Understanding the Immediacy of Other Minds |
| |
| Authors: | Nivedita Gangopadhyay Alois Pichler |
| |
| Affiliation: | The Wittgenstein Archives, University of Bergen, Norway |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper we address the epistemological debate between emerging perceptual accounts (PA) of knowing other minds and traditional theory of mind (ToM) approaches to the problem of other minds. We argue that the current formulations of the debate are conceptually misleading and empirically unfounded. Rather, the real contribution of PA is to point out a certain ‘immediacy’ that characterizes episodes of mindreading. We claim that while the intuition of immediacy should be preserved for explaining the nature and function of some cognitive processes of mindreading, the notion of immediacy should apply for describing a particular epistemic attitude and not a particular type of epistemic access. We draw on Wittgenstein's discussions of one's relation to other minds to elaborate our claims and to move the epistemological discussions beyond stalling debates between ToM and PA. |
| |
| Keywords: | theory of mind immediate mindreading theory‐theory simulation theory perceptual accounts Wittgenstein |
|
