 and 2 used temporary pharmacological inactivation of the amygdala prior to a US inflation procedure to assess its role in revaluing shock USs after either overtraining (Experiment 1) or limited training (Experiment 2), respectively. Inactivation of the BLA or CEA during the inflation session did not affect subsequent increases in conditioned freezing observed to either the tone conditioned stimulus (CS) or the conditioning context in either experiment. In Experiment 3, NBQX infusions into the BLA impaired the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning with an inflation-magnitude US, indicating that the amygdala is required for associative learning with intense USs. Together, these results suggest that the amygdala is not required for revaluing an aversive US despite being required for the acquisition of fear to that US.Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats is a behavioral model used to investigate the neurobiology underlying the development and maintenance of fear learning and memory (Grillon et al. 1996; LeDoux 1998, 2000; Bouton et al. 2001; Maren 2001b, 2005; Kim and Jung 2006). In this model, an innocuous conditioned stimulus (CS), such as a tone, is paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), such as a footshock. After one or more pairings, the rat learns that the CS predicts the US. As a consequence, CS presentations alone elicit a conditioned fear response (CR), which includes increases in heart rate, arterial blood pressure, hypoalgesia, potentiated acoustic startle, stress hormone release, and freezing (somatomotor immobility).The amygdala has been identified as one of the major regions in which fear memories are encoded and stored. Within the amygdala, the basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA; consisting of the lateral, basolateral, and basomedial nuclei) and the central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA) receive convergent CS and US information and are involved in the acquisition of fear memories (LeDoux 1998, 2000; Fendt and Fanselow 1999; Davis and Whalen 2001; Maren 2001b; Schafe et al. 2001; Fanselow and Gale 2003; Wilensky et al. 2006; Zimmerman et al. 2007). In addition, the CEA has an important role in the expression of fear CRs (Fendt and Fanselow 1999; LeDoux 2000; Davis and Whalen 2001; Maren 2001b; Fanselow and Gale 2003). In support of this, many studies have shown that either permanent or temporary lesions of the BLA or CEA prevent the acquisition and/or expression of fear memories (Helmstetter 1992; Helmstetter and Bellgowan 1994; Campeau and Davis 1995; Maren et al. 1996a,b; Killcross et al. 1997; Muller et al. 1997; Walker and Davis 1997; Cousens and Otto 1998; Maren 1998, 1999, 2001a,b; Wilensky et al. 1999, 2000, 2006; Goosens and Maren 2001, 2003; Nader et al. 2001; Fanselow and Gale 2003; Gale et al. 2004; Koo et al. 2004; Zimmerman et al. 2007).In addition to its role in encoding CS–US associations during conditioning, recent work suggests that the amygdala is also involved in representing properties of the US itself. For example, temporary or permanent lesions of the BLA reduce both decrements in conditioned responding after devaluation of a food US (Hatfield et al. 1996; Killcross et al. 1997; Blundell et al. 2001; Balleine et al. 2003; Everitt et al. 2003; Pickens et al. 2003; Holland 2004) and increments in conditional responding after inflation of a shock US (Fanselow and Gale 2003). Moreover, recent electrophysiological studies in primates indicate that amygdala neurons represent the value of both aversive and appetitive outcomes (Paton et al. 2006; Belova et al. 2007, 2008; Salzman et al. 2007). These studies suggest that one function of the BLA is to represent specific properties of biologically significant events, such as the food or shock USs that are typically used in Pavlovian conditioning paradigms. By this view, the BLA may represent specific sensory properties of USs that shape the nature of learned behavioral responses to the US (Balleine and Killcross 2006) and allow CSs to gain access to the incentive value of the US (Everitt et al. 2003).In contrast to this view, we recently reported that rats with neurotoxic BLA lesions exhibit normal US revaluation after Pavlovian fear conditioning (Rabinak and Maren 2008). In this study, auditory fear conditioning (75 CS–US trials) with a moderate footshock (1 mA) was followed by several exposures (five US-alone trials) to an intense footshock (3 mA) during an inflation session. Both intact rats and rats with BLA lesions exhibit a robust increase in conditional freezing to the auditory CS during a subsequent retention test (Rabinak and Maren 2008). Control experiments suggested that this was due to a revaluation of the US with which the CS was associated, rather than nonassociative sensitization of fear engendered by exposure to intense shock. These data reveal that the BLA may not be necessary for representing properties of shock USs during Pavlovian fear conditioning. To address these issues further, we have examined the consequence of reversible pharmacological manipulations of the amygdala during US inflation on conditional fear responses established with either extensive or limited training.     

Role of amygdala and hippocampus in the neural circuit subserving conditioned defeat in Syrian hamsters

We examined the roles of the amygdala and hippocampus in the formation of emotionally relevant memories using an ethological model of conditioned fear termed conditioned defeat (CD). Temporary inactivation of the ventral, but not dorsal hippocampus (VH, DH, respectively) using muscimol disrupted the acquisition of CD, whereas pretraining VH infusions of anisomycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor, failed to block CD. To test for a functional connection between the VH and basolateral amygdala (BLA), we used a classic functional connectivity design wherein injections are made unilaterally in brain areas either on the same or opposite sides of the brain. A functional connection between the BLA and VH necessary for the acquisition of CD could not be found because unilateral inactivation of either BLA alone (but not either VH alone) was sufficient to disrupt CD. This finding suggested instead that there may be a critical functional connection between the left and right BLA. In our final experiment, we infused muscimol unilaterally in the BLA and assessed Fos immunoreactivity on the contralateral side following exposure to social defeat. Inactivation of either BLA significantly reduced defeat-induced Fos immunoreactivity in the contralateral BLA. These experiments demonstrate for the first time that whereas the VH is necessary for the acquisition of CD, it does not appear to mediate the plastic changes underlying CD. There also appears to be a critical interaction between the two BLAs such that bilateral activation of this brain area must occur in order to support fear learning in this model, a finding that is unprecedented to date.Our laboratory has taken a novel approach to examine the behavioral and physiological changes that accompany social experience by studying a striking behavioral response that is exhibited following social defeat. When a Syrian hamster is paired with a larger, more aggressive opponent and is defeated, it subsequently becomes highly submissive and fails to defend its own home cage even against a smaller, nonaggressive intruder. We call this change in the behavior of the defeated hamster conditioned defeat (CD) (Portegal et al. 1993) and believe that it is a valuable model with which to study neural and behavioral plasticity following exposure to a biologically relevant stressor.One of the critical structures subserving CD is the amygdala; temporary inactivation of its major subnuclei, including the basolateral amygdala (BLA), blocks the acquisition of CD (Jasnow and Huhman 2001). Together with the findings that protein synthesis inhibition in the BLA effectively disrupts CD (Markham and Huhman 2008) and that overexpression of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) in the BLA enhances CD (Jasnow et al. 2005), the data support the hypothesis that the BLA is a critical site for plasticity related to CD.One brain region that we have largely overlooked, but which receives considerable attention for its role in learning and memory, is the hippocampus. Several groups have now gathered anatomical and behavioral data demonstrating functionally specific dissociation between the dorsal (DH) and ventral (VH) regions of the hippocampus (Risold and Swanson 1996; Moser and Moser 1998; Bannerman et al. 2004; McEown and Treit 2009). While the DH is critical for spatial relationships (O''Keefe and Nadel 1978; Moser et al. 1993; Eichenbaum 1996) and has been shown to play an important role in social recognition in hamsters (Lai et al. 2005), the VH appears to be involved in the production of behaviors produced in response to aversive stimuli (Trivedi and Coover 2004; Pentkowski et al. 2006).Considering how critically important the hippocampus and amygdala are in relation to fear and memory, some studies are beginning to suggest that these areas may functionally interact to modulate memory function (Akirav and Richter-Levin 2002; McGaugh et al. 2002; McGaugh 2004; Vouimba et al. 2007). The BLA projects to the hippocampus (Amaral and Insausti 1992), and high-frequency stimulation of the BLA combined with tetanic stimulation of the perforant pathway facilitates hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) (Ikegaya et al. 1996). Additionally, electrolytic lesions of the VH produce a deficit in the acquisition of fear to a contextual conditioned stimulus, and NMDA lesions of the BLA cause a nonselective deficit in the acquisition of fear to both contextual and acoustic conditioned stimuli (Maren and Fanselow 1995). Although our laboratory has previously demonstrated that the BLA is critically involved in the acquisition of CD (Jasnow and Huhman 2001), the role of the hippocampus has yet to be investigated. The aim of the present study was to examine whether the VH and DH are involved in mediating CD and also to determine whether there is a functional interaction between the hippocampus and the amygdala in the acquisition of CD.     

Hippocampal and extrahippocampal systems compete for control of contextual fear: Role of ventral subiculum and amygdala

Two neural systems, a hippocampal system and an extrahippocampal system compete for control over contextual fear, and the hippocampal system normally dominates. Our experiments reveal that output provided by the ventral subiculum is critical for the hippocampal system to win this competition. Bilateral electrolytic lesions of the ventral subiculum after conditioning, but not before conditioning, impaired contextual fear conditioning. Reversibly inactivating this region by bilateral injections of muscimol produced the same results—no impairment when the injection occurred prior to conditioning but a significant impairment when this region was inactivated after conditioning. Thus, the extrahippocampal system can support contextual fear conditioning if the ventral subiculum is disabled before conditioning but not if it is disabled after conditioning. Our experiments also reveal that the basolateral region of the amygdala (BLA) is where the two systems compete for associative control of the fear system. To test this hypothesis we reasoned that the extrahippocampal system would also acquire associative control over the fear system, even if the hippocampal system were functional, if the basal level of plasticity potential in the BLA could be increased. We did this by injecting the D1 dopamine agonist, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF82958","term_id":"1156217255","term_text":"SKF82958"}}SKF82958, into the BLA just prior to conditioning. This treatment resulted in a significant increase in freezing when the ventral subiculum was disabled prior to the test. These results are discussed in relationship to the idea that D1 agonists increase plasticity potential by increasing the pool of available extrasynaptic GluR1 receptors in the population of neurons supporting acquired fear.It is generally believed that contextual fear conditioning depends on the hippocampus. However, it is now clear that an extrahippocampal system exists that can also support contextual fear conditioning. The last statement is based on the fact that damage to the hippocampus prior to conditioning has a minor impact on contextual fear (Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Cho et al. 1999; Wiltgen et al. 2006). In fact, the conclusion that the hippocampus is normally involved in contextual fear conditioning is now based primarily on the finding that damage to the hippocampus after conditioning greatly impairs fear to the context in which conditioning occurs (Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Anagnostaras et al. 1999; Bannerman et al. 1999; Richmond et al. 1999; Fanselow 2000; Rudy et al. 2004; Wiltgen et al. 2006). Maren et al. (1997) were the first to appreciate the implications of this set of findings. Specifically, they proposed that (1) in the normal animal there is competition between the hippocampal system and an extrahippocampal system for support of contextual fear conditioning, and (2) the hippocampal system normally dominates the extrahippocampal system—preventing it from acquiring the information needed to support fear to the context. This competition hypothesis provides a reasonable account of the lesion data. If the hippocampus is damaged prior to conditioning, then the extrahippocampal system will be able to acquire control over the fear system and generate a fear response at the time of testing. However, if the hippocampal system is functional during conditioning, it will (1) acquire control of the fear system, and (2) prevent the acquisition of control by the extrahippocampal system. Thus, if the hippocampal system is damaged after conditioning, the expression of contextual fear will be impaired, because the information that was acquired by the hippocampal system will not be available and the extrahippocampal system never acquired the relevant information.Maren et al.''s competition hypothesis is accepted by a number of other researchers (Wiltgen and Fanselow 2003; Rudy et al. 2004; Driscoll et al. 2005; Wiltgen et al. 2006). Nevertheless, very little is known about the mediators of this competition. The experiments in this study were aimed at filling some of the gaps in our knowledge of the neural basis of this competition. They are organized around two hypotheses:

• The ability of the hippocampal system to dominate the extrahippocampal system depends on information it provides through the ventral subiculum, a major output region of the hippocampus.
• The locus of the competition is the basolateral region of the amygdala (BLA), which is thought to be critical to the acquisition of conditioned fear and is where information from the hippocampal and extrahippocampal system can converge.

     

Extinction circuits for fear and addiction overlap in prefrontal cortex

Extinction is a form of inhibitory learning that suppresses a previously conditioned response. Both fear and drug seeking are conditioned responses that can lead to maladaptive behavior when expressed inappropriately, manifesting as anxiety disorders and addiction, respectively. Recent evidence indicates that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is critical for the extinction of both fear and drug-seeking behaviors. Moreover, a dorsal-ventral distinction is apparent within the mPFC, such that the prelimbic (PL-mPFC) cortex drives the expression of fear and drug seeking, whereas the infralimbic (IL-mPFC) cortex suppresses these behaviors after extinction. For conditioned fear, the dorsal-ventral dichotomy is accomplished via divergent projections to different subregions of the amygdala, whereas for drug seeking, it is accomplished via divergent projections to the subregions of the nucleus accumbens. Given that the mPFC represents a common node in the extinction circuit for these behaviors, treatments that target this region may help alleviate symptoms of both anxiety and addictive disorders by enhancing extinction memory.Emotional memories, both in the aversive and appetitive domains, are important for guiding behavior. Regulating the expression of these memories is critical for mental health. Extinction of classical conditioning is one form of emotion regulation that is easily modeled in animals. In the aversive domain, a conditioned stimulus (CS) is typically paired with a shock, while in the appetitive domain, a CS is paired with the availability of food or drug reward. Repeated presentation of the CS in the absence of the reinforcer leads to extinction of conditioned fear or drug-seeking behaviors. In recent years, there have been great advances in our understanding of the neural circuitry responsible for this form of inhibitory learning (for reviews, see Cammarota et al. 2005; Maren 2005; Myers and Davis 2007; Quirk and Mueller 2008). The prefrontal cortex has been strongly implicated in fear expression (Powell et al. 2001; Vidal-Gonzalez et al. 2006; Corcoran and Quirk 2007) and fear extinction (Herry and Garcia 2002; Milad and Quirk 2002; Gonzalez-Lima and Bruchey 2004; Hugues et al. 2004; Burgos-Robles et al. 2007; Hikind and Maroun 2008; Lin et al. 2008; Mueller et al. 2008; Sotres-Bayon et al. 2008), and more recently, in expression of drug seeking after extinction (Peters et al. 2008a,b). These findings are consistent with a well-documented role of the prefrontal cortex in executive function and emotional regulation (Miller 2000; Fuster 2002; Quirk and Beer 2006; Sotres-Bayon et al. 2006).In this review, we propose that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) regulates the expression of both fear and drug memories after extinction, through divergent projections to the amygdala and nucleus accumbens, respectively. Extinction failure in the aversive domain can lead to anxiety disorders (Delgado et al. 2006; Milad et al. 2006), while extinction failure in the appetitive domain can lead to relapse in addicted subjects (Kalivas et al. 2005; Garavan and Hester 2007). A common neural circuit for extinction of fear and drug memories would suggest shared mechanisms and treatment strategies across both domains.     

