Postdigital We-Learn

Studies in Philosophy and Education - This paper examines relationships between learning and technological change and argues that we urgently need new ways to approach what it means to learn in the...     

Flourishing with Shared Vitality: Education based on Aesthetic Experience,with Performance for Meaning

Studies in Philosophy and Education - In this paper, I set an aspect of what it is to live a flourishing life against the backdrop of neo liberal trends that continue to influence educational...     

Uncommon Schools: Stanley Cavell and the Teaching of Walden

Thoreau’s Walden is a text that has been misinterpreted in various ways, one consequence of which is a failure to appreciate its significance as a perfectionist and visionary text for education. This paper explores aspects of what might be called its teaching, especially via the kind of teaching that is offered by Stanley Cavell’s commentary, The Senses of Walden. Walden is considered especially in the light of its conception of language as the “father-tongue” and of the ideas of continual rebirth and departure that are associated with this. References to teaching and learning abound in the book, but it is Thoreau’s specific reference to the need for “uncommon schools” that provides a focus for the present discussion. Paul Standish is Professor of Philosophy of Education at the University of Sheffield. His recent books include The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Education (2003), co-edited with Nigel Blake, Paul Smeyers and Richard Smith. He is Editor of the Journal of Philosophy of Education and Co-editor of the online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy of Education.     

What Form of Historical Consciousness Should Schools Impart?

Studies in Philosophy and Education - In this essay, I ask what form of historical consciousness schools should nurture in students. The two criteria I set up in this regard are...     

Moral education: An act-utilitarian view1

In this essay, I distinguish two significant act-utilitarian theories of moral education: the traditional rule of thumb view and the Harian intuition view. I argue that there are problems with the traditional view and that an act-utilitarian ought to adopt a version of the Harian view. I then explain and respond to a major objection to the intuition view given by Bernard Williams. Williams argues that the system of moral thought which the Harian view advocates we teach is inherently unstable and is certain to undermine itself. I argue that there is reason to expect a great deal of stability in this system.I wish to thank Richard Brandt, William Frankena and R.M. Hare for their conversation on this and other topics and for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank the Association for the Philosophy of Education and the Northwest Philosophy conference for the opportunity to read and discuss versions of the essay.     

Pedagogies of Non-self as Practices of Freedom

Studies in Philosophy and Education - This paper assumes that educators are now involved in a struggle for their souls and for the souls of their students. The idea of the soul in this case is not...     

形而上学的原初“制作”——西方哲学诞生的技术现象学考察

探讨形而上学的原初制作,意味着要从技艺的角度去追问原初形而上学的构造。本文拟从语言技艺的技术现象学视域,来尝试探索从柏拉图到亚里士多德之原初形而上学制作的隐秘。一、原初形而上学与语言技艺一般认为,形而上学的形成以巴门尼德的存在学说为其开端,中经苏格拉底-柏拉图的理念论,在亚里士多德的形而上学中初步完成。(张志伟等,第16页)这个观点并非没有争议。譬如,     

Humanist but not Radical: The Educational Philosophy of Thiruvalluvar Kural

Studies in Philosophy and Education - Humanist ideas in education have been promoted by both Western thinkers and classical wisdom texts of Asia. Exploring this connection, I examine the...     

全球化、后现代与哲学的文化多元性--简论中国哲学面临的困境与机遇

全球化具有两面性：作为现代性之结果的全球化进程向作为本土文化之结晶的中国哲学提出了严重的挑战,但全球化的后现代特征却为中国哲学的回归和重建创造了历史性的机遇。在此背景之下,原来按照西方哲学框架建立起来的中国哲学史学科,面临着转换研究范式和叙述方式的艰巨任务。中国哲学与西方哲学之间的关系不是从属性的,而是相互独立的两种哲学形态,它们具有不同的范式,而且相互之间不可通约。所以,当代的中国哲学研究不应该以西方哲学为典范和标准,而应该以之为参照系和对话伙伴,通过现时代“视域”与古典哲学“视域”的相互“交融”,对于现实的哲学问题给出中国哲学的解答。     

Democratic Education for Hope: Contesting the Neoliberal Common Sense

Studies in Philosophy and Education - This paper provides a reinterpretation of Paulo Freire’s philosophy of hope and suggests that this interpretation may function as a fruitful ground for...     

Modal logics with the Macintosh rule

Conclusion Having gained some idea of what MacIntosh logics there are, we conclude this paper with a remark about the totality of them. Let theterritory of a rule or condition be the class of all modal logics that have the rule or satisfy the condition. What is MacIntosh territory, the class of all normal logics with the MacIntosh rule, like? What is its structure?We are especially indebted to Max Cresswell, Rob Goldblatt, Steve Kuhn, Jack MacIntosh, Tamara Ollenberg, and Tim Williamson for very helpful contributions along the way to the present version of this essay. Elements of it were presented by Chellas at a miniconference on Issues in Philosophical and Mathematical Logic, in Devonport, New Zealand, 11–12 May 1991, at a South West Logic Workshop in Seattle, Washington, 20 July 1991, and at a meeting of the Florida Philosophical Association in Boca Raton, Florida, 8 November 1991. We wish to thank all who offered comments at those gatherings. An earlier version of the paper appeared in the Auckland Philosophy Papers series of the Department of Philosophy, University of Auckland, in May 1991.     

