应用层次析分法和模糊综合评判研究保健品消费心理

将层次分析方法与模糊综合评判理论相结合,以营养成分、包装情况、价格因素、广告宣传、售后服务为一级评判指标,以保健品专卖店、大型超市、小型超市、杂货店、厂家邮购五种销售渠道为二级评价指标,给出一种模糊判断的权重计算方法,建立了保健品消费心理的层次模糊决策模型。应用该模型对长春地区消费者的保健品消费心理进行了测试,结果表明：测试结果与实际销售情况相符。说明应用该方法建立起来的模型在了解消费者对保健品的消费心理方面是可行的,同时也为新型保健品的开发和市场推广提供了一定的依据。     

对心理现象的系统分析

本文试图用系统论的基本思想和原理,对心理现象进行重新的分类、并分析心理现象诸方面及诸因素之间的内在逻辑联系,以构建心理现象的整体形象。 系统论认为任何系统都是一个多维度、多层次的有机整体。笔者认为,任何有机系统都存在以下六个基本维度:即系统要素、系统结构、系统功能、系统需要、系统活动过程、系统品质。心理系统同样也存在着上述六个基本维度,下面进行分别论述。     

过去时间的心理结构

４０８名大学生被试用秒、分、小时、日、星期、年和月７个时间单位和模糊统计试验方法对４０个不定的过去时间修饰词作经验赋值,结果显示：（１）过去时间和未来时间在心理结构上是对称的,分为三个心理时间段,即以秒和分为计时单位的“较近的过去”和“较近的未来”,以小时、日和月为计时单位的“近的过去”和“近的未来”,和以年为计时单位的“远的过去”和“远的未来”。（２）随着时间修饰词的词义离现在由近至远,其词义地     

耗散结构视野下神经质症发生机理与心理治疗——从森田疗法到新森田疗法的嬗变

神经质症发病机理至今尚无公认的解释。森田疗法是当前公认用于神经质症治疗的有效手段,该理论是一种集东方智慧生活哲学的体现。可以尝试从系统科学耗散结构论的角度出发来初步探讨森田疗法及其进展对于神经质发生机理与治疗存在的合理性与积极意义。     

心理福利的结构研究

通过对幸福、福利及经济福利的反思 ,提出了心理福利这一研究课题 ;结合对被试样本的问卷调查 ,经因子分析 ,分别考察了心理福利的三个维度 :自我幸福感、生活满意感和对社会的行为性评价的因子结构 ;以此为基础 ,运用 L ISREL 8构建了心理福利的二阶结构模型。结果显示 ,模型与数据拟合良好。     

领导班子心理结构的优化选择

领导班子心理结构的优化选择,是把具有不同心理的领导安排在一个领导班子内。以达到较高的心理相容水平和能力、气质、性格上的互补,从而提高领导工作绩效。应当说,领导班子的年龄结构、知识结构、素质结构的优化问题已引起了人们的高度注意。越来越多的事实表明,合理的领导班子结构会带来比单个领导之间和更大的绩效。但是,我们也不能不看到,对于领导班子的心理结构的优化作为一个重要的理论问题加以考察和分析,并把这种分析的结论,尝试性地应用于建构各级领导班子的实践。     

耗散结构视野下神经质症发生机理与心理治疗--从森田疗法到新森田疗法的嬗变

神经质症发病机理至今尚无公认的解释.森田疗法是当前公认用于神经质症治疗的有效手段,该理论是一种集东方智慧生活哲学的体现.可以尝试从系统科学耗散结构论的角度出发来初步探讨森田疗法及其进展对于神经质发生机理与治疗存在的合理性与积极意义.     

小学生竞争心理结构的探索性研究

1　问题的提出　　所谓竞争 ,即互相争胜。小学生的竞争指 :在小学生的日常生活中 ,为了获得某种优势、达到某种目的 ,而采取一定措施相互超越的现象。其心理结构指 :小学生的竞争主要集中在哪几个心理维度上 ,以及各维度之间的关系。竞争行为在小学生的生活中处处可见。课业负担是明显的例证。长期的学习压力导致了一些儿童对学习失去兴趣 ,到了中学表现尤其明显。对此有人提出 :在现行体制下 ,依照国情、校情 ,创造小气候 ,引进竞争机制 ,大胆地进行教育方式、教学内容的改革尝试 ,积极改变目前的厌学、厌教、弃学、弃教和死学、死教的状…     

心理与教育测验中异常反应侦查新技术：变点分析法

变点分析法(change point analysis, CPA)近些年才引入心理与教育测量学, 相较于传统方法, CPA不仅可以侦查异常作答被试, 还能自动精确地定位变点位置, 高效清洗作答数据。其原理在于：判断作答序列中是否存在可将该序列划分为具有不同统计学属性两部分的点(即变点), 并且需使用被试拟合统计量(person-fit statistic, PFS)来量化两个子序列之间的差异。未来可将单变点分析拓展至多变点, 结合反应时等信息, 构建非参数化指标以及将现有指标拓展至多级计分或多维测验, 以提高CPA的适用广度及效力。     

Multi‐Criteria Ratios: What is the Unit?

