心理科学的两根拐杖

心理科学发展至今,一直受到哲学以及科学与技术发展的影响.哲学为心理科学的发展提供了方法论,科学与技术则为心理科学的发展提供了研究范式和研究工具.笔者认为:当今心理科学正处变革之中,后现代主义思潮与信息技术、纳米技术及生物技术的发展也许将孕育一场心理学革命.     

关于成立《心理科学》作者培训中心的启事

为繁荣和发展我国心理科学事业,提升本土心理学工作者尤其是广大青年心理学工作者及研究生之专业素养,普及心理科学研究及论文写作规范,提高心理科学研究论文质量,经《心理科学》编辑委员会研究决定,成立"《心理科学》作者培训中心"(以下简称"培训中心")。培训中心挂靠苏州大学,特聘苏州大学心理学系博士生导师、苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)主编田     

提高实验水平是发展心理科学的必由之路——兼评《心理与教育研究中的多因素实验设计》

自1879年威廉·冯特在德国莱比锡大学创立世界上第一个心理学实验室,使心理学脱离哲学并与生理学相分离而发展成为一门独立科学以来,实验就一直是心理科学赖以建设和发展的最重要的支柱。纵观心理学的历史,我们可以看到,在心理学研究中,一条原则的实施,一种学说的提出,一个学派的形成,一项改革的倡导,无不以其深厚的实验为基础。因此,心理科学是一门实验科学。从这一意义上,我们完全有理由相信,心理科学的发展水平很大程度上取决于心理实验的水平,心理科学研究的重大突破有待于心理学研究方法的重大革新,心理实验的设计水准已直接制约着心理…     

《社会心理科学》作者来稿须知——稿件格式必读

《社会心理科学》杂志为天津市法制心理学会主办，天津市心理学会、中国社会心理学会理论与教学专业委员会协办，为社会心理学、法制心理学、应用心理科学专业学术刊物。《社会心理科学》致力中国社会科学的繁荣发展，注重报道中国社会心理学基础理论、政法和应用心理科学科研成果，介绍国内外社会心理学、应用心理学以及政法、教育学等相关学科的新理论、新发展、新成就。《社会心理科学》主要以社会科学、心理科学、政法科学教学科研人员、部门实践工作和高等学校学生为读对象。     

心理学的心理学

近来由于科学和科学理论的发展,产生了科学的科学或科学学。麦迪森(K.B.Madsen)对科学学进行了逻辑的分析,认为科学学可被区分为科学的哲学,科学的历史,利学的心理学和科学的社会学。科安(R.W.Coan)从科学的心理学引伸出心理学的心理学,巴斯(A.R.Buss)则从科学的社会学引伸出心理科学的社会学。不问心理学的心理学或心理学     

后苏联时期俄罗斯心理学的现状

苏联解体后, 进入后苏联时期的俄罗斯心理学出现了一些新的动向, 主要表现为重新评价和审视苏联心理学的原则立场, 纠正十月革命后心理科学发展出现的偏差, 活动概念和文化历史理论仍具有生命力, 理论研究未见重大进展但工作仍继续进行, 心理科学的研究越来越贴近社会生活与实践等。当前俄罗斯心理学已成为一门深受大众青睐的科学, 它对当代各种形式的社会实践均产生了重要影响。     

教练心理学理论发展与研究现状

教练心理学是一门发掘人的潜力、促进个人身心健康和职业发展的心理科学。作为心理学领域一个新兴的分支学科,教练心理学已受到越来越多国际学者的关注和研究。本文旨在系统地介绍教练心理学的理论发展与研究现状,包括其概念与起源、哲学基础与原理、主要流派,以及教练心理学在管理、教育、个人发展、竞技运动等领域的实证研究和应用,并提出了未来的研究方向,为教练心理学的理论与应用研究提供参考。     

