Discrimination reversal conditioning of an eyeblink response is impaired by NMDA receptor blockade

In the present study we examined the effects of the specific NMDA receptor antagonist CPP on discrimination reversal learning in rabbits. We report two primary findings. First, the institution of NMDA receptor blockade had no effect on a learned discrimination. Second, after stimulus reversal, CPP treatment impaired acquisition of the discrimination reversal. This impairment manifested itself early in training as a retardation in acquisition of a CR to the new CS+ and late in training as an inability to suppress responsiveness to the new CS-. Given the comparability of the present results with previously published results for phenytoin-treated rabbits, we suggest that the effects of phenytoin on learning in this paradigm is at least in part mediated by its effects on NMDA receptors. We further suggest that these findings emphasize the need to better define the role of NMDA receptor activation and hippocampally-mediated circuits in a variety of associative learning paradigms.     

Classical eyeblink conditioning: Clinical models and applications

In this paper, we argue that the main reason that classical eyeblink conditioning has proven so useful when applied to clinical situations, is that a great deal of information is known about the behavioral and neural correlates of this form of associative learning. Presented here is a summary of three lines of research that have used classical eyeblink conditioning to study three different clinical conditions; autism, fetal alcohol syndrome, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. While seemingly very different clinical conditions, classical eyeblink conditioning has proven very useful for advancing our understanding of these clinical pathologies and the neural conditions that may underlie them.     

Ontogenetic changes in the neural mechanisms of eyeblink conditioning

The rodent eyeblink conditioning paradigm is an ideal model system for examining the relationship between neural maturation and the ontogeny of associative learning. Elucidation of the neural mechanisms underlying the ontogeny of learning is tractable using eyeblink conditioning because the necessary neural circuitry (cerebellum and interconnected brainstem nuclei) underlying the acquisition and retention of the conditioned response (CR) has been identified in adult organisms. Moreover, the cerebellum exhibits substantial postnatal anatomical and physiological maturation in rats. The eyeblink CR emerges developmentally between postnatal day (PND) 17 and 24 in rats. A series of experiments found that the ontogenetic emergence of eyeblink conditioning is related to the development of associative learning and not related to changes in performance. More recent studies have examined the relationship between the development of eyeblink conditioning and the physiological maturation of the cerebellum, a brain structure that is necessary for eyeblink conditioning in adult organisms. Disrupting cerebellar development with lesions or antimitotic treatments impairs the ontogeny of eyeblink conditioning. Studies of the development of physiological processes within the cerebellum have revealed striking ontogenetic changes in stimulus-elicited and learning-related neuronal activity. Neurons in the interpositus nucleus and Purkinje cells in the cortex exhibit developmental increases in neuronal discharges following the unconditioned stimulus (US) and in neuronal discharges that model the amplitude and time-course of the eyeblink CR. The developmental changes in CR-related neuronal activity in the cerebellum suggest that the ontogeny of eyeblink conditioning depends on the development of mechanisms that estavlish cerebellar plasticity. Learning and the induction of neural plasticity depend on the magnitude of the US input to the cerebellum. The role of developmental changes in the efficacy of the US pathway has been investigated by monitoring neuronal activity in the inferior olive and with stimulation techniques. The results of these experiments indicate that the development of the conditioned eyeblink response may depend on dynamic interactions between multiple developmental processes within the eyeblink neural circuitry.     

Classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in the delay paradigm in adults aged 18-83 years

To determine if age differences in classical conditioning of the eyelid response begin to appear in middle age in humans as they do in animals, adult subjects aged 18-83 years were trained in the delay conditioning paradigm. Large age effects occurred. Statistically significant differences first appeared in the decade of the 40s. Within-age-group variability was large. To reduce variability, subjects were classified by the magnitude of their unconditioned response (UR). Regardless of age, subjects with low amplitude URs conditioned poorly. In the normal UR amplitude group, the correlation between age and total percentage conditioned responses (CRs) was -.58. Eyeblink rate and voluntary responding did not account for age differences in conditioning, and it was unlikely that hearing acuity or corneal sensitivity caused the differences. Parallels between human and animal eyelid conditioning are considered, and it is suggested that age changes in the cerebellum may affect conditioning in aging mammals, including humans.     

