共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
《Philosophical Investigations》1985,8(3):222-226
Book reviewed in this article:
Towards a New Sensibility, Essays of O.K. Bouwsma, edited and introduced by J.L. Craft and Ronald E. Hustwit 相似文献
Towards a New Sensibility, Essays of O.K. Bouwsma, edited and introduced by J.L. Craft and Ronald E. Hustwit 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
11.
12.
《Journal of Chinese Philosophy》1987,14(1):111-127
Book reviewed in this article:
Nagariuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way, MuIamadhyamakokarika Introduction, Sanskirt Text, Enghh Translation and Annotation by David J. Kalupahana
Marxist Humanism and Confucian Humanism: A Comparative Study of the Concept of Man, by Fung Hu-hsiang 相似文献
Nagariuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way, MuIamadhyamakokarika Introduction, Sanskirt Text, Enghh Translation and Annotation by David J. Kalupahana
Marxist Humanism and Confucian Humanism: A Comparative Study of the Concept of Man, by Fung Hu-hsiang 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
I argue in this paper that anyone who accepts the ontology of scientific realism can only accept a pragmatic theory of truth, i.e., a theory on which truth is what it is epistemically right to believe. But the combination of realism with such a theory of truth is a form of internal realism; therefore, a scientific realist should be an internal realist. The strategy of the paper is to argue that there is no adequate semantic or correspondence theory of truth compatible with a realist ontology, that a redundancy theory cannot account for the value of truth, and that the only kind of truth theory which can account for the value of truth, and is compatible with a realist ontology, is a pragmatic theory. The kind of truth theory I wish to defend is objective and naturalistic, and the ontology is realistic. My position is, therefore, one of objective, naturalistic realism. 相似文献
20.