共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Prior’s three-valued modal logic Q was developed as a philosophically interesting modal logic. Thus, we should be able to modify Q as a temporal logic. Although a temporal version of Q was suggested by Prior, the subject has not been fully explored in the literature. In this paper, we develop a three-valued
temporal logic Q
t
and give its axiomatization and semantics. We also argue that Q
t
provides a smooth solution to the problem of future contingents.
Presented by Daniele Mundici 相似文献
2.
In the 1970s, Robin Giles introduced a game combining Lorenzen-style dialogue rules with a simple scheme for betting on the
truth of atomic statements, and showed that the existence of winning strategies for the game corresponds to the validity of
formulas in Łukasiewicz logic. In this paper, it is shown that ‘disjunctive strategies’ for Giles’s game, combining ordinary
strategies for all instances of the game played on the same formula, may be interpreted as derivations in a corresponding
proof system. In particular, such strategies mirror derivations in a hypersequent calculus developed in recent work on the
proof theory of Łukasiewicz logic.
Presented by Daniele Mundici 相似文献
3.
In this paper we examine Prior’s reconstruction of Master Argument [4] in some modal-tense logic. This logic consists of a
purely tense part and Diodorean definitions of modal alethic operators. Next we study this tense logic in the pure tense language.
It is the logic K
t
4 plus a new axiom (P): ‘p Λ G
p ⊃ P G
p’. This formula was used by Prior in his original analysis of Master Argument. (P) is usually added as an extra axiom to an axiomatization of the logic of linear time. In that case the set of moments is
a total order and must be left-discrete without the least moment. However, the logic of Master Argument does not require linear
time. We show what properties of the set of moments are exactly forced by (P) in the reconstruction of Prior. We make also some philosophical remarks on the analyzed reconstruction.
Presented by Jacek Malinowski 相似文献
4.
Peter Simons 《Synthese》2006,150(3):443-458
I consider the idea of a propositional logic of location based on the following semantic framework, derived from ideas of
Prior. We have a collection L of locations and a collection S of statements such that a statement may be evaluated for truth at each location. Typically one and the same statement may
be true at one location and false at another. Given this semantic framework we may proceed in two ways: introducing names
for locations, predicates for the relations among them and an “at” preposition to express the value of statements at locations;
or introduce statement operators which do not name locations but whose truth-conditional effect depends on the truth or falsity
of embedded statements at various locations. The latter is akin to Prior’s approach to tense logic. In any logic of location
there will be some basic operators which we can define. By ringing the changes on the topology of locations, different logical
systems may be generated, and the challenge for the logician is then in each case to find operators, axioms and rules yielding
a proof theory adequate to the semantics. The generality of the approach is illustrated with familiar and not so familiar
examples from modal, tense and place logic, mathematics, and even the logic of games.
相似文献
5.
Eric Pacuit 《Studia Logica》2007,86(3):435-454
Adam Brandenburger and H. Jerome Keisler have recently discovered a two person Russell-style paradox. They show that the following
configurations of beliefs is impossible: Ann believes that Bob assumes that Ann believes that Bob’s assumption is wrong. In [7] a modal logic interpretation of this paradox is proposed. The idea is to introduce two modal operators intended to
represent the agents’ beliefs and assumptions. The goal of this paper is to take this analysis further and study this paradox from the point of view of a modal logician.
In particular, we show that the paradox can be seen as a theorem of an appropriate hybrid logic.
Special Issue Formal Epistemology II. Edited by Branden Fitelson 相似文献
6.
Henning Peucker 《Axiomathes》2012,22(1):135-146
This article is composed of three sections that investigate the epistemological foundations of Husserl’s idea of logic from
the Logical Investigations. First, it shows the general structure of this logic. Husserl conceives of logic as a comprehensive, multi-layered theory
of possible theories that has its most fundamental level in a doctrine of meaning. This doctrine aims to determine the elementary
categories that constitute every possible meaning (meaning-categories). The second section presents the main idea of Husserl’s
search for an epistemological foundation for knowledge, science and logic. Their epistemological clarification can only be
reached through a detailed analysis of the structure of those intentions that give us what is meant in our intentions. To
reveal the intuitive giveness of logical forms is the ultimate aim of Husserl’s epistemology of logic. Logical forms and meaning-categories
can only be given in a certain higher-order intuition that Husserl calls categorical intuition. The third section of this
article distinguishes different kinds of categorical intuition and shows how the most basic logical categories and concepts
are given to us in a categorical abstraction. 相似文献
7.
Donald Capps 《Pastoral Psychology》2006,55(1):3-25
The psychoanalytic concept of the “reversal of generations,” in which one identifies with a grandparent as the primary parental authority in one’s life, is used to shed light on the role that John Henry Newman’s paternal grandmother played in his decision to become a priest in the Church of England and in his subsequent conversion to the Church of Rome; and on the role that Abraham Lincoln’s maternal grandfather played in his understanding of a husband’s obligation of faithfulness to his wife and of his presidential role in combating Southern secession but avoiding retribution. The writings of Erik H. Erikson are used to explore the role of the grandparent in legitimating critical acts of self-determination. 相似文献
8.