2010-2014年心理学核心期刊载文的文献计量分析

采用文献计量学方法,以2010－2014年《心理学报》、《心理科学》、《心理科学进展》、《中国临床心理学杂志》、《心理与行为研究》、《心理发展与教育》、《心理学探新》刊载的5878篇文献为研究对象,对作者人数、研究机构、合作情况、研究内容、研究领域,研究对象、研究方法进行了分析,旨在对过去国内心理学的研究发展状况进行系统回顾与总结,并对将来研究提供参考。     

中国法制心理科学研究的回顾与展望

跨入新千年以后,中国法制心理科学的发展也进入了一个新的阶段。为了总结经验,展望未来,回顾过去20余年我国法制心理学的发展历程是十分必要的。我曾经发表过《中国法制心理科学研究的回顾与展望》(载中国心理学会法制心理专业委员会编:《中国法制心理科学研究十年》,中国政法大学出版社1994年版)和《90年代中国法制心理科学研究的回顾与展望》(载中国心理学会法制心理专业委员会、中国犯罪学研究会犯罪与矫治心理学专业委员会编:《20世纪90年代中国法     

心理科学光辉的战斗的旗帜——学习潘菽教授心理学思想的一点体会

心理学——一门年青的科学、具有强大生命力的朝气蓬勃的科学、为人们关注的有着无限美好前景的人的科学,正出现在学术舞台之上。为两个文明服务的具有中国特色的心理学也正在形成之中。心理科学要前进,要发展,要从不成熟逐步走向成熟,就迫切需要改革与改进。这既是为我国心理学落后的现状决定,也是由心理科学能更佳地为实现四化、为建设两个文明所制约。     

Psychology and its role in information technology

This paper discusses a role for psychology in the development of information technology. Because of the popularity of psychology as an undergraduate major, psychology’s expertise in measurement, and the assertion of some that cognitive science provides the scientific basis for advancements in information technologies, psychology has a responsibility as a discipline to advance information technology and to educate students about this technology. Studies suggest that higher education in psychology can facilitate reasoning about general issues. A process-oriented course in psychology and computers is suggested as a way of incorporating computer literacy into the psychology curriculum. The role of the Society for Computers in Psychology is also discussed.     

心理学与经济、科学技术发展的关系

该文通过对我国２９个省、市、自治区及４５个国家和地区情况统计材料的分析研究,探讨了心理学与经济、科学技术发展的关系。结果表明,经济和科学技术发展水平较高的国家和地区,其心理学发展水平也相对较高;心理学家数目的增长依赖于经济和社会需求;心理学发展晚于经济发展并服从于Ｓ形模型;对于经济实力尚不够强大的国家,提供更多的机会培训心理学家是十分重要的;应重视和加速我国心理学的发展,以适应经济发展的需要。     

Psychology as a Science of Subject and Comportment,beyond the Mind and Behavior

The turn of qualitative inquiry suggests a more open, plural conception of psychology than just the science of the mind and behavior as it is most commonly defined. Historical, ontological and epistemological binding of this conception of psychology to the positivist method of natural science may have exhausted its possibilities, and after having contributed to its prestige as a science, has now become an obstacle. It is proposed that psychology be reconceived as a science of subject and comportment in the framework of a contextual hermeneutic, social, human behavioral science. Thus, without rejecting quantitative inquiry, psychology recovers territory left aside like introspection and pre-reflective self-awareness, and reconnects with traditions marginalized from the main stream. From this perspective psychology might also recover its credibility as a human science in view of current skepticism.     

Applying the Psychology of Science to the Science of Psychology: Can Psychologists Use Psychological Science to Enhance Psychology as a Science?

ABSTRACT— Added to the already tremendous diversity of subdisciplines of psychological science is the psychology of science. Although research on the psychology of science began in 1874, the field has seen a substantial expansion of activity in recent years. One particular subset of this research literature has special importance: namely, inquiries into the psychology of doing great science. These investigations may be assigned into four groups: cognitive, differential, developmental, and social. Each of these deal with critical questions that can, if answered, contribute directly to the improvement of psychology as a science. Potential applications include (a) the identification of scientific talent in psychology, (b) the education of future investigators in psychological science, and (c) the evaluation of psychology's progress as a scientific endeavor.     