Interactions between prefrontal cortex and cerebellum revealed by trace eyelid conditioning

Eyelid conditioning has proven useful for analysis of learning and computation in the cerebellum. Two variants, delay and trace conditioning, differ only by the relative timing of the training stimuli. Despite the subtlety of this difference, trace eyelid conditioning is prevented by lesions of the cerebellum, hippocampus, or medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), whereas delay eyelid conditioning is prevented by cerebellar lesions and is largely unaffected by forebrain lesions. Here we test whether these lesion results can be explained by two assertions: (1) Cerebellar learning requires temporal overlap between the mossy fiber inputs activated by the tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and the climbing fiber inputs activated by the reinforcing unconditioned stimulus (US), and therefore (2) trace conditioning requires activity that outlasts the presentation of the CS in a subset of mossy fibers separate from those activated directly by the CS. By use of electrical stimulation of mossy fibers as a CS, we show that cerebellar learning during trace eyelid conditioning requires an input that persists during the stimulus-free trace interval. By use of reversible inactivation experiments, we provide evidence that this input arises from the mPFC and arrives at the cerebellum via a previously unidentified site in the pontine nuclei. In light of previous PFC recordings in various species, we suggest that trace eyelid conditioning involves an interaction between the persistent activity of delay cells in mPFC-a putative mechanism of working memory-and motor learning in the cerebellum.Eyelid conditioning is a form of associative learning that has proven useful for mechanistic studies of learning (Thompson 1986). All variants of eyelid conditioning involve pairing a conditioned stimulus (CS, typically a tone) with a reinforcing unconditioned stimulus (US, mild electrical stimulation near the eye) to promote learned eyelid closure in response to the CS (also known as a conditioned response). Delay eyelid conditioning, where the CS and US overlap in time (Fig. 1A , left), is largely unaffected by forebrain lesions (Solomon et al. 1986; Mauk and Thompson 1987; Kronforst-Collins and Disterhoft 1998; Weible et al. 2000; Powell et al. 2001; McLaughlin et al. 2002) and engages the cerebellum relatively directly (but see Halverson and Freeman 2006). Presentation of the tone and the US are conveyed to the cerebellum via activation of mossy fibers and climbing fibers, respectively (Fig. 1B; Mauk et al. 1986; Steinmetz et al. 1987, 1989; Sears and Steinmetz 1991; Hesslow 1994; Hesslow et al. 1999). In addition, output via a cerebellar deep nucleus is required for the expression of conditioned responses (McCormick and Thompson 1984). This relatively direct mapping of stimuli onto inputs and of output onto behavior makes delay eyelid conditioning a powerful tool for the analysis of cerebellar learning and computation (Mauk and Donegan 1997; Medina and Mauk 2000; Medina et al. 2000, 2002; Hansel et al. 2001; Ohyama et al. 2003).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The procedures, neural pathways, and putative signals involved in delay and trace eyelid conditioning. (A) Stimulus timing for delay (left) and trace (right) training trials. For delay conditioning, the US overlaps in time with the tone CS. In this and subsequent figures, green is used to indicate the presentation of the CS for delay conditioning. For trace conditioning, the US is presented after CS offset, and “trace interval” refers to the period between CS offset and US onset. For convenience, we used red and maroon regions to represent the CS and trace interval, respectively. Sample conditioned eyelid responses are shown below, for which an upward deflection indicates closure of the eyelid. (B) Schematic representation of the pathways engaged by delay conditioning. The CS and US, respectively, engage mossy fibers and climbing fibers relatively directly, and forebrain input is not required for normal learning. (C) The signals hypothesized to engage the cerebellum during trace conditioning. The activity of mossy fibers directly activated by the tone CS does not significantly outlast the stimulus. Thus, a forebrain structure is thought to provide an input that overlaps in time with the US and is necessary to produce cerebellar learning.Trace eyelid conditioning, where the US is presented after tone offset (Fig. 1A, right), has attracted interest for its potential to reveal the nature of interactions between the forebrain and cerebellum as well as the learning mechanisms within these systems. This potential stems from the sensitivity of trace conditioning not only to lesions of cerebellum but also to lesions of hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), or mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (Woodruff-Pak et al. 1985; Moyer Jr. et al. 1990; Kronforst-Collins and Disterhoft 1998; Weible et al. 2000; Powell et al. 2001; McLaughlin et al. 2002; Powell and Churchwell 2002; Simon et al. 2005). Given the general inability of forebrain lesions to affect delay conditioning, these results have promoted the general interpretation that the forebrain and cerebellum interact to mediate trace conditioning (Weiss and Disterhoft 1996; Clark and Squire 1998; Clark et al. 2002).Here we test the specific hypotheses that (Fig. 1C) (1) cerebellar learning requires that mossy fiber and climbing fiber inputs overlap in time (or nearly so) and (2) that cerebellar learning in trace conditioning occurs in response to a forebrain-driven mossy fiber input that outlasts the CS to overlap with the US rather than the inputs activated by the tone CS (Clark et al. 2002). The data provide direct support for both assertions and, together with recent anatomical studies (Buchanan et al. 1994; Weible et al. 2007), reveal a pathway between the mPFC and cerebellum that is necessary for the expression of trace eyelid responses. When combined with previous recordings from PFC in primates and rodents (Funahashi et al. 1989; Bodner et al. 1996; Fuster et al. 2000; Narayanan and Laubach 2006), these data support the hypothesis that trace eyelid conditioning is mediated by interactions between working memory-related persistent activity in mPFC and motor learning mechanisms in the cerebellum.     

Memory deficits are associated with impaired ability to modulate neuronal excitability in middle-aged mice

Normal aging disrupts hippocampal neuroplasticity and learning and memory. Aging deficits were exposed in a subset (30%) of middle-aged mice that performed below criterion on a hippocampal-dependent contextual fear conditioning task. Basal neuronal excitability was comparable in middle-aged and young mice, but learning-related modulation of the post-burst afterhyperpolarization (AHP)—a general mechanism engaged during learning—was impaired in CA1 neurons from middle-aged weak learners. Thus, modulation of neuronal excitability is critical for retention of context fear in middle-aged mice. Disruption of AHP plasticity may contribute to contextual fear deficits in middle-aged mice—a model of age-associated cognitive decline (AACD).Plasticity of intrinsic neuronal excitability increases the overall storage capacity of neurons and therefore likely plays a critical role in learning and memory (Zhang and Linden 2003). Increased neuronal excitability via reductions of the post-burst afterhyperpolarization (AHP) is hypothesized as a general mechanism underlying learning and memory tasks (Disterhoft et al. 1986; Disterhoft and Oh 2006). The AHP serves to limit subsequent firing in response to excitation (Madison and Nicoll 1984; Lancaster and Adams 1986; Storm 1990; Sah and Bekkers 1996). Generally speaking, the size of the AHP is inversely related to neuronal excitability, and the measurement of the AHP is routinely used as an index of neuronal excitability.Our laboratory and others have shown that AHP reductions are observed in hippocampal neurons from animals that learn hippocampal-dependent tasks including trace eyeblink conditioning in rabbit and rat (de Jonge et al. 1990; Moyer Jr et al. 1996, 2000; Kuo 2004) and spatial water maze in rat and mouse (Oh et al. 2003; Tombaugh et al. 2005; Ohno et al. 2006b). Learning-related reductions in the AHP have also been observed in cortical neurons following odor discrimination (Saar et al. 1998) and extinction learning (Santini et al. 2008). In vitro, activity-dependent plasticity of the AHP is induced using physiologically relevant stimuli (Kaczorowski et al. 2007). Because the AHP serves to limit subsequent firing, learning-related reductions in the AHP are poised to facilitate mechanisms crucial for information storage, such as long-term potentiation (LTP), synaptic integration (Sah and Bekkers 1996), metaplasticity (Le Ray et al. 2004), and spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) (Le Ray et al. 2004).Hippocampal neurons from naïve aged rodents and rabbits show a decrement in basal excitability evidenced by a robust enhancement of the AHP (Landfield and Pitler 1984; Moyer Jr et al. 1992, 2000; Oh et al. 1999; Kumar and Foster 2002, 2004; Power et al. 2002; Hemond and Jaffe 2005; Murphy et al. 2006b; Gant and Thibault 2008). Enhancement of the AHP in hippocampal neurons in aged animals correlates with impaired performance on learning paradigms that depend on a functional hippocampus, such as trace eyeblink and spatial water maze (Moyer Jr et al. 2000; Tombaugh et al. 2005; Murphy et al. 2006a). Pharmaceuticals aimed at reducing the AHP and increasing basal excitability (Moyer Jr et al. 1992; Moyer Jr and Disterhoft 1994) have been successful at restoring performance of aged rats on trace eyeblink conditioning (Deyo et al. 1989; Straube et al. 1990; Kowalska and Disterhoft 1994). Interestingly, AHPs from neurons recorded from aged learners are indistinguishable from young learners; both are reduced compared to that of aged weak-learners (Moyer Jr et al. 2000; Tombaugh et al. 2005). These data suggest that mechanisms that permit learning-related modulation of the AHP are also critical determinants of learning abilities in an aged population. To date, age-related impairments in hippocampal-dependent tasks and biophysical alterations in hippocampal neurons have largely focused on studies that compare animals at extreme ends of the aging spectrum.In an effort to better understand physiological changes that underlie the onset of early cognitive decline, the development of rodent models of “normal” age-associated cognitive decline (AACD), as well as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), is critical (Pepeu 2004). Therefore, we set out to characterize the development of age-related deficits indicative of hippocampal dysfunction in middle-aged C57Bl6/SJL mice and to examine the biophysical changes in hippocampal neurons that accompany such deficits.Recently, age-related deficits in contextual fear memory following trace fear conditioning were reported in a subset of middle-aged rats (Moyer Jr and Brown 2006). Because the dorsal hippocampus is critical for trace and contextual fear conditioning in mice and rats (McEchron et al. 1998; Chowdhury et al. 2005; Misane et al. 2005), trace fear conditioning is an ideal paradigm for exploring cellular mechanisms that underlie early-age-related cognitive decline.Here we investigate the effects of “early” aging on trace fear conditioning by comparing performance outcomes of young (2 mo, n = 7; and 4 mo, n = 8) and middle-aged (8 mo, n = 22) male C57/SJL F1 hybrid mice. Mice were trained and tested singly, and the experimenter was blind to the training and retention status of the mice. All animal procedures were approved by the Northwestern University Animal Care and Use Committee. Preliminary data were reported previously (Kaczorowski 2006).To assess hippocampal function with aging, young and middle-aged mice were trained on a trace fear conditioning task followed by retention tests of the auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) and contextual CS memory. The basic protocol for trace fear conditioning has been described previously (Ohno et al. 2006a). Mice were trained in a Plexiglas conditioning chamber with a stainless-steel floor grid used for shock delivery. After the baseline period (150 sec), mice received four pairings of the CS (tone; 15 sec, 3 kHz, 75 dB) and US (shock; 1 sec, 0.7 mA). The CS and unconditioned stimulus (US) were separated by a 30-sec empty trace interval. The intertrial interval was set at 210 ± 10 sec. The training chamber was wiped with 95% ethyl alcohol, illuminated with a 10-W bulb in an otherwise dark room, and provided with 65-dB white noise to make it distinct. During training on trace fear conditioning, no effect of age was observed on measures of baseline freezing (F_(2,34) = 2.0, P = 0.15), the expression of freezing during tone (F_(2,34) = 0.6, P = 0.6), or post-shock freezing (F_(2,34) = 0.2, P = 0.8), suggesting that middle-aged and young mice do not differ in measures of anxiolysis or expression of behavioral freezing (measured index of fear) (Fig. 1A).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Onset of early aging deficits in 8-mo-old middle-aged mice. (A) Baseline (BL) freezing and auditory CS freezing during trace fear conditioning was similar between young (2 mo and 4 mo) and middle-aged (8 mo) mice. (B1) Mean baseline freezing and retention of the auditory CS memory (tones 1–4) were comparable in young (2 mo and 4 mo) and middle-aged (8 mo) mice. (B2) Middle-aged mice showed a significant decrease in freezing compared to young (2 mo and 4 mo) mice when exposed to the original context chamber where they had been trained 1 d earlier; (*) P < 0.05.Retention of the auditory CS:US memory was tested 24 h later in a novel context that differed in its location, size, scent, lighting, background noise, and flooring (bedding) compared to the training chamber. Data from three mice (one young, two middle-aged) were excluded because of video malfunction. Following a 150-sec baseline, mice received four presentations of the tone CS in the absence of footshock. Neither baseline freezing (F_(2,31) = 2.6, P = 0.1) nor conditional freezing in response to the tone CS (F_(2,31) = 1.6, P = 0.2) differed between young and middle-aged mice (Fig. 1B1). Thus, retention of the auditory CS following trace fear conditioning was intact in middle-aged compared to young mice. Although deficits in retention of auditory trace fear have been reported in aged mice and rats (Blank et al. 2003; McEchron et al. 2004; Villarreal et al. 2004), the results herein agree with report of intact trace fear memory in middle-aged rats (Moyer Jr and Brown 2006).One hour after this testing, retention of the contextual fear memory was assessed by placing mice in the original context (in the absence of the tone and footshock) and measuring freezing for 10 min. A subtle but significant difference in freezing was observed as a function of age (F_(2,31) = 4.3, P = 0.02; Fig. 1B ​2).2). A student''s post-hoc t-test revealed that mean freezing (collapsed across 10 min) of middle-aged mice was reduced compared to 2-mo (P < 0.05) and 4-mo (P < 0.05) young mice. Contextual fear memory deficits have been similarly reported in aged mice (Fukushima et al. 2008). Studies that failed to observe contextual fear deficits in aged (>18 mo) mice may result from a floor effect because young mice showed weak conditioning to the context (∼30% freezing) (Feiro and Gould 2005; Gould and Feiro 2005) or employment of delay (Corcoran et al. 2002; Feiro and Gould 2005; Gould and Feiro 2005) compared to trace procedures (Moyer Jr and Brown 2006). Although differences in experimental parameters are plausible, heterogeneity in the performance of aged mice may make detection of age-related impairments difficult owing to increased variability.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Selective deficits on retention of contextual fear in middle-aged weak-learner mice. (A,B) Summary plot and histogram show young mice (100%, n = 6) at 2 mo of age showed robust recall of contextual fear memory (range 75%–99%) with mean and standard deviation (SD) of 91% ± 10%, whereas retention of middle-aged mice (n = 21) varied to a much greater extent (range 21%–95%; M, SD = 74% ± 19%). Distribution of middle-aged mice relative to their mean percent freezing shows two distinct populations. Middle-aged mice with freezing levels less than 3 SD from the mean freezing in young wild-type (WT) mice (61%, dashed line) were characterized as having weak contextual fear memory (weak learners) and those with freezing levels ≥62% as having strong contextual fear memory (learners). (C) Baseline (BL) freezing, expression of post-shock freezing and freezing during retention tests for auditory CS and trace CS memories, were comparable in both weak-learners and learners. (D) Selective deficits in retention of contextual fear memories were observed in middle-aged weak learners as compared to middle-aged learners; (*) P < 0.05.Previous studies in the rat report heterogeneity in spatial water maze and contextual fear conditioning in middle-aged and/or aged rats compared to young animals (Fischer et al. 1992; Wyss et al. 2000; Moyer Jr and Brown 2006). Therefore, we determined if middle-aged impairments of context fear (Fig. 2A) were driven by a subset of impaired mice. The degree of age-related impairment in each middle-aged mouse was determined by comparison to a reference group of young mice tested concurrently (shown in Fig. 1). The behavioral criterion for retention of contextual fear in middle-aged mice was set at 61%, which was 3 standard deviations (SD) below the mean freezing in young mice (mean and SD, 91% ± 10%; Fig. 1). A bimodal distribution of freezing of middle-aged mice was observed (Fig. 2B), where 70% of middle-aged mice performed above criterion and were labeled learners (n = 14), and 30% of middle-aged mice performed below criterion and were labeled as weak learners (n = 6). Comparison on measures of baseline freezing (F_(1,18) = 1.8, P = 0.2) and expression of post-shock freezing (F_(1,18) = 2.1, P = 0.2) revealed no differences between the groups during auditory trace fear training (Fig. 2C). Similarly, no differences in baseline freezing (F_(1,18) = 0.03, P = 0.9) or acquisition/recall of conditioned auditory trace fear (tone, F_(1,18) = 0.08, P = 0.8; trace, F_(1,18) = 2.4, P = 0.1) were observed 24 h later during retention tests. Thus, deficits ascribed to middle-aged weak learners were limited to contextual processing/retention, where middle-aged weak learners responded to the contextual CS with significantly lower levels of freezing compared to middle-aged learners (F_(1,18) = 47, P = 0.001; Fig. 2D). To summarize, we found that onset of cognitive decline in the C56Bl6/SJL mice was first apparent in a subset of middle-aged mice. Middle-aged weak learners showed a mild but specific deficit in hippocampal-dependent contextual learning/memory (spatial learning) but not hippocampal-dependent auditory trace learning/memory (temporal learning), assessed following trace fear conditioning.Given that contextual fear deficits occurred in a subset of middle-age mice, we were able to directly assess age-related alterations in excitability and AHP plasticity in CA1 neurons as they relate to learning abilities (learners vs. weak learners). Within 1 h of cessation of behavioral tests, middle-aged learners and weak learners were decapitated under deep halothane anesthesia and their brains quickly removed and placed into ice-cold artificial cerebral spinal fluid (aCSF): 125 mM NaCl, 25 mM glucose, 25 mM NaHCO₃, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH₂PO₄, 2 mM CaCl₂, 1 MgCl₂ (pH 7.5, bubbled with 95%O₂/5%CO₂). Naïve mice were removed from their home cage and underwent identical decapitation procedures. Slices (300 μm) of the dorsal hippocampus and adjacent cortex were made using a Leica vibratome. The slices were first incubated for 30 min at 34°C in bubbled aCSF, and held at room temperature in bubbled aCSF for 1–4 h before use. Recording electrodes prepared from thin-walled capillary glass were filled with potassium methylsulfate-based internal solution and had a resistance of 5–6 MΩ.Whole-cell current-clamp recordings were performed on CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons of middle-aged learners (n = 36, 14 mice) and weak-learners (n = 15, 6 mice), as well as middle-aged naïve mice (n = 35 cells, 18 mice). Neuronal excitability was compared by measuring the post-burst AHP generated by 25 action potentials at 50 Hz (Fig. 3A), a stimulus shown to reliably evoke an AHP of sizable—but not maximal—amplitude from hippocampal neurons of mice (Ohno et al. 2006b). A significant difference in the peak amplitude of the AHP from learners, weak learners, and naïve mice was observed (F_(2,83) = 5, P < 0.01). Because the peak AHP and sAHP amplitudes did not differ between neurons from weak-learners and naïve mice (Fig. 3B). No differences in membrane resistance (F_(2,83) = 1.6, P = 0.2) or action potential properties, elicited using a brief (2 msec) near threshold current step (pA), were observed (Open in a separate window^aP < 0.05 compared to Weak L.^bP < 0.05 compared to Naïve.^cP < 0.05 compared to Pooled.Open in a separate windowFigure 3.Learning-related AHP plasticity is impaired in middle-aged weak-learner mice. (A) Representative traces showing the sAHP is reduced in neurons from (black) middle-aged learners compared to (blue) weak-learner mice and (gray) naïve mice. (Inset) The medium AHP (mAHP) of neurons from (black) learner mice was decreased compared to (blue) weak-learner mice and (gray) naïve mice. (B) No differences in the AHP from naïve and weak learners were observed; therefore, their data were pooled, and mean AHP was plotted by time on a log scale. (Inset) The mean amplitude of the peak AHP (1 msec) and sAHP (600 msec) was significantly reduced in neurons from learners compared to AHPs from weak learners and naïve labeled control; (*)P < 0.05.The results presented here are important in two respects. First, we demonstrate that the successful acquisition and recall of trace fear conditioning results in a significant reduction in the AHP in CA1 hippocampal neurons from the mouse. Our data are similar to previous reports showing learning-related reductions of the AHP in hippocampal neurons following training on hippocampal-dependent tasks (Disterhoft and Oh 2007) and thus strengthen the case for neuronal excitability change as a general mechanism underlying hippocampal-dependent learning. Second, we demonstrate that the onset of age-related cognitive decline in the C56Bl6/SJL mouse (termed “weak learners”) first manifests as a specific deficit in spatial associative learning in a subset of middle-age mice. These data, combined with a previous report from middle-aged rats (Moyer Jr and Brown 2006), suggest that initiation of age-related hippocampal dysfunction results in specific spatial—as opposed to temporal—deficits in associative learning and memory during middle age. By combining trace fear conditioning with whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in middle-aged mice, we revealed that “early” age-related impairments in spatial associative learning—like those in the aged hippocampus (Tombaugh et al. 2005)—result in part from an impairment of AHP plasticity of hippocampal neurons. Because AHP reductions are poised to facilitate mechanisms crucial for information storage, it is interesting that trace fear conditioning facilitates the long-term potentiation (LTP) of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus (Song et al. 2008).Generally speaking, both LTP and activation of AHP currents (I_AHP and sI_AHP) are sensitive to changes in intracellular Ca²⁺ (Storm 1990; Sah 1996; Malenka and Nicoll 1999). Thus, dysregulation of Ca²⁺ homeostasis in the hippocampus of middle-aged rats via enhancement of Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release (CICR) is an important finding (Gant et al. 2006). Age-related enhancement of Ca²⁺-dependent AHPs has been shown to raise the threshold for induction of LTP (Kumar and Foster 2004). These data support our hypothesis that impairments in contextual fear reported herein, as well as deficits in spatial water maze reported in middle-aged rats (Frick et al. 1995; Markowska 1999; Kadish et al. 2009), result from dysfunction of AHP plasticity.Studies in middle-aged mice have important implications for the treatment of “normal” age-associated cognitive decline (AACD), as well as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Pepeu 2004). Further studies aim to examine alterations in cholinergic function in our middle-aged mouse model, as the cholinergic agonist carbachol suppressed the AHP in neurons from naïve middle-aged mice (Supplemental Fig. 1). Activation of cholinergic receptors shape neuronal excitability and synaptic throughput (Tai et al. 2006) through multiple Ca²⁺-dependent processes (Gahwiler and Brown 1987; Tai et al. 2006). Restoration of cholinergic function has been shown to rescue deficits on hippocampal-dependent tasks in aged rodent and mouse models of Alzheimer''s disease (AD) (Disterhoft and Oh 2006), as well as in human AD patients (Cummings et al. 1998; Morris et al. 1998; Pettigrew et al. 1998), and therefore is a potential target aimed at the rescue of early age-related cognitive decline.     

