共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
护士职业的人格特质研究 总被引:22,自引:1,他引:21
采用Y-G性格测验问卷,对临床护士和在读护生共390人,进行了心理测评,展开了护士职业的人格特质研究。研究结果表明:优秀护士群体的性格类型和某些人格特质显著地优于一般护士群体;优秀护士与一般护士间所显现出显著差异的人格特质,对于护士角色人格的构成具有决定性影响;Y-G性格测验的A型性格类型评定对于护士职业的心理选拔显现特异性趋势;整个测评研究结果,基本支持"护士个体人格特质与角色人格特质的匹配模式"等理论假设. 相似文献
2.
农村留守儿童人格特征研究 总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6
留守儿童是我国社会转型期的产物,是新时期出现的特殊儿童群体.本文采用Y-G性格测验、学生团体主题统觉测验(G-TAT)和S-K克雷佩林心理测验方法,对江西玉山县242名农村留守儿童和一般儿童的人格发展进行调查,比较分析了留守儿童和一般儿童在人格特征方面存在差异,并从亲子关系角度尝试分析了导致这些人格特征差异的原因. 相似文献
3.
优秀幼儿教师与幼专学生性格特征的比较研究 总被引:5,自引:1,他引:4
采用Y—G性格测验问卷,对优秀幼儿园教师和幼师高专学生共156人,进行了心理测评,展开了优秀幼儿园教师与幼师高专学生性格特征的比较研究。结果表明:幼儿教师的性格类型与其职业成就相关;Y—G性格测验的D型性格类型为幼儿教师的理想性格类型;幼师高专学生与优秀幼儿园教师的性格特征间存在显著差异。整个测评研究结果,为幼师高专学校招生选拨及培养学生的工作提供心理学依据。 相似文献
4.
贫困优秀学生的人格特征研究 总被引:10,自引:0,他引:10
本文以关注贫困优秀学生的全面健康发展为目的,以上海市久隆模范中学的贫困优秀学生为被试.采用中小学团体智力量表、SCL-90心理健康自评量表、Y-G人格测验、学习适应性测验四种测查工具,结果发现①贫困优秀学生具有很好的学习潜能,其学习的适应性高、学习的能动性强:②由于长期生活在贫困家庭,贫困优秀学生的心理健康水平较低,其性格也存在一定的缺陷,需要社会、学校给予更多的关心和引导;③对贫困优秀生的健康人格的培养和教育胜于知识的教育,只有一以贯之地予以心理支持方能使其知识、能力、人格和谐地发展。 相似文献
5.
6.
领导者的人格特质和行为方式——企业和学校领导者的比较 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本文运用了勒温的民主行为问卷、李克特的人—事行为问卷和Y—G 性格测验量表,调研了140名企业和学校领导者的人格特质、性格类型和行为方式.结果表明:(1)大多数企业领导者具有D 型性格和一般活动性、支配性、社会外向性的人格特质,大多数学校领导者具有C 型性格和客观性、合作性、非抑郁性的人格特质,没有一个领导者具有B 型和E 型性格;(2)具有放任型领导方式的人数最多,具有以人为中心的领导方式的领导者人数最少. 相似文献
7.
青年罪犯的人格特征研究 总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6
采用“卡特尔十六种人格因素测验”问卷,分析比较了青年罪犯与青年学生的人格特质、次元人格因素、应用人格因素。结果表明:青年罪犯与青年学生在8种人格特质(C、F、G、H、L、Q1、Q2、q)、1种次元人格因素(X2)、1种应用人格因素(Y4)上存在显著差异,提示青年罪犯确有异于同龄人的人格特征,这对青年犯罪的预防与矫治具有重要意义。 相似文献
8.
9.
目的:探讨医科大学生优秀学业表现的特征人格以及学业成绩性别差异的人格心理学原因。方法:以卡特尔16PF个性测验为测试工具,应用Spearman相关系数对医科大学生人格特质与学业成绩综合得分进行相关分析。结果:医科大学男女生的开放性分别为5.80±0.89和4.47±1.41,差别有统计学显著性(p0.001)。大学生学业成绩的高低和大学生的自律性和稳定性的相关系数分别为0.271和0.263。结论:医科男女大学生学业成绩差异主要与其开放性大小有关,大学生在校期间学业成绩分值的高低与人格特质中的自律性和稳定性大小成正比,提示加强大学生自律性和稳定性的训练有助于塑造大学生良好的人格特质。 相似文献
10.
山东省公民心理素质现状调查与分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本研究以“Y-G人格测验”为工具 ,采取分层随机抽样方法 ,对山东省部分地区公民心理素质进行了较为广泛的调查。结果显示目前该省公民心理素质存在以下几个问题 :(1 )情绪不够稳定 ;(2 )社会适应性较差 :(3 )偏于内向。文章提出了改善公民心理素质的教育对策和建议。 相似文献
11.