Parallel acquisition of awareness and differential delay eyeblink conditioning

There is considerable debate about whether differential delay eyeblink conditioning can be acquired without awareness of the stimulus contingencies. Previous investigations of the relationship between differential-delay eyeblink conditioning and awareness of the stimulus contingencies have assessed awareness after the conditioning session was finished using a post-experimental questionnaire. In two experiments, the point at which contingency awareness developed during the conditioning session was estimated from a button-press measure of expectancy of the unconditioned stimulus (US). In both experiments, knowledge of the stimulus contingencies and acquisition of differential delay eyeblink conditioning developed approximately in parallel. In Experiment 1 it was shown that predicting the US facilitated eyeblink conditioning compared with predicting the eyeblink response. In Experiment 2, a masking task was used that slowed down the emergence of awareness, and it was shown that differential conditioning only occurred in participants who were able to predict the US. The current findings challenge the hypothesis that differential delay eyeblink conditioning is entirely mediated by a functionally and neurally distinct nondeclarative learning system.     

Parallel acquisition of awareness and trace eyeblink classical conditioning

Trace eyeblink conditioning (with a trace interval ≥500 msec) depends on the integrity of the hippocampus and requires that participants develop awareness of the stimulus contingencies (i.e., awareness that the conditioned stimulus [CS] predicts the unconditioned stimulus [US]). Previous investigations of the relationship between trace eyeblink conditioning and awareness of the stimulus contingencies have manipulated awareness or have assessed awareness at fixed intervals during and after the conditioning session. In this study, we tracked the development of knowledge about the stimulus contingencies trial by trial by asking participants to try to predict either the onset of the US or the onset of their eyeblinks during differential trace eyeblink conditioning. Asking participants to predict their eyeblinks inhibited both the acquisition of awareness and eyeblink conditioning. In contrast, asking participants to predict the onset of the US promoted awareness and facilitated conditioning. Acquisition of knowledge about the stimulus contingencies and acquisition of differential trace eyeblink conditioning developed approximately in parallel (i.e., concurrently).     

Eat,drink, and be merry,for tomorrow we diet: effects of anticipated deprivation on food intake in restrained and unrestrained eaters

This study examined the effect of anticipated food deprivation on intake in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Participants were randomly assigned to a diet condition, in which they expected to diet for a week, or to a control (no-diet) condition. Immediately after being assigned to a condition, participants completed a taste-rating task in which food consumption was measured. Restrained eaters in the diet condition consumed significantly more food than did restrained eaters in the no-diet condition or unrestrained eaters in either condition. Unrestrained eaters consumed the same amount regardless of condition. These results confirm that merely planning to go on a diet can trigger overeating in restrained eaters, reflecting the dynamic connection between dieting and overeating.     

Central cannabinoid receptors modulate acquisition of eyeblink conditioning

Delay eyeblink conditioning is established by paired presentations of a conditioned stimulus (CS) such as a tone or light, and an unconditioned stimulus (US) that elicits the blink reflex. Conditioned stimulus information is projected from the basilar pontine nuclei to the cerebellar interpositus nucleus and cortex. The cerebellar cortex, particularly the molecular layer, contains a high density of cannabinoid receptors (CB1R). The CB1Rs are located on the axon terminals of parallel fibers, stellate cells, and basket cells where they inhibit neurotransmitter release. The present study examined the effects of a CB1R agonist WIN55,212-2 and antagonist SR141716A on the acquisition of delay eyeblink conditioning in rats. Rats were given subcutaneous administration of 1, 2, or 3 mg/kg of WIN55,212-2 or 1, 3, or 5 mg/kg of SR141716A before each day of acquisition training (10 sessions). Dose-dependent impairments in acquisition were found for WIN55,212-2 and SR141716A, with no effects on spontaneous or nonassociative blinking. However, the magnitude of impairment was greater for WIN55,212-2 than SR141716A. Dose-dependent impairments in conditioned blink response (CR) amplitude and timing were found with WIN55,212-2 but not with SR141716A. The findings support the hypothesis that CB1Rs in the cerebellar cortex play an important role in plasticity mechanisms underlying eyeblink conditioning.     

