Mediated conditioning and retrospective revaluation with LiCl then flavour pairings

It is becoming accepted that the associative strength of a cue can change in its absence, despite this being difficult to explain using existing theories of Pavlovian conditioning. To investigate the influence of timing on learning about the representation of an absent cue, lithium chloride (LiCl) or a flavour previously paired with LiCl was presented in a distinctive context that had previously been paired with a neutral target flavour. The former treatment produced an aversion to the target flavour whether the LiCl was presented 10 min before, or immediately after, exposure to the context. However, presenting the flavour associate of LiCl created an aversion to the target flavour only if it had been presented 10 min after LiCl during initial training. This pattern of results cannot be explained in the terms of a simple timing account, and it is proposed that an explanation will require different associative rules operating in simultaneous and successive training schedules.     

Examination of factors which might disrupt a learned association between pentobarbital and LiCl

Injections of a sedative dose of pentobarbital (Pent) were followed 30 min later by injections of a toxic dose of lithium chloride (LiCl). As a result of these Pent →LiCl pairings, injections of Pent after consumption of saccharin solution failed to produce the usual saccharin aversion. This loss of the capacity of Pent to produce a flavor aversion is called Avfail. Experiment 1 showed that the Avfail effect was obtained with saccharin even though the rats consumed a novel vinegar solution prior to the Pent→LiCl pairings in Phase 1. This was surprising since the novel flavor was associated with the LiCl and ought to have overshadowed the association of Pent with LiCl. Experiment 2 showed that one set of Pent→LiCl pairings can produce two Avfail effects in sequence: the first with a novel flavor and the second with a flavor previously paired with LiCl sickness. It also showed that insertion of Pent injections and handling cues between the Pent→LiCl and the Flavor→Pent phases did not reduce the magnitude of Avfail. Experiment 3 showed that the Avfail effect was not disrupted by the insertion of 54 saline injections between the Pent→LiCl and Flavor→Pent pairings, nor by interposing 26 saline injections between each pair of Flavor→Pent trials. This seemed to exclude an important role for injection cues. Experiment 3 also showed that 4 exposures to Pent and 50 exposures to saline between the Pent→LiCl trials and the Flavor→Pent trials and 26 exposures to saline injections between each pair of Flavor→Pent trials did not reduce the magnitude of Avfail. The same exposure to Pent and saline injections did reduce the magnitude of the saccharin aversion shown by the LiCl→Pent group. These data are viewed as consistent with Lett's (Drug-drug associations: Evidence for the conditioning of a compensatory response. Paper presented at a meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, 1981) suggestion that Avfail represents a learned antisickness response.     

味觉厌恶性条件反射建立后脑内c-Fos的表达

以新异味觉刺激糖精水的摄入为条件刺激,以腹腔注射环磷酰胺(CY,免疫抑制剂)或氯化锂(LiCl)为非条件刺激,分别使大鼠建立味觉厌恶性条件反射.在条件刺激日,糖精水在学习组大鼠下列脑区中诱发出密集的Fos表达下丘脑、杏仁核、边缘皮质等,而非学习组在这些区域中却没有或只有少量表达.另外,在丘脑前背侧核、扣带回、下丘脑外侧核、穹隆下器、压部后颗粒皮质、视上核,CY组的Fos表达明显多于LiCl组;而在伏核、杏仁基底外侧核、腹外侧隔核,LiCl组的Fos表达明显多于CY组,这种差异可能是两种药物的不同药理性质所致.