共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
David Pauley 《Psychoanalytic Dialogues》2018,28(2):157-163
This response to commentary of Drs. Caldwell and DeGolia (this issue) looks at Winnicott’s language and a revealing case example (“String”) by way of making a place for the concept of the negative transitional object. Rather than a regression or a fixation at a presymbolic level, it views negative transitional objects such as addictions as a creative if problematic adaptation to a flawed relational surround. Winnicott’s case example suggests that he may well have been pondering similar extensions of his theory at the time of his death. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Margy Sperry Psy.D. MFT 《Psychoanalytic Dialogues》2013,23(6):715-719
In replying to the commentaries, I continue to explore differences between a complexity model of the mind and an intrapsychic one, and elaborate aspects of the complex negotiation process that occurred between my patient, Kerri, and me. Taking up Chefetz's notion that a “change in self-state predicts observed fluctuations in the capacity to mentalize,” I consider ways that self-states in both the patient and analyst fluctuate, influence, and reorganize the unfolding process, including the systemic capacity to mentalize. 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
13.
Cathleen Kaveny 《The Journal of religious ethics》2018,46(1):190-200
In this “Response to Critics,” Cathleen Kaveny continues the conversation in the JRE symposium centered on her recent book, Prophecy without Contempt: Religious Discourse in the Public Square. The book's central argument is that adequate discussion of contention in the contemporary public square requires attending to matters of rhetoric, particularly the rhetoric of prophetic indictment. Kaveny engages the comments of four interlocutors: Alda Balthrop‐Lewis, James Childress, William Hart, and Martin Kavka. The first section, “Overarching Goals,” summarizes the objectives of the book. The second section, “Methodology,” engages critics regarding methodological issues, highlighting Kaveny's commitment to a version of MacIntyre's tradition theory and her indebtedness to her legal training. The third section, “Structure,” responds to particular questions her interlocutors raise about the four parts of the book. The fourth section, “Larger Questions,” ponders the next stages of the academic and political discussion about contention in the public square. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
We address some of the individual points that Lombardi makes, some that we agree with and some that as infant mental health clinicians we do not agree with—for example, that at the beginning of life the mind is still not there—and try to show why we think that is. 相似文献