Reciprocal patterns of c-Fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala after extinction and renewal of conditioned fear

After extinction of conditioned fear, memory for the conditioning and extinction experiences becomes context dependent. Fear is suppressed in the extinction context, but renews in other contexts. This study characterizes the neural circuitry underlying the context-dependent retrieval of extinguished fear memories using c-Fos immunohistochemistry. After fear conditioning and extinction to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS), rats were presented with the extinguished CS in either the extinction context or a second context, and then sacrificed. Presentation of the CS in the extinction context yielded low levels of conditioned freezing and induced c-Fos expression in the infralimbic division of the medial prefrontal cortex, the intercalated nuclei of the amygdala, and the dentate gyrus (DG). In contrast, presentation of the CS outside of the extinction context yielded high levels of conditioned freezing and induced c-Fos expression in the prelimbic division of the medial prefrontal cortex, the lateral and basolateral nuclei of the amygdala, and the medial division of the central nucleus of the amygdala. Hippocampal areas CA1 and CA3 exhibited c-Fos expression when the CS was presented in either context. These data suggest that the context specificity of extinction is mediated by prefrontal modulation of amygdala activity, and that the hippocampus has a fundamental role in contextual memory retrieval.Considerable interest has emerged in recent years in the neural mechanisms underlying the associative extinction of learned fear (Maren and Quirk 2004; Myers et al. 2006; Quirk and Mueller 2008). Notably, extinction is a useful model for important aspects of exposure-based therapies for the treatment of human anxiety disorders such as panic disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Bouton et al. 2001, 2006). During extinction, a conditioned stimulus (CS) is repeatedly presented in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus (US), a procedure that greatly reduces the magnitude and probability of the conditioned response (CR). After the extinction of fear, there is substantial evidence that extinction does not erase the original fear memory, but results in a transient inhibition of fear. For example, extinguished fear responses return after the mere passage of time (i.e., spontaneous recovery) or after a change in context (i.e., renewal) (Bouton et al. 2006; Ji and Maren 2007). In other words, extinguished fear is context specific. The return of fear after extinction is a considerable challenge for maintaining long-lasting fear suppression after exposure-based therapies (Rodriguez et al. 1999; Hermans et al. 2006; Effting and Kindt 2007; Quirk and Mueller 2008).In the last several years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the neural mechanisms underlying the context specificity of fear extinction. For example, lesions or inactivation of the hippocampus prevent the renewal of fear when an extinguished CS is presented outside of the extinction context (Corcoran and Maren 2001, 2004; Corcoran et al. 2005; Ji and Maren 2005, 2008; Hobin et al. 2006). In addition, neurons in the basolateral complex of the amygdala exhibit context-specific spike firing to extinguished CSs (Hobin et al. 2003; Herry et al. 2008), and this requires hippocampal input (Maren and Hobin 2007). Indeed, amygdala neurons that fire more to extinguished CSs outside of the extinction context are monosynaptically excited by hippocampal stimulation (Herry et al. 2008). In contrast, neurons that responded preferentially to extinguished CSs in the extinction context receive synaptic input from the medial prefrontal cortex (Herry et al. 2008).The prevalent theory of the interactions between the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala that lead to regulation of fear by context assumes that when animals experience an extinguished CS in the extinction context, the hippocampus drives prefrontal cortex inhibition of the amygdala to suppress fear (Hobin et al. 2003; Maren and Quirk 2004; Maren 2005). When animals encounter an extinguished CS outside of the extinction context, the hippocampus is posited to inhibit the prefrontal cortex and thereby promote amygdala activity required to renew fear. The hippocampus may also drive fear renewal through its direct projections to the basolateral amygdala (Herry et al. 2008). Although this model accounts for much of the extant literature on the context specificity of extinction, it is not known whether the nodes of this hypothesized neural network are coactive during the retrieval of fear and extinction memories. As a first step in addressing this issue, we used ex vivo c-Fos immunohistochemistry (e.g., Knapska et al. 2007) to generate a functional map of the neural circuits involved in the contextual retrieval of fear memory after extinction. Our results reveal reciprocal activity in prefrontal-amygdala circuits involved in extinction and renewal and implicate the hippocampus in hierarchical control of contextual memory retrieval within these circuits.     

Impairments in fear conditioning in mice lacking the nNOS gene

The fear conditioning paradigm is used to investigate the roles of various genes, neurotransmitters, and substrates in the formation of fear learning related to contextual and auditory cues. In the brain, nitric oxide (NO) produced by neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) functions as a retrograde neuronal messenger that facilitates synaptic plasticity, including the late phase of long-term potentiation (LTP) and formation of long-term memory (LTM). Evidence has implicated NO signaling in synaptic plasticity and LTM formation following fear conditioning, yet little is known about the role of the nNOS gene in fear learning. Using knockout (KO) mice with targeted mutation of the nNOS gene and their wild-type (WT) counterparts, the role of NO signaling in fear conditioning was investigated. Plasma levels of the stress hormone corticosterone were measured to determine the relationship between physiological and behavioral response to fear conditioning. Contextual fear learning was severely impaired in male and female nNOS KO mice compared with WT counterparts; cued fear learning was slightly impaired in nNOS KO mice. Sex-dependent differences in both contextual and cued fear learning were not observed in either genotype. Deficits in contextual fear learning in nNOS KO mice were partially overcome by multiple trainings. A relationship between increase in plasma corticosterone levels following footshock administration and the magnitude of contextual, but not cued freezing was also observed. Results suggest that the nNOS gene contributes more to optimal contextual fear learning than to cued fear learning, and therefore, inhibition of the nNOS enzyme may ameliorate context-dependent fear response.Anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), constitute the most prevalent mental illnesses in the United States, costing nearly one-third of the country''s total health bill (Greenberg et al. 1999). The treatment of these disorders requires overcoming complications such as reluctance to seek mental health treatment and an extremely high comorbidity rate with other affective disorders, reaching 80% (Brady 1997; Solomon and Davidson 1997). Emerging evidence suggests that dysfunctions underlying acquired anxiety and PTSD include an abnormal reaction to stress, which is mediated by specific neurochemical and neuroanatomical substrates (Yehuda and McFarlane 1995; Adamec 1997). Pharmacotherapies that target neuronal signaling molecules, such as nitric oxide (NO), may play a role in the treatment of these disorders.In the brain, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) activation and calcium influx into the cell activates the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) enzyme to produce NO, which has the role of retrograde messenger (Snyder 1992). NO is involved in memory formation and synaptic plastic events such as late-phase long-term potentiation (LTP) (Lu et al. 1999; Arancio et al. 2001; Puzzo et al. 2006). Behavioral evidence in invertebrates (Lewin and Walters 1999; Muller 2000; Kemenes et al. 2002; Matsumoto et al. 2006) and vertebrates (Medina and Izquierdo 1995; Rickard et al. 1998; Ota et al. 2008) suggest that NO has a major role in consolidation of long-term memory (LTM). Recently, studies have shown that site-specific pharmacological blockade of NO signaling in rats impairs contextual (Resstel et al. 2008) and cued (Schafe et al. 2005) fear learning. However, the role of the nNOS gene in fear conditioning has not been investigated.In the present study, fear conditioning was investigated in homozygous nNOS knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice. In the fear-conditioning paradigm, the association of a footshock (unconditioned stimulus; US), with a specific context and a neutral stimulus (auditory cue) results in learned fear. Re-exposure to the conditioning context and to the previously neutral auditory cue (conditioned stimulus; CS) elicits a freezing response in the absence of the aversive US. Thus, the fear-conditioning paradigm includes both contextual and cued fear learning components, which can be measured in separate tests. Fear conditioning recruits both the amygdala (emotional cue learning) and the hippocampus (spatial/contextual learning) (Phillips and LeDoux 1992; Goosens and Maren 2004; Mei et al. 2005). The involvement of these brain regions in fear learning and anxiety has been confirmed by animal and human imaging studies (LeDoux 1998; Rauch et al. 2006).We report that nNOS KO mice showed a severe deficiency in contextual fear learning and a less marked deficit in cued fear learning compared with WT mice after a single fear-conditioning session. This deficiency was partially improved by multiple (four) fear-conditioning sessions. In addition, we observed that plasma levels of corticosterone, the primary stress hormone in rodents, are related to contextual fear learning ability.     

Genetic inactivation of D-amino acid oxidase enhances extinction and reversal learning in mice

Activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) glycine site has been shown to accelerate adaptive forms of learning that may benefit psychopathologies involving cognitive and perseverative disturbances. In this study, the effects of increasing the brain levels of the endogenous NMDAR glycine site agonist D-serine, through the genetic inactivation of its catabolic enzyme D-amino acid oxidase (DAO), were examined in behavioral tests of learning and memory. In the Morris water maze task (MWM), mice carrying the hypofunctional Dao1^G181R mutation demonstrated normal acquisition of a single platform location but had substantially improved memory for a new target location in the subsequent reversal phase. Furthermore, Dao1^G181R mutant animals exhibited an increased rate of extinction in the MWM that was similarly observed following pharmacological administration of D-serine (600 mg/kg) in wild-type C57BL/6J mice. In contextual and cued fear conditioning, no alterations were found in initial associative memory recall; however, extinction of the contextual fear memory was facilitated in mutant animals. Thus, an augmented level of D-serine resulting from reduced DAO activity promotes adaptive learning in response to changing conditions. The NMDAR glycine site and DAO may be promising therapeutic targets to improve cognitive flexibility and inhibitory learning in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and anxiety syndromes.The N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) has an important role in excitatory neurotransmission and contributes to numerous brain processes, including synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory formation (Nicoll 2003). Activation of NMDARs requires membrane depolarization in addition to concurrent binding of glutamate to NMDAR2 (NR2) and glycine to the NMDAR1 (NR1) subunit (Johnson and Ascher 1987; Clements and Westbrook 1991). D-serine has also been shown to be an endogenous co-agonist for the NR1 glycine site, acting with high selectivity and a potency similar to or greater than that of glycine (Matsui et al. 1995). In the brain, the localization of D-serine closely resembles that of NMDARs (Schell et al. 1997), and D-serine has been reported to be the predominant physiologic co-agonist for the maintenance of NMDAR-mediated currents in the hippocampus, retina, and hypothalamus (Mothet et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2003). Moreover, in vivo studies have demonstrated that the NMDAR glycine site is not saturated at the synapses of several brain regions (Fuchs et al. 2005). Consequently, increasing D-serine levels may modulate neurotransmission and behavioral responses reliant on NMDAR activity.The NMDAR glycine site has been implicated in the pathophysiology and treatment of a number of psychiatric conditions (Coyle and Tsai 2004; Millan 2005). Blockade of the NMDAR with noncompetitive antagonists like phencyclidine results in the production and exacerbation of schizophrenic-like symptoms in humans and animals (Javitt and Zukin 1991; Krystal et al. 1994). Genetic studies have associated genes that mediate D-serine synthesis and degradation with a vulnerability to schizophrenia, and levels of D-serine are decreased in the CSF and serum of schizophrenic patients (Chumakov et al. 2002; Hashimoto et al. 2003, 2005; Schumacher et al. 2004; Morita et al. 2007). These observations prompted clinical trials with direct and indirect activators of the NMDAR glycine site, including D-serine, and improvements were revealed when these compounds were added to conventional antipsychotic regimes, particularly with the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia (Tsai et al. 1998; Coyle and Tsai 2004; Heresco-Levy et al. 2005). Furthermore, altered NMDAR activation has also been shown to affect extinction, a learning process that may be of benefit in anxiety illnesses, such as post-traumatic stress syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder (Davis et al. 2006). In rodents, extinction was shown to be impaired following inhibition of NMDARs in contextual fear conditioning, inhibitory avoidance, and eyeblink conditioning tasks (Kehoe et al. 1996; Lee and Kim 1998; Szapiro et al. 2003). In contrast, the partial NMDAR agonist D-cycloserine facilitated the extinction of fear memories in rodents and individuals with phobias and other anxiety disorders (Ressler et al. 2004; Ledgerwood et al. 2005; Norberg et al. 2008). Thus, the NMDAR glycine site and its related modulatory proteins may be important targets for the amelioration of psychopathologies involving cognitive dysfunction and maladaptive behaviors.Endogenous levels of D-serine in the brain are regulated by its catabolic enzyme, D-amino acid oxidase (DAO); by the D-serine synthesis enzyme, serine racemase (Srr); and by neuronal and glial transporters (Foltyn et al. 2005; Martineau et al. 2006). Agents targeting such proteins may prove to be an effective method of increasing cerebral D-serine and occupancy of the NMDAR glycine site, which could overcome the difficulties D-serine and similar compounds have with penetrating the blood-brain barrier (Coyle and Tsai 2004; Bauer et al. 2005). Inhibiting DAO function in the brain is of particular interest as it would circumvent any nephrotoxicity associated with high levels of systemic D-serine (Maekawa et al. 2005a). DAO is a peroxisomal flavoprotein that at physiological pH is highly selective for D-serine, and in the brain, DAO is located predominantly in astrocytes (Mothet et al. 2000). An inverse correlation between the brain distribution of DAO and D-serine evinces the efficacy of this enzyme, with the most abundant DAO expression located in the D-serine-sparse hindbrain and cerebellum (Schell et al. 1995; Moreno et al. 1999). To study the effects of limiting DAO function, we tested a line of mice carrying a single point mutation (G181R) that results in a complete lack of DAO activity and consequently augmented D-serine in serum and brain (Sasaki et al. 1992; Hashimoto et al. 1993). These mice have previously been shown to exhibit an in vitro increase in NMDAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents in dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord and an in vivo elevation of cGMP that is indicative of augmented NMDAR activity (Wake et al. 2001; Almond et al. 2006). This demonstrates that reduced DAO function is capable of augmenting NMDAR activation, and it may follow that cognitive and extinction processes influenced by NMDARs are enhanced in Dao1^G181R mutant mice. To investigate this possibility, we assessed the effects of the Dao1^G181R mutation on learning, memory, and extinction in Morris water maze (MWM) and in contextual and cued fear conditioning paradigms.     

