共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
马修.阿诺德的《文化与无政府状态》既是一部文化批评名著,也是一部政治学名作。作者应时势之需要,赋予文化以政治教化的功能,以此来纠偏中产阶级的市侩习气,驯化底层民众的反抗精神,以力求社会摆脱陷入无政府状态的可能。阿诺德的对策固然有迂阔不实的一面,可他从文化角度去解决社会问题,对于20世纪新左派知识分子倡导的文化政治多有启发。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
Thomas C Dalton 《Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science》2005,40(4):182-204
This article examines the work of Arnold Lucius Gesell and argues that he not only paved the way for contemporary research in motor development, but that he and colleagues anticipated fundamental issues about growth that must be addressed by psychologists and neuroscientists who are committed to the advancement of developmental science. Arnold Lucius Gesell was a pioneer in developmental psychology when the field was in its infancy. He worked diligently for the rights of physically and mentally handicapped children to receive special education that would enable them to find gainful employment. Gesell's writings in books and popular magazines increased public awareness of and support for preschool education and better foster care for orphans. Despite these achievements, many of his successors have questioned his views about infant development. Developmental psychologists have criticized Gesell for proposing a stage theory of infant growth that has fallen into disfavor among contemporary researchers. His conception of development as a maturational process has been challenged for allegedly reducing complex behavioral, perceptual, and learning processes to genetic factors. The author rejects this overly simplistic interpretation and contends that Gesell's work continues to stand the test of time. 相似文献
7.
Thomas C. Dalton 《Integrative psychological & behavioral science》2005,40(4):182-204
This article examines the work of Arnold Lucius Gesell and argues that he not only paved the way for contemporary research
in motor development, but that he and colleagues anticipated fundamental issues about growth that must be addressed by psychologists
and neuroscientists who are committed to the advancement of developmental science. Arnold Lucius Gesell was a pioneer in developmental
psychology when the field was in its infancy. He worked diligently for the rights of physically and mentally handicapped children
to receive special education that would enable them to find gainful employment. Gesell’s writings in books and popular magazines
increased public awareness of and support for preschool education and better foster care for orphans. Despite these achievements,
many of his successors have questioned his views about infant development. Developmental psychologists have criticized Gesell
for proposing a stage theory of infant growth that has fallen into disfavor among contemporary researchers. His conception
of development as a maturational process has been challenged for allegedly reducing complex behavioral, perceptual, and learning
processes to genetic factors. The author rejects this overly simplistic interpretation and contends that Gesell’s work continues
to stand the test of time.
Reprinted from Jaan Valsiner (ed.).Thinking in Psychological Science: Ideas and Their Makers. Transaction Publishers.
Previously published inFrom Past to Future, Vol. 3(2), Beyond Observing Human Nature: Theoretical Contributions of Arnold Gesell to Developmental
Science, pp. 7–31. @ 2001 Frances L. Hiatt School of Psychology, Clark University. Author: Thomas C. Dalton, Cal Poly State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
Singer M 《Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society》2004,148(1):123-127
12.
13.
Alan D. Goldberg 《Journal of counseling and development : JCD》1998,76(3):351-357
A proponent of the scientist-practitioner model, Arnold Goldstein has devoted his career to the study and practice of helping people change. In this interview, he discussed the origins of his interest in aggression and violence, described the development of models for enhancing prosocial skills and reflects on the current and future status of counselor education. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
17.
RUSSELL B. GOODMAN 《Midwest Studies In Philosophy》2004,28(1):137-148
18.
Ann Milliken Pederson 《Zygon》2002,37(2):421-432
James Huchingson's book, Pandemonium Tremendum: Chaos and Mystery in the Life of God , is an artistic improvisation on recurrent themes in the dialogue between religion and science. Around the cantus firmus of the Pandemonium Tremendum Huchingson composes a grand metaphysical composition that is glorious in its detail, magnificent in its overarching themes, and careful in its attention to context. Much like a suspended chord between two different harmonies, Huchingson's theological composition dangles the reader in the tensions of religion and science, modernity and postmodernity, particulars and universals, God and the world. Although this book is surely a cutting-edge development in the ongoing corpus of religion and science, I am most excited about its constructive theological provocations. This is a work in progress, a composition in the making. 相似文献
19.
20.