共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Stefano Predelli 《Journal of Philosophical Logic》2010,39(1):5-21
In this essay, I propose an analysis of Quine’s example ’Giorgione was so-called because of his size’, grounded on the idea
of an obstinate demonstrative. In the first sections, I discuss the advantages and drawbacks of the demonstrative and logophoric
treatments of ‘so called’, I highlight certain parallelisms with Davidson’s paratactic view of quotation, and I introduce
independent considerations in favor of the idea of an obstinate demonstrative. In the second half of my essay, I apply this
notion to Quine’s example, and I discuss its consequences with respect to the principle of substitutivity of coreferential
singular terms. 相似文献
2.
Jack Ritchie 《Synthese》2008,162(1):85-100
Structural realism is an attempt to balance the competing demands of the No Miracles Argument and the Pessimistic Meta-Induction.
In this paper I trace the development of the structuralist idea through the work of one of its leading advocates, John Worrall.
I suggest that properly thought through what the structuralist is offering or should be offering is not an account of how
to divide up a theory into two parts—structure and ontology—but (perhaps surprisingly) a certain kind of theory of meaning—semantic
holism. I explain how a version of structural realism can be developed using Davidson’s theory of meaning and some advantages
this has over the Ramsey-sentence version of structuralism. 相似文献
3.
Nathaniel Goldberg 《Philosophia》2009,37(2):261-280
Donald Davidson used triangulation to do everything from explicate psychological and semantic externalism, to attack relativism
and skepticism, to propose conditions necessary for thought and talk. At one point Davidson tried to bring order to these
remarks by identifying three kinds of triangulation, each operative in a different situation. Here I take seriously Davidson’s
talk of triangular situations and extend it. I start by describing Davidson’s situations. Next I establish the surprising
result that considerations from one situation entail the possibility that at any one time one language is partially untranslatable
into another. Because the possibility is time-indexed, it need not conflict with Davidson’s own argument against the possibility
of untranslatability. I derive the result, not to indict Davidson, but to propose a new kind of triangulation, the reconciliation
of untranslatability, which I investigate. Insofar as triangulation is central to Davidson’s views, getting a handle on his
various triangular situations is key to getting a handle on his contributions to philosophy. Insofar as those contributions
have enriched our understanding of how language, thought, and reality interrelate, extending Davidson’s model promises to
extend our understanding too.
相似文献
Nathaniel GoldbergEmail: |
4.
In Intentionality and other works, John Searle establishes himself as a leading defender of the view that consciousness of what one is doing
is always a component of one’s action. In this paper I focus on problems with Searle’s view to establish that there are actions
in which the agent is not at all aware of what she is doing. I argue that any theory that misses this sort of action keeps
us from important insights into autonomy, self-knowledge and responsibility.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
5.
Arpy Khatchirian 《Philosophical Studies》2009,146(2):197-221
One might take the significance of Davidson’s indeterminacy thesis to be that the question as to which language we can take
another to be speaking can only be settled relative to our choice of an acceptable theory for interpreting the speaker. This,
in turn, could be taken to show that none of us is ever speaking a determinate language. I argue that this result is self-defeating
and cannot avoid collapse into a troubling skepticism about meaning. I then offer a way of trying to make sense of the idea
that some utterances do belong to determinate languages even though there is no determinate language one can take another
to be speaking. This, however, results in an uninviting picture of communication in which no speaker is really in a position
to say what another’s words mean. 相似文献
6.
There is a common-sense view of language, which is held by Wittgenstein, Strawson Dummett, Searle, Putnam, Lewis, Wiggins,
and others. According to this view a language consists of conventions, it is rule-governed, rules are conventionalised, a
language is learnt, there are general learning mechanisms in the brain, and so on. I shall call this view the ‘ordinary language’
view of language. Chomsky’s attitude towards this view of language has been rather negative, and his rejection of it is a
major motivation for the development of his own theory. In this paper I shall review Chomsky’s long-standing criticisms. I
shall show that (1)Chomsky’s argument does not constitute a dismissal of the ‘ordinarylanguage’ view of language, (2) Chomsky’s
conclusions about language do not follow from his argument, and (3) the ‘ordinary language’ view actually points to a promising
way for us to understand the true nature of language and mind.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
7.