Making context memories independent of the hippocampus

We present evidence that certain learning parameters can make a memory, even a very recent one, become independent of the hippocampus. We confirm earlier findings that damage to the hippocampus causes severe retrograde amnesia for context memories, but we show that repeated learning sessions create a context memory that is not vulnerable to the damage. The findings demonstrate that memories normally dependent on the hippocampus are incrementally strengthened in other memory networks with additional learning. The latter provides a new account for patterns of hippocampal retrograde amnesia and how memories may become independent of the hippocampus.Contextual fear conditioning can be supported by two neural systems, one that contains the hippocampus (HPC), and one that does not. Evidence for this assertion comes from studies in which the HPC, in rats, is damaged either before or after the contextual fear conditioning. Extensive damage to the HPC before conditioning has little effect on contextual fear conditioning (Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Wiltgen et al. 2006). This result can only mean that there is a non-HPC memory system that can support fear of context. In contrast, there is unequivocal evidence that moderate to extensive damage to the HPC soon after learning severely impairs the ability of the conditioning context to evoke fear, suggesting that the HPC normally makes a major contribution to this type of memory (Kim and Fanselow 1992; Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Anagnostaras et al. 1999; Debiec et al. 2002; Lehmann et al. 2007b; Sutherland et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2009).The dissociable effects of pre- and post-training HPC damage on contextual fear conditioning have been interpreted as suggesting that: (1) When the HPC is intact during learning it interferes with other systems and prevents them from acquiring an independent contextual fear conditioning memory, and (2) when the HPC is absent, these other systems are released from this interference and are able to rapidly acquire an independent memory (Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Fanselow and Poulos 2004; Driscoll et al. 2005; Lehmann et al. 2006; Sutherland et al. 2006). The latter interference from the HPC on the other memory systems has been termed overshadowing. Supplemental Figure S1 depicts data from our laboratory demonstrating the overshadowing phenomenon and the dissociable effects of HPC damage induced before and after contextual fear conditioning.Very little, however, is known about the parameters determining the extent to which the HPC system interferes with the non-HPC system for control over contextual fear. The purpose of the current study is to provide some insight into this issue. Typically, contextual fear conditioning in rats is conducted in a single conditioning session in which a configuration of static background cues is paired with several footshocks. When returned to the conditioning context, rats display several species-specific defensive responses including freezing (i.e., absence of movement except for breathing). Several theorists have proposed that non-HPC systems are more likely to be recruited when there are multiple experiences with similar events, which, in turn, would mitigate the necessity of the HPC for memory expression (O''Keefe and Nadel 1978; Sherry and Schacter 1987; McClelland et al. 1995; O''Reilly and Rudy 2001; White and McDonald 2002). Accordingly, we hypothesized that repeated contextual fear conditioning sessions separated by hours and days would overcome the HPC interference or overshadowing effect. In other words, with repeated learning sessions, enough information would be incrementally captured by the non-HPC system to support a contextual fear memory that would survive complete damage to the HPC.Adult male rats received 11 fear-conditioning sessions across 6 d. In each session, they were placed in a context and received mild footshocks (Shock Context). Concurrently, the rats were exposed 10 times to another context in which they never received shock (No-Shock Context). The No-Shock Context served as a control condition to measure whether the rats simply showed generalized fear or could show context-specific memory. Within 72 h following the last conditioning session, rats either received sham surgery or complete lesions of the HPC using the neurotoxin N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) (Lehmann et al. 2007a). Rats were then tested for retention in both the Shock and No-Shock Contexts in a counterbalanced order. In addition, in a single learning episode, another group of rats received a matching number of shocks (i.e., 12 shocks) and context exposure (i.e., 17 min), and then received surgery 7–10 d after conditioning. The latter interval is identical to the interval between the initial conditioning session and surgery in the repeated learning condition. Figure 1 illustrates and describes the design of the experiments.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Illustration of the experimental design used in (A) the single conditioning session and (B) repeated conditioning session experiments. In A the rats were initially placed in the conditioning chamber for 17 min and received the first of 12 footshocks (1 mA/2 sec) at the 300-sec mark, and then one every following 58 sec after shock offset. Seven to 10 d later, the rats either received sham or HPC damage (Sx). Approximately 10 d after, the rats were returned to the chamber to assess freezing over a 5-min retention test. In B the rats were placed initially in the conditioning chamber for 1 min and received a shock at the 45-sec mark (Shock Context). Approximately 45 min later, the rats were placed in a different chamber for 1 min and did not receive shock (No-Shock Context). The procedure was repeated twice daily for five consecutive days, and the Shock and No-Shock chamber order was counterbalanced according to the principles of a Latin Square design. The rats then received sham or HPC damage 1–3 d later. The rats'' retention was assessed in both contexts ∼10 d after surgery in both the Shock and No-Shock Context in a counterbalanced order with a 24-h span between tests. Importantly, the number of shocks, context exposure time, and interval between initial learning and surgery were matched between both experiments.When all shocks were delivered in a single session, HPC damage caused profound retrograde amnesia. As illustrated in Figure 2A, the HPC rats displayed significantly less freezing than control rats during the retention test (t₍₈₎ = 23.895, P < 0.001). This result replicates all previous studies in which the HPC was damaged days after a single contextual fear conditioning training session (Kim and Fanselow 1992; Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Anagnostaras et al. 1999; Debiec et al. 2002; Lehmann et al. 2007b; Sutherland et al. 2008).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Mean (± SEM) percent time freezing by Sham and HPC rats during the retention test of the (A) single conditioning (12 shocks) experiment and (B) repeated conditioning session experiment. In A the HPC rats showed significantly less freezing (P < 0.001) than the Sham rats, suggesting that the damage caused profound retrograde amnesia for contextual fear conditioning learned in a single session 7–10 d before surgery. In B the performance of the HPC rats did not significantly differ from the Sham rats, and they exhibited significantly more freezing in the Shock Context than the No-Shock Context (P < 0.001). Consequently, repeated conditioning sessions prevented the retrograde amnesic effects normally observed in contextual fear conditioning following HPC damage, suggesting that other neural networks were now able to support the memory.In striking contrast, memory for contextual fear conditioning was spared when the HPC was damaged after repeated conditioning sessions. Figure 2B shows the percent time spent freezing during the retention test in the Shock and No-Shock Contexts. An ANOVA with between-group factor (Lesion: Sham and HPC) and within-group factor (Context: Shock and No-Shock) revealed a significant main effect of Context (F_(1,14) = 84.731, P < 0.001), indicating that the rats displayed higher levels of freezing in the Shock than in the No-Shock Context. The effect of Lesion (F_(1,14) = 4.280, P = 0.058) was not significant, nor was the Lesion × Context interaction (F_(1,14) = 0.877, P = 0.369), suggesting that extensive HPC damage did not impair memory. The tendency for an effect of Lesion is due to the HPC rats freezing less than the Sham rats in the No-Shock Context (P = 0.06) rather than freezing less in the Shock Context (P = 0.457).The repeated conditioning sessions clearly enabled a contextual fear representation to be established in non-HPC memory systems. However, it is surprising that the HPC damage did not impair the ability to discriminate between the Shock and No-Shock Context, because evidence suggests that context discrimination is dependent on the HPC (see Moscovitch et al. 2006). Indeed, studies of rats with HPC damage induced before learning have shown that contextual fear conditioning is acquired quickly by non-HPC systems in a single session, but the ability to discriminate between the training context and a new context is lost (Frankland et al. 1998; Antoniadis and McDonald 2000; Winocur et al. 2007). Hence, it is significant in the present study that the HPC damage did not impair context discrimination abilities in the rats that received repeated learning episodes. The latter appear to have established a context representation, outside of the HPC, that was not bereft of details. Yet, one should consider that the rats in the repeated sessions experiment received experience in both the Shock and No-Shock Contexts prior to surgery, and this discrimination training procedure may have established two different non-HPC representations. It remains possible that HPC damage would impair the ability to discriminate the Shock Context from a new context, which is what is found in anterograde amnesia studies (Frankland et al. 1998; Antoniadis and McDonald 2000; Winocur et al. 2007). To address this possibility, a new experiment examined whether HPC-damaged rats could discriminate the Shock Context from a Novel Context. Rats were trained with the same repeated learning protocol as described earlier, with the exception that the rats were never placed in the No-Shock Context prior to surgery. One to 3 d following learning, the rats either received Sham or complete HPC damage. They were then tested for retention in the Shock and the Novel (i.e., No-Shock) Context in a counterbalanced order. Figure 3 shows the percent time spent freezing during the retention test in the Shock and Novel Contexts. An ANOVA with between-group factor (Lesion: Sham and HPC) and within-group factor (Context: Shock and Novel) revealed that the rats froze significantly more in the Shock than the Novel Context (F_(1,10) = 57.393, P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the HPC and Sham groups (F_(1,10) = 0.597, P = 0.458) and the Lesion × Context interaction did not reach significance (F_(1,10) = 0.123, P = 0.733). Thus, as in the previous repeated sessions experiment, the HPC damage did not cause retrograde amnesia for contextual fear conditioning and, more importantly, the HPC damage did not impair the ability to discriminate between the original context and new context.Open in a separate windowFigure 3.Mean (± SEM) percent time freezing by Sham and HPC rats in the Shock and Novel Contexts during the retention tests of the discrimination experiment. The rats exhibited significantly more freezing in the Shock than the Novel Context (P < 0.001), and the HPC rats did not significantly differ from the Sham rats, suggesting that the HPC-damaged rats remembered the specific meaning of the Shock Context as well as control rats. Hence, repeated conditioning sessions established a context-rich representation in non-HPC systems, which supports successful context discriminations.The absence of amnesia for contextual fear conditioning in the current study is not due to insufficient damage to the HPC. We calculated (see Lehmann et al. 2007b) that an average of 83% of the HPC was damaged across rats (smallest: 64%; largest: 90%) in the repeated learning experiments (see Supplemental material for more histological details). The amount of HPC damage is substantially more than that found in most studies reporting impairments for contextual fear conditioning following HPC damage (Kim and Fanselow 1992; Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Anagnostaras et al. 1999; Debiec et al. 2002) and more than for the single-session experiment (average 76%) in which we currently report amnesia. Therefore, the amount of HPC damage inflicted in the rats in this study is certainly sufficient to disrupt HPC-dependent memories.Like others (Kim and Fanselow 1992; Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Anagnostaras et al. 1999; Debiec et al. 2002; Lehmann et al. 2007b; Sutherland et al. 2008), we found that damage to the HPC after a single contextual fear-conditioning session involving multiple shocks produces profound retrograde amnesia for contextual fear conditioning. However, in two separate experiments, distributing shock across multiple conditioning sessions prevented this amnesia. In one case, the rats experienced Context–Shock pairings in one context and no shock in another context. Following this training, rats with damage to the HPC did not differ from control rats in the absolute amount of freezing in the training context nor in their ability to discriminate between the two contexts. In the second case, rats only received the multiple Context–Shock sessions. Rats with damage to the HPC could not be distinguished from control rats during the test in the training context or in their responses to a novel context. These findings provide new support for the general idea that contextual fear conditioning can be supported by both HPC and non-HPC systems. This conclusion is supported by (1) the finding that damage to the HPC following a single conditioning session virtually eliminates freezing during the test, implying the importance of the HPC system, and (2) that following multiple conditioning sessions, damage to the HPC has no effect on either contextual fear displayed in the training context or their ability to discriminate the training context from other contexts, suggesting the existence of non-HPC systems that can support contextual fear. The findings also reveal that the overshadowing or interference by the HPC over the non-HPC memory systems for control over contextual fear is not absolute. Following a single conditioning session, removal of the HPC produced a devastating retrograde amnesia, illustrating substantial overshadowing. However, distributing conditioning across several sessions completely attenuated the effects of damage to the HPC, revealing that non-HPC systems can support contextual fear conditioning despite the HPC, and revealed the importance of multiple sessions for this to occur.The overshadowing by the HPC is based on the familiar idea in associative learning at the behavioral level, where through a competitive process some of the cues that redundantly predict a reinforcer acquire the ability to generate strong conditioned responding, while other equally predictive, but less salient cues do not (Stout et al. 2003). Conditioning to the less potent cues proceeds more effectively if the more potent competitors are absent. Following the same principle, if the HPC representation is active, then learning in the non-HPC systems suffers strong interference. In contrast, in the absence of the HPC representation, learning in non-HPC systems is released from this interfering effect of the HPC. Thus, the learning rate in non-HPC networks is potently lowered by the activity of the HPC. However, with repeated learning, other structures, which are overshadowed by the HPC, may cumulatively build a representation that achieves HPC independence. The current findings clearly support this hypothesis, whereby repeated learning episodes incrementally established a contextual fear-conditioning representation outside of the HPC that mitigated the usual retrograde amnesic effects of HPC damage.One important question is where does the HPC interference occur? Biedenkapp and Rudy (2009) recently reported that the HPC competes with the basolateral region of the amygdala during fear conditioning. Previously, Guarraci et al. (1999) found that the amount of conditioned fear produced by training could be increased if the dopamine D1 receptor agonist {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF82958","term_id":"1156217255","term_text":"SKF82958"}}SKF82958 was injected into the basolateral region. Biedenkapp and Rudy (2009) reasoned that if this is the area where the HPC interferes with non-HPC systems for the association with shock, then a local infusion of {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF82958","term_id":"1156217255","term_text":"SKF82958"}}SKF82958 before a single session of contextual fear conditioning should attenuate the interference and allow the non-HPC system to gain more control over contextual fear. Their data supported this hypothesis, which leads to the possibility that with multiple conditioning sessions, the non-HPC system gradually gains association with these fear-supporting neurons in this region of the brain.Patients with bilateral damage to the HPC often exhibit temporally graded retrograde amnesia, such that recently acquired memories are lost, whereas remote memories, especially those acquired years before the damage, are more likely to be spared (Scoville and Milner 1957; Rempel-Clower et al. 1996). This pattern of amnesia is taken as evidence for temporally based systems consolidation, whereby over time the essential support for memories is “switched” from dependence on the HPC to neocortical networks (McClelland et al. 1995; Squire and Alvarez 1995; Anagnostaras et al. 2001; Meeter and Murre 2004; Squire et al. 2004; Wiltgen et al. 2004; Frankland and Bontempi 2005). Our research, however, points to another process for becoming independent of the HPC, a change in the strength of the representation in non-HPC systems during learning rather than a consolidation process linked to the passage of time since the learning episode. A study of a former London taxi driver with bilateral HPC damage alludes to this possibility (Maguire et al. 2006). This amnesic patient showed greater retrograde amnesia for roads that he used less commonly than the major arteries that he used regularly. Hence, greater exposure to the major arteries established memories in non-HPC systems, whereas roads with less exposure remained dependent on the HPC regardless of the age of the memory. Our findings add support to this view, because studies examining the effects of complete HPC damage after a single conditioning episode suggest that the HPC is permanently involved in contextual fear conditioning (Lehmann et al. 2007b; Sutherland et al. 2008); yet, with repeated learning episodes we clearly demonstrated that the memory rapidly becomes independent of the HPC. The latter is important because the process for memories becoming independent of the HPC need not require systems consolidation.In conclusion, this is the first example of intact contextual fear memories following complete HPC damage induced soon after learning. Importantly, repetition of the learning episode underlies the change in memory from HPC dependent to HPC independent. We argue that each learning episode incrementally establishes a representation in non-HPC memory systems—a representation that ultimately becomes sufficiently strong to support memory expression without the HPC. The current findings also demonstrate the critical need to consider learning parameters when discussing patterns of retrograde amnesia and the role of the HPC in memory.     

