当代中学生价值取向现状的调查研究

对来自北京、河北、山西、内蒙、山东、安徽、福建等7省市的958名初三至高三的中学生进行了价值取向的测量,并对中学生价值取向在性别、年级和生存状态等因素方面的特点进行了分析。结果表明：1．中学生的价值取向总体上是积极向上的,他们在重视正义公理和社会规范的同时,也重视对个人品德的要求和自我各项的发展;2．不同亚群体中学生的价值取向之间存在一定的差异。     

大学生择业价值取向调查问卷的编制及初步研究

通过对影响大学生职业决策因素的基线调查,编制大学生择业价值取向调查问卷,进而分析影响大学生职业选择的因素及大学生择业观。结果表明(1)影响大学生职业决策的因素依次为工资福利、自我价值的实现、专业及个人兴趣、工作环境、社会需要、工作稳定性、生活环境等;(2)量表具有较高的信度和效度;(3)大学生择业价值观具有社会取向和个人取向两个维度,而且大学生更倾向于个人取向;(4)不同性别大学生择业价值观并不存在显著性差异,但对择业标准的认识上可能不同。     

当代大学生价值观取向的问题分析及对策

经济全球化背景下各种思潮不断涌入,与中国的传统价值现和马克思主义的价值观发生着激烈的碰撞,大学生的价值现取向也发生了一定的变化.当代大学生价值取向总体上呈现出多元化的趋势,主导价值观日趋弱化,这是由国际因素、国内因素、教育因素、家庭因素等诸多因素的影响造成的.引导大学生树立正确的价值观,应当引导他们树立社会主义主导价值观,坚定他们的理想信念;创新高校德育工作,提高德育的时效性;实施全方位引导的有效机制.     

专业人员价值取向的现状研究

对8省市的428位专业人员所进行的价值取向研究表明,我国专业人员的价值取向总体倾向是积极向上,与社会期待相符合的,重视社会责任、工作、公众利益、法律规范、感情和家庭的价值;性别、文化程度和年龄等人口统计学因素显著影响专业人员的价值取向的个别侧面,但收入水平、婚姻状况和家庭结构的作用不显著。     

家庭因素对大学毕业生就业的影响

目前,大学生就业问题已越来越引起社会、家庭以及个人的重视。本文分析了“家庭因素与大学毕业生就业之间的关系”的现象与问题,发现了家庭因素对大学生就业观念的形成与职业的选择上有一定的影响。应积极发挥家庭因素在大学毕业生就业过程中的作用;同时,也建议家庭在合理范围内影响大学毕业生的就业,而国家和社会应致力于公平就业环境的塑造,使家庭因素在合理、可控范围内发挥作用。     

青少年学生自我价值感特点的初步研究

采用《青少年学生自我价值感量表》对初中一年级到大学四年级共２１８７名青少年学生进行问卷调查,结果发现：（１）不同年级的学生在总体自我价值感、社会取向和个人取得的自我价值感方面差异极显著。（２）男生个人取向的自我价值感显著高于女生,女生社会取向的自我价值感则显著高于男生;男生个人取向的道德价值感高于女生,女生的社会取向的道德价值感则高于男生。（３）重点中学的学生在总体自我价值感、社会取向和个人取向的自我价值感、个人取向的家庭价值感以及社会取向的心理价值感、家庭价值感方面均显著高于非重点中学的学生。     

当代大学生价值观的离散选择模型分析

本研究使用离散选择模型方法对3,796名在校大学生的Rokeach Value Survey数据进行了分析,结果表明当代大学生在终极价值观方面最偏好合家安宁、幸福、快乐、自由和自尊,而在工具性价值方面最偏好诚实的、有能力的、负责任的和胸怀宽广的,反映了重视家庭价值,强调个人品质等传统文化特点的回归,也体现出了社会经济文化快速发展背景下的社会适应意义;女性与男性价值观偏好的基本走向差别不大,女性相对更具时代特点,男性相对更为传统;年龄因素对终极性价值观的效应相对于工具性价值观更明显.     

大学生生命认知和生命价值取向的发展特点

在生命教育的社会背景下,以上海四所高校的一年级和三年级的812名在校本科生为研究对象,运用造句和模拟遗书等投射方式,并结合小组访谈等形式,旨在测查大学生对生命过程与死亡现象的认知特征,及对生命意义的价值取向,以此探究当代大学生的生命认知和生命价值取向的发展特点。结果发现：（1）当代大学生对生命的认知以表达态度为主,具有积极向上、珍爱生命的特点;而在对死亡的认知上,则主要采用本质认知的方式进行表述,以中性、概括、简洁为主要特点;（2）总体来看,女生比男生对生命过程和死亡现象的认知更为积极,体悟更深;（3）在生命价值取向方面,当大学生更多地表现出关顾他人的价值取向,并伴有强烈的家庭责任意识。     

