共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Human Studies - Other people figure in our experience of the world; they strike us as unique and genuinely other. This paper explores whether a Husserlian account of empathy as the way in which we... 相似文献
4.
5.
J. N. Mohanty 《Husserl Studies》1988,5(3):219-233
Lecture given at the Annual meeting of the British Society for Phenomenology held at St. Edmund Hall, Oxford, on 25 March 1988. The occasion was remembering Husserls passing away fifty years ago. 相似文献
6.
7.
Martin Schwab 《Topoi》1986,5(2):163-175
Conclusion Derrida's Husserl thinks of meaning as self-presence and of self-presence as transparent and complete presence of meaning to the mind. Expression and thought are but particular modes or media of the more englobing relation of a self-acquainted life. Reflection is the highest form and telos of the other forms of presence.In contrast, the — by no means complete — Husserl who has begun to appear in my interpretation does not unconditionally subscribe to the value of presence. Not only is an important part of intentional life directed towards objects which it does not possess in their plenitude — hence its emptiness —, this part of intentional life is also blind towards itself. Reflection tries to fill this gap by grasping what is not present to a life immersed in its world. But a retreat from life is the price of presence, a presence, in addition, whose power is essentially limited by the fluidity of its material and by the limits of its bearers.And yet Husserl maintains, passionately maintains, the claim and value of reflection and of a scientific attitude which Derrida rejects with equal passion. May they not have a positive function in a frame which is no longer that of presence metaphysics? As deconstruction has evolved its philosophy of anti-presence, it has brushed away the reflexive potential of Phenomenology and chosen to reject its own origin. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
Janet Donohoe 《Continental Philosophy Review》2010,43(1):127-140
In this paper, I explore a confrontation between Husserl’s ethical position of vocation and its absolute ought with a feminist
ethical position. I argue that Husserl’s ethics has a great deal to offer a feminist ethics by providing for the possibility
of an ethics that is particular rather than universal, that recognizes the role of the social through tradition in establishing
values and norms without conceding the ethical responsibility of the individual, and that acknowledges the role of both reason
and desire in establishing moral values that has the consequence of breaking down the public/private distinction that has
reigned in so many ethical theories. In order to make this case, I proceed with a review of Husserl’s position of the absolute
ought, some typical criticisms that might be leveled at his position, and finally, responses to those criticisms that show
ways in which Husserl’s position can be beneficial to the formulation of a feminist ethics that is inclusive of the emotional
aspect of moral valuation, and the particularity of ethical commitments, while providing for a different way of evaluating
thinking that accommodates what are usually understood to be “feminine” concerns. In addition to describing Husserl’s position,
I show how that position meets some of the expectations for a feminist ethics as put forth by Iris Marion Young and Sara Ruddick. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Husserl bibliography 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
Wojciech Żełaniec 《Husserl Studies》1992,9(3):239-246
International Academy of Philosophy Principality of Liechtenstein 相似文献
20.