Post-retrieval disruption of a cocaine conditioned place preference by systemic and intrabasolateral amygdala β2- and α1-adrenergic antagonists

Previous work has demonstrated post-retrieval impairment in associative learning paradigms, including those mediated by drugs of abuse, using nonspecific β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) antagonists. Remarkably little is known about the role of the specific β-AR subtypes, or other adrenergic receptors, in these effects. The current study examined the effects of β₁ and β₂, as well as α₁-adrenergic receptor antagonism following retrieval of a cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP). We found that rats administered the β₂ antagonist ICI 118,551 (8 mg/kg intraperitoneal [IP]) or the α₁ antagonist prazosin (1 mg/kg IP) following a drug-free test for CPP showed attenuated preference during a subsequent test, while the β₁ antagonist betaxolol (5 or 10 mg/kg IP) and a lower dose of prazosin (0.3 mg/kg IP) had no effect. Furthermore, post-test microinfusion of ICI 118,551 (6 nmol/side) or prazosin (0.5 nmol/side) into the basolateral amygdala (BLA) also impaired a subsequent preference. Systemic or intra-BLA ICI 118,551 or prazosin administered to rats in their home cages, in the absence of a preference test, had no effect on CPP 24 h later. ICI 118,551 also attenuated the FOS response in the BLA induced by the CPP test. These results are the first to demonstrate a role for α₁- and β₂-specific adrenergic mechanisms in post-retrieval memory processes. These systemic and site-specific injections, as well as the FOS immunohistochemical analyses, implicate the importance of specific noradrenergic signaling mechanisms within the BLA in post-retrieval plasticity.Substantial evidence indicates that information acquired during a learning event is initially plastic, at which time memory retention can be disrupted, but is strengthened by a time-dependent consolidation process (McGaugh 2000). Recent work has focused on retrieval-induced plasticity, a process by which changes in the retention of previously acquired information are possible. The notion of reconsolidation, one theoretical mechanism by which such changes may occur, suggests that a retrieved memory enters a labile state and is vulnerable to disruption (Sara 2000; Nader 2003). Although the theoretical mechanisms underlying reconsolidation remain unclear, the behavioral effects have been demonstrated across many different learning paradigms using a variety of pharmacological manipulations (for review, see Tronson and Taylor 2007; Diergaarde et al. 2008). Studies with aversive and appetitive preparations, including drug reward-mediated learning, have demonstrated that the noradrenergic system is important for these post-retrieval memory processes (Przybyslawski et al. 1999; Debiec and Ledoux 2004; Bernardi et al. 2006; Diergaarde et al. 2006; Robinson and Franklin 2007; Abrari et al. 2008; Fricks-Gleason and Marshall 2008; Milton et al. 2008). For example, using an animal model of cocaine-conditioned behaviors, Bernardi et al. (2006) demonstrated that systemic post-retrieval administration of propranolol impaired a subsequent conditioned place preference (CPP), suggesting that β-adrenergic receptors (β-ARs) play an important role in processes occurring following drug memory retrieval.However, most of what is known about the noradrenergic system in the memory processes that follow cued reminder trials comes from studies that use nonspecific β-AR antagonists, such as propranolol. As a consequence, several issues regarding ARs and post-retrieval memory processes remain unresolved. First, because propranolol has affinity for both β₁- and β₂-AR subtypes, it is unclear which subtype mediates these effects. To date, no studies have examined reconsolidation-like impairments using subtype-specific β-AR antagonists, which is important because more specific medications may be equally efficacious with less adverse effects. Second, no studies to date have examined α-ARs regarding a potential role in reconsolidation-like effects. α-ARs—specifically α₁-ARs—have a demonstrated role in memory consolidation (Ferry et al. 1999a,b) and may also mediate post-retrieval processes. Third, although the BLA has had a demonstrated role in reconsolidation-like effects in numerous studies, the behavioral conditions during retrieval of drug-associated memories leading to gene expression within the basolateral amygdala (BLA) have not clearly been defined. Specifically, in the CPP paradigm used here, it is unclear whether exposure to a cocaine cue alone will induce gene expression or whether a preference for the drug-associated environment needs to be expressed for BLA involvement (Franklin and Druhan 2000; Miller and Marshall 2005).Understanding the role of specific adrenergic receptors in mediating post-retrieval memory processes is particularly important in drug-induced CPP. In humans, drug-associated stimuli can facilitate drug use (Gawin 1991; See 2005) or precipitate relapse following abstinence (O''Brien et al. 1992). Thus, pharmacotherapies targeting these memory processes would benefit from a clearer understanding of the specific receptors that mediate behavioral effects (Taylor et al. 2009).Here, we first examined the effects of systemic post-test β₁-, β₂-, and α₁-AR antagonism on cocaine CPP. We then focused on the BLA due to its involvement in reconsolidation-like effects in drug learning paradigms (e.g., Lee et al. 2005), employing microinfusions of AR antagonists and measuring FOS immunoreactivity (FOS-IR) to examine the BLA as a potential site of AR-mediated impairments.     

The NMDA antagonist MK-801 disrupts reconsolidation of a cocaine-associated memory for conditioned place preference but not for self-administration in rats

Recent research suggests that drug-related memories are reactivated after exposure to environmental cues and may undergo reconsolidation, a process that can strengthen memories. Conversely, reconsolidation may be disrupted by certain pharmacological agents such that the drug-associated memory is weakened. Several studies have demonstrated disruption of memory reconsolidation using a drug-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) task, but no studies have explored whether cocaine-associated memories can be similarly disrupted in cocaine self-administering animals after a cocaine priming injection, which powerfully reinstates drug-seeking behavior. Here we used cocaine-induced CPP and cocaine self-administration to investigate whether the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (+)-5methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801) given just prior to reactivation sessions would suppress subsequent cocaine-primed reinstatement (disruption of reconsolidation). Systemic injection of MK-801 (0.05 or 0.20 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally) in rats just prior to reactivation of the cocaine-associated memory in the CPP context attenuated subsequent cocaine-primed reinstatement, while no disruption occurred in rats that did not receive reactivation in the CPP context. However, in rats trained to self-administer cocaine, systemic administration of MK-801 just prior to either of two different types of reactivation sessions had no effect on subsequent cocaine-primed reinstatement of lever-pressing behavior. Thus, systemic administration of MK-801 disrupted the reconsolidation of a cocaine-associated memory for CPP but not for self-administration. These findings suggest that cocaine-CPP and self-administration do not use similar neurochemical processes to disrupt reconsolidation or that cocaine-associated memories in self-administering rats do not undergo reconsolidation, as assessed by lever-pressing behavior under cocaine reinstatement conditions.The ability to disrupt previously consolidated memories in a reactivation-dependent manner is thought to be due to the disruption of a memory reconsolidation process. This disruption of reconsolidation has been observed in a wide variety of tasks and species (Nader et al. 2000b; Sara 2000; Alberini 2005; Riccio et al. 2006). Early reconsolidation experiments primarily focused on aversive learning paradigms, with an emphasis on disruption of reconsolidation as a potential treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (Misanin et al. 1968; Nader et al. 2000a; Debiec and Ledoux 2004; Brunet et al. 2008). Only more recently have investigators demonstrated that appetitive memories also undergo reconsolidation; most, but not all (Yim et al. 2006), studies found a disruption of expression for the drug-associated memory, suggesting the potential to target the reconsolidation process as a treatment for drug addiction (Lee et al. 2005; Miller and Marshall 2005; Milekic et al. 2006; Valjent et al. 2006; Brown et al. 2007; Kelley et al. 2007; Sadler et al. 2007; Fricks-Gleason and Marshall 2008; Milton et al. 2008a, b).Miller and Marshall (2005) showed that reconsolidation of cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) in the rat could be disrupted by either pre- or post-treatment of a phosphorylation inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (1/2) (ERK) in a reactivation-dependent manner. Other studies have shown that protein synthesis inhibitors (Milekic et al. 2006), a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor (Brown et al. 2007), a β-noradrenergic receptor antagonist (Bernardi et al. 2006; Robinson and Franklin 2007a; Fricks-Gleason and Marshall 2008), and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist (Kelley et al. 2007; Sadler et al. 2007) can also disrupt the reconsolidation of drug-associated CPP memories. Studies by Lee and colleagues have shown that Zif268 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide infused into the basolateral amygdala prior to reactivation of memory for a cocaine-associated cue (the conditioned stimulus or CS) disrupts the ability of cocaine-associated cues to establish subsequent acquisition of a new instrumental response (Lee et al. 2005), and the ability of a drug-associated cue to induce relapse under a second-order schedule (Lee et al. 2006a). Thus, cocaine-associated memories appear to undergo reconsolidation in both Pavlovian and operant conditioning paradigms.Relapse to drug-seeking or drug-taking behavior can occur after re-exposure to three types of stimuli: the drug itself, drug-associated contextual and discrete cues, and stress; and all of these may promote relapse in humans (for review, see Epstein et al. 2006). Only a few CPP studies (Valjent et al. 2006; Brown et al. 2007) and no self-administration studies to our knowledge have tested whether the drug-associated memory can be rendered susceptible to disruption by pharmacological agents such that subsequent cocaine-primed reinstatement is suppressed. This drug-primed effect is observed in humans, producing relapse (Ludwig et al. 1974; Jaffe et al. 1989), and in rats, producing robust reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in both CPP and self-administration tasks (McFarland and Ettenberg 1997; McFarland and Kalivas 2001; Sanchez and Sorg 2001; Kalivas and McFarland 2003). The development of a treatment strategy that makes use of the reconsolidation process will ultimately need to be powerful enough to diminish drug-seeking behavior in the presence of sizable doses of the drug itself. Therefore, the primary goal of this study was to determine whether drug-primed reinstatement could be suppressed in rats that have the memory reactivated in the presence of a pharmacological agent in cocaine self-administering rats. Since we previously have demonstrated the ability to disrupt cocaine-primed reinstatement only in animals in which the memory was reactivated using cocaine-induced CPP, we also tested the extent to which the same parameters used to disrupt reconsolidation in a cocaine-induced CPP task would disrupt reconsolidation in a cocaine self-administration task under conditions of drug-induced reinstatement.To examine this question, we chose the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801). MK-801 has been shown to disrupt reconsolidation of spatial tasks (Przybyslawski and Sara 1997), fear tasks (Lee et al. 2006b), amphetamine-induced CPP (Sadler et al. 2007), cocaine-induced CPP (Kelley et al. 2007), and sucrose self-administration (Lee and Everitt 2008). Importantly, the two studies examining CPP using MK-801 did not explore whether MK-801 suppressed drug-seeking behavior in a manner that was dependent on whether the memory was reactivated, leaving open the possibility that it was not a reconsolidation process that was disrupted by MK-801.Here we demonstrate that MK-801 injected prior to cocaine-primed reinstatement of CPP disrupted subsequent cocaine-primed reinstatement of CPP, and this disruption was dependent on CPP contextual reactivation since injection of MK-801 and cocaine in the home cage did not disrupt subsequent cocaine-primed reinstatement of CPP. However, drug-seeking behavior in animals trained for cocaine self-administration was not disrupted when rats were reactivated under the same parameters that disrupted cocaine-induced CPP or when rats were given a reactivation session identical to their self-administration sessions. We thus demonstrate for the first time that memories associated with cocaine-induced CPP and cocaine self-administration are not similarly susceptible to disruption by MK-801.     

LTP in hippocampal area CA1 is induced by burst stimulation over a broad frequency range centered around delta

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is typically studied using either continuous high-frequency stimulation or theta burst stimulation. Previous studies emphasized the physiological relevance of theta frequency; however, synchronized hippocampal activity occurs over a broader frequency range. We therefore tested burst stimulation at intervals from 100 msec to 20 sec (10 Hz to 0.05 Hz). LTP at Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapses was obtained at intervals from 100 msec to 5 sec, with maximal LTP at 350–500 msec (2–3 Hz, delta frequency). In addition, a short-duration potentiation was present over the entire range of burst intervals. We found that N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors were more important for LTP induction by burst stimulation, but L-type calcium channels were more important for LTP induction by continuous high-frequency stimulation. NMDA receptors were even more critical for short-duration potentiation than they were for LTP. We also compared repeated burst stimulation with a single primed burst. In contrast to results from repeated burst stimulation, primed burst potentiation was greater when a 200-msec interval (theta frequency) was used, and a 500-msec interval was ineffective. Whole-cell recordings of postsynaptic membrane potential during burst stimulation revealed two factors that may determine the interval dependence of LTP. First, excitatory postsynaptic potentials facilitated across bursts at 500-msec intervals but not 200-msec or 1-sec intervals. Second, synaptic inhibition was suppressed by burst stimulation at intervals between 200 msec and 1 sec. Our data show that CA1 synapses are more broadly tuned for potentiation than previously appreciated.Long-term potentiation (LTP) is used as a model for studying synaptic events during learning and memory (Bliss and Collingridge 1993; Morris 2003; Lynch 2004). At most synapses, LTP is triggered by postsynaptic Ca²⁺ influx through N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) glutamate receptors (Collingridge et al. 1983; Harris et al. 1984; Herron et al. 1986) and, under some conditions, through L-type voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels (Grover and Teyler 1990, 1994; Morgan and Teyler 1999). LTP was discovered in the dentate gyrus (Bliss and Lomo 1973) following several seconds of 10–100 Hz stimulation of the perforant path. Since then, many LTP studies have used similar long, high-frequency stimulation (HFS) protocols, most typically 100 Hz, 1 sec (Bliss and Collingridge 1993). Although effective, HFS does not resemble physiological patterns of activity (Albensi et al. 2007). Patterned stimulation resembling physiological activity, in particular theta burst stimulation, is also effective for LTP induction (Larson et al. 1986; Staubli and Lynch 1987; Capocchi et al. 1992; Nguyen and Kandel 1997). Theta burst stimulation consists of short bursts (4–5 stimuli at 100 Hz) repeated at 5 Hz, which lies within the hippocampal theta frequency range (4–12 Hz) (Bland 1986; Buzsáki 2002). Primed burst stimulation, another form of patterned stimulation, involves delivery of a priming stimulus followed by a single short burst (Larson and Lynch 1986; Rose and Dunwiddie 1986). The temporal requirements for primed burst LTP are quite precise (Diamond et al. 1988; Greenstein et al. 1988; Larson and Lynch 1989): Intervals less than 140 msec or greater than 200 msec are ineffective.The mechanisms underlying theta frequency-dependent LTP have been studied primarily using the primed burst protocol (Larson and Lynch 1986, 1988, 1989; Pacelli et al. 1989; Davies and Collingridge 1996). Activation of GABA_B autoreceptors during the priming stimulus suppresses GABA release during the following burst (Davies et al. 1990; Lambert and Wilson 1994; Olpe et al. 1994), allowing greater postsynaptic depolarization (Larson and Lynch 1986; Pacelli et al. 1989) and more effective NMDA receptor activation (Davies and Collingridge 1996). Consequently, temporal requirements for primed burst potentiation match the time course of GABA_B autoreceptor-mediated suppression of GABA release (Davies et al. 1990; Davies and Collingridge 1993; Mott et al. 1993).Besides theta, hippocampal activity is observed at other frequencies, notably sharp waves (0.01–5 Hz) (Buzsáki 1986, 1989; Suzuki and Smith 1987) and low-frequency oscillations (≤1 Hz) (Wolansky et al. 2006; Moroni et al. 2007). These lower frequencies dominate during slow wave sleep (Buzsáki 1986; Suzuki and Smith 1987; Wolansky et al. 2006; Moroni et al. 2007), and contribute to hippocampal memory processing (Buzsáki 1989; Pennartz et al. 2002). While synchronized population activity over frequencies from <1 Hz to 12 Hz is associated with hippocampal memory function, previous LTP studies have focused on theta. We therefore investigated burst stimulation at frequencies from 0.05 Hz to 10 Hz. We found that CA1 synapses potentiate to some degree over this entire range and that maximal potentiation occurs around delta frequency rather than theta.     

Early extinction after fear conditioning yields a context-independent and short-term suppression of conditional freezing in rats

Extinction of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats is a useful model for therapeutic interventions in humans with anxiety disorders. Recently, we found that delivering extinction trials soon (15 min) after fear conditioning yields a short-term suppression of fear, but little long-term extinction. Here, we explored the possible mechanisms underlying this deficit by assessing the suppression of fear to a CS immediately after extinction training (Experiment 1) and the context specificity of fear after both immediate and delayed extinction training (Experiment 2). We also examined the time course of the immediate extinction deficit (Experiment 3). Our results indicate that immediate extinction produces a short-lived and context-independent suppression of conditional freezing. Deficits in long-term extinction were apparent even when the extinction trials were given up to 6 h after conditioning. Moreover, this deficit was not due to different retention intervals that might have influenced the degree of spontaneous recovery after immediate and delayed extinction (Experiment 4). These results suggest that fear suppression under immediate extinction may be due to a short-term, context-independent habituation process, rather than extinction per se. Long-term extinction memory only develops when extinction training occurs at least six hours after conditioning.Pavlovian fear conditioning and extinction are important behavioral models for studying the brain mechanisms underlying the acquisition, storage, retrieval, and suppression of traumatic fear (LeDoux 2000; Maren 2001, 2005; Kim and Jung 2005). In this procedure, an emotionally neutral stimulus, such as a tone, is paired with an aversive stimulus (US), such as an electric foot shock. After a few tone–foot shock pairings, the previous neutral tone becomes a potent conditioned stimulus (CS) and acquires the ability to elicit fear responses, such as freezing (CR). However, with repeated presentations of the CS-alone, the previously acquired CR gradually subsides, a process called extinction (Davis et al. 2003; Maren and Quirk 2004; Kim and Jung 2005; Myers and Davis 2007). The behavioral processes and the underlying neural mechanisms of extinction have attracted extensive attention in contemporary research of learning and memory (Bouton et al. 2006). Indeed, it has been suggested that failure to extinguish fear may contribute to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Bouton et al. 2001; Rothbaum and Davis 2003). To avoid the possible long-term consequences and costs of PTSD or other anxiety disorders, clinical interventions are essential. While early interventions may manage the stress response to trauma, their efficacy has been challenged, because the acute intense stress of the traumatic experience might actually exacerbate relapse of fear (McNally 2003; Rothbaum and Davis 2003; Gray and Litz 2005). Thus, it is essential to learn when these interventions generate the best long-term extinction of fear responses.In a recent study, we demonstrated that delivering extinction trials shortly after fear conditioning yields poor long-term fear reduction (Maren and Chang 2006; but, see Myers et al. 2006). We observed that conditional freezing decreased during extinction training, but recovered completely 24 h later. This was true even when we gave 225 massed extinction trials 15 min after fear conditioning. However, in these experiments the within-session decrease in fear in rats that underwent extinction was similar to that in rats that were not exposed to extinction trials. Thus, it is unclear to what extent the short-term fear suppression we observed was due to a loss of fear to the context, the auditory CS, or both. It is also not clear whether fear suppression was due to extinction or, alternatively, another learning process such as habituation.To examine these issues further, in the present study we first assessed fear suppression to the auditory CS after immediate extinction by probing CS fear 15 min after extinction training. In a second experiment, we examined whether short-term fear suppression to the CS is renewed outside of the extinction context, as context specificity is one of the hallmarks of extinction (Bouton 2002; Ji and Maren 2007). In the third and fourth experiments, we examined the temporal delay necessary between conditioning and extinction to yield long-term suppression of fear. In our previous work (Maren and Chang 2006), all phases of training were conducted in the same context. Therefore, fear to the context decreased conditional freezing to the tone, particularly when extinction occurred shortly after conditioning, a time at which sensitized context fear was high. In an effort to isolate fear to the tone CS during extinction, we conducted extinction and test sessions in a context that was different from the conditioning context (i.e., an ABB procedure, where each letter denotes the context used for conditioning, extinction, and test, respectively). Our results reveal that delivering CS-alone trials shortly after fear conditioning produces a short-lived and context-independent suppression of freezing. This fear suppression may be due to a short-term, context-independent habituation process, rather than extinction. Furthermore, poor long-term extinction occurs even when the extinction trials were administered up to 6 h after conditioning.     

