The psychology of being a beginner

Beginners are plagued with overconfidence. They perform the worst on tests of knowledge or skill and yet are the most overconfident. One would expect that learning would better calibrate beginners and lead to better quality decisions. However, learning can instead produce overconfidence. In this article I discuss how being beginner can lead to errors in self-assessments and riskier decisions. I review differences in beginner overconfidence in several places in the literature. First, the Dunning–Kruger Effect, which finds those with the least knowledge are the most overconfident. To be sure, beginners can range from rank beginners, those who have acquired no knowledge, to experienced beginners, beginners who having gained some but not vast knowledge. Next, I discuss the beginner's bubble that follows the trajectory of confidence and overconfidence as people transition from rank to experienced beginners. The beginner's bubble pattern finds rank beginners have insight into their poor abilities. However, with some learning there is a surge of confidence and overconfidence. Lastly, I explore differences in confidence and overconfidence as learners transition from rank to experienced beginners in other places in the literature.     

The experience of being a woman student

The experiences of a group of young women students at a large northern, inner-city university were investigated. The results give cause for concern for the achievements, gender effects, financial and personal security, housing and emotional health of these women.     

The importance of being we: human nature and intergroup relations

The author discusses the nature of in-group bias and the social motives that underlie ethnocentric attachment to one's own membership groups. Two common assumptions about in-group bias are challenged: that in-group positivity necessitates out-group derogation and that in-group bias is motivated by self-enhancement. A review of relevant theory and research on intergroup relations provides evidence for 3 alternative principles: (a) in-group attachment and positivity are primary and independent of out-groups, (b) security motives (belonging and distinctiveness) underlie universal in-group favoritism, and (c) attitudes toward out-groups vary as a function of intergroup relationships and associated threats to belonging and distinctiveness     

Wisdom won from illness: The psychoanalytic grasp of human being

From its inception psychoanalysis claimed not merely to be an effective therapy for psychological suffering, but to shed light on the human condition. But what kind of insight does psychoanalysis offer? This paper locates psychoanalysis in the western philosophical tradition, arguing that psychoanalysis provides not only theoretical wisdom about the human, but practical wisdom of a peculiar kind. The human mind, through its self‐conscious understanding can be immediately and directly efficacious in shaping its own structure.     

Searching for a social consensus in the establishment of bioethical norms

Although France has just acquired a third generation bioethics law, the convention on bioethics that was held in the spring of 2009, as well as all the reports drawn up in France with a view to revising the 2004 bioethics law, raise questions about the process by which bioethics norms are formed. This is a consideration of the formation of the norm and its content. As for the formation of the norm, since the early 1980s, it can be seen that in France there has been a study of the place of the bioethic norm in the hierarchy of positive law. While the legislator's intervention was delayed in 1988 (in particular by the Braibant report), 2008 saw questions about the place of the Constitution in the process. Although the rl61e of the legislator emerged consolidated, at the same time the participation of the citizens by means of the convention is seen to be reinforced. The place of agencies, in particular the bioethics agency created in 2004, also has a great impact on the production of norms. Next, as far as the content is concerned, the debates on biomedical ethics for the last 30 years seem curiously to keep raising the same questions (post-mortem insemination, surrogate motherhood, presumed consent to organ donation...). This recurrence is interesting. Why can't France, or rather the French, manage to answer these questions once and for all? While our neighbours, in particular the United Kingdom and Spain, behave more serenely in this area (eg the giving up of anonymity for donated gametes in the UK), France is perpetually questioning, caught between the need to follow the evolution of our neighbours' norms and maintaining our more conservative position. On this point too the Convention and the life of the biomedicine agency make it possible to take stock of French social values which are growing stronger as the years go by. It is then tempting to draw a parallel with the founding texts of the French republic, and particularly the declaration of human rights in 1789 in order to find the place of man.     

The phenomenology of being a target of prejudice.

The effects of preceived prejudice upon affect and self-evaluation were explored by experimentally investigating the reactions of Jews to failure in an interpersonal situation. Subjects attributing their failure to religious discrimination by gentiles reported feeling more aggression, sadness, anxiety, and egotism on the Mood Adjective Check List than those who could not invoke anti-Semitism as an explanation for their failure. Moreover, they indicated less "social affection," particularly when one of the prejudiced opponents constituted the audience for their self-presentation. Finally, in response in perceived prejudice, subjects also evaluated themselves more favorably on positive traits underlying the Jewish stereotype. These findings were explained in terms of a stress interpretation.