What Goes Up Apparently Needn't Come Down: Asymmetric Predictions of Ascent and Descent in Rankings |
| |
| Authors: | Shai Davidai Thomas Gilovich |
| |
| Affiliation: | Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | In eight studies, we document an upward mobility bias, or a tendency to predict that a rise in rankings is more likely than a decline. This asymmetry was observed in predictions of classroom performance, NBA and NFL standings, business school rankings, and employee performance rankings. The bias was found for entities people care about and want to see improve their standing, as well as entities in which people are not invested. It appears to result from people's tendency to give considerable weight to a focal agent's intentions and motivation, but to give less weight to the intentions of competitors and other factors that would thwart the focal agent's improvement. We show that this bias is most pronounced for implicit incremental theorists, who believe that performance is malleable (and hence assign more weight to intentions and effort). We discuss implications of this asymmetry for decision making and for an understanding of the underdog bias. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | upward mobility bias focalism relative performance prediction |
|
|
