共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Michael McKinsey 《No?s (Detroit, Mich.)》2002,36(S16):199-224
2.
Kevin Falvey 《Analysis》2000,60(265):137-142
3.
Matthew Kennedy 《No?s (Detroit, Mich.)》2011,45(1):77-102
Working from a naïve‐realist perspective, I examine first‐person knowledge of one's perceptual experience. I outline a naive‐realist theory of how subjects acquire knowledge of the nature of their experiences, and I argue that naive realism is compatible with moderate, substantial forms of first‐person privileged access. A more general moral of my paper is that treating “success” states like seeing as genuine mental states does not break up the dynamics that many philosophers expect from the phenomenon of knowledge of the mind. 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
Traditional representations of philosophy have tended to prize the role of reason in the discipline. These accounts focus
exclusively on ideas and arguments as animating forces in the field. But anecdotal evidence and more rigorous sociological
studies suggest there is more going on in philosophy. In this article, we present two hypotheses about social factors in the
field: that social factors influence the development of philosophy, and that status and reputation—and thus social influence—will
tend to be awarded to philosophers who offer rationally compelling arguments for their views. In order to test these hypotheses,
we need a more comprehensive grasp on the field than traditional representations afford. In particular, we need more substantial
data about various social connections between philosophers. This investigation belongs to a naturalized metaphilosophy, an
empirical study of the discipline itself, and it offers prospects for a fuller and more reliable understanding of philosophy. 相似文献
7.
Philosophical Studies - 相似文献
8.
Dylan Jones Clare Madden Chris Miles 《The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology》1992,44(4):645-669
Memory for visually presented items is impaired by speech that is played as an irrelevant background. The paper presents the view that changing state of the auditory material is an important prerequisite for this disruption. Four experiments studied the effects of sounds varying in complexity in an attempt to establish which features of changing state in the auditory signal lead to diminished recall. Simple unvarying or repetitive speech sounds were not sufficient to induce the irrelevant speech effect (Experiment 1): in addition, simple analogues of speech, possessing regular or irregular envelopes and using a range of carriers, failed to imitate the action of speech (Experiment 2). Variability of between-utterance phonology in the irrelevant stream (Experiment 3) emerged as a crucial factor. Moreover, predictability of the syllable sequence did not reduce the degree of disruption (Experiment 4) suggesting that supra-syllabic characteristics of the speech are of little importance. The results broadly support the idea that disruption of short-term memory only occurs when the speech stream changes in state. It is argued that disruption occurs in memory when cues to serial order based on phonological representations of heard material interfere with the phonological codes of visual origin. It is suggested that cues to changing state of the speech input contaminate those associated with items of visual origin, which are already in a phonological store. 相似文献
9.
Joseph Agassi 《Inquiry (Oslo, Norway)》2013,56(1-4):420-426
That everyone has some privileged access to some information is trivially true. The doctrine of privileged access is that I am the authority on all of my own experiences. Possibly this thesis was attacked by Wittgenstein (the thesis on the non‐existence of private languages). The thesis was refuted by Freud (I know your dreams better than you), Duhem (I know your methods of scientific discovery better than you), Malinowski (I know your customs and habits better than you), and perception theorists (I can make you see things which are not there and describe your perceptions better than you can). The significance of this rejected thesis is that it is the basis of sensationalism and thus of all inductivist and some conventionalist philosophy. 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
LAURENCE BONJOUR 《Midwest Studies In Philosophy》1994,19(1):283-300
13.
Much of contemporary scholarly opinion rejects the attempt to construct a general theory of religion (that is, its origin, structure, and functions). This view says that particular religious traditions are unique, sui generis , incommensurable, and cannot therefore be generalized. Much of contemporary opinion also rejects the attempt to explain religious phenomena using the categories and concepts of the natural and social sciences. This view says that the phenomena of religion cannot be understood apart from a recognition of "the sacred," or some element of transcendence, implying that religion cannot be naturalized. This article begins to show how the phenomena of religion can be both generalized and naturalized. 相似文献
14.
15.
RICHARD FOLEY 《Midwest Studies In Philosophy》1994,19(1):243-260
16.
17.
Privileged communication laws may exempt counselors from testifying in judicial hearings. Many counselors are not covered, however, and many exceptions to the laws exist. 相似文献
18.
19.
Kourken Michaelian 《希帕蒂亚:女权主义哲学杂志》2008,23(1):65-98
This article attempts to reconcile Sandra Harding's postmodernist standpoint theory with process reliabilism in first‐order epistemology and naturalism in metaepistemology. Postmodernist standpoint theory is best understood as consisting of an applied epistemological component and a metaepistemological component. Naturalist metaepistemology and the metaepistemological component of postmodernist standpoint theory have produced complementary views of knowledge as a socially and naturally located phenomenon and have converged on a common concept of objectivity. The applied epistemological claims of postmodernist standpoint theory usefully can be construed as applications of process reliabilist first‐order epistemology. Postmodernist standpoint theory, reliabilism, and naturalism thus form a coherent package of views in metaepistemology, first‐order epistemology, and applied epistemology. 相似文献
20.