African Philosophy of Education: The Price of Unchallengeability

In South Africa, the notion of an African Philosophy of Education emerged with the advent of post-apartheid education and the call for an educational philosophy that would reflect this renewal, a focus on Africa and its cultures, identities and values, and the new imperatives for education in a postcolonial and post-apartheid era. The idea of an African Philosophy of Education has been much debated in South Africa. Not only its content and purpose but also its very possibility have been, and continue to be, the subject of understandably passionate exchanges. In this paper, after discussing some of the constitutive features of African Philosophy of Education, we indicate aspects with which we are sympathetic. Our central question is whether African Philosophy of Education is the revisioned, ‘typically African’ philosophy of education that it is claimed to be. We argue that it has revealed certain tendencies that are remarkably similar to characteristics of Fundamental Pedagogics, the repressive doctrine complicit in apartheid education that it claims to replace. More substantially still (and this is a feature that has wider ramifications for philosophy of education internationally), African Philosophy of Education, by labeling itself uniquely and distinctly ‘African’, runs the risk of insulating itself not only from interaction with the wider (i.e. non-African) world but also from any critical interrogation.

Troubling Hope: Performing Inventive Connections in Discomforting Times

Studies in Philosophy and Education - In what follows, we revisit the most promising conceptions of “hope” while following Haraway’s admonition to “stay with the...     

Listening to Dialogue

In accordance with Progressivism, Matthew Lipman, introduced an educational model for renewal and change by means of the child. With his Philosophy for Children programme he wished to offer an alternative for the intellectualistic oriented education which silenced children. The answer to the search for freedom and change, Lipman finds in the symbioses between ‘Philosophy’ and ‘Children’. Philosophy expressed in critical thinking and communication, was the basis to emancipate the child from the oppression of the adult and to cause change. According to Lipman the main purpose of philosophy is to free every individual from determination. This plea is being elaborated by dialogue. The main issue of our paper concerns the question whether Lipman’s alternative ‘Philosophy for Children’ can fulfil the promise of change and freedom. To answer this question we will investigate thoroughly where dialogue and change in Philosophy for Children stand for. Finally we will propose another perspective of dialogue. A dialogue stressed on listening. Listening to how the world appears to us and how we appear to ourselves. Nancy Vansieleghem is working on a Ph.D. in Philosophy of Education at the Department of Education at the University of Gent, Belgium. Her main area of research is philosophy of dialogue and public space.     

Finding Treasures: Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology?

Studies in Philosophy and Education - In the world of Philosophy for Children (P4C), the word “method” is found frequently in its literature and in its practitioner’s handbooks....     

Idealistische Häresien in der Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Cassirer, Carnap und Kuhn

Idealist Heresies in Philosophy of Science: Cassirer, Carnap, and Kuhn. As common wisdom has it, philosophy of science in the analytic tradition and idealist philosophy are incompatible. Usually, not much effort is spent for explaining what is to be understood by idealism. Rather, it is taken for granted that idealism is an obsolete and unscientific philosophical account. In this paper it is argued that this thesis needs some qualification. Taking Carnap and Kuhn as paradigmatic examples of positivist and postpositivist philosophies of science it is shown that these accounts share important features with Cassirer's idealist philosophy of science developed in the first half of this century. As it turns out, often Cassirer is more modern than those classical philosophers of (post)posivitist philosophy of science. For instance, Quine's criticism against Carnap's empiricist philosophy of science launched in Two Dogmas of Empiricism is anticipated by Cassirer for several decades. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Aristotelian Character Friendship as a ‘Method’ of Moral Education

Studies in Philosophy and Education - The aim of this article is to make a case for Aristotelian friendship as a ‘method’ of moral education qua mutual character development. After...     

Voices of Silence: Foucault,Disability, and the Question of Self-determination

Studies in Philosophy and Education - In this paper I examine two controversialissues that occurred in two different centuriesbut that are inextricably linked with eachother – the 1835 murder...     

Education,Contact and the Vitality of Touch: Membranes,Morphologies, Movements

Studies in Philosophy and Education - This paper explores how touch is key to understanding education—not as an achievement or an instrument of acquisition, but as a process through which one...     

Three-concept monte: Explanation,implementation and systematicity

Fodor and Pylyshyn (1988), Fodor and McLaughlin (1990) and McLaughlin (1993) challenge connectionists to explain systematicity without simply implementing a classical architecture. In this paper I argue that what makes the challenge difficult for connectionists to meet has less to do with what is to be explained than with what is to count as an explanation. Fodor et al. are prepared to admit as explanatory, accounts of a sort that only classical models can provide. If connectionists are to meet the challenge, they are going to have to insist on the propriety of changing what counts as an explanation of systematicity. Once that is done, there would seem to be as yet no reason to suppose that connectionists are unable to explain systematicity.Shorter versions of this paper were presented at the 1993 annual meetings of both the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology and the Society for Philosophy and Psychology. The paper has benefited from the comments and criticisms of Frances Egan, David Chalmers, Terry Horgan, Brian McLaughlin, Tim van Gelder and Ted Warfield.