Josep Maria Font 《Studia Logica》2009,91(3):383-406
This is a contribution to the discussion on the role of truth degrees in manyvalued logics from the perspective of abstract
algebraic logic. It starts with some thoughts on the so-called Suszko’s Thesis (that every logic is two-valued) and on the
conception of semantics that underlies it, which includes the truth-preserving notion of consequence. The alternative usage
of truth values in order to define logics that preserve degrees of truth is presented and discussed. Some recent works studying
these in the particular cases of Łukasiewicz’s many-valued logics and of logics associated with varieties of residuated lattices
are also presented. Finally the extension of this paradigm to other, more general situations is discussed, highlighting the
need for philosophical or applied motivations in the selection of the truth degrees, due both to the interpretation of the
idea of truth degree and to some mathematical difficulties. 相似文献
9.
Theories of adult development suggest that personality development and social role involvements are sources of adult well-being
for both men and women. However, previous research on this topic has focused mainly on (a) women, and (b) early stages of
adulthood. We tested an alternative model for predicting late-midlife adults’ well-being, with role quality, number of roles,
and healthy adaptation to late midlife (reflected in lower concern about aging) as mediators of the relationship between young
adult identity development and well-being in late midlife. Results indicated that the model fit women’s experience very well,
and men’s experience somewhat. Follow-up analyses indicated that the model fit men’s experience with respect to family role
quality, but that young adult identity played a lesser role in men’s well-being in later midlife, and that problems in the
late-midlife work role were reflected in concerns about aging for men, but not for women. 相似文献
10.
Sara L. Uckelman 《Synthese》2012,188(3):349-366
Though Arthur Prior is now best known for his founding of modern temporal logic and hybrid logic, much of his early philosophical career was devoted to history of logic and historical logic. This interest laid the foundations for both of his ground-breaking innovations in the 1950s and 1960s. Because of the important r?le played by Prior??s research in ancient and medieval logic in his development of temporal and hybrid logic, any student of Prior, temporal logic, or hybrid logic should be familiar with the medieval logicians and their work. In this article we give an overview of Prior??s work in ancient and medieval logic. 相似文献
11.
Edward Casey 《Human Studies》2006,29(4):445-462
This essay begins by situating the work of David Carr in relation to the reception of phenomenology in the United States.
It addresses Carr’s early (and continuing) contributions to the philosophy of history, especially as this topic emerges in
Husserl’s middle and later writings. The idea of point of view as this emerges in Carr’s own writings on history is examined,
with special attention to differences between its spatial and temporal instantiations. Carr’s emphasis on the primacy of temporality
in human experience is contrasted with an approach that is more appreciative of the role of place in this experience. It is
suggested that place offers an important alternative to time as a basis for the understanding of history and narrative. 相似文献
12.
13.
Philippe Balbiani Andreas Herzig Nicolas Troquard 《Journal of Philosophical Logic》2008,37(4):387-406
We propose two alternatives to Xu’s axiomatization of Chellas’s STIT. The first one simplifies its presentation, and also
provides an alternative axiomatization of the deliberative STIT. The second one starts from the idea that the historic necessity
operator can be defined as an abbreviation of operators of agency, and can thus be eliminated from the logic of Chellas’s
STIT. The second axiomatization also allows us to establish that the problem of deciding the satisfiability of a STIT formula
without temporal operators is NP-complete in the single-agent case, and is NEXPTIME-complete in the multiagent case, both
for the deliberative and Chellas’s STIT. 相似文献
14.
Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz 《Studia Logica》2008,90(2):211-247
The intention here is that of giving a formal underpinning to the idea of ‘meaning-is-use’ which, even if based on proofs,
it is rather different from proof-theoretic semantics as in the Dummett–Prawitz tradition. Instead, it is based on the idea
that the meaning of logical constants are given by the explanation of immediate consequences, which in formalistic terms means
the effect of elimination rules on the result of introduction rules, i.e. the so-called reduction rules. For that we suggest
an extension to the Curry– Howard interpretation which draws on the idea of labelled deduction, and brings back Frege’s device
of variable-abstraction to operate on the labels (i.e., proof-terms) alongside formulas of predicate logic.
Presented by Heinrich Wansing 相似文献
15.
Michael Friedman 《Synthese》2011,180(2):249-263
Both realists and instrumentalists have found it difficult to understand (much less accept) Carnap’s developed view on theoretical
terms, which attempts to stake out a neutral position between realism and instrumentalism. I argue that Carnap’s mature conception
of a scientific theory as the conjunction of its Ramsey sentence and Carnap sentence can indeed achieve this neutral position.