Theta bursts in the olfactory nerve paired with β-adrenoceptor activation induce calcium elevation in mitral cells: A mechanism for odor preference learning in the neonate rat

Odor preference learning in the neonate rat follows pairing of odor input and noradrenergic activation of β-adrenoceptors. Odor learning is hypothesized to be supported by enhanced mitral cell activation. Here a mechanism for enhanced mitral cell signaling is described. Theta bursts in the olfactory nerve (ON) produce long-term potentiation (LTP) of glomerular excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in the periglomerular (PG) and external tufted (ET) cells. Theta bursts paired with β-adrenoceptor activation significantly elevate mitral cell (MC) calcium. Juxtaglomerular inhibitory network depression by β-adrenoceptor activation appears to increase calcium in MCs in response to theta burst stimulation.Early odor preference learning provides us with a model in which the necessary and sufficient inputs for learning can be localized to a relatively simple cortical structure, the olfactory bulb (Sullivan et al. 2000). The critical changes for this natural form of learning occur in the olfactory bulb network (Coopersmith and Leon 1986, 1987, 1995; Wilson et al. 1987; Woo et al. 1987; Wilson and Leon 1988; Wilson and Leon 1991; Guthrie et al. 1993; Johnson et al. 1995; Yuan et al. 2002). Odor preference learning is induced by the pairing of odor with activation of the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system, a component of our arousal circuitry (Harley 1987; Berridge and Waterhouse 2003; Berridge 2008), which is critically involved in other forms of memory (Harley 1987; Berridge and Waterhouse 2003) and compromised in diseases of memory, such as Alzheimer''s (Palmer and DeKosky 1993; Weinshenker 2008). The unconditioned stimulus for early odor preference learning is mediated by β-adrenoceptor activation in the olfactory bulb (Sullivan et al. 1991, 1992; Wilson and Sullivan 1991, 1994; Wilson et al. 1994; Harley et al. 2006). β-Adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists infused in the olfactory bulb can induce or block learning, respectively (Sullivan et al. 1989, 2000).Despite the fact that the behavioral model for early odor preference learning has been established for decades (Sullivan et al. 1988, 1989), and despite the fact that the olfactory bulb circuit contains synapses that are essential for the formation of a localizable long-term memory that is easily indexed in behavior (Coopersmith and Leon 1986; Wilson et al. 1987; Woo et al. 1987; Wilson and Leon 1988; Woo and Leon 1991; Johnson et al. 1995; McLean et al. 1999; Yuan et al. 2002), the circuitry and the synapses in the olfactory bulb that mediate learning are not well understood. Long-term potentiation (LTP), the putative synaptic model for associative learning in other brain regions (Bliss and Lomo 1973; Brown et al. 1988; Barnes 1995; Malenka 1994), has not been demonstrated compellingly in the rat olfactory bulb. The lack of evidence for a synaptic locus and a mechanism to support odor preference learning is partly due to the dissociation of the neural changes previously observed following early odor learning (seen at the glomerular input level) (Coopersmith and Leon 1986; Wilson et al. 1987; Woo et al. 1987; Wilson and Leon 1988; Woo and Leon 1991; Johnson et al. 1995; Yuan et al. 2002) and the innervation pattern of noradrenergic fibers in the olfactory bulb (seen mostly in the deep layers of the olfactory bulb, but sparse in the glomerular layer) (McLean et al. 1989; McLean and Shipley 1991).McLean and colleagues have proposed, based on physiological and anatomical evidence, that early odor preference learning leads to a long-term facilitation of the olfactory nerve (ON) inputs to mitral cells (MCs, the main output cell of the olfactory bulb) (McLean et al. 1999; Yuan et al. 2003b; McLean and Harley 2004). In the present study, odor input is mimicked in vitro by theta burst stimulation (TBS) of the ON, and the modulation of glomerular and MC responses to theta bursts alone and in conjunction with bath application of the β-adrenoceptor agonist, isoproterenol, is assessed. The results support the McLean glomerular/MC hypothesis of early odor preference learning.In the first set of experiments (Fig. 1A–D), the effects of theta burst ON input on the field glomerular excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) were tested. The ON was stimulated by a single test stimulus (20–100 μA) every 20 sec in horizontal olfactory bulb slices from postnatal 6–14-d-old Sprague–Dawley rats (Fig. 1A). TBS (10 bursts of high frequency stimulation at 5 Hz, each burst containing five pulses at 100 Hz, same stimulation intensity as test stimuli) that mimics the sniffing cycles in the ON (Kepecs et al. 2006) was given after a baseline was taken. All the experiments were done in aCSF containing (in millimolars) 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.3 MgSO₄, 1 NaH₂PO₄, 26.2 NaHCO₃, 22 mM glucose, and 2.5 CaCl₂, equilibrated with 95% O₂/5% CO₂. Field recording pipettes were filled with aCSF. All recordings were acquired at 30°C–32°C. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Student''s t-test was used to determine statistical significance.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Theta LTP can be induced in the olfactory bulb first synapses. (A) Stimulation and recording configuration. A bipolar stimulation pipette was placed on a bundle of ON fibers that innervated the recorded glomerulus. ON, olfactory nerve; GL, glomerular layer; MC, mitral cell. (B–D) LTP of glomerular field EPSPs induced by ON theta burst stimulation (TBS). (B) Time course of glomerular field EPSPs (upper: single example; lower: average traces from N = 34 recordings). Note field EPSP was potentiated following TBS. (C) Paired-pulse ratio (PPR, N = 7) of ON field EPSPs (interval 50 msec) was depressed following TBS. (D) LTP of glomerular field EPSPs was D-APV independent (N = 5). (E–G) TBS of ON induced LTP in postsynaptic external tufted (ET) cells. (E) Time course of EPSCs recorded from ET cells (N = 6). (F) PPR of EPSCs (N = 4). (G) LTP of ET cell EPSCs are D-APV independent (N = 3). (H,I) TBS of ON induced potentiation of periglomerular (PG) cell EPSCs. (H) Time course of EPSCs (N = 8). (I) PPR of EPSCs (N = 4).There was on average a 14.5 ± 2.5% increase in the field EPSP peak amplitude at 30 min post TBS induction (N = 34, t = 5.82, P < 0.001, Fig. 1B). Bath application of D-APV (50 μM), an NMDAR antagonist, did not eliminate TBS potentiation; the EPSP peak is 115.6 ± 5.4% of baseline, 30 min post-induction (N = 5, t = 2.90, P = 0.022, Fig. 1D). This result suggests that plasticity occurs at the first step of odor processing (Ennis et al. 1998; Mutoh et al. 2005; Tyler et al. 2007; Dong et al. 2008; Jones et al. 2008). Hence, the synapses between the ON and its postsynaptic neurons are potential targets for learning-dependent plasticity as suggested by the long-lasting metabolic and anatomical changes observed at the olfactory bulb glomerular level following early odor preference training (Coopersmith and Leon 1986; Wilson et al. 1987; Woo et al. 1987; Wilson and Leon 1988; Woo and Leon 1991; Johnson et al. 1995; Yuan et al. 2002). Paired stimuli given to the ON using a 50-msec interval were used to test presynaptic changes to TBS. Paired-pulse ratios, an indicator of changes in presynaptic release (Murphy et al. 2004), decreased following TBS (91.5 ± 2.8% of control, N = 7, t = 3.05, P = 0.011, Fig. 1C). The decrease in paired-pulse ratio suggests TBS potentiation is presynaptically mediated. The glomerular potentiation seen here is consistent with a recent adult mouse model showing an increase in odor-specific glomeruli and olfactory sensory neurons following odor learning (Jones et al. 2008).In the second set of experiments, glomerular excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in postsynaptic juxtaglomerular (JG) cells were recorded in voltage-clamp mode (membrane potential held at −60 mV). The effects of TBS on JG cell EPSCs were tested. Patch pipettes were filled with an internal solution containing (in millimolars) 114 K-gluconate, 17.5 KCl, 4 NaCl, 4 MgCl₂, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 3 Mg₂ATP, and 0.3 Na₂GTP. There are two main populations of JG cells in the glomeruli, periglomerular (PG) cells, and external tufted (ET) cells. PG cells are inhibitory on MCs (Murphy et al. 2005), while ET cells are excitatory neurons, which receive monosynaptic ON input and then excite PG interneurons (Hayar et al. 2004). PG cells form two functionally distinct populations: ∼30% are driven by monosynaptic ON input, while the remaining population receive their input mainly through ET cells (ON–ET–PG circuit) (Shao et al. 2009). These JG cells form a glomerular inhibitory network in which inhibitory PG cells (activated by either ON input or ET cells) provide both feed-forward and feedback inhibition to MCs of the olfactory bulb through dendrodendritic synapses (Hayar et al. 2004; Murphy et al. 2005). ET cells can be distinguished from PG cells by their morphology, location, and characteristic spontaneous rhythmic spike bursting pattern recorded extracellularly before switching to whole-cell voltage-clamp mode (Hayar et al. 2004; Dong et al. 2007). ET cells were significantly potentiated by TBS while the TBS effect on PG cells was more moderate and more variable (ET: 124.1 ± 11.4% of control at 30 min post-induction, N = 6, t = 2.12, P = 0.043, Fig. 1E; PG: 115.7 ± 15.5%, N = 8, t = 1.01, P = 0.172, Fig. 1H). It should be noted that there is a stronger dialysis effect in small cells, such as the PG cells, which is suggested to account for the weaker and more variable potentiation in this subgroup. Three PG cells showed compelling potentiation (164 ± 13.5% of control at 30 min post-induction, t = 4.73, P = 0.021). The paired-pulse ratio of the EPSCs was reduced following TBS induction (ET: 81.6 ± 4.6% of control, N = 4, t = 4.01, P = 0.014, Fig. 1F; PG: 80.1 ± 10.5%, t = 1.90, P = 0.070, Fig. 1I), consistent with a presynaptic expression mechanism. Furthermore, ET cell LTP was NMDA-receptor independent when tested with APV (161.9 ± 23.3% of control, 15 min post-induction, N = 3, t = 2.66, P = 0.028, Fig. 1G).The role of theta LTP in learning is of particular interest because this pattern of activation is likely to occur in the ON. Since theta is the frequency associated with sniffing in the olfactory bulb (Kepecs et al. 2006), it is straightforward to hypothesize that it has a role in the learning of odor associations. Yet odor preference learning does not occur with odor exposure per se. An interaction between a theta paced odor input and the arousal modulator, norepinephrine (NE), is critical.In the third set of experiments, calcium imaging was used to examine the network of MC responses in each slice. Conventionally, it has been assumed that the glomerular field EPSP mostly reflects MC activity (Mori 1987; Shipley et al. 1996). But recent studies demonstrate the contribution of other cell types to the glomerular field EPSP such as the JG cells (ET and PG cells) (Karnup et al. 2006) monitored here. Therefore, the glomerular field EPSP is not a simple summation of synchronized MC activity. Moreover, synaptic activities at MC dendritic tufts in glomeruli may not propagate efficiently enough to the soma to change MC spiking rate due to the significant length of MC apical dendrites (Karnup et al. 2006). Therefore, this set of experiments used direct monitoring of MC activity through calcium imaging to characterize activity-dependent changes in the olfactory bulb output map. Calcium imaging permits the examination of a large population of neurons with single-cell resolution (Egger 2007).A calcium indicator dye, Oregon Green BAPTA-1, was pressure-injected into the MC layer to stain populations of MCs (Fig. 2A,B). Calcium transients were imaged at 494 nm excitation (15–20 Hz, 2 × 2 binning). Regions of interest (∼20 μm diameter) centered over MC somata were used for kinetic analysis. By selecting 8–12 cells per slice (including both strongly and weakly activated cells), and measuring single MC somatic calcium transients (ΔF/F, average over six to eight trials, background subtracted from an immediate adjacent area next to the somata), changes were observed in the MC responses to ON stimulation (40–100 μA) 30 min following TBS (the same time point at which the magnitude of theta LTP in the glomerular layer was measured). The overall MC calcium responses to ON stimulation were not significantly affected by TBS (113.0 ± 10.5% of control, N = 74 cells from nine slices, t = 1.24, P = 0.220, Fig. 2 panel C1). The olfactory bulb network is, as noted, functionally complex with both feed-forward and feedback inhibition modifying the MC responses to ON/odor stimulation (Murphy et al. 2005). Given the increase in coupling to inhibitory interneurons seen in the second set of experiments, it may be that enhanced feed-forward inhibition from the inhibitory JG network prevented an increase in MC responding. However, it should be noted that increases in MC responses related to TBS could be masked due to the limitation of the in vitro methodology (e.g., selected cells may include those projecting to glomeruli further away from the stimulation site and those deeper in the tissue which have weaker signal-to-noise ratios). However, as subsequent experiments, described below, reveal significant MC calcium responses with the same in vitro methodology, it is likely that the response to TBS alone is relatively minor.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Pairing of TBS and isoproterenol (ISO) increased MC calcium responses. (A) ΔF/F calcium image (20× objective) of a slice stained with a calcium indicator dye, Oregon Green BAPTA-1 AM. The MC layer is labeled by white dashed lines. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) An example of ΔF/F calcium imaging showing enhanced calcium responses following TBS+ISO in one MC (white asterisk). Lower traces are calcium transients recorded from the soma of the MC. (C) Averaged calcium transient changes in MCs following TBS, ISO, and TBS+ISO (normalized to control), measured at 30 min post-manipulations. **P < 0.01. (C1) Single-cell calcium transient changes before and after TBS. Dashed black line indicates no change. Cells above the dashed line show increased calcium responses, whereas those below the dashed line show decreased calcium responses. (C2) MC calcium responses to paired TBS and ISO. Note that the majority of MCs showed increased calcium responses following TBS+ISO. (C3) MC calcium responses to ISO only.Since TBS itself was not sufficient to produce significant MC calcium responses, the combined effect of TBS and the β-adrenoceptor agonist, isoproterenol, were examined. Isoproterenol was applied to the bath solution 5–10 min before the TBS and washed out after the TBS induction. The pairing of TBS and isoproterenol (10 μM) increased MC calcium responses in most of the cells measured (137.0 ± 11.0% of control, N = 55 from five slices, t = 3.27, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 panel C2). Five to ten min application of isoproterenol alone to the bath solution did not alter the MC responses observed 30 min after isoproterenol washout (102.5 ± 8.8% of control, N = 47 from four slices, t = 0.28, P = 0.781, Fig. 2 panel C3). Thus, the potentiated MC calcium response was only seen with paired isoproterenol and TBS. As a caveat it should be noted that MCs fire action potentials spontaneously in vivo at ∼3 Hz (Cang and Isaacson 2003) and in vitro at ∼15 Hz (up to 75 Hz) (Griff et al. 2008). A change in ΔF/F calcium response reflects a change in the ratio of the evoked response over the baseline spontaneous response. Changes in MC spontaneous firing, therefore, can affect the ΔF/F calcium signal measured from the MC. However, if pairing TBS with isoproterenol increased spontaneous firing, the increase in the evoked firing rate of MCs had to occur to a greater degree.This result, that only the pairing of TBS with isoproterenol enhanced MC calcium responses, correlates with the behavioral studies (Langdon et al. 1997; Sullivan and Leon 1987; Sullivan et al. 2000) showing that only the pairing of an odor and isoproterenol produces associative learning, while either odor alone or isoproterenol alone does not lead to associative learning. It supports the view that at the level of physiological mechanism, classical conditioning is the interaction of arousal modulation and theta modulation while either alone does not create the necessary associative conditions. Consistent with previous work showing enhanced CREB phosphorylation in MCs following learning (McLean et al. 1999; Yuan et al. 2000, 2003a), the present calcium imaging results support the hypothesis that odor learning results in increased firing in odor encoding MCs. Increased firing in MCs is also consistent with recent work by Gire and Schoppa showing that the pairing of NE with TBS induces an enhancement of MC long-lasting depolarization and gamma frequency oscillation (Gire and Schoppa 2008). Interestingly, MC firing is mainly suppressed to a familiar odor in neonatal rats (Wilson et al. 1985). TBS potentiation of the inhibitory JG circuitry may contribute to the odor habituation observed behaviorally.In the fourth set of experiments, the effects of isoproterenol on JG cell activity were examined. Previous research using slice physiology to identify a synaptic site of NE action was constrained by the known distribution of noradrenergic input to the olfactory bulb. Noradrenergic fibers project heavily to the subglomerular layers; they terminate densely in the internal plexiform and the granule cell (GC) layers, and moderately in the external plexiform and the MC layers (McLean et al. 1989). Based on this anatomical evidence, it was assumed that either GCs or MCs were the potential targets for β-adrenoceptor action. However, the Ennis group showed that the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol has no direct effect on MC excitability in acute rat olfactory bulb slices (Hayar et al. 2001). Although isoproterenol caused an inward current in MCs in voltage-clamp mode, this inward current was blocked by synaptic transmission blockers, suggesting an indirect effect of isoproterenol, possibly through interneurons. NE could disinhibit MCs through suppressing GC activity as reported in the turtle and dissociated rat olfactory bulb cultures (Jahr and Nicoll 1982; Trombley and Shepherd 1992; Trombley 1994). However, this effect was attributed to an α2-, but not β-adrenoceptor, mediated presynaptic inhibition of GC and/or MC dendrites (Trombley 1992, 1994; Trombley and Shepherd 1992). Since isoproterenol here altered MC calcium responses to ON theta burst input, it was possible that JG cells were potential targets for NE action. Studies using immunocytochemistry (Yuan et al. 2003b) and receptor autoradiography (Woo and Leon 1995) show that β-adrenoceptors are expressed in JG cells (Woo and Leon 1995; Yuan et al. 2003b), as well as in MCs (Yuan et al. 2003b) and GCs (Woo and Leon 1995).With the application of isoproterenol the JG cell EPSCs to ON stimulation were suppressed (ET: 86.6 ± 6.0% of control, N = 6, t = 2.25, P = 0.037, Fig. 3A; PG: 87.3 ± 3.6%, t = 3.55, P = 0.006, Fig. 3A). Isoproterenol was applied for 5 min in the bath solution and then washed out. The effect of isoproterenol was reversed after washout (94.8 ± 6.7%, N = 3, t = 0.78, P = 0.259, Fig. 3A). Similar results were found with calcium imaging using the averaged cell calcium transients from 8–20 cells per slice (Fig. 3B). The averaged response from each slice was counted as one experiment. JG cell calcium transients were suppressed in the presence of isoproterenol (83.7 ± 3.0% of control, N = 7, t = 5.40, P = 0.002, Fig. 3B). The effect of isoproterenol was reversed 30 min following washout (100.6 ± 1.8% of control, N = 3, t = 0.36, P = 0.754). In two experiments, recordings were made from slices that had a cut between the MC and the glomerular layer to isolate the potential secondary effect from MCs onto JG cells. In this case, isoproterenol still suppressed JG cell calcium transients (Fig. 3B, dashed circles).Open in a separate windowFigure 3.The effects of ISO on JG cells (PG+ET cells). (A) ISO (10 μM) application suppressed EPSCs of ET cells (N = 6) and PG cells (N = 7), which was reversed following ISO washout (N = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (B) ISO application suppressed ON-evoked calcium transients in JG cells (N = 7 slices). The ISO effect was reversed 30 min after washout (N = 3). N = 2 experiments were recorded from slices of a cut that was made between the glomerular layer and the MCs layer. **P < 0.01Given the results of both whole-cell recording and calcium imaging, it was reasonable to hypothesize that isoproterenol would decrease JG cell activity, reducing GABA release onto MCs and causing MC disinhibition. Indeed, it has been shown NE application caused a reduction of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in MCs (Gire and Schoppa 2008). Taken together these findings support the enhanced MC excitation model for early odor preference learning. While the present experiments were conducted with the β_1/2 agonist, isoproterenol, associative odor preference learning depends on β₁, not β₂, receptors (Harley et al. 2006). β₁ adrenoceptors are also expressed in JG cells (Yuan et al. 2003b). The role of specific β-adrenoceptor subtypes in mediating MC disinhibition will be tested in the future studies.The present results argue that potentiation of MC calcium responses occurs only when theta frequency activity is paired with β-adrenoceptor activation. They also suggest that one critical role of NE activation via β-adrenoceptors in the olfactory bulb is to suppress the inhibitory JG network, subsequently transiently disinhibiting MCs and providing the conditions for strengthening ON–MC connections in selected glomeruli. This mechanism likely operates in concert with changes promoted by patterned cAMP waves in MCs (Cui et al. 2007).     

