经验取样法——一种收集“真实”数据的新方法

经验取样法是一种有效的密集纵向研究数据收集方法。该方法的优点正逐渐被广大研究者所认同,国外运用经验取样法取得的研究成果越来越多,而国内学者对经验取样法的研究尚处于探索阶段,运用此方法的实证研究更是凤毛麟角。通过对《应用心理学期刊》(Journal of Applied Psychology)最近5年(2010~2014年)发表的26篇采用经验取样法的实证研究论文的内容分析,发现这些文章全面体现了经验取样法的特点、研究内容、样本量、激励方式、数据收集和操作过程等该方法的操作要素。对其进行总结不仅有利于对经验取样法在组织行为学中的应用状况进行总结,而且也能促进这一方法在未来的组织行为学和人力资源管理中的发展和应用。     

教育心理学的研究领域和发展趋势

当前教育心理学研究的主要领域有哪些?多年来教育心理学发展的趋势是什么? 曾担任五年《教育心理学杂志》(《Journal of Educational Psychology》,美国心理学会主办)副主编和六年主编的Smamuel Ball教授在他离任前就上述两个主要问题进行了考察和分析。教育心理学应该研究哪些领域?多年来这个问题一直没有取得一致意见。比如1941年,Blair就曾选取了当时最为流行的8本教育心理学教科书进行了内容分析,结果发现这些书中     

近十年国内外有关Muller—lyer错觉研究概况

1989年是著名的Muller—lyer(米勒)几何视错觉现象提出的100周年.一百年前,米勒发现在两根等长线段的末端分别加上向外的斜线和向内的斜线会导致失真的知觉反映,带有向外斜线的线段主观知觉显得长些。带有向内斜线的线段主观知觉显得短些,等长线段由于不同方向斜线的附着产生了知觉差异,这种几何视错觉现象因它的提出者而得名,称为Muller—lyer错觉.近十年(1980—1989),从文献资料上看,发表在世界心理学研究权威杂志(如心理学报、Perception & Psychophysics、Perception、Perceptual & Motor Skills、BritishJournal of Perelopmental Psychology、Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology     

第28届国际心理学大会(ICP2004)

第28届国际心理学大会(28th International Congress of Psychology,ICP2004)将于2004年8月8-13 日在北京国际会议中心召开。欢迎国内代表踊跃报名参加这一盛会。 国际心理学大会是心理学的奥林匹克大会,每四年一次。ICP2004是首次在中国召开的国际心理学大 会,对中国心理学者是百年一遇的机会。在北京即可与全世界3000名国际心理学同行交流您最感兴趣的 研究领域和成果。您在大会上所做的报告(包括口头报告和展报),将在《国际心理学杂志》 (SSCI)摘 要发表。     

加强民族心理学研究,促进中国心理科学繁荣——民族心理学专栏前言

在中国心理学会理事长杨玉芳研究员和《心理学进展》主编隋南研究员两位先生的共同促成下,《心理科学进展·民族心理学专栏》面世了.作为组稿人,受编辑部之邀,为这一组文章写一个前言. 一 民族心理学研究是心理科学研究的应有之义.在心理学建立之初,冯特就花了近20年的时间完成了10卷本巨著《民族心理学》(Folk Psychology),内容涉及语言、艺术、神话、社会、法律、文化和历史.冯特将"民族"理解为种族共同体,民族心理学和个体心理学一样,是心理学的基础分支.个体心理学以个体为研究对象,民族心理学以群体为研究对象;个体心理学研究人的简单心理过程,民族心理学研究人的高级心理过程.     

评西方心理学史的时代精神说

近来出版的西方心理学史如波林《实验心理学史》(1950,中译本,1981)。舒尔茨《现代心理学史》(1975,中译本,1982)墨菲《近代心理学历史导引》(1972,中译本,1980),利黑(T.H.Leahey)《心理学史》(A History of Psychology,1980,尚未有中译本)为了解释     

第28届国际心理学大会（ICP2004）

2004 年8月8日~13日,北京 (www.icp2004.org) 第28届国际心理学大会(28th International Congress of Psychology, ICP2004)将于2004年8月8~13日在北京国际会议中心召开。欢迎国内代表踊跃报名参加这一盛会。 国际心理学大会是心理学的奥林匹克大会,每四年一次。ICP2004是首次在中国召开的国际心理学大会,对中国心理学者是百年一遇的机会。在北京即可与全世界3000名国际心理学同行交流您最感兴趣的研究领域和成果。您在大会上所做的报告(包括口头报告和展报),将在《国际心理学杂志》(SSCI)摘要发表 会议概况:预计各国…     