Blocking the BK channel impedes acquisition of trace eyeblink conditioning

Big-K⁺ conductance (BK)-channel mediated fast afterhyperpolarizations (AHPs) following action potentials are reduced after eyeblink conditioning. Blocking BK channels with paxilline increases evoked firing frequency in vitro and spontaneous pyramidal activity in vivo. To examine how increased excitability after BK-channel blockade affects learning, rats received bilateral infusions of paxilline, saline, or nothing into hippocampal CA1 prior to trace eyeblink conditioning. The drug group was slower to acquire the task, but learning was not completely impaired. This suggests that nonspecific increases in excitability and baseline neuronal firing rates caused by in vivo blockade of the BK channel may disrupt correct processing of inputs, thereby impairing hippocampus-dependent learning.Learning and increased neuronal intrinsic excitability are strongly correlated, although a causal relationship has not yet been definitively established (Disterhoft and Oh 2006). One of the mechanisms of increased excitability is through reduction of potassium currents, which cause afterhyperpolarizations (AHP). Afterhyperpolarizations in pyramidal cells can be divided into three categories based upon their timing and duration. The fast AHP lasts only 2–5 ms, follows the depolarizing phase of individual action potentials, and is mediated largely by the big-K⁺ conductance (BK) channel. The post-burst AHP has a medium (50–100 ms) and a slow (1–2 s) component, and follows trains or bursts of action potentials. The medium AHP is carried by apamin sensitive small-K⁺ conductance (SK) channels, but the channel(s), which carry the slow AHP, are still unknown (Storm 1987; Disterhoft and Oh 2006).Learning-related reductions in the post-burst AHP are well documented (for review see Disterhoft and Oh 2006). Additionally, pharmacological modulators of the post-burst AHP alter learning in an expected manner—compounds that reduce the AHP improve learning (galantamine [Simon et al. 2004] and nimodopine [Deyo et al. 1989]). Learning-related reductions of the fast AHP are also seen in prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons after extinction of fear conditioning (Santini et al. 2008) and in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons after learning trace eyeblink conditioning (tEBC) (Matthews et al. 2008). In vitro whole-cell recordings show that blocking the BK channel with either paxilline or iberiotoxin increases the firing rate to a step current injection (Nelson et al. 2003). Likewise, injection of paxilline into the hippocampus increases the in vivo spontaneous firing frequency of hippocampal CA1 neurons of awake freely moving rats up to 2.5-fold over saline injections (Matthews et al. 2008), indicating that the BK-mediated fast AHP plays an important role in intrinsic excitability. The current study was undertaken to determine whether pharmacologically reducing the fast AHP during training would improve trace eyeblink conditioning.Experimental subjects were 3- to 4-mo old Fisher 344 X Brown Norway F1-hybrid rats. Animals were housed in pairs, in a climate-controlled facility with a 12:12 light–dark cycle, and ad libitum access to food and water. Procedures were in accordance with the guidelines of the Northwestern University Animal Care and Use Committee and conformed to NIH standards (NIH Publication No. 80-23). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals utilized and their discomfort. Thirty-seven rats were originally included in the study, however 13 were excluded from the experiment due to incorrect cannulae placement, faulty EMG signal, or unrelated health issues. The final groups included in the study were nine drug animals, seven vehicle animals, eight sham animals, and six non-cannulated animals.Guide cannulae (26 gauge stainless steel) were bilaterally implanted at −3.6 mm AP, ±2.0 mm ML. The guide cannulae were lowered slowly (0.5 mm/5 min) to a depth of −1.9 mm subdura. The cannulae were cemented in place with dental acrylic. An electronic connector strip with pins for ground and two EMG wires was fitted between the two guide cannulae and grounded to the skull screws. The EMG wires were implanted under the right eyelid and the entire apparatus was cemented in place (Weiss et al. 1999). Rats were given Buprenex (0.05 mg/kg) post-surgery to alleviate any discomfort.Cannulae placements were verified histologically after training was completed. Animals were given a lethal dose of barbiturate (0.15 mL i.p.) then transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline followed by 10% formalin. After perfusion, the brains were carefully immersed in 10% formalin for a minimum of 24 h. Eighty micron coronal