Andrea Zhok 《Husserl Studies》2011,27(3):227-256
The essay discusses Donald Davidson’s concept of anomalous monism in the framework of Husserlian phenomenology. It develops
in four stages. Section 1 is devoted to a critical presentation of the argument for anomalous monism. Section 2 succinctly examines those Husserlian notions that best provide the ground for a discussion parallel to Davidson’s. In Sect.
3, the aporetic status of “mental causation” is analyzed by providing a genetic-phenomenological account of efficient causation.
Section 4 draws some general conclusions concerning the kind of efficaciousness that must be attributed to consciousness and discusses
the sense in which anomalous monism can be defended in a phenomenological framework, but not in a naturalistic one. 相似文献
8.
G. Contessa 《Philosophical Studies》2007,136(2):217-248
Hanoch Ben-Yami has argued that the theory of the semantics of natural kind terms proposed by Kripke and Putnam is false and
has proposed an allegedly novel account of the semantics of kind terms. In this article, I critically examine Ben-Yami’s arguments.
I will argue that Ben-Yami’s objections do not show that Kripke and Putnam’s theory is false, but at most that the specific
versions of it held by Kripke and Putnam have some weaknesses. Moreover, I will argue that Ben-Yami’s account is not a novel
account but it is only an unsatisfactory version of Kripke and Putnam’s theory. 相似文献
9.
Since it first appeared, there has been much research and critical discussion on the theory of optimal data selection as an explanation of Wason’s (1966, 1968) selection task (Oaksford & Chater, 1994). In this paper, this literature is reviewed, and the theory of optimal data selection is reevaluated in its light. The information gain model is first located in the current theoretical debate in the psychology of reasoning concerning dual processes in human reasoning. A model comparison exercise is then presented that compares a revised version of the model with its theoretical competitors. Tests of the novel predictions of the model are then reviewed. This section also reviews experiments claimed not to be consistent with optimal data selection. Finally, theoretical criticisms of optimal data selection are discussed. It is argued either that the revised model accounts for them or that they do not stand up under analysis. It is concluded that some version of the optimal data selection model still provides the best account of the selection task. Consequently, the conclusion of Oaksford and Chater’s (1994) original rational analysis (Anderson, 1990), that people’s hypothesis-testing behavior on this task is rational and well adapted to the environment, still stands. 相似文献
10.
Hans-Johann Glock 《Philosophia》2009,37(4):653-668
This paper considers the connection between concepts, conceptual schemes and grammar in Wittgenstein’s last writings. It lists
eight claims about concepts that one can garner from these writings. It then focuses on one of them, namely that there is
an important difference between conceptual and factual problems and investigations. That claim draws in its wake other claims,
all of them revolving around the idea of a conceptual scheme, what Wittgenstein calls a ‘grammar’. I explain why Wittgenstein’s
account does not fall prey to Davidson’s animadversions against the idea of a conceptual scheme as a force operating on a
pre-conceptual content. In the sequel I deny that the distinction between grammatical and empirical propositions disappears
in the last writings: it is neither deliberately abandoned, nor willy-nilly undermined by the admission of hinge propositions
in On Certainty or by the role accorded to agreement in judgement. 相似文献
11.