中晚期青少年的个人规划及其与亲子、朋友沟通的关系

采用未来取向问卷（中文版）、亲子沟通和朋友沟通问卷调查了1741名高中生和大学生,从探索和投入两个方面考察了中晚期青少年个人规划的基本特点以及亲子沟通、朋友沟通与个人规划的关系。研究发现：青少年对未来教育的探索和投入水平高于未来职业和婚姻/家庭;从青少年中期到晚期,个体对不同领域的探索与投入遵循不同的发展模式;女青少年对未来教育的投入更多,而男青少年对未来婚姻/家庭的探索和投入更多;城市青少年对未来教育的探索和投入更多,而农村青少年对未来婚姻/家庭的投入更多。亲子沟通对中晚期青少年成就领域的规划具有较大影响,且影响大于朋友沟通,而朋友沟通对青少年未来婚姻/家庭规划的影响更大     

社会价值取向滑块测验中文版的测量学分析

以大学生群体为样本,对社会价值取向滑块测验(The Slider Measure)中文版的心理测量学特征进行分析,并考察大学生社会价值取向分布的一般特点。研究结果发现滑块测验中文版的重测信度为0.76,与三优势测验的聚合效度为0.57;大学生社会价值取向的分布表现为亲社会者最多,个人主义者次之,竞争者最少的模式,且绝大多数亲社会者行为动机为追求双方相对收益最小化的平等取向;社会价值取向的类型分布在性别与是否独生子女维度上表现出较高的同质性与一致性。社会价值取向滑块测验中文版具有较好的信效度,可以作为测量中国大学生社会价值取向的有效工具。     

工读学校学生的心理健康状况及其影响因素研究

本研究以工读学校和普通学校七～九年级学生为研究对象,研究工读学校学生的心理健康状况及其影响因素。结果表明：(1)工读学校学生的总体焦虑水平和抑郁水平显著高于普通中学生,存在更多的心理健康问题;(2)工读学校学生的心理健康水平不存在显著的年级差异,而普通中学生的心理健康水平存在显著的年级差异;(3)父母的教养方式与工读学校学生的心理健康水平存在显著的相关。工读学校学生的父母更多地采取消极的教养方式;(4)生活事件应激与工读学校学生的心理健康水平存在极其显著的负相关。工读学校学生负性生活事件所带来的应激强度显著高于普通中学生。     

The Impact of Authoritative, Authoritarian, and Permissive Parenting Styles on Children’s Later Mental Health in Japan: Focusing on Parent and Child Gender

Few studies in Japan have examined whether children’s later mental health is influenced by the way parental authority is exercised, specifically with a focus on gender. Our main purposes of this study were to confirm the three-factor structure of the Japanese version of the Parental Authority Questionnaire (PAQ) and to verify its reliability and validity. We then used structural equation modeling to examine whether children’s later mental health was influenced by parents’ authoritative, permissive, and authoritarian parenting. The subcategories included in the Japanese version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure were chosen as mental health indices. A total of 1,320 people in Japan, including company employees, university students, and hospital staff members, were asked to recall and evaluate the parenting they received and to report on their current mental health. Confirmatory factor analyses verified the three-factor structure of the Japanese version of the PAQ, with a reduction in the number of items from the original version. The respondents, regardless of gender, evaluated their mothers as having been more authoritative than their fathers. Concerning the impact of parenting styles on respondents’ later mental health, both maternal and paternal authoritarian parenting styles worsened respondents’ later mental health, including symptomatic problems, risk to self and others, life functioning, and psychological well-being. Both maternal and paternal authoritative parenting had a beneficial impact on respondents’ later mental health. Simultaneous analyses of multi-groups demonstrated that the nature of these influences did not vary with respondent gender. We present the above results in detail, and discuss them from psycho-socio-cultural viewpoints.     

轻度智障学生心理健康教育干预的形式与方法

轻度智障学生具有学习焦虑、孤独感、好责备自己、缺乏主动性和积极性等心理健康方面的问题。产生这些问题的原因有个体因素、父母教养因素和学校教育因素等。针对这些问题,教育者使用多种辅导形式和方法进行干预,使轻度智障学生的心理健康水平得以提高与改善。本文最后提出了在进行教育干预时需注意的一些问题,为学校开展该方面工作提供参考。     

问题学生的自尊及其相关因素研究

本研究以初一至初三年级的235名问题学生和143名普通学生为对象,对问题学生的自尊及其相关因素进行了研究。结果表明：(1)问题学生的自尊除初三外一般比普通学生低,这与普通学生在初三自尊的显著降低有关;(2)问题学生的自尊不存在显著的年级或年龄差异,而普通学生的自尊表现出明显的随年龄增长下降的趋势;(3)问题学生的父母教养方式和生活事件所带来的应激与其自尊的发展存在极其显著的相关,问题学生的负性生活事件应激强度显著高于普通学生;(4)问题学生的自尊与其心理健康水平存在非常显著的相关。提示自尊发展是影响问题学生心理健康状况的重要因素之一。     

The relationship between parenting styles and young adults' self-concepts and evaluations of parents.