sections were made with a freezing cryostat, and every second section was kept and mounted on gelatin coated slides. Sections were stained with cresyl violet to reveal cell death or excessive damage surrounding the injection cannulae. Animals with incorrectly placed cannulae or excessive tissue damage were not included in the study. A diagram of the most ventral extent of each cannula is shown in Figure 1A. Paxilline, a BK-channel blocker, is a peptide and there is little known about the motility of this molecule in the brain. From previous in vivo recording work (Matthews et al. 2008), it is known that the BK blocker is active and able to diffuse at least a radius of 1.7 mm from the tip of the cannula. To approximate the spread of paxilline in the present study, 1.0% ibotenic acid was injected into two animals at the completion of training in a manner that exactly mimicked the paxilline injections in volume and rate. Five days after excitotoxic lesion, animals were sacrificed and their brains processed. Figure 1B shows the maximum and minimum extent of cell loss due to ibotenic acid lesion.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Cannula placement and drug spread. (A) Cannulae were bilaterally implanted to terminate directly above the CA1 layer of the hippocampus. Placement was verified after the behavioral experiments. Gray dots indicate the location of the tip of each cannula for animals included in the study. (B) The spread of the drug was approximated by injecting 1.0% ibotenic acid into the left hemisphere of two animals at the end of training. The injection volume and rate were the same as those used for the study. The right hemisphere served as a within-animal control for the action of the ibotenic acid. The maximal (light gray) and minimal (dark gray) spread are shown. Measurements are relative to bregma. (Adapted from Paxinos and Watson [1998] and reprinted with permission from Elsevier ©1998.)Freely moving animals were injected with vehicle (1% DMSO in saline), drug (1 μM paxilline in saline), or nothing 20–30 min before the start of training, including the first habituation session. The trainer was blind to the identity of the injected substance. Infusions were performed using two 2 μL Hamilton syringes connected by lengths of flexible, oil filled tubing to 33 gauge infusion needles, which extended 0.5 mm beyond the end of the guide cannulae. One microliter of sterile solution was infused into each hemisphere at a constant rate of 0.2 μL/min using a Stoelting double-barrel infusion pump. The injection needles were left in place for 1 min following the injection to allow diffusion away from the tip of the needle.Trace eyeblink conditioning is an associative learning task in which a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) is paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US) that elicits a reflexive eyelid closure. The insertion of a stimulus-free “trace” interval between the CS and the US makes this task strongly dependent on the hippocampus (Solomon et al. 1986; Moyer Jr. et al. 1990). After repeated pairings of the CS and the US, if an association has been learned, the subject will begin to blink during the trace period in anticipation of the US. Trace eyeblink conditioning procedures as described by Weiss et al. (1999) were followed. Training sessions were conducted in a sound-attenuating chamber and controlled with a custom-designed LabVIEW (National Instruments) program; eyelid EMG data were integrated online during training. Animals were connected to the recording computer via the implanted connector strip; a short tether served the dual purpose of allowing EMG activity to be monitored and positioning an air puff delivery tube in front of the eye, while the rat was freely moving. On the first day, the subjects received a session of stimulus-free habituation to the training chamber lasting as long as a conditioning session. The subsequent 5 d were training sessions. Conditioned animals received 30 trials per session (30 s average ITI) for a total of 150 CS–US pairings, consisting of a tone stimulus (CS, 80 dB, 250 ms) paired with a corneal air puff (US, 3–5 psi, 100 ms) with a 250 ms stimulus-free trace interval interposed.The primary measure of tEBC learning used in this study was a correctly timed eyelid closure, i.e., an eyelid closure that begins during the trace interval and continues until the air puff. Eyelid activity was measured with an implanted EMG electrode. The division of eyelid responses into “adaptive” and “nonadaptive” categories has been used in other studies (Garcia et al. 1999). For this reason, we analyzed eyelid closure during the entire tone/trace period and during only the last 200 ms preceding the air puff. Responses given