Effect of effort on resistance to extinction of the bar-pressing response

This study was designed to obtain more information on the relation between effort and resistance to extinction when all subjects receive equal acquisition experience on each effort level at which the response is subsequently to be extinguished. Twenty-four subjects were given 120 reinforcements on each of three weighted bars of 5, 40 and 70 gm. They were then ordered into three groups, each extinguished on one effort level. Analysis of the number of responses emitted in six daily 20-min. extinction sessions showed that resistance to extinction was not related to the amount of effort expended in extinction.     

Effect of effort and latent extinction on resistance to extinction

Sixty-four male Wistar rats were given acquisition training in an enclosed straight-alley runway which could be adjusted for angles of inclination. The 2×2×2 design involved two angles of inclination in acquisition (0° and 40°) and two angles of inclination in extinction (0° and 40°). Between acquisition and extinction, half the subjects were exposed to a latent extinction procedure and half served as controls. Number of responses in a 30-min extinction session was an inverse function of effort required in extinction. Additionally, latent extinction procedures resulted in reduced resistance to extinction, but only when the effort conditions of acquisition and extinction were constant. When the effort conditions of acquisition and extinction were dissimilar, latent extinction procedures resulted in increased resistance to extinction. The results raise questions about the nature of the learning which occurs during latent extinction training.     

The effects of single-component extinction of a three-component serial CS on resistance to extinction of the conditioned avoidance response

Central to a fear interpretation of how avoidance responses are maintained in the absence of further CS-UCS pairings is the underlying assumption of an existing gradient of fear across the CS-UCS interval. Extrapolations based on this gradient lead to a number of differential predictions concerning the topography of avoidance responding during extinction. The present research was concerned with the differential effects of extinguishing separate components of the CS complex upon responding to the complete CS complex during extinction. In Phase 1 of the study, rats were classically conditioned to a three-component serial CS (S₁/S₂/S₃) followed by shock. Each subject was then given avoidance training in a one-way apparatus to a criterion of one successful avoidance. In Phase 2, subjects were divided into four groups, with three of the groups receiving nonreinforced exposure for 25 trials to one of the components of the serial CS (S₁, S₂, or S₃). The fourth group (S₀) was exposed for the same period of time to the apparatus cues. In Phase 3, the total stimulus complex was reintroduced in its original order, and animals were tested until extinction of the instrumental response was reached. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that a fear gradient exists in extinction and decreases in magnitude as the distance from the point of UCS onset increases.     

Magnitude of negative reinforcement and resistance to extinction

In the first experiment rats experienced large or small magnitude of negative reinforcement (shock reduction) in a straight alley. Half of the subjects in each magnitude group received continuous reinforcement, and the other half received a 50% partial reinforcement schedule (nonreinforcement consisting of no shock reduction in the goal box). In extinction the groups were ordered: large partial > small-partial > small-continuous > large-continuous. In the second experiment rats received large, small and nonreinforcement in various sequences using the runway-negative reinforcement procedure and were ordered: SNL>LNL>SNL>LNS in resistance to extinction (letters represent the magnitudes in the sequence experienced in acquisition). The results of these experiments indicate a commality between positive and negative reinforcement with respect to behavioral phenomena and theoretical accounts of those phenomena.     

The timing of bar-pressing behaviour

The time spent by a rat in a bar-pressing situation is made up of active time spent n pressing, eating time, and extra time spent in other activities. With a well trained rat, active time and extra time are small, and eating time mainly determines the rate of reward delivery. Active time is affected by a change of weight on the bar, the time between reward deliveries is affected by the amount of reward, and the extra time is affected by extinction conditions.

There is not a one-to-one correspondence between periods of activity at the knob and rewards.

The term “response” and some variables based on it are given empirical referents, which show that much research and theorizing on bar-pressing behaviour has been concerned with only a small selection of the rat's bar-pressing activities. Some reasons for this restriction are the use of the simple weighted bar, the lack of a rationale for bar-pressing research, and the practice of not watching the rat during an experiment.