关于场依存性-独立性与催眠感受性及性格的比较研究 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
对场依存性独立性认知方式与催眠感受性及Y—G性格测验所评定的人格特征的相互关系进行了研究,结果表明:场依存性-独立性与催眠感受性之间不存在相关关系,提示两者为彼此独立的人格特征;在人格特质方面.场依存性者比场独立性者具有更强的社会外向性、社交活动主导性和乐天性;而场独立性者则具有较强的神经质倾向;在人格类型上,场依存性者和场独立性者均普遍表现为A、A’和D型,而C型则更可能是场独立性者所具有的特征;从人格类型的研究角度证明,内、外向性格与场依存性-独立性基本上分属两个不同的人格维度;场依存性-独立性与个体心理健康水平无关。 相似文献
12.
The biosocial model postulates that personality is comprised of two broad domains: temperament, which is largely due to inherited variations in specific monoamine neurotransmitter systems; and character, which arises from socioculturally learned differences in values, goals, and self-concepts and is the strongest predictor of personality disorders. The model also proposes that serotonin modulates the temperament trait of harm avoidance. We analyzed the association of temperament and character traits with the 5-HTTLPR, an inherited variation that modulates serotonin transporter gene expression, in 634 volunteer subjects. Contrary to theory, the 5-HTTLPR was most strongly associated with the character traits of cooperativeness and self-directedness. Associations with the temperament traits of reward dependence and harm avoidance were weaker and could be attributable largely to cross-correlations with the character traits and demographic variables. Psychometric analysis indicated that the serotonin transporter influences two broad areas of personality, negative affect and social disaffiliation, that are consistent across inventories but are more concisely described by the 5-factor model of personality than by the biosocial model. These results suggest that there is no fundamental mechanistic distinction between character and temperament in regard to the serotonin transporter gene, and that a single neurotransmitter can influence multiple personality traits. 相似文献
13.
14.
事故驾驶员与安全驾驶员人格特征的比较研究 总被引:7,自引:1,他引:6
本研究采用柳井晴夫等人编制的新性格检查问卷,对60名公交车驾驶员的人格特征进行了测量.结果表明:(1)事故组驾驶员与安全组驾驶员在五个人格特征上存在显著性差异,其中事故组驾驶员攻击性、神经质倾向较强,而持久性、协调性和同情性较差.(2)男性事故组驾驶员与安全组驾驶员在四个人格特征上存在显著性差异,其中事故组驾驶员攻击性和神经质倾向较强,但持久性和协调性较差。(3)女性事故组驾驶员与安全组驾驶员在两个人格特征上存在显著性差异,前者较后者攻击性强,但缺乏同情性.(4)性别在12项人格特征上无显著性差异.本研究结果可为设计制定专门应用于交通领域的人格测验,以及对驾驶员的选拔、培训、教育和管理提供一定的理论依据. 相似文献
15.
This study explored the relationship between two creative styles (adaptor and innovator) and the Big Five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience). 164 teachers from 3 secondary and 2 primary schools in Singapore completed a self‐report questionnaire, which consisted of the Kirton Adaption‐Innovation Inventory and the NEO‐Five Factor Inventory. It was found that adaptors were significantly more conscientious than innovators, while innovators were significantly more extraverted and open to experience than adaptors. No significant differences were found between adaptors and innovators in neuroticism and agreeableness. The study also revealed a meaningful pattern of relationships between the Big Five personality traits and the three facet scales of the KAI. Specifically, Sufficiency of Originality was negatively correlated with Openness to Experience and Extraversion; Rule Governance was positively correlated with conscientiousness but negatively correlated with openness to experience; Efficiency was positively correlated with conscientiousness. The overall findings supported the fundamental contention that different creative styles were due to different combinations of personality traits, with adaptors being more conscientious, while innovators being more extraverted and open to experience. These personality‐based differences in creative styles between adaptors and innovators had resulted in much social conflict between them. One way of resolving it is to make known the nature and value of different creative styles to these two different types of creators. 相似文献
16.
超常儿童心理与教育研究15年 总被引:16,自引:2,他引:14
中国超常儿童心理与教育的研究15年来收获如下:在理论方面:1.超常与常态儿童在不同的认知方面差异的显著性,认知构成的模式特点、及发展趋势均有不同。2.超常儿童的个性倾向和特征具有明显特点,但发展不平衡,表现为3种类型;个性特征与学习成绩相关密切。3.超常儿童的成长过程可概括为4种类型。4.超常儿童心理成分不限于高智力、创造力,还包括良好发展的个性倾向和特征。在应用方面:研究结果在鉴别和教育超常儿童等方面进行了应用和检验。 相似文献
17.
Charles P. Nichols Kennon M. Sheldon Melanie S. Sheldon 《Social and Personality Psychology Compass》2008,2(2):968-984
Personality is arguably the most integrative area of psychology; yet, it is an area about which evolutionary psychologists have had comparatively little to say. This is unfortunate because evolutionary theory holds great potential as a framework that can link together the disparate aspects that make up a person. We suggest that progress in evolutionary personality psychology will be helped by clarification of precisely what an evolutionary theory of personality would need to address. To this end, we first describe and assess some extant contributions by theorists attempting to understand personality from an evolutionary perspective. Next, we endorse a working definition of what personality entails and outline three types of personality differences – character traits, goals/motives, and selves/identities – that any comprehensive evolutionary theory of personality should address. Finally, we suggest an approach forward, one where evolved species‐typical motives orient people toward adaptive ends and result in the differentiation of individuals’ unique selves. 相似文献