during the 200 ms preceding the US are termed adaptive conditioned responses (CR). Figure 2 shows the timing of the tone, trace, and air puff; the timeline for each type of response; and an integrated EMG. Any trials in which the baseline activity in the 500 ms preceding CS presentation exceeded two standard deviations were discarded. Eye closure was defined as greater than four standard deviations above baseline. Averages for all relevant measures for each session were compared between groups for training sessions 1–5 using repeated-measures ANOVA. Learning across training sessions within each group was assessed with a planned comparison ANOVA using StatVIEW software. The stimulus-free habituation session was excluded from all between-group analyses. The percentage of aCRs during habituation is shown in Figure 3 to provide the baseline level of spontaneous eyelid closures.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Timing of conditioned responses (CRs) in relation to the tone, trace, and air puff. The integrated EMG shows a robust adaptive eyelid closure in anticipation of the air puff. The tone lasted 250 ms and was followed by a 250 ms trace period. The air puff was 100 ms long. Below the EMG trace is a time line showing the period for an adaptive CR and an unconditioned response (UR).Open in a separate windowFigure 3.BK block slows learning of trace eyeblink conditioning. Vehicle, drug, and sham animals were injected and immediately trained on the trace eyeblink task over 6 d, one session each day. (Non-cannulated animals were trained in two sessions per day for 3 d.) The first session for all groups was stimuli-free habituation. Each session consisted of 30 pairings of a CS tone with a US air puff. Injection of the BK blocker paxilline resulted in slower acquisition of the task (*P < 0.05), although animals in all groups were eventually able to learn the task (#P < 0.001).The concentration of paxilline was selected based on the dose that achieved a maximal increase in spontaneous firing in vivo (Matthews et al. 2008). Two groups were designed to control for pressure effects of the injection or the stress and tissue damage of the cannulation surgery. These were a vehicle group (1% DMSO in saline) and a sham group (empty needles). In addition, the learning behavior of these cannulated animals was compared to a separate group of animals that had only the EBC head apparatus implanted (non-cannulated).Rats that received an infusion of paxilline (1 μM) immediately preceding training were significantly slower to acquire the task as measured by the percent of adaptive CRs exhibited across all training sessions (F _(3,26) = 3.155, P = 0.042, repeated-measures ANOVA, Fisher''s PLSD, P < 0.02) (Fig. 3). The percentage of responses during the entire tone/trace period showed a trend toward reduced learning in the drug group (F _(3,26) = 2.729, P = 0.064, repeated-measures ANOVA).Other parameters of the eyelid closure were examined. There were no significant differences in the peak, onset, duration, or area of the adaptive CR. There was also no difference between groups in the onset of the air-puff elicited eyelid closure (unconditioned response [UR]), suggesting that the drug did not cause decreased sensitivity to the US. Finally, the baseline eyelid EMG activity of all four groups during the stimulus-free habituation session was not significantly different, suggesting that the drug did not suppress or enhance spontaneous eyelid activity.All animals in the study showed improved performance across the training sessions (F _(4,104) = 21.810, P < 0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA). Further analyses revealed that animals in the drug group also showed continuous learning over the training days (Session 1: 16.1% ± 4.9%, Session 5: 56.8% ± 8.2%; F _(4,32) = 6.961; P = 0.0004), and eventually the drug group reached a percentage of adaptive CRs statistically comparable to the controls (F _(3,26) = 2.377, P = 0.093 for Session 5, ANOVA).There is a precedent for anticipating enhanced learning after in vivo pharmacological manipulations of intrinsic excitability (Disterhoft and Oh 2006). The long-lasting post-burst AHP is reduced in hippocampal cells from animals that have learned a hippocampus-dependent task (Moyer Jr. et al. 1996; Oh et al. 2003), and increased in aging animals that have difficulty learning. Pharmacologically reducing the post-burst AHP in vivo with calcium channel blockers (nimodipine) (Deyo et al. 1989), acetylcholine agonists (CI-1017) (Weiss et al. 2000), or cholinesterase inhibitors (galantamine and metrifonate) (Kronforst-Collins et al. 1997; Weible et al. 2004) leads to improved learning in aging animals. Thus, the finding that blocking the BK channel results in