共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 218 毫秒
1.
Lorenz B. Puntel 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1997,28(2):367-383
Dialectics and Formalization. In an appendix to his article Can the concept of dialectic be made clear? (JGPS 27: 131–165) the author critically examined an attempt by D. Wandschneider of reconstructing Hegelian dialectical logic by displaying antinomic structures. The main steps of this reconstruction were formalized within the framework of second order predicate logic. In his reply (JGPS 27: 347–352) Wandschneider argues that formalization is the wrong way of interpreting and judging his reconstruction project on the ground that the understanding of predication is already presupposed by predicate logic and, therefore, cannot be formalized. In the present contribution it is shown that Wandschneider's criticism is based on a fundamentally mistaken conception of formalization and formal logic and that the problems posed by his project remain completely unresolved. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
Gottfried gabriel 《Erkenntnis》2000,52(2):185-198
Goodman's most important contribution to philosophy seems to be his analysis of the relation between facts of science and fictions of art. His view can be seen as a kind of complementary pluralism. That is to say, science and art are two complementary forms of achieving cognition. This position overcame the positivistic view (of his teacher Carnap) according to which the value of art is restricted to the non-cognitive function of expressing emotions. In this paper I compare some of Goodman's fundamental ideas – especially his central conception of exemplification – with their counterparts in Baumgarten, Kant, and Cassirer. Based on this comparison I argue against the tendency to regard analytic and continental philosophy as two completely separated traditions. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Emil J. Walter 《Synthese》1949,8(1):54-64
Ohne ZusammenfassungEin formal- klassifikatorischer Beitrag zur Terminologie der modernen Wirtschaftssysteme 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
《Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences》1992,28(3):304-306