It is estimated that there could be 200 million‘environmental refugees’ by the middle of this century. One major environmental
cause of population displacement is likely to be global climate change. As the situation is likely to become more pressing,
it is vital to consider now the rights of environmental refugees and the duties of the rest of the world. However, this is
not an issue that has been addressed in mainstream theories of global justice. This paper considers the potential of two leading
liberal theories of international justice to address the particular issues raised by the plight of potential and actual environmental
refugees. I argue that neither John Rawls’s ‘Law of Peoples’ approach nor Charles Beitz’s `cosmopolitanism' is capable of
providing an adequate account of justice in this context. Beitz’s theory does have some advantages over Rawls’s approach but
it fails to take proper account of the attachment that some people have to their own ‘home’.
This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
12.
Per Sandin 《Philosophia》2009,37(1):153-167
This paper discusses the application of the supreme emergency doctrine from just-war theory to non-antagonistic threats. Two
versions of the doctrine are considered: Michael Walzer’s communitarian version and Brian Orend’s prudential one. I investigate
first whether the doctrines are applicable to non-antagonistic threats, and second whether they are defensible. I argue that
a version of Walzer’s doctrine seems to be applicable to non-antagonistic threats, but that it is very doubtful whether the
doctrine is defensible. I also argue that Orend’s version of the doctrine is applicable to non-antagonistic threats, but that
his account is not defensible, regardless of whether the threats are antagonistic or not.
相似文献
Per SandinEmail: |
13.
Annika Wallin 《Synthese》2011,178(3):503-514
Revised simulation theory (Goldman 2006) allows mental state attributions containing some or all of the attributor’s genuine,
non-simulated mental states. It is thought that this gives the revised theory an empirical advantage, because unlike theory
theory and rationality theory, it can explain egocentric bias (the tendency to over attribute ones’ own mental states to others).
I challenge this view, arguing that theory theory and rationality theory can explain egocentricity by appealing to heuristic
mindreading and the diagnosticity of attributors’ own beliefs, and that these explanations are as simple and consistent as
those provided by revised simulation theory. 相似文献
14.
WANG Lu 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2008,3(1):83-98
Research into logical syntax provides us the knowledge of the structure of sentences, while logical semantics provides a window
into uncovering the truth of sentences. Therefore, it is natural to make sentences and truth the central concern when one
deals with the theory of meaning logically. Although their theories of meaning differ greatly, both Michael Dummett’s theory
and Donald Davidson’s theory are concerned with sentences and truth and developed in terms of truth. Logical theories and
methods first introduced by G. Frege underwent great developments during the past century and have played an important role
in expanding these two scholars’ theories of meaning.
Translated by Ma Minghui from Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究 (Philosophical Research), 2006, (7): 53–61 相似文献
15.
Valer Ambrus 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1999,30(1):1-16
Putnam originally developed his causal theory of meaning in order to support scientific realism and reject the notion of incommensurability.
Later he gave up this position and adopted instead what he called ‘internal realism’, but apparently without changing his
mind on topics related to his former philosophy of language. The question must arise whether internal realism, which actually
is a species of antirealism, is compatible with the causal theory of meaning. In giving an answer I begin with an analysis
of the content and metaphysical background of scientific realism. I show that it presupposes metaphysical realism and that
Putnam's philosophical conversion is due to his becoming aware of the latter's incoherence. After giving a brief sketch of
internal realism I conclude by arguing that within this new theoretical framework the causal theory of meaning loses its force
as a weapon against incommensurability.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
16.
The idea of the “nation” has played only a small role in modern political philosophy because of its apparent irrationalism
and amoralism. David Miller, however, sets out to show that these charges can be overcome: nationality is a rational element
of one’s cultural identity, and nations are genuinely ethical communities. In this paper I argue that his project fails. The
defence against the charge of irrationalism fails because Miller works within a framework of ethical particularism which leads
to a position of metaethical relativism. A consequence of this relativism is that a community’s moral principles and boundaries
of exclusion cannot be rationally justified to those constructed as “outsiders”. The defence against the charge of amoralism
fails because Miller does not so much provide an argument to show that nations are ethical communities as assume they are;
we are therefore left without resources to discriminate between ethical and unethical nations. I apply these problems to Miller’s
treatment of the question of immigration, arguing that it shows that his version of “liberal” nationalism has a tendency to
collapse towards a conservative position on such issues. This should not give us any great confidence that the nation, as
Miller presents it, should be embraced by modern political philosophy.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
17.
