Zeit und Zeitlosigkeit der Psychoanalyse

Time is a central category of psychoanalysis and a differential criterion against other forms of psychotherapy. The polarity of time and timelessness moulds not only the most important analytic notions, but the treatment too. Treatment means work in and on time and means production of the past. In the timeless, fulfilling moment of interpretation, of insight and emotional experience the therapeutic process is condensed to the time of the psychoanalysis. The close connection between time experience and early relationship experience is elaborated along the history of development and thereby, the relevance of integrable deprivations is highlighted. Thus, it is not surprising that psychopathologies are also time pathologies. Psychoanalysis should be the advocate of the experience of time against the increasing acceleration of life.     

Die Wiederherstellung der Zeit in der ambulanten Psychotherapie mit Psychosekranken

In psychoanalytic psychotherapy with psychotic patients, a disturbance in time experience quite frequently turns out to be central to the psychotic experience as a whole. These patients experience disruptions in the flow of time that lead to a loss of temporal continuity. This loss of temporal structures causes damage in thinking functions: Relations like causality, finality and others which imply a temporal dimension, cannot be established any more. Parts of treatment histories serve to demonstrate the reconstruction of temporal continuity by the patient in psychotherapy. Object-relation-theory and Piaget’s experimental psychology provide the frame of reference for the understandig of the mental processes involved. At the beginning of the psychotherapy the patient experiences being together with the therapist and being separated from him as two discrete conditions of existing which have no links. The periodical reappearance of being together in combination with the awareness of the therapist’s continuous ongoing care encourages the patient to remember and to envisage the meetings with the therapist. The reliability of the alternation seems to stimulate a specific mental activity which creates connections allowing for transitions between the different conditions — in the sense of Winnicott’s transitional phenomena. Transitional phenomena which sometimes are quite concrete things bridge the gap between presence and future. Narrating serves as a link to the past. Through these creative ego-activities temporal continuity is regained providing the basis for strucured thinking and — very important — for the perception of one’s own personality and its continuity over time, thus generating a sense of identity. This process of reconstructing time is interesting in itself, because it sheds light on the psychodynamics of the restitutional processes after a psychotic illness. Moreover, it allows for hypotheses about the development of the inner time dimension in early childhood.     

Das Unheimliche der Ambivalenz

This essay??s main concern consists of a critical survey of the coherences, alliances and associative entanglement between psychic ambivalences, encounters of the uncanny and the connections to the issues of death. References for the considerations presented here are Freuds??s seminal papers ??The antithetical meanings of primal words?? (1910), ??The uncanny?? (1919) and ??Beyond the pleasure principle?? (1920). The axis formed by these essays is being crisscrossed by the phenomen of the uncanny valley, an issue widely discussed within the cyber scene which may introduce a new perspective in order to extend the analysis of the concept and structure of ambivalences with new questions. This approach adverts to an inherent paradox which seems to be constitutive for ambivalence itself.     

Das Problem der Geifteswiffenfchaft

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Das Problem der Chronometerauswahl

On Choice of Time Metric. What criteria ought to be satisfied by those observable processes which, accompanied by a function assigning values to intervals of that processes, serve as the standard for measurement of time? In how far do the criteria which can reasonably be established admit of an unambigous definition of time metric? That are the questions to which I have addressed myself in the paper. Peter Janich has aimed at solving the problem with careful avoidance of any reference to physical theory. Although this paper owes a great deal to his ‘Protophysik der Zeit’, reasons will be ad-vanced that it is in principle impossible to give a foundation of time metric without any reference to physical theory. It follows that taking results of physical theory into account is unavoidable as far as a definite decision concerning the choice of time metric is aspired. At first sight reference to law-like assertions on the duration of temporal intervals appears to be paradoxical for it means to take something which originally ought to be submitted to experimental test as the standard for measurement. Poincaré is fairly conscious of this problem, yet explicitly acknowledges that there is a mutual relationship between definition of time metric and physical theory. It will be shown that this kind of mutual relationship which even might be termed as circular does not void physical theory of empirical content. Thus in the final part I am concerned to free the position which recommends reference to physical theory from its paradoxical image in order to advance a conventionalist account as a sceptical, but nevertheless fully satisfying solution.     

Das psychische Erbe der Menschheit

The historical development and importance in theory and practice of the term archetype, the core concept of Analytical Psychology, is extensively presented. Beginning with C.G. Jung’s definition of archetype through to the current state of the discussion, various conceptualizations of biological, developmental psychological and cultural theoretical basis are presented. The results show that there is empirical evidence for psychological archetypes, for instance in the neurosciences, developmental psychological and anthropological research and that the classical conception of inheritance of complex symbolic patterns cannot be substantiated by more recent results in human genetics and particularly in epigenetics. The prominent attempts at solving this problem from the contempory Analytical Psychology will be discussed, in particular emergence and system theoretical argumentation. Finally, various empirical, partially experimental studies from Analytical Psychology, among others from the authors themselves, will be presented which confirm the hypothesis of the existence of archetypes and of a collective (unconscious) memory. The article gives a total overview of the state of specialist discussions on the archetype concept for the readership above and beyond the narrow field of Analytical Psychology.