共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Journal of Philosophical Logic - Why is it that even strong formal theories of truth fail to prove their own consistency? Although Field (Mind, 115, 459, 2006) has addressed this question for many... 相似文献
2.
Jan Woleński 《Axiomathes》2010,20(2-3):347-355
This paper investigates relations between truth and consistency. The basic intuition is that truth implies consistency, but the reverse dependence fails. However, this simple account leads to some troubles, due to some metalogical results, in particular the Gödel-Malcev completeness theorem. Thus, a more advanced analysis is required. This is done by employing the concept of ω-consistency and ω-inconsistency. Both concepts motivate that the concept of the standard truth should be introduced as well. The results are illustrated by an interpretation of the well-known logical square and its generalization. 相似文献
3.
Evandro Agazzi 《Studia Logica》2011,97(1):7-29
After a brief survey of the different meanings of consistency, the study is restricted to consistency understood as non-contradiction
of sets of sentences. The philosophical reasons for this requirement are discussed, both in relation to the problem of sense
and the problem of truth (also with historical references). The issue of mathematical truth is then addressed, and the different
conceptions of it are put in relation with consistency. The formal treatment of consistency and truth in mathematical logic
is then considered, with particular attention paid to the relation between syntactic and semantic properties of sets and calculi.
After the crisis of mathematical intuition and the dominance of the formalistic view, it seemed that consistency could totally
replace the requirement of truth in mathematics, also in the sense that the existence of “objects” of axiomatic systems could
be granted by their consistency. A rejection of this claim is presented, whose central point is a detailed analysis of the
theorem that any consistent set S of sentences of first order logic has a model. A critical scrutiny shows that this model is very peculiar, being offered
by the elements of the same language that is being interpreted, and the satisfiability conditions for any sentence being constituted
by the mere fact of belonging to S. Though not being insignificant from a metatheoretical point of view, this theorem fails to endow consistency (even in this
privileged case) with an “ontological creativity”, that is, with the capability of providing a model ontologically distinct
from the language itself (which is the precondition for the classical notion of truth that is also preserved in the Tarskian
semantics and model theory). A final discussion regarding the different “ontological regions” and the referential nature of
truth clarifies the different aspects of the whole issue discussed. 相似文献
4.
Carlo Nicolai 《Journal of Philosophical Logic》2016,45(1):89-119
In the paper we investigate typed (mainly compositional) axiomatizations of the truth predicate in which the axioms of truth come with a built-in, minimal and self-sufficient machinery to talk about syntactic aspects of an arbitrary base theory. Expanding previous works of the author and building on recent works of Albert Visser and Richard Heck, we give a precise characterization of these systems by investigating the strict relationships occurring between them, arithmetized model constructions in weak arithmetical systems and suitable set existence axioms. The framework considered will give rise to some methodological remarks on the construction of truth theories and provide us with a privileged point of view to analyze the notion of truth arising from compositional principles in a typed setting. 相似文献
5.
6.
Ernest Adams 《Pacific Philosophical Quarterly》2002,83(3):207-222
This paper explores the ways in which truth is better than falsehood, and suggests that, among other things, it depends on the kinds of proposition to which these values are attached. Ordinary singular propositions like "It is raining" seem to fit best the bivalent "scheme" of classical logic, the general proposition "It is always raining" is more appropriately rated according to how often it rains, and a "practically vague" proposition like "The lecture will start at 1" is appropriately rated according to its nearness to exactness. Implications for logic of this "rating system" are commented on. 相似文献
7.
8.
10.
11.
This paper examines the question of the extensional correctness of Tarskian definitions of logical truth and logical consequence.
I identify a few different informal properties which are necessary for a sentence to be an informal logical truth and look
at whether they are necessary properties of Tarskian logical truths. I examine arguments by John Etchemendy and Vann McGee
to the effect that some of those properties are not necessary properties of some Tarskian logical truths, and find them unconvincing.
I stress the point that since the hypothesis that Tarski's definitions are extensionally correct is deeply entrenched, the
burden of proof is still on the shoulders of Tarski's critics, who have not lifted the burden.
This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
Journal of Philosophical Logic - 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
Michael P. Lynch 《The Philosophical quarterly》2004,54(217):497-517
18.
Keith Lehrer 《Erkenntnis》2005,63(3):413-423
There is an objection to coherence theories of knowledge to the effect that coherence is not connected with truth, so that
when coherence leads to truth this is just a matter of luck. Coherence theories embrace falliblism, to be sure, but that does
not sustain the objection. Coherence is connected with truth by principles of justified acceptance that explain the connection
between coherence and truth. Coherence is connected with truth by explanatory principle, not just luck. 相似文献
19.
Through a discussion of Donald Spence's Narrative Truth and Historical Truth, a critical introduction to the hermeneutic or interpretive perspective is presented. Spence's book has generally been assumed to offer a hermeneutic reformulation of psychoanalysis. However, its presuppositions are incompatible with fundamental tenets of contemporary hermeneutic thought, as expressed in the philosophies of Heidegger, Gadamer, and the later Wittgenstein. Spence's basic assumptions are classically empiricist and positivistic. His vision of human experience is essentially associationistic and Humean; it treats experience as involving two processes, the passive reception of raw sense data and a subsequent projection of meaningful interpretation. Spence advocates the gathering of brute data while denying or downplaying the epistemological value of theorizing and of interpretive understandings. These assumptions are contrasted with those of the hemeneutic philosophers. Unlike these philosophers, Spence tends to dichotomize coherence and correspondence theories of truth. As a result, he wavers between relativism (regarding therapeutic interpretations) and objectivism (regarding scientific knowledge). 相似文献
20.