D-cycloserine potentiates the reconsolidation of cocaine-associated memories

Conditioned cue-induced relapse to drug seeking is a major challenge to the treatment of drug addiction. It has been proposed that D-cycloserine might be useful in the prevention of relapse by reducing the conditioned reinforcing properties of drug-associated stimuli through facilitation of extinction. Here we show that intrabasolateral amygdala infusions of D-cycloserine in fact potentiate the reconsolidation of stimulus–cocaine memories to increase cue-induced relapse to drug seeking in rats with an extensive drug self-administration history. This elevation of cocaine seeking was correlated with an increase in the expression of the reconsolidation-associated gene zif268.Drug addiction is often described as a chronic relapsing disorder, in which craving and relapse to drug seeking occur even after prolonged abstinence (Gawin and Kleber 1986; Lu et al. 2004). A major contributor to relapse is exposure to environmental stimuli that have previously been associated regularly with the effects of self-administered drugs of abuse. Such drug-associated stimuli induce craving in abstinent addicts, and precipitate relapse to drug seeking (Gawin and Kleber 1986; Ehrman et al. 1992; O''Brien et al. 1998; Childress et al. 1999). In experimental animals, a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired repeatedly with self-administered cocaine similarly induces relapse to drug seeking (de Wit and Stewart 1981; Fuchs et al. 1998; Grimm et al. 2001).The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is a primary locus of CS–US (unconditioned stimulus) associations (LeDoux 2000; Everitt et al. 2003), and is critical for the control of goal-directed behavior by conditioned reinforcers (Burns et al. 1993; Corbit and Balleine 2005). Furthermore, lesions of the BLA disrupt conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of drug seeking (Meil and See 1997) and the acquisition of drug seeking under a second-order schedule of reinforcement (Whitelaw et al. 1996). The infusion of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeting the immediate-early gene zif268 (also known as EGR1, Krox24, and NGFI-A) into the BLA impairs the reconsolidation of CS–cocaine associations and thereby reduces cue-induced cocaine seeking and relapse (Lee et al. 2005, 2006a). Memory reconsolidation is the process that is hypothesized to restabilize memories following their reactivation through stimulus re-exposure (Nader 2003), the disruption of which both results in amnesia and has been proposed to be a potential treatment strategy for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as post-traumatic stress and drug addiction in which persistent maladaptive memories play an important role (Lee et al. 2005; Brunet et al. 2007).An alternative therapeutic approach for such disorders is to use cognitive enhancement strategies to potentiate the extinction of the maladaptive memories (Ressler et al. 2004; Richardson et al. 2004). The partial N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonist D-cycloserine (DCS) potentiates extinction in aversive and appetitive tasks when administered both systemically and directly into the BLA (Walker et al. 2002; Ledgerwood et al. 2003; Botreau et al. 2006). However, under certain conditions intra-BLA DCS can increase, rather than reduce, subsequent fear memory expression (Lee et al. 2006b). This finding is consistent with a potentiation of fear memory reconsolidation, and predicts that DCS might also enhance drug memories, which would be a potentially major limitation in a therapeutic setting. Therefore, using conditions that have been previously demonstrated to engage drug memory reconsolidation in a translational model of cocaine seeking (Lee et al. 2006a); we investigated whether or not DCS infusion into the BLA would enhance memory reconsolidation to increase cocaine seeking. Also investigated was the expression of zif268 in the amygdala following DCS treatment and CS re-exposure since this plasticity gene provides a cellular correlate of memory reconsolidation (Lee et al. 2005).The subjects were 45 adult male Lister hooded rats, weighing 280–350 g. They were housed in pairs prior to surgery, and singly thereafter, in holding rooms maintained at 21°C on a reversed-light cycle (12 h light:12 h dark; lights on at 19:00). After recovery from surgery, food was restricted to 20 g/day. Water was freely available throughout the experiment. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the UK 1986 Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (Project License PPL 80/1767). Rats were implanted with a single catheter in the right jugular vein, and also with bilateral chronic indwelling guide cannulae targeting the BLA. The coordinates for cannulae implantation were (relative to bregma): AP − 2.6; ML ± 4.5; DV − 5.6 (from dura). Details of the intravenous and stereotaxic surgical procedures are described elsewhere (Di Ciano and Everitt 2001). A minimum of 7 d was allowed before behavioral training and testing began.All behavioral procedures were carried out in operant chambers (Med Associates) as previously described (Di Ciano and Everitt 2001), and were based on previous experiments (Lee et al. 2006a). Rats underwent 10 d of cocaine self-administration training under a fixed-ratio-1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement. At the start of each self-administration session, two levers were inserted into the operant chamber and the house light was illuminated. Each response on the active lever (counterbalanced left or right) was reinforced with a single infusion of i.v. cocaine (0.25 mg in 0.1 mL over 5 s per infusion), accompanied by a 20-s illumination of the CS light located above the active lever, during which both levers were retracted and the house light was extinguished. Responses on the other, inactive, lever had no programmed consequence. To prevent accidental overdose, rats were limited to 30 infusions per hour in the 3-h sessions. In the event of 30 infusions being received, the levers were retracted and the house light extinguished until an hour had elapsed, after which the levers were again extended and the house light illuminated.The memory for the CS–cocaine association was reactivated in a single 30-min session through 30 noncontingent presentations of the CS light (20 s; 40-s ISI). No levers were present during the reactivation session, which took place 3 d after the completion of self-administration training, and 20 min following infusion of DCS (Sigma, UK; 20 μg/μL; 0.5 μL/side; 0.25 μL/min) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) into the BLA as described previously (Lee et al. 2006b). The absence of the levers should decrease the probability of substantial reactivation of the instrumental memory. Nonreactivated groups were infused with DCS and then returned immediately to the home cage without a behavioral test session.Testing, which took place 6 d after self-administration training, involved the levers again being extended into the operant chamber and assessed the impact of the CS upon instrumental responding after 6-d abstinence as a model of cue-induced relapse. A response on the active lever was reinforced by a 1-s presentation of the CS light, during which the house light was extinguished, and a response on the inactive lever again had no programmed consequence. There were no cocaine infusions, and the number of lever presses was recorded in a 60-min session. The rats were subsequently retested on the following day.After completion of behavioral testing, the rats were perfused and their brains cut to produce 60 μm coronal sections, which were stained with cresyl violet. Assessment was conducted under light microscopy, and subjects were only included in the statistical analysis if the injectors were located bilaterally within the BLA, and there was no bilateral damage to the amygdala or any other area of the brain (5 rats were excluded on this basis). Fourteen rats were killed by carbon dioxide inhalation 2 h after memory reactivation (or at the same time point following infusions and nonreactivation). Their brains were extracted, the BLA microdissected bilaterally, and the samples frozen on dry ice and stored at –80°C prior to the quantification of zif268 protein levels through Western blot analysis as described previously (Lee et al. 2005).All rats included in the behavioral analyses had cannulae placed bilaterally in the BLA (Fig. 1). There was no difference between any of the groups during cocaine self-administration training and on average rats received 505 pairings of the light CS with an infusion of cocaine (data not shown; Condition × DCS: F < 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Location of injectors within the BLA. Schematic representation of the brain at three rostro-caudal levels (−2.30, −2.56, and −2.80 mm from bregma). All rats included in the statistical analyses had injectors placed bilaterally in the BLA (× = PBS reactivated; • = DCS reactivated; □ = PBS nonreactivated; △ = DCS nonreactivated).Infusion of DCS into the BLA before drug cue re-exposure elevated subsequent active lever responding in a reactivation-dependent manner (Fig. 2). For the first test, ANOVA revealed a significant DCS × Reactivation × Lever interaction (F _(1,22) = 8.62; P < 0.01), as well as a significant DCS × Reactivation interaction (F _(1,22) = 4.71; P < 0.05). The effect was specific to the reactivated condition, as DCS infusion had no impact upon the nonreactivated condition (Fs < 1). This was confirmed by a significant DCS × Lever interaction (F _(1,13) = 13.12; P < 0.01) for the reactivated condition, and a significant main effect of DCS (F _(1,13) = 9.66; P < 0.01), but no effect of DCS on inactive lever presses (F < 1). The DCS-induced elevation of responding was again observed 24 h later in test 2 (DCS × Reactivation × Lever: F _(1,22) = 4.44; P < 0.05), indicating a persistent potentiation of responding, and an overall analysis revealed no difference in the effect of DCS between tests 1 and 2 (DCS × Reactivation × Lever: F _(1,13) = 7.41; P < 0.02; DCS × Reactivation × Lever × Test: F _(1,22) = 1.66; P > 0.21).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Effect of prereactivation intra-BLA DCS on cocaine seeking. The number of active and inactive lever presses during the 60-min tests are presented for rats infused 3 d and tested 6 d after the end of self-administration training (A) in both the reactivated (PBS n = 8, DCS n = 7) and nonreactivated (PBS n = 6, DCS n = 5) conditions. DCS increased subsequent active lever responding across both bins in a reactivation-dependent manner, and the elevation was observed in a further test 24 h later (B). Data presented as mean + SEM. An asterisk (*) represents a significant DCS × Lever interaction, P < 0.05.Infusion of DCS into the BLA before drug cue re-exposure potentiated the subsequent expression in the BLA of zif268 protein levels 2 h after the reactivation session as measured by Western blotting analysis (Fig. 3). ANOVA revealed a significant effect of DCS when infused prior to memory reactivation (F _(1,6) = 9.42; P < 0.03). However, there was no effect of DCS treatment when infused in the absence of memory reactivation (F _(1,4) = 1.41; P > 0.30).Open in a separate windowFigure 3.Effect of prereactivation intra-BLA DCS on zif268 protein levels in the BLA. The images of the gels were quantified and normalized to give a measure of zif268 protein relative to control PBS-infused rats. DCS increased the levels of zif268 protein 2 h after memory reactivation [(A); n = 4 per group], but not at the equivalent time point in the nonreactivated condition [(B); n = 3 per group]. Data presented as mean + SEM.The present results demonstrate that infusion of the partial NMDA receptor agonist DCS into the BLA shortly before re-exposure to a cocaine-associated CS increased subsequent cocaine seeking behavior maintained by that CS. Moreover, the expression of the reconsolidation-associated gene zif268 in the amygdala was also elevated by DCS infusion coupled with CS re-exposure. Both of these effects were critically dependent upon rats being re-exposed to the cocaine CS shortly after DCS infusion. We have previously demonstrated both that paired presentations of CS and reward are necessary for the acquisition of conditioned reinforcing properties (Parkinson et al. 2005), and that re-exposure to contextual and other stimuli are insufficient to reactivate the CS–cocaine memory (Lee et al. 2006a). Therefore, the present results most likely reflect an effect of DCS to potentiate the reconsolidation of the CS–cocaine memory, thereby enhancing the appetitive properties of the CS and increasing cue-induced cocaine seeking.DCS has been shown to potentiate a number of memory plasticity processes, including initial memory acquisition/consolidation (Monahan et al. 1989; Land and Riccio 1999; Kalisch et al. 2008), memory extinction (Walker et al. 2002; Ledgerwood et al. 2003), and memory reconsolidation (Lee et al. 2006b). Moreover, the effect of DCS here was memory reactivation dependent and hence not a result of an acute effect upon behavior. Therefore, the elevation of subsequent cue-induced cocaine seeking reflects an enhancement of CS–cocaine memory expression. The delay of 3 d between the end of self-administration training and DCS infusion ensured that initial consolidation processes were complete, and hence the effect of DCS is more likely be related to memory extinction or reconsolidation, of which only a potentiation of memory reconsolidation can account for the present results. Therefore, the behavioral evidence strongly indicates that DCS infusion into the BLA can potentiate drug memory reconsolidation to elevate subsequent drug seeking, at least under certain circumstances.The cellular data obtained in the present study provides further evidence that DCS elevation of NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate transmission enhances cocaine seeking through the potentiation of drug memory reconsolidation. The expression of the immediate-early gene zif268 has been shown in several settings to be a critical and causal mechanism in memory reconsolidation. The expression of zif268 at both the mRNA and protein levels is upregulated by stimulus re-exposure that induces the reconsolidation of aversive contextual fear (Hall et al. 2001; Lee et al. 2004), discrete cue fear (Hall et al. 2001), and conditioned withdrawal memories (Hellemans et al. 2006), as well as appetitive CS–cocaine associations (Thomas et al. 2003). Moreover, functional reduction of zif268 expression in transgenic mice or through the local intracerebral infusion of zif268 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides impairs the reconsolidation of several types of memory (Bozon et al. 2003; Lee et al. 2004, 2005, 2006a; Hellemans et al. 2006). Of special importance is the observation that zif268 expression in the BLA is correlated with, and necessary for, the reconsolidation of CS–cocaine memories (Thomas et al. 2003; Lee et al. 2005, 2006a), and hence zif268 protein levels in the BLA are a cellular marker for drug memory reconsolidation. Here zif268 protein levels in the BLA were greatly increased by intra-BLA DCS infusion in conjunction with memory reactivation, strongly suggesting that DCS acts to enhance the cellular mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation, resulting in the observed elevation of drug seeking behavior at a later test. Importantly, this potentiation of zif268 expression was not observed when DCS was infused in the absence of a memory reactivation session, thus demonstrating that the impact of DCS conforms to the reactivation-dependent criterion of memory reconsolidation effects (Lewis 1979; Dudai 2004).Previous studies have demonstrated that treatment with DCS in conjunction with nonreinforced CS re-exposure results in a subsequent decrease in drug-related behavior, consistent with an enhancement of drug memory extinction, leading to the suggestion that DCS might be used in conjunction with cue exposure therapy as a treatment strategy for addiction (Botreau et al. 2006; Kelley et al. 2007). However, these studies used a drug conditioned place preference procedure, involving only four experimenter-administered intraperitoneal injections of cocaine. The present study uses a more translationally relevant model of chronic cocaine self-administration with hundreds of pairings of the CS with intravenous cocaine. Therefore, the effect of DCS to increase subsequent cue-induced cocaine seeking may reflect more accurately the likely outcome of a DCS-based treatment strategy, given the chronic nature of drug exposure characteristic of addiction. Moreover, it may be the case that DCS combined with cue exposure may not be effective in prolonging abstinence and preventing relapse, as this approach may, in fact, further strengthen the detrimental impact of exposure to drug-associated stimuli, making relapse more likely.The different levels of drug memory strength between the conditioned place preference and self-administration studies can explain the contrasting outcomes observed with DCS. The strength of conditioning is an important factor in determining whether memory-modulating treatments impact upon reconsolidation or extinction, with stronger training biasing toward memory reconsolidation (Eisenberg et al. 2003). Therefore, it is not surprising that DCS enhanced drug memory reconsolidation here, while potentiating extinction in the more weakly conditioned place preference studies, especially given that we have previously shown DCS to have bidirectional mnemonic effects in a fear conditioning procedure (Lee et al. 2006b). Future studies will be required to clarify parametrically the impact of memory strength and also the extent of cue exposure upon the effects of DCS. In addition, while the present study focused upon the Pavlovian conditioned reinforcing effects of drug-associated stimuli, due to their importance in relapse, the effect of DCS upon instrumental responding is also of interest. Any impact of DCS upon instrumental memories is likely to be mediated by neural loci beyond the amygdala, and so it will be important to establish how systemic, rather than localized intracerebral, injections of DCS affect the many drug-related memories that contribute to drug seeking behavior. The present results do not invalidate the potential application of DCS in the future treatment of drug addiction. However, they demonstrate clearly that its use must be carefully controlled, as there is the distinct likelihood that memory reconsolidation, rather than extinction, processes will be potentiated, leading to the deleterious consequence of promoting the conditioned elicitation of drug seeking behavior and relapse.     