Bengt Brülde 《Journal of Happiness Studies》2007,8(1):15-49
The paper starts with a presentation of the pure happiness theory, i.e. the idea that the quality of a person’s life is dependent
on one thing only, viz. how happy that person is. To find out whether this type of theory is plausible or not, I examine the
standard arguments for and against this theory, including Nozick’s experience machine argument. I then investigate how the
theory can be modified in order to avoid the most serious objections. I first examine different types of epistemic modifications
of the theory (e.g. the idea that a person’s happiness is more valuable for her if it is based on a correct perception of
her own life), and then turn to a number of modifications which all make the value of a person’s happiness depend on whether
the evaluative standard on which her happiness is based satisfies certain requirements. In connection with this, I present
and defend my own modified version of the happiness theory. 相似文献
18.
Laurance J. Splitter 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》2011,30(4):343-362
I take as my starting point recent concerns from within educational psychology about the need to treat the conceptual and
philosophical underpinnings of empirical research in the field more seriously, specifically in the context of work on the
self, mind and agency. Developing this theme, I find such conceptual support in the writings of P. F. Strawson and Donald
Davidson, two giants of analytic philosophy in the second half of the Twentieth Century. Drawing particularly on Davidson’s
later work, in which he seeks to integrate key claims about subjectivity, objectivity, belief, truth and knowledge, within
what he refers to as a triangular framework of two speakers and a common world, I find support for pedagogic and classroom
organizational structures based on collaborative thinking and dialogue. While Davidson did not write about education, I argue
that his framework has much to offer, most particularly in view of the priority it affords language and dialogue as the necessary
and sufficient conditions for reason, belief and thought—in short, for being a person in the world. 相似文献
19.
Joshua Gert 《The Journal of Ethics》2012,16(1):15-34
Alan Goldman’s Reasons from Within is one of the most thorough recent defenses of what might be called ‘orthodox internalism’ about practical reasons. Goldman’s
main target is an opposing view that includes a commitment to the following two theses: (O) that there are such things as
objective values, and (E) that these values give rise to external reasons. One version of this view, which we can call ‘orthodox
externalism’, also includes a commitment to the thesis (I) that rational people will be motivated by any reason they have
of which they are aware. Goldman himself embraces (I), and deploys it frequently in his criticisms of orthodox externalism.
But there is logical space for an externalist view that includes a commitment to (O) and (E), but that denies (I). The resulting
“hyperexternalist” view holds that some reasons need not motivate us, even if we are rational. In this paper I argue that
Goldman’s criticisms of orthodox externalism leave hyperexternalism untouched, and that his specific criticisms of my own
version of hyperexternalism do not work. In light of Goldman’s criticisms of orthodox externalism and my own criticisms of
Goldman’s view, hyperexternalism emerges as the favored option. 相似文献
20.
Nam-In Lee 《Husserl Studies》2010,26(2):131-145
In this paper, I will examine the possibility of first philosophy from a phenomenological point of view. I will do this by
assessing Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect. 1, I will delineate Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect. 2, I will introduce Levinas’s conception of ethics as first philosophy and sketch out his criticism of Husserl’s conception
of first philosophy. In Sect. 3, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception and show that from a phenomenological point of view, it is possible
to develop first philosophy only in a relative sense and not in an absolute sense. The possibility of first philosophy in
a relative sense implies that both Husserl’s and Levinas’s conceptions of first philosophy have some limitations and should
be revised, since in a certain way, they are each conceived from an absolute point of view. In Sect. 4, I will show that the conception of first philosophy in a relative sense is a phenomenological one and sketch out some basic
features of first philosophy in a relative sense. 相似文献