To see this, however, we need to see why the Newman problem raised in the context of recent work on structural realism is
no problem for Carnap’s conception; and we also need to locate Carnap’s work on theoretical terms within his wider program
of Wissenschaftslogik or the logic of science. 相似文献
16.
William H. Hanson 《Philosophical Studies》2006,130(3):437-459
The traditional view that all logical truths are metaphysically necessary has come under attack in recent years. The contrary
claim is prominent in David Kaplan’s work on demonstratives, and Edward Zalta has argued that logical truths that are not
necessary appear in modal languages supplemented only with some device for making reference to the actual world (and thus
independently of whether demonstratives like ‘I’, ‘here’, and ‘now’ are present). If this latter claim can be sustained, it
strikes close to the heart of the traditional view. I begin this paper by discussing and refuting Zalta’s argument in the
context of a language for propositional modal logic with an actuality connective (section 1). This involves showing that his
argument in favor of real world validity his preferred explication of logical truth, is fallacious. Next (section 2) I argue
for an alternative explication of logical truth called general validity. Since the rule of necessitation preserves general
validity, the argument of section 2 provides a reason for affirming the traditional view. Finally (section 3) I show that
the intuitive idea behind the discredited notion of real world validity finds legitimate expression in an object language
connective for deep necessity.
Earlier versions of this paper were read at the universities of Graz,
Maribor, and Salzburg, and at a workshop on the philosophy of logic at the
National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) in Mexico City. My
thanks to those present at these events for many helpful suggestions. Thanks
are also due to an anonymous referee for Philosophical Studies. 相似文献
17.
Wilfrid Hodges 《Journal of Philosophical Logic》2009,38(6):589-606
In a recent paper Johan van Benthem reviews earlier work done by himself and colleagues on ‘natural logic’. His paper makes
a number of challenging comments on the relationships between traditional logic, modern logic and natural logic. I respond
to his challenge, by drawing what I think are the most significant lines dividing traditional logic from modern. The leading
difference is in the way logic is expected to be used for checking arguments. For traditionals the checking is local, i.e.
separately for each inference step. Between inference steps, several kinds of paraphrasing are allowed. Today we formalise
globally: we choose a symbolisation that works for the entire argument, and thus we eliminate intuitive steps and changes
of viewpoint during the argument. Frege and Peano recast the logical rules so as to make this possible. I comment also on
the traditional assumption that logical processing takes place at the top syntactic level, and I question Johan’s view that
natural logic is ‘natural’. 相似文献
18.
Fulin Chao 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2006,1(2):161-184
In ancient Chinese thoughts, de is a comparatively complicated idea. Most of the researchers translated it directly into “virtue”, but this translation is
not accurate for our understanding of the idea of “de” in pre-Qin times. Generally speaking, in Pre-Qin times, the idea of “de” underwent three developmental periods. The first is the de of Heaven, the de of ancestors; the second the de of system; and the third the de of spirit and moral conducts. In a long period of history, the idea of “de” never cast off the influence of tian Dao (the way of Heaven). It was in Western Zhou Dynasty that the idea of “de” shook off the dense fog of the mandate of Heaven. However, it was the thinkers in Spring and Autumn Period and Warring States
who made contributions to bring it deep into people’s mind. The ancient Chinese thoughts were mainly concerned with people’s
recognition and development of their own abilities, with people’s seeking harmony and balance between human-beings and nature,
and with people’s seeking harmonious and balanced human relations. The development of the idea of “de” played a very important role in this context.
__________
Translated from Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 中国社会科学 (China Social Sciences), 2005(4) by Lei Yongqiang 相似文献
19.
Kjartan Koch Mikalsen 《Res Publica》2010,16(1):23-40
It is common to interpret Kant’s idea of public reason and the Enlightenment motto to ‘think for oneself’ as incompatible
with the view that testimony and judgement of credibility is essential to rational public deliberation. Such interpretations
have led to criticism of contemporary Kantian approaches to deliberative democracy for being intellectualistic, and for not
considering our epistemic dependence on other people adequately. In this article, I argue that such criticism is insufficiently
substantiated, and that Kant’s idea of public reason is neither at odds with deference to a certain kind of authority, nor
with making judgements of character in rational deliberation. This view is corroborated by recent work on Kant’s epistemology
of testimony. 相似文献
20.
Grigori Mints 《Synthese》2006,148(3):701-717
We put together several observations on constructive negation. First, Russell anticipated intuitionistic logic by clearly
distinguishing propositional principles implying the law of the excluded middle from remaining valid principles. He stated
what was later called Peirce’s law. This is important in connection with the method used later by Heyting for developing his
axiomatization of intuitionistic logic. Second, a work by Dragalin and his students provides easy embeddings of classical
arithmetic and analysis into intuitionistic negationless systems. In the last section, we present in some detail a stepwise
construction of negation which essentially concluded the formation of the logical base of the Russian constructivist school.
Markov’s own proof of Markov’s principle (different from later proofs by Friedman and Dragalin) is described. 相似文献