slowed learning is somewhat surprising, given the previous report of a reduction in the BK-mediated fast AHP after learning tEBC (Matthews et al. 2008). Several explanations may account for why pharmacologically reducing the fast AHP in vivo impaired rather than improved learning.First, the reduction of the fast AHP seen with channel blockers in in vitro experiments is of greater magnitude than the reductions in the fast AHP seen after learning; additionally, the fast AHP in cells from trained animals can be further reduced in vitro with paxilline or iberiotoxin (Matthews et al. 2008). It could be that there is an important difference between reducing the BK-mediated current, as is seen after learning, and completely blocking it using a drug. Reducing the fast AHP increases intrinsic excitability, and completely blocking the BK channel increases excitability even further. However, it is important to emphasize recent research showing how excessive excitability can be detrimental to learning. An early indicator of mild cognitive impairment detected with fMRI is hyperactivity in the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe (Miller et al. 2008). At the cellular level, saturating in vivo hippocampal LTP results in impaired spatial learning due to increased epileptiform activity, rather than saturated synaptic plasticity (McNamara et al. 1993). Finally, work with a knockout model of the β-4 subunit of the BK channel shows that this calcium- and voltage-dependent channel helps to regulate hyperexcitability and reduce the occurrence of temporal lobe seizures (Brenner et al. 2005). Although intrahippocampal paxilline infusion did not cause epileptiform activity in in vivo recordings, or observable seizure behavior (Juhng et al. 1999), it is possible that the drug caused pathological increases in excitability that impeded learning.Second, unregulated or meaningless increases in baseline neural activity in the hippocampus increase background noise, effectively decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio for the whole network, making it more difficult to distinguish important, information-bearing activity from background noise. In delay conditioning (where there is no trace interval between the CS and US), ablation of the hippocampus does not disrupt eyeblink conditioning (Solomon et al. 1986; Hesslow 1994), however, increasing (Salafia et al. 1979) or suppressing (Solomon et al. 1983) hippocampal activity has a strong retarding effect on learning this task. Disrupting synaptic transmission in a subregion of the hippocampus also impairs spatial learning (Niewoehner et al. 2007), further illustrating how a disturbance of information processing at a single junction of the trisynaptic circuit can impair learning. BK channels are present in presynaptic terminals, as well as at the soma, where they participate in controlling transmitter release. Blocking BK channels decreases failures and increases the amplitude of EPSCs at CA3–CA3 synapses (Raffaelli et al. 2004). The infusion of paxilline may have also increased the efficacy and frequency of transmitter release at the CA3–CA1 synapse in the present experiment. It may be that by selecting a dose of paxilline that caused a maximum increase in in vivo spontaneous activity, we overdosed the hippocampus to levels of excitability that interfered with stimulus processing, thereby impairing and slowing learning.Finally, the fast AHP is largely mediated by the BK channel, but other potassium currents also play a role in action potential repolarization. The A-type potassium current in particular has been implicated in learning-related excitability changes and is active during an action potential (Giese et al. 1998). Changing action potential repolarization dynamics also alters the calcium influx into cells (Zhou et al. 2005), which can have far reaching effects on other calcium-dependent processes, such as gene regulation, synaptic plasticity, or protein expression. The learning impairment seen in this study might be due to secondary effects on other potassium currents or calcium-dependent processes.This study indicates that normal activity of BK channels is required for acquisition of the tEBC task. The channel may act to maintain neurons within a narrow window of excitability, keeping neurons within an operating range of “optimal excitability.” BK channel activity is strongly modulated by kinase-phosphotase activity (Reinhart et al. 1991; Loane et al. 2006), and reduction of BK-mediated current through modulators of these molecules may have a more beneficial impact on learning. Since blocking of the BK channel with paxilline impedes learning, this drug may not present a useful tool for pharmacological learning-enhancement manipulations.     

Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning

Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning has been used extensively as a model system for examining the neural mechanisms underlying associative learning. Delay eyeblink conditioning depends on the intermediate cerebellum ipsilateral to the conditioned eye. Evidence favors a two-site plasticity model within the cerebellum with long-term depression of parallel fiber synapses on Purkinje cells and long-term potentiation of mossy fiber synapses on neurons in the anterior interpositus nucleus. Conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus inputs arise from the pontine nuclei and inferior olive, respectively, converging in the cerebellar cortex and deep nuclei. Projections from subcortical sensory nuclei to the pontine nuclei that are necessary for eyeblink conditioning are beginning to be identified, and recent studies indicate that there are dynamic interactions between sensory thalamic nuclei and the cerebellum during eyeblink conditioning. Cerebellar output is projected to the magnocellular red nucleus and then to the motor nuclei that generate the blink response(s). Tremendous progress has been made toward determining the neural mechanisms of delay eyeblink conditioning but there are still significant gaps in our understanding of the necessary neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying cerebellar learning.     

Metabolic mapping of the rat cerebellum during delay and trace eyeblink conditioning

The essential neural circuitry for delay eyeblink conditioning has been largely identified, whereas much of the neural circuitry for trace conditioning has not been identified. The major difference between delay and trace conditioning is a time gap between the presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) during trace conditioning. It is this time gap or trace interval which accounts for an additional memory component in trace conditioning. Additional neural structures are also necessary for trace conditioning, including hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. This addition of forebrain structures necessary for trace but not delay conditioning suggests other brain areas become involved when a memory gap is added to the conditioning parameters. A metabolic marker of energy use, radioactively labeled glucose analog, was used to compare differences in glucose analog uptake between delay, trace, and unpaired experimental groups in order to identify new areas of involvement within the cerebellum. Known structures such as the interpositus nucleus and lobule HVI showed increased activation for both delay and trace conditioning compared to unpaired conditioning. However, there was a differential amount of activation between anterior and posterior portions of the interpositus nucleus between delay and trace, respectively. Cerebellar cortical areas including lobules IV and V of anterior lobe, Crus I, Crus II, and paramedian lobule also showed increases in activity for delay conditioning but not for trace conditioning. Delay and trace eyeblink conditioning both resulted in increased metabolic activity within the cerebellum but delay conditioning resulted in more widespread cerebellar cortical activation.     

Mediodorsal thalamic lesions impair trace eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit

Rabbits received lesions of the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus (MDN) or sham lesions and were subjected to classical eyeblink (EB) and heart rate (HR) conditioning. All animals received trace conditioning, with a.5-sec tone conditioned stimulus, a .5-sec trace period, and a 50-msec periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus. Animals with MDN lesions acquired the EB conditioned response (CR) more slowly than sham-lesioned animals. However, previous studies have shown that MDN damage does not affect delay conditioning using either .5-sec or 1-sec interstimulus intervals. The lesions had no significant effect on the HR CR. These results suggest that information processed by MDN and relayed to the prefrontal cortex is required for somatomotor response selection under nonoptimal learning conditions.     