DHPG activation of group 1 mGluRs in BLA enhances fear conditioning

Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors are known to play an important role in both synaptic plasticity and memory. We show that activating these receptors prior to fear conditioning by infusing the group 1 mGluR agonist, (R.S.)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG), into the basolateral region of the amygdala (BLA) of adult Sprague–Dawley rats enhances freezing normally supported by a weak footshock. This effect of DHPG was blocked when it was co-infused with either the general group 1 mGluR1 antagonist, (R,S)-1-aminoindan-1,5 dicarboxylic acid (AIDA), or with the selective mGluR5 antagonist, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP). These results support previous findings by Rodrigues and colleagues that mGluR5s in the lateral region of the amygdala make an import contribution to fear conditioning. More importantly, they support the general ideas embedded in the concept of metaplasticity, as per Abraham, and the synaptic-tagging hypothesis per Frey and Morris—that the processes that specify the content of experience can be experimentally separated from those needed to acquire the memory.The last decade has seen an increased appreciation of the view that the plasticity state of neurons—their ability to be modified by experience—is not fixed. Instead, the effect of experience depends on the physiological or biochemical state of the neurons or synapses that receive and store information contained in the experience, and this state is variable. This perspective is captured by the concept called “metaplasticity” (Abraham and Bear 1996; Abraham and Tate 1997; Abraham 2008), which recognizes that prior events can change the general plasticity or modifiability of neurons and synapses that will potentially store information contained in a subsequent target experience. This idea is also embedded in the synaptic-tagging hypothesis (Frey and Morris 1997, 1998) that will be described in some detail in the Discussion section. This view is important because it recognizes that the processes that specify the content of experience can be experimentally separated from those that are needed to store the memory for the experience.As reviewed by Abraham (2008), the range of prior events that can potentially determine a neuron''s state of plasticity is quite large and can be mediated by their effects on many components of the machinery that supports changes in synaptic strength. They include modification in NMDA-receptor function, AMPA-receptor trafficking, neuronal excitability, and epigenetic modifications.One way that the potential for plasticity can be altered is by activation of group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1s and mGlur5s) (Abraham 2008). A number of reports based on the in vitro long-term potentiation (LTP) methodology suggest that activating this class of receptors prior to the delivery of a relatively weak inducing stimulus can transform a normally short-lasting form of LTP into a more persistent form (Cohen and Abraham 1996; Cohen et al. 1998; Raymond et al. 2000). For example, an infusion of (R.S.)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG), a group 1 mGluR agonist, into the bathing medium 30 min prior to the delivery of a weak inducing stimulus can significantly enhance the persistence of the resulting LTP, while having no effect on the baseline response (Cohen et al. 1998; Raymond et al. 2000). This effect of DHPG, however, is blocked (Raymond et al. 2000) when its administration is accompanied by an infusion of the group 1 mGluR antagonist, (R,S)-1-aminoindan-1,5 dicarboxylic acid (AIDA).Group 1 mGluRs also have been implicated in fear conditioning. For example, Rodrigues et al. (2002) reported that one subtype, mGluR5, is localized in dendrites and spines in neurons in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala, and fear conditioning can be significantly impaired if the mGluR5 antagonist, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), is infused into the lateral nucleus prior to conditioning.These findings, from the studies of synaptic plasticity and fear conditioning, provide the empirical basis for the hypothesis that motivates the experiments reported here—that the plasticity potential of neurons in the amygdala that support fear conditioning can be increased by activating group 1 mGluRs prior to the conditioning experience.To evaluate this idea, we followed a strategy similar to that used to study the role of mGluRs in LTP (Cohen and Abraham 1996; Cohen et al. 1998; Raymond et al. 2000). In these in vitro LTP experiments, a relatively weak inducing stimulus was used to generate a short-lasting LTP. Infusing the group 1 agonist DHPG prior to the delivery of the inducing stimulus transformed this short-lasting LTP into a more persistent form. Their results suggest that the activation of group 1 mGluR1 receptors independently initiates processes that make an important contribution to long-lasting LTP. To apply this strategy to fear conditioning, we used a very low level of shock—one that by itself produced an almost undetectable level of conditioned fear (as measured by freezing, the innate defensive response of rodents). We then determined if the activation of group 1 mGluRs prior to the conditioning experience would transform this outcome and produce a stronger level of freezing. DPHG was infused into the basolateral region of the amygdala (BLA) to activate the mGluRs.     

Perirhinal cortex is necessary for acquiring,but not for retrieving object–place paired association

Remembering events frequently involves associating objects and their associated locations in space, and it has been implicated that the areas associated with the hippocampus are important in this function. The current study examined the role of the perirhinal cortex in retrieving familiar object–place paired associates, as well as in acquiring novel ones. Rats were required to visit one of two locations of a radial-arm maze and choose one of the objects (from a pair of different toy objects) exclusively associated with a given arm. Excitotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex initially impaired the normal retrieval of object–place paired-associative memories that had been learned presurgically, but the animals relearned gradually to the level of controls. In contrast, when required to associate a novel pair of objects with the same locations of the maze, the same lesioned rats were severely impaired with minimal learning, if any, taking place throughout an extensive testing period. However, the lesioned rats were normal in discriminating two different objects presented in a fixed arm in the maze. The results suggest that the perirhinal cortex is indispensable to forming discrete representations for object–place paired associates. Its role, however, may be compensated for by other structures when familiar object–place paired associative memories need to be retrieved.Remembering an event in space often requires associating objects and their locations. Associating object and place information into a unitary event representation is believed to be a foundation of episodic memory (Cahusac et al. 1989; Gaffan 1994; Davachi 2006). It has been suggested that the hippocampus and its associated regions in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) are essential in this cognitive process, and amnesic patients with damage in the MTL structures exhibit severe deficits in associating object and place information (Smith and Milner 1981; Vargha-Khadem et al. 1997; Stepankova et al. 2004). Animal models produced by localized lesions in the hippocampus and other MTL structures also support the idea by showing that the lesioned animals are impaired in associating objects and places (Parkinson et al. 1988; Gaffan and Parker 1996; Sziklas et al. 1998; Bussey et al. 2001; Gilbert and Kesner 2003, 2004; Malkova and Mishkin 2003; Lee et al. 2005; Bachevalier and Nemanic 2008; Kesner et al. 2008; Lee and Solivan 2008). Although the theoretical importance of the MTL structures in object–place association has been well acknowledged, specific contributions of the MTL structures in object–place associative memory are poorly understood. The current study examined the role of the perirhinal cortex, one of the extra hippocampal regions in the MTL, using a behavioral paradigm previously shown to be dependent on the intact hippocampus (Lee and Solivan 2008).The literature suggests that the role of the hippocampus in the object–place paired-associate task is to put together object and place information into a unified and distinct event representation. It has been suggested that spatial information and nonspatial information (such as object information) may be streamed into the hippocampus in a relatively segregated fashion, the former information mostly fed through the medial entorhinal cortex to the hippocampus via the postrhinal cortex and the latter being fed through the lateral entorhinal cortex via the perirhinal cortex (Mishkin et al. 1997; Suzuki et al. 1997; Burwell 2000; Fyhn et al. 2004; Witter and Amaral 2004; Hafting et al. 2005; Hargreaves et al. 2005; Furtak et al. 2007; Kerr et al. 2007). In our previous study (Lee and Solivan 2008) in which rats were required to discriminate rewarding versus nonrewarding pairs of similar object–place paired associates, the hippocampal lesioned rats demonstrated severe and irrecoverable deficits. The results from the study not only corroborate the long-held view that the hippocampus associates object and place information, but also demonstrate that the hippocampus is critical for disambiguating similar object–place paired associates. However, it requires examining functions of other upstream structures of the hippocampus to conclusively assign the role of associating object and place information to the hippocampus. If, for example, lesions produced in the perirhinal cortex produce similar deficits, it would be premature to conclude that the association between object and place information uniquely occurs in the hippocampus.To elucidate the relative contributions of the MTL structures in the hippocampal-dependent object–place paired-associate task (Fig. 1), we manipulated the perirhinal cortex in the current study, one of the regions implicated as an object-information provider to the hippocampus (Knierim et al. 2006; Eichenbaum and Lipton 2008). Here we tested whether the perirhinal cortex was involved in the acquisition of new object–place paired associations. Importantly, we also tested the perirhinal cortical contributions to retrieving learned paired associates between objects and places. In the current study, the rats needed to pay attention to both object and place information. Therefore, if the perirhinal cortex is unique in its function for providing object information to the hippocampus, it is predicted that lesions in the perirhinal cortex will produce severe deficits as seen in the hippocampal lesioned animals in our previous study. A simple object-discrimination task that did not require spatial information was also employed to further examine the role of the perirhinal cortex only in specific conditions.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Illustration of the radial arm maze and behavioral paradigms. (A) Phase 1: Two objects (Spider-Man and LEGO block) were presented on arms 3 and 5 in gray color. Only one of the objects was rewarded in arm 3 (Spider-Man) and arm 5 (LEGO block) irrespective of its locations in the choice platform. Possible configuration of objects and appropriate choices are provided for both arms. In each trial, only one arm was open in the maze and objects were available in that open arm. (B) Phase 2: For acquisition of novel object–place paired associations, a pair of new objects (Barney and Girl) was presented on arms 3 and 5. Possible locations of the objects are shown as in A. Each object was rewarded only in a particular arm (Barney in arm 3 and Girl in arm 5) irrespective of its location in the choice platform. (C) Phase 3: Illustration of the task using only one arm (arm 4) in the maze. Two new objects (Mr. Potatohead and Cylinder) were used and the Mr. Potatohead choice was rewarded regardless of its location in the choice platform.     

Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: Convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory

Functional neuroimaging studies of humans engaged in retrieval from episodic memory have revealed a surprisingly consistent pattern of retrieval-related activity in lateral posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Given the well-established role of lateral PPC in subserving goal-directed and reflexive attention, it has been hypothesized that PPC activation during retrieval reflects the recruitment of parietal attention mechanisms during remembering. Here, we evaluate this hypothesis by considering the anatomical overlap of retrieval and attention effects in lateral PPC. We begin by briefly reviewing the literature implicating dorsal PPC in goal-directed attention and ventral PPC in reflexive attention. We then discuss the pattern of dorsal and ventral PPC activation during episodic retrieval, and conclude with consideration of the degree of anatomical convergence across the two domains. This assessment revealed that predominantly divergent subregions of lateral PPC are engaged during acts of episodic retrieval and during goal-directed and reflexive attention, suggesting that PPC retrieval effects reflect functionally distinct mechanisms from these forms of attention. Although attention must play a role in aspects of retrieval, the data reviewed here suggest that further investigation into the relationship between processes of attention and memory, as well as alternative accounts of PPC contributions to retrieval, is warranted.Episodic memory—declarative memory for events—has long been known to depend on the medial temporal lobe and, to a lesser extent, the prefrontal cortex (Squire 1992; Shimamura 1995; Wheeler et al. 1995; Gabrieli 1998; Eichenbaum and Cohen 2001; Squire et al. 2004). Recently, an explosion of functional neuroimaging studies has revealed that episodic retrieval is also consistently associated with activity in lateral posterior parietal cortex (PPC), including in the intraparietal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule (Figs. 1, ​,2;2; for detailed review, see Wagner et al. 2005; Cabeza 2008; Cabeza et al. 2008; Ciaramelli et al. 2008; Vilberg and Rugg 2008b; Olson and Berryhill 2009). This unexpected finding raises the possibility that parietal mechanisms may be more central to episodic retrieval than previously thought.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Anatomy of posterior parietal cortex (PPC). A posterior-lateral view of human PPC is depicted, with PPC separated into dorsal and ventral portions by the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Dorsal PPC includes the superior parietal lobule (SPL) and IPS. Ventral PPC includes inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and its subregions: supramarginal gyrus (SMG), temporoparietal junction (TPJ), and angular gyrus (AnG).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Left lateral PPC activity during episodic retrieval. (A) A comparison of hits relative to correct rejections reported by Kahn et al. (2004) revealed “old/new” effects in dorsal PPC, inclusive of IPS. Average signal change within IPS was greater for items perceived as old (hits and false alarms) vs. those believed to be new (misses and correct rejections). (B) A comparison of successful, relative to unsuccessful, cued recall by Kuhl et al. (2007) revealed greater activity in AnG, compatible with the broader literature on recollection success effects (see Fig. 4). In addition, effects were observed in more anterior aspects of ventral PPC (SMG), as well as in dorsal PPC (principally SPL) (see Discussion). (C) Orienting to memory in attempts to recollect, independent of recollection success, is often associated with activity in dorsal PPC. For example, comparison of temporal recency judgments to novelty-based decisions elicited greater IPS activity (Dudukovic and Wagner 2007).At the neuropsychological level, human lesion evidence regarding the necessity of lateral PPC mechanisms for episodic retrieval is limited and mixed (Berryhill et al. 2007; Davidson et al. 2008; Haramati et al. 2008; Simons et al. 2008). By contrast, other neuropsychological data indicate that lateral PPC is unambiguously associated with another cognitive domain—attention (Posner et al. 1984; Mesulam 1999; Parton et al. 2004). This latter lesion literature is further complemented by rich functional neuroimaging evidence implicating dorsal and ventral PPC in goal-directed and reflexive attention, respectively (for review, see Corbetta and Shulman 2002; Corbetta et al. 2008).Drawing from the rich literature linking attention to lateral PPC, memory researchers have recently proposed that lateral PPC activity during episodic retrieval tasks reflects the engagement of attention mechanisms during remembering (Cabeza 2008; Cabeza et al. 2008; Ciaramelli et al. 2008; Olson and Berryhill 2009). Specifically, it has been hypothesized that: (1) Dorsal PPC activity during retrieval may reflect the recruitment of goal-directed attention in service of performing retrieval tasks and (2) ventral PPC engagement during retrieval may mark the reflexive capture of attention by mnemonic representations. While prior comprehensive reviews of the neuroimaging literature on parietal correlates of episodic retrieval have documented functional dissociations along the dorsal/ventral axis of lateral PPC, which qualitatively parallel those seen in the attention literature, evaluation of the hypothesis that PPC retrieval activity reflects attention mechanisms further requires an assessment of the degree to which attention and retrieval effects co-localize. Here we review lateral PPC correlates of both episodic retrieval and attention, with the goal of directly assessing to the degree of anatomic overlap.It should be noted from the outset that the aim of the present review is to evaluate the hypothesis that lateral PPC episodic retrieval effects can be explained in terms of goal-directed and reflexive attention mechanisms. As such, we a priori imposed three constraints that served to focus our treatment of these two substantial literatures. First, while both the dual-attention and memory retrieval literatures focus on effects on the lateral parietal surface, retrieval effects are predominantly left lateralized. Thus, we constrained our analysis of attention and retrieval findings to left lateral PPC.⁵ Second, because prior retrieval reviews focused theoretical discussion on dual-attention accounts, here we similarly constrained our treatment of the extensive attention literature to include only those effects relevant to dual-attention theory. Finally, because the preponderance of evidence offered in support of dual-attention theory''s proposed dorsal attention network derives from studies of visual attention, the present review of the dorsal network is also confined to visual attention. As such, the present review should not be viewed as a comprehensive review of the entire attention literature.We first survey the functional neuroimaging literature on parietal correlates of goal-directed and reflexive attention, and then discuss how these correlates converge and diverge with the patterns of lateral PPC activity present during episodic retrieval. We conclude by considering theoretical frameworks that focus on the role of attention in episodic retrieval, as well as nonattention-based accounts of PPC activity during retrieval, and we highlight open questions that await further investigation.