Range effects in successive discrimination

In two sets of experiments we examined pigeons' discrimination performance with a visual flicker-rate continuum, using a conventional successive discrimination procedure. In the first experiment, responses during the intermediate stimulus value were never reinforced, while responses during stimuli on either end of the continuum were reinforced periodically. In the second experiment, responses during stimuli from one end of the continuum were never reinforced, while responses during stimuli from the other end of the continuum were reinforced periodically. Results from both experiments show that discrimination between unchanged positive and negative stimulus values is a function of the range over which the total stimulus set varies. These range effects are comparable to effects found in absolute judgment tasks in human and animal psychophysics. In addition, the range effects reported here are not due to channel capacity, but may depend instead on variability in judgment criteria.     

Conditional discrimination with conceptual simultaneous and successive cues in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)

At the end of several stages of training, 4 squirrel monkeys met an 87% criterion for choosing correctly between exemplars of the concept "sameness" and the concept "difference," the simultaneous cues, as a function of having been cued by an exemplar either of the concept "triangularity" (cued sameness) or "heptagonality" (cued difference), the successive cues, which were presented in random order. In addition, the best monkey met criterion when the exemplars of sameness and difference were presented 16 s after the withdrawal of the exemplar of triangularity or heptagonality, and the other monkeys performed successfully with shorter delays. The results are discussed in terms of (a) "working memory," (b) the significance for the evolution of behavior of investigating the conceptual capacities of animals, and (c) implications for language in nonhuman animals.     

The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children

A non-verbal teaching program, combined with reinforcement and extinction (Program Group), was compared with reinforcement and extinction alone (Test Group) in teaching retarded children to discriminate circles from ellipses. In the Program Group, fading techniques were used to transfer stimulus control from “bright vs. dark” to “form vs. no-form” and then to “circle vs. ellipse”. The Test Group had the task of learning the circle-ellipse discrimination with no prior teaching program. With the program, seven of 10 children learned the circle-ellipse discrimination. Without the program, one of nine learned. The eight Test-Group children who failed to learn circle vs. ellipse were then given the opportunity to learn the form no-form discrimination by reinforcement and extinction alone, without fading. Six of the eight learned, but only three of these six then learned circle vs. ellipse on a second test. All seven Program-Group children who had learned form vs. no-form also learned the circle-ellipse discrimination by means of fading; each of the seven made fewer errors than any of the three who succeeded on the second test. Children who failed to learn circle vs. ellipse adopted response patterns incompatible with the development of appropriate stimulus control.     

The role of simultaneous and successive processing in EFL reading

This study examines the relationship between simultaneous and successive processing (the Planning, Attention, Simultaneous and Successive processing [PASS] theory processes) and reading skills in English as a foreign language (EFL). A group of 81 children were administered two batteries of tests. One was used to measure EFL reading skills, while the other one assessed simultaneous and successive processing. We hypothesised (a) cognitive processes to predict reading ability, as well as (b) the presence of a significant relationship between (c) simultaneous processing and reading comprehension and (d) successive processing and letter and word decoding. The findings confirmed that the anticipated relationships between these domains exist and are of moderate effect size. The research has helped to contribute to the understanding of how simultaneous and successive processing can affect EFL reading skills both on the level of basic word and letter decoding and reading comprehension.     

Discrimination of simultaneous and successive tones

A series of discrimination tasks involving simultaneous and successive presentation of pairs of piano notes was given to 27 Ss. The listeners exhibited less-than-perfect ability to “hear out” the component notes in simultaneous presentations. This finding, in agreement with the results of previous investigators, demonstrated the limitation of Ohm’s law of acoustical analysis. It was also found that changes in successive notes fOllowing simultaneous notes were discriminated more accurately than changes in simultaneous notes following successive notes. This was interpreted as suggesting that listeners are better able to analyze than to synthesize the components of complex tones.     

Stimulus comparison strategies and task demands in successive discrimination

This research isolates two distinct strategies used to identify stimuli presented at different rates in successive discrimination tasks. The short-term strategy (used at rapid rates) compares current stimuli to immediately prior stimuli present in sensory or other short-term storage, whereas the long-term strategy (used at slow rates) compares current stimuli to a standard stimulus in long-term memory. In Experiment 1, subjects detected a medium-duration tone amid both long and short distractors. Analysis of false alarms indicated that strategy choice is strongly influenced by event rate, and therefore by the presence or absence of sensory traces of preceding stimuli. Experiment 2 was designed to force subjects to use the short-term strategy (to detect targets, present stimuli had to be compared to their immediate predecessors), and varied the event rate. Subjects were able to maintain a high level of performance throughout the task only at the fastest event rate. This pattern of results suggested that when the task demanded it, subjects could use a particular strategy, but if the event rate (and consequently the availability or otherwise of relevant memorial traces) was not favourable to that strategy, then performance was disadvantaged.