Standard delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness

P. F. Lovibond and D. R. Shanks (2002) suggested that all forms of classical conditioning depend on awareness of the stimulus contingencies. This article considers the available data for eyeblink classical conditioning, including data from 2 studies (R. E. Clark, J. R. Manns, & L. R. Squire, 2001; J. R. Manns, R. E. Clark, & L. R. Squire, 2001) that were completed too recently to have been considered in their review. In addition, in response to questions raised by P. F. Lovibond and D. R. Shanks, 2 new analyses of data are presented from studies published previously. The available data from humans and experimental animals provide strong evidence that delay eyeblink classical conditioning (but not trace eyeblink classical conditioning) can be acquired and retained independently of the forebrain and independently of awareness. This conclusion applies to standard conditioning paradigms; for example, to single-cue delay conditioning when a tone is used as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and to differential delay conditioning when the positive and negative conditioned stimuli (CS+ and CS-) are a tone and white noise.     

Differential effects of progesterone and medroxyprogesterone on delay eyeblink conditioning in ovariectomized rats

Ovarian hormones modulate acquisition processes involved in classical conditioning. Although progesterone has been indirectly implicated, its role in classical conditioning of the eyeblink response has not been directly investigated. We assessed the effects of daily dosing of progesterone or medroxyprogesterone (MPA), a non-metabolized synthetic progestin, upon the acquisition of a classically conditioned eyeblink response in ovariectomized (OVX) female rats. Rats were dosed 4h prior to each training session with 0.1 or 1.5 mg/kg of either of these hormones or sesame oil. A delay conditioning paradigm was employed using a 500 ms conditioned stimulus coterminating with a 10 ms 10 V unconditioned stimulus. At the low dose, progesterone and MPA rats did differ from each other, with MPA-treated rats learning slower, but neither group differed from OVX-oil or Sham-oil controls. No group differences in acquisition were observed at the higher dose. During extinction trials, high-dose MPA-treatment and OVX-oil groups extinguished quicker than the high-dose progesterone-treated group. In addition, unconditional response (UR) amplitudes were lower in all OVX groups, regardless of hormone or oil treatment, compared to the sham-oil group. Since MPA did not affect extinction, it is likely the slower extinction in the progesterone-treated rats is due to a metabolite of progesterone. Corticosterone is discussed as a likely candidate for such a role. In addition, we found chronic absence of ovarian hormones decreased UR amplitudes, although differences in UR amplitudes were not associated with changes in the acquisition process. These results are discussed with respect to differences in the hormonal effects upon acquisition versus extinction processes and how these data may explain reports of learning differences in women based on oral contraceptive usage.     

Developmental changes in eyeblink conditioning and neuronal activity in the pontine nuclei

Neuronal activity was recorded in the pontine nuclei of developing rats during eyeblink conditioning on postnatal days 17–18 (P17–P18) or P24–P25. A pretraining session consisted of unpaired presentations of a 300-msec tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and a 10-msec periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus (US). Five paired training sessions followed the unpaired session, consisting of 100 trials of the CS paired with the US. The rats trained on P24–P25 exhibited significantly more conditioned responses (CRs) than the rats trained on P17–P18, although both groups produced CRs by the end of training. Ontogenetic increases in pre-CS and stimulus-elicited activity in the pontine nuclei were observed during the pretraining session and after paired training. The activity of pontine units was greater on trials with CRs relative to trials without CRs in rats trained on P24–P25, but almost no CR-related modulation was observed in the pontine units of rats trained on P17–P18. The findings indicate that pontine neuronal responses to the CS and modulation of pontine activity by the cerebellum and red nucleus undergo substantial postnatal maturation. The developmental changes in pontine neuronal activity might play a significant role in the ontogeny of eyeblink conditioning.