In the present study, 123 college students were surveyed in order to assess their self-concepts, evaluations of parents, and perceptions of their parents' parenting styles. Notably, the students' self-concepts were found to vary directly with perceived level of parental warmth, but did not vary as a function of their parents' level of restrictiveness. Fathers and mothers were found to be rated more highly if they were perceived as being warm and permissive rather than hostile and restrictive. Finally, opposite-sex parents' level of warmth also correlated with how each parent was evaluated. Some explanations for these findings are offered.     

On the development of regulatory focus: the role of parenting styles

The present study was designed to contribute to our understanding of the development of chronic self‐regulatory orientations reflecting self‐regulation with a promotion and prevention focus, respectively. Little research addressed this issue empirically, although regulatory focus theory (RFT) explicitly entails assumptions concerning the role of parenting styles in the development of habitual self‐regulatory orientations. According to RFT, parenting styles involving a critical and punitive mode that is focused on attaining safety and meeting obligations increases the likelihood that the child will acquire a predominantly prevention‐focused style of self‐regulation. In contrast, parenting styles involving a bolstering mode that is focused on accomplishing ideal goals and fulfilling aspirations increases the likelihood that the child will acquire a predominantly promotion‐focused style of self‐regulation. To test these assumptions, the present study assessed via self‐reports the degree to which participants experienced different parenting styles as well as their chronic self‐regulatory focus. The results reveal positive associations between the critical and punitive parenting style and prevention‐focused self‐regulation and between the bolstering parenting style and promotion‐focused self‐regulation thus corroborating the propositions of RFT. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

城乡父母养育方式与大学生自我概念的关系研究

通过调查689名大学生的父母养育方式和自我概念,考察不同地域父母养育方式与大学生自我概念的关系。结果表明：城市女生比农村女生感受到父母更多的温暖理解和过度保护、更少的偏爱,而城乡男大学生在父母养育方式上没有差异;城市大学生在自我概念各维度上得分均高于农村大学生,而这种差异在女大学生中尤其明显。父母温暖理解对子女的自我概念有正向影响,而拒绝否认和过度保护对子女自我概念有负向影响;城市大学生的自我概念发展主要受父亲养育方式影响,而农村大学生的自我概念发展同时受父亲和母亲养育方式的影响。     

父母教养方式与中学生自我调节学习的关系

该研究采用中文版父母养育方式评价量表（EMBU）和在Pintrich的动机学习策略量袁基础上自编的自我调节学习量表,探讨了父母教养方式与中学生自我调节学习的关系。研究发现：（1）父母教养方式中的情感因素对中学生自我调节学习有显著的影响：情感温暖因素对认知／元认知策略以及资源管理策略因素有显著的影响;惩罚严厉因素对学习价值和学习期待因素有显著的影响。（2）母亲的教养方式较父亲的教养方式对中学生的自我调节学习影响更大。     

Teachers' Epistemic Authority: Perceptions of Students and Teachers

The present study examines students' perception of the teacher's role as epistemic authorities, that is, a source of determinative influence on the formation of individuals' knowledge, from three perspectives. First, it examines 7th and 10th graders' perception of their teachers as epistemic authorities. The results showed that a teacher's subject matter, as well as students' age and gender, influence perception of him/her as an epistemic authority. In addition, interest in the subject matter was found to be an important predictor of students' perception. The second part focuses on teachers' self-perceptions as epistemic authorities. The results indicated that teachers' personal efficacy is the most powerful predictor of their self-perception. Finally, the study compares students' perceptions of teachers as epistemic authorities, teachers' self-perceptions in these terms and teachers' perceptions of how their students perceive them. Two main findings showed the following: (a) teachers perceive themselves as being more of an epistemic authority than their students consider them; (b) teachers believe that students perceive them as being more of an epistemic authority than the students actually think.     

Perceptions of family relations when mothers and fathers are depicted with different parenting styles

College students (N = 125) reported their perceptions of family relations in response to vignettes that presented 5 different parenting styles. Participants viewed family relations as most positive when parents were portrayed as authoritative or permissive and as most negative when parents were portrayed as uninvolved-neglecting or authoritarian. Student gender and parent gender effects qualified these findings. Female students reported family relations to be less positive than did male students when parents were depicted as authoritarian or as uninvolved-neglecting, and they rated family relations more positively than did male students when parents were depicted as permissive. Participants viewed family relations as more positive when mothers rather than fathers were presented as permissive and when fathers rather than mothers were depicted as authoritarian. The authors discuss the findings of the study in relation to theories of beliefs about children and implications for future parenting styles of male and female college students.