期刊简介

《心理学报》,月刊,中国心理学会和中国科学院心理研究所主办,科学出版社出版,主要发表我国心理学家最新、最高水平的心理学科技论文。1956年创刊。作为反映我国心理学研究水平的主要窗口,《心理学报》不仅在中国心理学界享有较高的声誉,在国际上也有一定影响。在国际上,《心理学报》是SCOPUS(Elsevier),ESCI(Emerging Sources Citations Index,Web of Science),PsycINFO/Psychological Abstracts(APA)等重要数据库的检索(收录)期刊。在国内,《心理学报》是国家科技部《中国科技论文统计源期刊》(CSTPCD);中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心期刊;中国科学文献计量评价研究中心(中国科学院文献情报中心、中国社会科学院文献信息中心、中国学术期刊<光盘版>电子杂志社、北京大学图书馆)《中国科学引文数据库》来源期刊、《中国人文社会科学引文数据库》来源期刊、《中国学术期刊综合评价数据库》来源期刊;中国社会科学院文献信息中心《中国人文社会科学核心期刊》;南京大学社会科学数据库研究开发中心《中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)》统计源期刊;《中国学术期刊文摘》源期刊;被北京地区高校期刊工作研究会和北京大学图书馆选录为心理学类核心期刊,编入《中文核心期刊要目总览》(2020年版)。     

期刊简介

《心理学报》,月刊,中国心理学会和中国科学院心理研究所主办,科学出版社出版,主要发表我国心理学家最新、最高水平的心理学科技论文。1956年创刊。作为反映我国心理学研究水平的主要窗口,《心理学报》不仅在中国心理学界享有较高的声誉,在国际上也有一定影响。在国际上,《心理学报》是SCOPUS(Elsevier),ESCI(Emerging Sources Citations Index,Web of Science),PsycINFO/Psychological Abstracts(APA)等重要数据库的检索(收录)期刊。在国内,《心理学报》是国家科技部《中国科技论文统计源期刊》(CSTPCD);中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心期刊;中国科学文献计量评价研究中心(中国科学院文献情报中心、中国社会科学院文献信息中心、中国学术期刊<光盘版>电子杂志社、北京大学图书馆)《中国科学引文数据库》来源期刊、《中国人文社会科学引文数据库》来源期刊、《中国学术期刊综合评价数据库》来源期刊;中国社会科学院文献信息中心《中国人文社会科学核心期刊》;南京大学社会科学数据库研究开发中心《中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)》统计源期刊;《中国学术期刊文摘》源期刊;被北京地区高校期刊工作研究会和北京大学图书馆选录为心理学类核心期刊,编入《中文核心期刊要目总览》(2017年版)。《心理学报》的读者对象为从事心理学、工程、生物学、医学、教育学及哲学的科技工作者、大专院校师生及其他有关人员。     

积极心理学研究综述--心理学研究的一个新思潮

积极心理学(Positive Psychology)是美国心理学界兴起的一个新的研究领域,现在受到越来越多的研究者的关注。本文介绍了积极心理学的产生背景,基本内容,价值与意义,并在此基础上指出了今后的研究任务。     

GROUP RESEARCH TRENDS IN SOCIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY:

We report the results of an archival study of group research published in three organizational psychology journals (Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, and Academy of Management Journal) from 1975 through 1994 Moreland, Hogg, and Hains (1994), in a review of three social psychology journals (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin), suggested there is an increasing enthusiasm for the social psychological study of groups However, their data relations. We tested the proposal that research traditionally viewed as intragroup (e g, group performance) has been taken up by organizational psychologists. Our data support this contention, as the publication Pattern for intragroup research topics in the three organizational journals was an inverse of that reported by Moreland et al. Results are discussed in terms of historical and interdisciplinary     

The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections

The seven articles in this issue, and the accompanying meta-analysis in Health Psychology Review [McEachan, R.R.C., Conner, M., Taylor, N., & Lawton, R.J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 97-144], illustrate the wide application of the theory of planned behaviour [Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211] in the health domain. In this editorial, Ajzen reflects on some of the issues raised by the different authors. Among the topics addressed are the nature of intentions and the limits of predictive validity; rationality, affect and emotions; past behaviour and habit; the prototype/willingness model; and the role of such background factors as the big five personality traits and social comparison tendency.     

The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections

The seven articles in this issue, and the accompanying meta-analysis in Health Psychology Review [McEachan, R.R.C., Conner, M., Taylor, N., & Lawton, R.J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 97–144], illustrate the wide application of the theory of planned behaviour [Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211] in the health domain. In this editorial, Ajzen reflects on some of the issues raised by the different authors. Among the topics addressed are the nature of intentions and the limits of predictive validity; rationality, affect and emotions; past behaviour and habit; the prototype/willingness model; and the role of such background factors as the big five personality traits and social comparison tendency.     

Extending Corporate Social Responsibility Research to the Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior Domains: A Look to the Future

Although issues of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have become an important topic of research, there have been few studies on this topic conducted in the fields of human resource (HR) management and organizational behavior (OB). To address this gap, we edited a special issue of Personnel Psychology that explicitly focuses attention on CSR in the HR/OB domains. In this introductory editorial, we synthesize and extend the four articles published in the special issue. We also address issues relating to the conceptualization and measurement of CSR, the application of microlevel theories to CSR, and the practical and methodological implications of research in this domain. Finally, we provide suggestions for future research linking CSR with some of the most frequently studied topics in HR/OB. We propose that a focus on HR/OB will improve our understanding of the antecedents and consequences of CSR and also benefit HR/OB in terms of bridging the science–practice and micro–macro gaps.     

