Spatial Semantics,Cognition, and Their Interaction: A Comparative Study of Spatial Categorization in English and Korean |
| |
| Authors: | Hongoak Yun Soonja Choi |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of English Language and LiteratureJeju National University;2. Department of Linguistics, Comparative Psycholinguistics Research GroupUniversity of Vienna;3. Department of LinguisticsSan Diego State University |
| |
| Abstract: | This study has two goals. First, we present much‐needed empirical linguistic data and systematic analyses on the spatial semantic systems in English and Korean, two languages that have been extensively compared to date in the debate on spatial language and spatial cognition. We conduct our linguistic investigation comprehensively, encompassing the domains of tight‐ and loose‐fit as well as containment and support relations. The current analysis reveals both cross‐linguistic commonalities and differences: From a common set of spatial features, each language highlights a subset of those features for its principal categorization, and those primary features are importantly different between English and Korean: English speakers categorize events predominantly by containment and support relations (and do so with prepositions), whereas Korean speakers categorize them by tight‐fit and loose‐fit relations (and do so with verbs), with a further distinction of containment and support within the loose‐fit relation. The analysis also shows that the tight‐fit domain is more cross‐linguistically diverse in categorization than is the loose‐fit domain. Second, we test the language data against the nonlinguistic categorization results reported in Choi and Hattrup (2012). The results show a remarkable degree of convergence between the patterns predicted from the current linguistic analysis and those found in C&H's nonlinguistic study and thus provide empirical and strong evidence for an influence of language on nonlinguistic spatial cognition. At the same time, the study reveals areas where the two systems closely interact with each other as well as those where one is independent from the other. Taking both parts of the study together, we identify the specific roles that language and spatial perception/cognition play in spatial categorization. |
| |
| Keywords: | Language and perception/cognition Cross‐linguistic differences in spatial semantics Tight/loose fit Containment Support Verticality |
|
|
