共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
《Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)》1950,2(4):198-199
By C. Spearman, Ph.D. (Leipzig), Hon. LL.D. (Wittenberg), F.R.S., and Ll. Wynn Jones, M.A. (Oxon.), Ph.D. (Leipzig), D.Sc. (Wales). London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd., 1950. Pp. vi + 198. 16s. 相似文献
2.
3.
Edwin R. Gerler 《Journal of counseling and development : JCD》1979,57(10):540-542
The multimodal counseling model is based on the notion that a client's concerns can be dealt with most successfully when the counselor or therapist treats several aspects of a client's functioning. The multimodal model uses the acronym BASIC ID to identify the areas of client functioning that frequently need to be treated. These areas include behavior, affect, sensation, imagery, cognition, interpersonal relations, and drugs. The D mode, which represents drugs, is a misunderstood aspect of the BASIC ID partly because it does not seem to parallel other aspects of the model. Over the past few years the D mode has been expanded to include more than drugs, in particular, to include diet and other physiological factors. This article describes the evolution of the D mode and attempts to show the importance of a physiological dimension to the multimodal counseling approach. 相似文献
4.
《Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)》1953,5(4):185-186
R. S. Peters (Editor). Abridged edition in one volume. London, Allen & Unwin, and New York, Macmillan. 1953. Pp. 742. 42s. net. 相似文献
5.
JIAMING CHEN 《The Philosophical forum》2016,47(3-4):425-437
6.
7.
《Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)》1950,2(3):142-143
By D. O. Hebb. New York: J. Wiley & Sons; London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd. Pp. xix + 335. 32s. net. 相似文献
8.
Adrian Haddock 《European Journal of Philosophy》2019,27(4):957-970
This paper develops a way of understanding G. E. M. Anscombe's essay “The First Person” at the heart of which are the following two ideas: first, that the point of her essay is to show that it is not possible for anyone to understand what they express with “I” as an Art des Gegebenseins—a way of thinking of an object that constitutes identifying knowledge of which object is being thought of; and second, that the argument through which her essay seeks to show this is itself first personal in character. Understanding Anscombe's essay in this light has the merit of showing much of what it says to be correct. But it sets us the task of saying what it is that we understand ourselves to express with “I” if not an Art des Gegebenseins, and in particular what it is that we understand ourselves to express with sentences with “I” as subject that might seem to express identity judgments, such as “I am NN”, and “I am this body”. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
JAMES A. MONTMARQUET 《Metaphilosophy》2007,38(1):71-87
Abstract: In this article I distinguish a type of justification that is “epistemic” in pertaining to the grounds of one's belief, and “practical” in its connection to what act(s) one may undertake, based on that belief. Such justification, on the proposed account, depends mainly on the proportioning of “inner epistemic virtue” to the “outer risks” implied by one's act. The resulting conception strikes a balance between the unduly moralistic conception of William Clifford and contemporary naturalist virtue theories. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
James R. Barday 《Journal of counseling and development : JCD》1984,62(8):443-443
20.