Discovering corporate consciousness

This paper attempts to first define the concept of corporate consciousness and to locate it within a nomological net of related concepts. It is found that corporate consciousness may be an identifiable concept, but its differentiation from such related constructs as corporate social responsibility is unclear. Second, some methodological issues related to the study of corporate consciousness are discussed such as level of analysis, measurement, and discriminant validity. Third, to help researchers decide if corporate consciousness should be studied, a general set of criteria for selecting research topics is presented, and corporate consciousness is evaluated briefly within that context.This paper is based on Michael A. Campion's keynote address delivered at the Fifteenth Annual Industrial/Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (IOOB) Graduate Student Conference, Chicago IL, March 4 to March 6, 1994.The authors would like to extend special thanks for ideas and suggestions to the Executive Committee of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology at their Spring, 1994 meeting, and to the following doctoral students at the Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN: Lynda Aiman-Smith, Richard Davies, Ken Harding, Carl Maertz, Stan Malos, and Hwee Hoon Tan. The authors also wish to acknowledge the helpful and insightful comments of two anonymous reviewers regarding an earlier draft of this paper, as well as the editorial assistance and comment of Dale Rose.     

Behavior analytic contributions to public health and telehealth

The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis is launching a special series on the topics of public health and telehealth. The special series begins with the articles in this issue and will continue for the next 2 to 3 issues with an open submission window until September 1, 2020. Behavior analysis has much to offer with respect to public health and much to gain from continued and expanded use of telehealth. This paper outlines the importance of these topics in the current crisis and in our ongoing evolution as a field. The historical literature in behavior analysis is reviewed for each topic along with suggestions for future research. The articles from the special series will be combined with historical contributions from JABA into a virtual issue. We encourage continued submissions on these topics even after the special series is completed as future papers will also be incorporated into the special issue.     

An evaluation of the quantity and quality of empirical research in three pastoral care and counseling journals, 1990-1999: has anything changed?

This article summarizes a review of all articles published in Pastoral Psychology, The Journal of Rleigion and Health, and The Journal of Pastoral Care between 1900 and 1999, identifying a total of 737 scholarly articles, of which 165 (22.4%) were research studies. The proportion of research studies, especially quantitative studies, increased significantly between the first and second half of the study period (p < .05). There was a significant positive correlation between compliance with three out of four criteria of internal validity. Three of five criteria of external validity were also positively related to one another. Compared to previous research using identical criteria to assess quantitative studies in the same journals in 1980-1989, the 1990-1999 sample showed improved compliance with respect to specifying the sampling method (p < .001), reporting the response rate (p < .05), and discussing the limitations of research studies (p < .001). However, the overall findings suggest that many researchers in the field do not have a sophisticated knowledge of statistical sampling, statistical analysis, or research design. Several recommendations for increasing the quality of quantitative research are offered.     

The story of this special issue on critical perspectives in work and organizational psychology

In this editorial, we tell the story of how the Special Issue on Critical Perspectives in Work and Organizational Psychology (CWOP) came about, how it fits within the broader agenda of building a critical community within Work and Organizational Psychology, and how future research and thought may be inspired by the collection of critical papers related to work and organizational psychology. We introduce the term “criticalizing” as a key concept in how the Special Issue was developed by the editorial team and the authors. Criticalizing moves beyond fixed static notions of “critical” scholarship toward a process of engaging in more fluid, expansive, and creative perspectives on the scholarship within work and organizational psychology. We illustrate how the set of papers within the Special Issue engages in such criticalizing of the field and offer new ways of thinking about and researching relevant topics in work and organizational psychology.     

THE APPLICATION OF EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS

Although factor analysis has been a major contributing factor in advancing psychological research, a systematic assessment of how it has been applied is lacking. For this review we examined the Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , and Personnel Psychology over a ten-year period (1975–1984) and located 152 studies that employed factor analysis. We then analyzed the choices made by the researchers concerning factor model, retention criteria, rotation, interpretation of factors and other issues relevant to factor analysis. The results indicate that choices made by researchers have generally been poor and that reporting practices have not allowed for informed review, cumulation of results, or replicability. A comparison of results by time interval (1975–1979; 1980–1984) revealed minimal differences in choices made or the quality of reporting practices. Suggestions for improving the use of factor analysis and the reporting of results are presented.     

RESEARCH SETTINGS IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: FACTS,FALLACIES, AND THE FUTURE1,2,3

Data were collected about research issues involving laboratory and field settings through a content analysis of the 1966, 1970, and 1974 volumes of the Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, and Personnel Psychology. Four general categories of data were collected: (a) affiliation of investigators, (b) topic areas investigated, (c) settings of the research, and (d) research strategies employed. Four common beliefs of either laboratory or field advocates were contradicted by the data. First, laboratory research was found fairly frequently in the industrial-organizational literature. Second, theory and hypothesis testing were not overemphasized. Third, laboratory research was as applied as field research. Lastly, studies published by researchers with nonacademic affiliations were as likely to have been conducted in laboratory settings as field settings. Recommendations were made to use the laboratory more frequently for theory and hypothesis based research and to use a variety of research strategies in both laboratory and field settings.