Moral Testimony Pessimism and the Uncertain Value of Authenticity |
| |
| Authors: | Andreas L. Mogensen |
| |
| Affiliation: | University of Oxford |
| |
| Abstract: | Many philosophers believe that there exist distinctive obstacles to relying on moral testimony. In this paper, I criticize previous attempts to identify these obstacles and offer a new theory. I argue that the problems associated with moral deference can't be explained in terms of the value of moral understanding, nor in terms of aretaic considerations related to subjective integration. Instead, our uneasiness with moral testimony is best explained by our attachment to an ideal of authenticity that places special demands on our moral beliefs. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