Is culture a problem for social psychology?

Culture has been regarded as an anathema to psychology as an empiricist research tradition. Despite the explosive growth of research on culture and psychology over the last decade of the 20th century and its importance in Asian social psychology, the ontological and epistemological tension between psychology as a science and psychology as a cultural/historical discipline introduced in the writings of the thinkers of the Enlightenment and counter-Enlightenment still lingers on in the contemporary discourse of psychology. Clifford Geertz once ominously suggested that cultural psychology may have chewed more than it can. In the present paper, the interpretive turn in social science as exemplified by writings of Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur is reviewed and how it may impinge on the practice of Asian social psychology as an empirical science in methodological, epistemological, and ontological respects is discussed. It is argued here that the current practice of Asian social psychology is largely, though not entirely, free of the challenges mounted by these theorists, and that Asian social psychology has an advantage of not being encumbered by this traditional tension due to a monist ontology that is prevalent in Asia.     

Feminist Engagement with Evolutionary Psychology

In this paper, I ask feminist philosophers and science studies scholars to consider the goals of developing critical analyses of evolutionary psychology. These goals can include development of scholarship in feminist philosophy and science studies, mediation of the uptake of evolutionary psychology by other academic and lay communities, and improvement of the practices and products of evolutionary psychology itself. I evaluate ways that some practices of feminist philosophy and science studies facilitate or hinder meeting these goals, and consider the merits of critical engagement with some of the scientists themselves. Finally, I describe a community of feminist evolutionary psychologists with whom it might be both fruitful and interesting to engage, and identify ways that these interactions may benefit the science and the study of the science.     

科学心理学的观念及其范畴含义解析

关于心理学作为科学的观念或理想普遍兴起于19世纪下半叶,正是对这个观念或理想的百余年历史的追求和实践,塑造了现代意义上的科学心理学及其历史作为整体的基本面貌,并决定了科学心理学观念的两种范畴含义及其差异,具体表现为在心理学作为科学的整体背景中它的现象学传统或道路与它的科学主义传统或道路之间的对峙关系。历史分析表明,对科学心理学观念的范畴含义的理解和实现,与关于科学观念的范畴含义的探索和理解是密切关联、相互制约的。以人类思维的理论形态的历史转换为背景,我们发现,关于心理学作为科学的观念,只有实现为现象学意义上的科学,才能真正实现它自身;但主流的科学主义传统则要把心理学实现为自然科学,由此实现的科学心理学,只能是对心理学作为科学的观念的异化。     

THE TECHNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Changes in technology tiller the ability of people to express competence, to interact with others, to he active rather than passive, and to exercise influence. For the most part, these changes in psychological processes are accidental by-products of technology's attempts to solve the practical problems of society. Because of the close relation between technology and social behavior, we argue that technology should be included as an explanatory variable in social psychology's construction of behavior. Several benefits should result from developing a social psychology of technology. For one, social psychology will be better able to account for the variance of critical social behaviors such as competence, autonomy, social influence, and social isolation. Second, the study of technology will provide a historical perspective for examining changes in social behavior. Finally, the application of social psychological constructs and methods to the study of technology will provide insights that are not available from studies of this topic by economics, philosophy, and political science.     

Functional relations and cognitive psychology: Lessons from human performance and animal research

We consider requirements for effective interdisciplinary communication and explore alternative interpretations of “building bridges between functional and cognitive psychology.” If the bridges are intended to connect radical behaviourism and cognitive psychology, or functional contextualism and cognitive psychology, the efforts are unlikely to be successful. But if the bridges are intended to connect functional relationships and cognitive theory, no construction is needed because the bridges already exist within cognitive psychology. We use human performance and animal research to illustrate the latter point and to counter the claim that the functional approach is unique in offering a close relationship between science and practice. Effective communication will be enhanced and, indeed, may only occur if the goal of functional contextualism extends beyond just “the advancement of functional contextual cognitive and behavioral science and practice” to “the advancement of cognitive and behavioral science and practice” without restriction.