When Analytic Hierarchy Process ratios are normalized to sum to unity, the unit of measure becomes obscure. This paper investigates this obscurity and whether ratio measurement is possible when there is no prior knowledge of the measurement unit. Initially, we look at ratio scales of tangible attributes of objects with well‐known measures. Then, ratio scales of unknown intangible attributes of objects are analysed. We discover that natural zero and a specific unit of measure are not necessarily used explicitly in deriving ratio scale measures. Nevertheless, the derived scale does have a derived unit of measurement. We conclude that although composite multi‐criteria answers are possible in ratio form, it is important to know that a unit of measure exists if ambiguities are to be avoided. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Journeys in the labyrinth: Some difficulties in the psychotherapy of a severely traumatized adolescent

This paper explores the long-term sequelae of chronic early trauma as expressed by an adolescent in intensive psychotherapy. In particular, attention is given to the ways in which intolerable early experience may block subsequent identificatory ego growth by means of a radical defensive detachment from any potential source of help. Healthy maturation is replaced by an elaborate structure of defences aimed at obliterating awareness of unfulfilled attachment needs and providing a constantly available inner sanctum filled with exciting but profoundly unsatisfying sadomasochistic distractions. The technical importance of careful attention to the therapist's countertransference experiences is underlined. It is suggested that the presence of hatred in this area may represent one of the few undistorted communications from the patient, implying hatred of torture and cruelty. As such, when carefully metabolized by the psychotherapist, it may herald the recovery of hope and serve to protect hidden, bullied aspects of the patient's self which are still on the side of life and development.     

Explanatory warrant for scientific realism

Nancy Cartwright relies upon an inference pattern known as inference to the best causal explanation (IBCE) to support a limited form of entity realism, according to which we are warranted in believing in entities that purportively cause observable effects. IBCE, as usually understood, is valid, even though all other forms of inference to the best explanation (IBE) are usually understood to be invalid. We argue that IBCE and IBE are in the same boat with respect to their ability to support realist conclusions. Either rule can be interpreted as valid, this is a matter of semantic convention. However, doing so deprives the rule of the empirical content the realist needs, requiring the realist to find independent warrant for a strong (theoretical or causal) premise. We then examine the proposed means of obtaining this warrant, and find them as inadequate in the case of IBCE as they are in the case of IBE.     

Substantive unconscious and adjective unconscious: the contribution of Wilfred Bion

The author first provides her readers with a brief summary of some of Freud's ideas, as found throughout his work, on the notion of 'unconscious'. The notion of unconscious as noun is contrasted to the idea of unconscious as adjective, this latter being proposed as a quality, or a state, ever temporary, dynamic, and subject to the constant changes going on in the individual's internal psychic world, as well as to external conditions. After presenting some considerations, the author then contrasts the Kleinian model of the mind to the Freudian, and Wilfred Bion's contribution is discussed at some length. Within Bion's conception of psychic functioning, the model of 'dream' is highlighted and, in this regard, clarifications are sought regarding Bion's view of the unconscious. To conclude, a brief and superficial approximation to the work of Carl Jung is touched upon, although the author admits to knowing little of Jung's positions.     

A multiple-attribute decision-making approach to assess the disability of visually impaired workers

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has redefined employability and disability. The measurement and evaluation of the disabled worker's residual capabilities, in terms of worker strengths and weaknesses, job requirements and work environment, is the first step to comply with the ADA. This study presents an application of multiple-attribute decision-making procedures. The task is to develop a single index for use in assessing the disability of visually impaired workers through a consideration of factors defined by the U.S. Employment Service for successful job performance. The index can also be used to identify and prioritize the need for reasonable accommodation and to match visually impaired workers to appropriate employment.     

Jung's mediatory science as a psychology beyond objectivism

In this paper, the author argues that Jung's non-objectivist--yet scientific--epistemology and his empirical/hermeneatic methods of inquiry situate him within a psychological tradition that, in many respects, began with William James and, today, is finding expression in the work of many non-Jungian cognitive scientists. In an effort to encourage dialogue between Jungians and scholars within related intellectual traditions, the author presents evidence from the corpus of Jung's work that demonstrates that, like William James, Jung intentionally rejected the absolutist claims of objectivism and the opposite position on 'anything goes' relativism, emotivism, or subjectivism. Instead, Jung forged a path that led to the meta-psychological position similar to internal realism (Putnam 1981) or experientialism (Lakoff 1987) and to a theoretical psychology that gave a central place both to unconscious cognitive structure and to imagination. This he labelled a 'mediatory science'. The psychological theories developed within this mediatory science framework represent an early articulation of key constructs that are currently used by a number of cognitive scientists seeking to understand how we make sense of experience.     

基于默会知识的循证医学耗散结构观

阐述了循证医学的理论核心——最佳证据实质是一种默会知识,并指出应当把最佳证据视为一种默会知识,循证医学就会形成一种耗散结构。提出利用耗散结构理论显化默会知识寻找最佳证据的动力学规律和方法论。