共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
结构主义认为,数学对象的本性是它们所属结构的基本关系通过适当的逻辑方式定义的。“消除性的”结构主义认为,可以设想通过一定的解释程序,那些我们用来指称数字和非数学对象的概念就会被数的系统中的数或集合所替代,即使那些概念指称和数完全不同的对象。而“非消除性”的结构主义认为,应该把数论和集合理论中的数、集合和其他数学对 相似文献
2.
Simon Friederich 《Erkenntnis》2010,73(1):67-81
The debate on structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics has brought into focus a question about the status of meta-mathematics.
It has been raised by Shapiro (2005), where he compares the ongoing discussion on structuralism in category theory to the Frege-Hilbert controversy on axiomatic
systems. Shapiro outlines an answer according to which meta-mathematics is understood in structural terms and one according
to which it is not. He finds both options viable and does not seem to prefer one over the other. The present paper reconsiders
the nature of the formulae and symbols meta-mathematics is about and finds that, contrary to Charles Parsons’ influential
view, meta-mathematical objects are not “quasi-concrete”. It is argued that, consequently, structuralists should extend their
account of mathematics to meta-mathematics. 相似文献
3.
4.
John Morrison 《No?s (Detroit, Mich.)》2020,54(2):290-326
I use an old challenge to motivate a new view. The old challenge is due to variation in our perceptions of secondary qualities. The challenge is to say whose perceptions are accurate. The new view is about how we manage to perceive secondary qualities, and thus manage to perceive them accurately or inaccurately. I call it perceptual structuralism . I first introduce the challenge and point out drawbacks with traditional responses. I spend the rest of the paper motivating and defending a structuralist response. While I focus on color, both the challenge and the view generalize to the other secondary qualities. 相似文献
5.
6.
Mario Rendon 《American journal of psychoanalysis》1979,39(4):343-351
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Karl-Georg Niebergall 《Synthese》2002,130(1):135-162
In this paper, the (possible) role of model theory forstructuralism and structuralist definitions of ``reduction' arediscussed. Whereas it is somewhat undecisive with respect tothe first point – discussing some pro's and con's ofthe model theoretic approach when compared with a syntacticand a structuralist one – it emphasizes that severalstructuralist definitions of ``reducibility' do not providegenerally acceptable explications of ``reducibility'. This claimrests on some mathematical results proved in this paper. 相似文献
15.
Jairo José da Silva 《Axiomathes》2010,20(2-3):229-253
In this paper I argue for the view that structuralism offers the best perspective for an acceptable account of the applicability of mathematics in the empirical sciences. Structuralism, as I understand it, is the view that mathematics is not the science of a particular type of objects, but of structural properties of arbitrary domains of entities, regardless of whether they are actually existing, merely presupposed or only intentionally intended. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.